Chem 125 Lecture 2 9/5/08 Projected material This material is for the exclusive use of Chem 125 students at Yale and may not be copied or distributed further. It is not readily understood without reference to notes from the lecture.

Are There Atoms & Molecules? What Force Holds Atoms Together?

Isaac Newton ( )

Force : Gravity Attraction at a Distance vs. Cartesian blocked repulsion Newton : Force  r -2 (How about mass?)

Isaac Newton ( )

Query 31 in Opticks (1717) Have not the small Particles of Bodies certain Powers, Virtues, or Forces by which they act at a distance, not only upon the Rays of Light for reflecting, refracting and inflecting them, but also upon one another for producing a great part of the Phaenomena of Nature? For it's well know that Bodies act one upon another by the Attractions of Gravity, Magnetism and Electricity; and these Instances shew the Tenor and Course of Nature, and make it not improbable but that there may be more attractive Powers than these. For Nature is very consonant and conformable to her self.

Query 31 How these Attractions may be perform'd, I do not here con- sider. What I call Attraction may be perform'd by impulse, or by some other means unknown to me. I use that Word here to signify only in general any Force by which Bodies tend towards one another, whatsoever be the Cause. For we must learn from the Phaenomena of Nature what Bodies attract one another, and what are the