University of California (UC) Doctoral Student Career and Life Survey Findings, 2006-2007 Mary Ann Mason Marc Goulden Karie Frasch Sharon Page-Medrich.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Science and the Life/Work Balance Shelley Adamo Dalhousie University.
Advertisements

NSF NC STATE. NSF ADVANCE: Increasing the Participation and Advancement of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Careers The goal of the.
October 17,  Review of CCSSE  Descriptions of HCC Students  Discussion of Benchmark Results  Item Results  Critical Thinking analysis.
Developing New Initiatives for a Family Friendly Package Report on the University of California Work and Family Survey Source: UCOP, “Long Range Planning.
Faculty Have Families Too. Why are work/family issues important?  Almost all faculty members will face some kind of family issue during their careers,
Postdocs and Career Outcomes of Biomedical PhDs COSEPUP Ad-Hoc Committee on Postdocs December 13, 2011 Shulamit Kahn, Boston University Donna K. Ginther,
Eldercare in the Workplace Survey Summary June 2010 Prepared by: Center for Healthy Aging.
A Measure of Equity Caryn McTighe Musil The Association of American Colleges and Universities CCAS Conference – New Orleans Gender Issues Breakfast November.
Choosing and Maintaining an Academic Career Lawrence R. Schiller, MD, FACG Digestive Health Associates of Texas Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas.
Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences Research Institute for Sociology Michael Wagner On the links between unemployment, partnership stability.
NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity ADVANCE Faculty Work Life Survey: Comparison of Statistically Significant Gender Differences.
Completer Survey Institutional Research College of the Redwoods November 2012.
Faculty Climate Survey 2013 Gesemia Nelson, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Sociology and Anthropology.
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education 2010 Survey of Pre-tenure Faculty.
1 Faculty Climate Survey Highlights Institutional Research & Faculty Development and Diversity March 2008.
The Ann Richards Invitational Roundtable on Gender and the Media Older Workers: Benefits and Obstacles for Women's and Men's Continued Employment October.
Women in Academia June 19, 2007 SPGRE Professional Development Seminars.
Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) University of Minnesota.
Leading through Diversity: Work-Life Balance The Irvine Division of the Academic Senate endorses in the strongest terms work-life balance in faculty careers.
Federal Grants and the Academic Pipeline: White Paper Figures.
Policies Not Enough Kathleen Christensen Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Leading Through Diversity Chairs Retreat Lake Arrowhead, California September 16, 2009.
UC Academic Family Friendly Policies: Sharing Best Practices Source: UCOP, “Long Range Planning Presentation,” before the Board of Regents, September 2002.
DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS AND OPTIONS. Degrees Diploma High School– 4 years Community College – 2 years (Optional) Associate’s Degree University –4.
2014 IT Salary Survey: Healthcare Research Findings © 2014 Property of UBM Tech; All Rights Reserved.
Benchmarks from the Harvard Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey University Faculty Meeting October.
2014 IT Salary Survey: Banking Research Findings © 2014 Property of UBM Tech; All Rights Reserved.
2014 IT Salary Survey: Insurance Research Findings © 2014 Property of UBM Tech; All Rights Reserved.
WOMEN FACULTY AND THE SOCIAL–CULTURAL NEXUS IN HIGHER EDUCATION Karla A. Henderson, North Carolina State University To examine the social- cultural nexus.
Chapter 7: Work and Retirement
University of California Applications and Thought-Starters C L A S S R O O M IN-BETWEEN SPACES HOUSING & DINING LIBRARY OFFICES MEDICAL CENTERS CLICK TO.
ADVANCE Catalyst Program Baseline Measurement for Women in CST  Applicant tracking trends  Hiring trends  Retention and promotion study  Campus Climate.
HIGHLIGHTS OF SURVEY RESULTS OF TENURED AND TENURE TRACK FACULTY NDSU FORWARD Survey of Work/Life Balance:
The Self-Sufficiency Standard and Calculator A Path to Economic Security.
Chapter 6 Education and Achievement ___________________________.
Cathee Johnson Phillips, M.A. Executive Director, NPA June 2011.
ADVANCE PAID Program Office of Academic Personnel Setting the UC Context for Issues of the Double Bind Yolanda Moses Associate Vice Chancellor for Diversity,
COACHE Presentation LUCINDA FINLEY Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs.
Dual Career Couples in the Academic Sciences Dr. Elizabeth G. Creamer, Professor Virginia Tech Town Meeting Thursday, March 6, 2008 American.
Norma M. Allewell The Postdoctoral Experience: What Works? What Doesn’t Work?
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Why do teacher trainees prioritize their studies differently? Odd Helge Lindseth.
Making the Case for Private Universities: Keep in Mind “Best Fit” Senior AVID September 9, 2015.
The Journey Of Adulthood, 5/e Helen L. Bee & Barbara R. Bjorklund Chapter 8 Work and Retirement The Journey of Adulthood 5/e by Bee & Bjorklund. Copyright.
The Mapping Project Scholarship and Caretaking? Possibilities for Faculty with Family Responsibilities in Engineering and the Sciences University of Illinois-Chicago.
Decoding the Middle Market Walter H. Zultowski, Ph.D. WZ Research + Consulting, LLC Society of Actuaries Annual Meeting October 15, 2012.
World of Work: The Academic Job Search Tracey Jandrisits Executive Advisor to the Provost and Manager of Faculty Relations and Recruitment Office of the.
4/6/20061 Are Sociologists Different? Findings from Social Science PhDs- 5+ Year Out: A National Study of PhDs in Six Social Science Fields Panel: Satisfaction.
Predictors of Work-life Balance for Women Entrepreneurs in the North- East Region of Romania Dan Dumitru Ionescu, PhD Candidate Alina Măriuca Ionescu,
WSU SAMPLE  All full-time tenured and tenure-track faculty  All campuses  Response rate: 57.6 % (N=603)  At least 50 % response rate in all colleges.
MAA Committee on the Participation of Women in Mathematics Joint Committee on the Participation of Women in the Mathematical Sciences Parental and Family.
Marie E. Zeglen, Ph.D. Assistant Provost for Institutional Planning and Research.
Faculty Survey Highlights University Council Presentation Lynn McCloskey Edward S. Macias April 7, 2008.
Outline Survey overview Instrument Construction Survey Logistics Response Rates Uses of Survey Data Communication with campus groups Program evaluation.
Balancing Academic Work and Family: AAUP Policy and Initiatives Presentation to the NSF Advance Annual Meeting Atlanta, Georgia, April 20, 2004 John W.
Work after Retirement from Career Jobs Robert L. Clark, Robert G. Hammond, Melinda Sandler Morrill, Aditi Pathak Department of Economics Poole College.
The Nationwide Retirement Institute Health Care and Long-term Care Study November 2015 Conducted by Harris Poll NFM-14918AO.
2008 COACHE Survey of Pre-Tenure Faculty Faculty Senate January 25, 2011 Betsy Brown and Nancy Whelchel.
UC ADVANCE PAID Roundtable Mid-Career Faculty Advancement Satisfaction Evaluation Mentoring Workshops UC Berkeley April 10, 2013 Angelica M Stacy, Associate.
A Report on the Progress of San Diego Women Executives “Women as Leaders” Results of the 2005 Athena Survey: A Report on the Progress of San Diego Women.
The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 Ui100: First-Year Seminar Some information taken from The U.S. Department of Labor website.
3/8/20161 Family Sociology Welfare Reform. 3/8/20162 Families & Poverty  The percentage living below poverty has changed little over the past 20 years.
Tenure Clock & Modified Duties Utilization Survey Jean A. Waltman, Ph.D. Center for the Education of Women University of Michigan.
DISCLAIMER The content, logos, graphics, and images in this presentation are the sole property of Utah Career and Technical Education (CTE) in conjunction.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Assessment Activities Presentation for the NC State Assessment Work Group May 2, 2007 Nancy Whelchel, PhD Assistant Director.
Slide 1: UC Berkeley (UCB) Chairs & Deans, Tenure-Track Faculty, Postdoctoral Scholars, Graduate Students, and Undergraduates by Gender, Dec Sources.
College Knowledge. Presentation Goals Understand the benefits of a college education. Learn the pathways to college. Learn how to prepare for college.
University of California, Berkeley
Faculty Climate Survey Highlights
Presentation transcript:

University of California (UC) Doctoral Student Career and Life Survey Findings, Mary Ann Mason Marc Goulden Karie Frasch Sharon Page-Medrich University of California, Berkeley

University of California (UC) Doctoral Student Career and Life Survey An 18-page Web survey assessed the attitudes of doctoral students (second year and higher) toward current and future career and life issues and their satisfaction with their degree program, with special attention to issues affecting student parents. Launched at UC Berkeley in fall 2006 and at the other UC campuses (except Merced) in spring 2007, an overall 43% rate was achieved (8,373 respondents/19,678 surveyed) and an estimated 48% response rate among women doctoral students. Respondents’ Basic Demographics 51% of respondents are women but women are only 45% of UC’s doctoral student population (second year+). 14% of women and 12% of men have been parents as doctoral students. 34% of women and 33% of men are married. 17% of women and 11% of men are partnered. 5% of women and 3% of men are divorced/not remarried. Women are on average 1 year older than men: age 31 vs. 30. Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ).

UC Doctoral Student Career and Life Survey: Response Rates by Campus UC CampusNumber of Responses Number Surveyed* Total Response Rate Estimated Response Rate for Women** Berkeley2,1224,20151%56% Davis1,1622,46847%54% Irvine7781,94540%45% Los Angeles1,5274,36435%39% Riverside4481,19438%41% San Diego9062,20041%45% San Francisco %53% Santa Barbara8551,86946%53% Santa Cruz %47% Total8,37319,67843%48% *Bad addresses are excluded from number surveyed and response rate calculation. **Estimated based on percent of women among surveyed population (according to the local campus) and percent of women among survey respondents (self-reported by respondents).

WomenMen Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ). UC Doctoral Students: As you think about your future career plans, how concerned are you about the family friendliness of possible career paths? N=3,948N=3,648

As you think about possible future career paths and family issues, how family friendly do you imagine each of the following job types to be? UC Doctoral Students by Gender Yellow shading indicates the group’s response is significantly higher than the other group’s response (P<.001). *vs. not too or not at all family friendly. Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ). Percent Imagining Job Type to Be Very or Somewhat Family Friendly* Rank Job TypesTotalMenWomen 1 Tenure-track faculty careers at teaching-intensive colleges 77%82%73% 2 Policy or managerial careers inside academia 76%80%73% 3 Research careers outside academia 75%78%72% 4 Policy or managerial careers outside academia 72%74%71% 5 Non-tenure-track faculty careers 63%62%64% 6 Research careers at research-intensive universities 47%55%40% 7 Tenure-track faculty careers at research-intensive universities 37%46%29% N=7,294 to 7,550 3,481 to 3,596 3,784 to 3,923

Gender New Child Born or Adopted as PhD Student? Paid off Federal Grant at Birth/Adopt. Event? % Imagining Career to be Very/Somewhat Family Friendly N Men No new child46% 3,257 Yes, new child Not paid off federal grant 46% 227 Yes, paid off federal grant 35% 62 Women No new child29% 3,637 Yes, new child Not paid off federal grant 29% 211 Yes, paid off federal grant 16% 45 Percent Imagining Tenure-Track Faculty Careers at Research-Intensive Universities to Be Very or Somewhat Family Friendly* by New Child Born/Adopted as PhD Student & Paid Status at Event *vs. not too or not at all family friendly Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ).

Percent Rating Tenure-Track Faculty Careers at Research Intensive Univ. as Very or Somewhat Family Friendly by Perceived Commonness of Women Faculty in Their Department/Unit Having Children Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ). Perceived Commonness of Women Faculty in Department/Unit Having Children Percent Rating Tenure-Track Faculty Careers at Research Intensive Universities as Very or Somewhat Family Friendly Women Doctoral Students Men Doctoral Students Total N= , , Very common Somewhat common Not too common Not at all common

Career Goal at Start of PhD N=3710 N=3994N=3936 Current Goal Men Women N=3672 Current Goal Men Women Career Goal at Start of PhD Changing Career Goals Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ). *Professor w. Research Emphasis UC PhD Students

Career Goal at Start of PhD N=1774 N=856 N=840 Current Goal Men Women N=1754 Current Goal Men Women Career Goal at Start of PhD Changing Career Goals Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ). *Professor w. Research Emphasis PTEM** UC PhD Students **Includes physical sc., technology, engineer., & math.

Reasons Most Commonly Cited by UC PhD Students for Shifting Career Goal away from Professor with Research Emphasis Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ). Percent Citing Factor As “Very Important*” in Career Goal ShiftTotalMenWomen 1 Negative experience as PhD student 45%44%46% 2 Other life interests 42%35%48% 3 Professional activities too time consuming 41%35%45% 4 Issues related to children 36%21%46% 5 Geographic location issues 35%28%40% 6 Feelings of isolation/alienation as PhD student 33%31%35% 7 Bad job market 30%29%30% 8 Career advancement issues 30%34%27% 9 Job security 29% 10 Spouse/partner issues or desire to marry 27%22%32% 11 Monetary compensation (e.g., salary, benefits) 27%31%23% 12 Other career interests 25%23%27% Yellow shading indicates the group’s response is significantly higher than the other group’s response (P<.01). N=956 to 1, to to 666 *”Not applicable” is excluded from analysis.

Percent of UC PhD Students Dissatisfied* with Current Aspects of their Experience, By Gender Yellow shading indicates the group’s response is significantly higher than the other group’s response (P<.001). *Dissatisfied includes “Not too” and “Not at all satisfied” vs. “Very” and “Somewhat satisfied.” % Dissatisfied* with Experience All PhD Students MenWomen 1 Dept/unit support for career-life balance49%46%53% 2 Time for self (e.g. recreation, health)43%39%47% 3 Personal progress toward career goals26% 4 Personal progress toward PhD degree24%25%23% 5 Overall career and life situation21%20%22% 6 Interaction with faculty19%18%19% 7 Interaction with fellow PhD students17%18%16% 8 Interaction with primary faculty advisor17%16%17% 9 Quality of degree program10% Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ). N=7,790 to 8,300 3,741 to 4,034 4,008 to 4,219

If “yes,” would you consider having children as a PhD student? WomenMen Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ). WomenMen UC PhD Students: Whether or not you currently have children, do you expect to have or adopt any in the future? N=4,066 N=3,796 N=2,619 N=2,394

Reasons Cited for Not Having or Being Uncertain about Having a Child as a UC PhD Stud. (slide 1 of 2) (among those planning to have children in the future) Percent Citing As Very Important* TotalMenWomen 1 Time demands of current PhD program/employment 72%68%76% 2 Current level of personal/household income 64%67%61% 3 Anticipated demands of future program/career 54%48%59% 4 Stress of raising a child as a PhD student 53%48%58% 5 Concerns re affordability/availability of quality childcare 53%49%56% 6 Concerns re affordability/availability of quality housing 51% 52% 7 Uncertain future employment situation 50%48%51% 8 Concerns re affordability/availability of health insurance 47% 48% 9 Worry PhD program & caregiving are incompatible 46%36%54% 10 Concerns re degree progress 43%34%51% 11 Concerns about availability of pregnancy leave 43%32%50% 12 Uncertain current employment situation 38%35%40% Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ). Yellow shading indicates the group’s response is significantly higher than the other group’s response (P<.001). N=3,880-4,353 1,607-2,006 2,199-2,330 *”Not applicable” is excluded from analysis.

Reasons Cited for Not Having or Being Uncertain about Having a Child as a UC PhD Stud. (slide 2 of 2) (among those planning to have children in the future) Percent Citing As Very Important* Tot.MenWom. 13 Concerns re future career advancement/success 36%27%43% 14 Anticipated future level of personal/household income 33%32%33% 15 Uncertainty re future spouse/partner (not married) 30%27%33% 16 Limit. interest in becoming parent as a PhD student 29%31%28% 17 Spouse/partner does not want child at this time 28%32%24% 18 Time for leisure or social activities 23% 19 Effects of a(nother) child on my marriage/relationship 17% 20 Worry advisor would take my work less seriously 15%8%21% 21 Worry possible employers might take work less serious 15%6%23% 22 Worry other faculty might take work less seriously 13%6%19% 23 Medical or health reasons (including age) 13%8%17% 24 Worry peers would take my work less seriously 9%4%14% Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ). Yellow shading indicates the group’s response is significantly higher than the other group’s response (P<.001). N= 1,788-4, , ,314 *”Not applicable” is excluded from analysis.

Everybody is Busy (UC Doctoral Students) N= Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ).

UC Doctoral Student Parents and Career-Family Conflict N= Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ). Note: These questions were based on Robert Drago’s Mapping Project Survey Instrument (

UC Doctoral Student Parents and Career-Family Support/Flexibility N= Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ). Note: Some questions were based on Robert Drago’s Mapping Project Survey Instrument (

Career Duties That Place Stress on UC Doctoral Student Parenting Percent of UC Doctoral Student Parents Experiencing a “Great Deal” of Stress in Parenting as a Result of Specific Educational/Career Duty (“Not Applicable” is excluded. “Some,” “A little,” and “None” responses are grouped.) Career Duties Meeting teaching obligations Meeting deadlines for grants/fellowships Attending seminars, colloquia, dept. meetings Research/writing (part of paid work) Attending conferences/presenting papers Conducting time-sensitive experiments Field research away from home Research/writing (PhD program ) N= Source: Mason, Mary Ann and Marc Goulden “UC Doctoral Student Career Life Survey.” ( ).

Elongating Career Timelines (Mean Time-to-Events) : U.S. Science & Social Sci. PhDs Who Achieve Tenure, * *Mean age calculations are based on PhD Recipients who are given up to 14 years from PhD receipt to achieve tenure; e.g., 1999 includes SDR respondents who received their PhD in Source: NSF, SDR Sciences, Note: The use of NSF Data does not imply the endorsement of research methods or conclusions contained in this report.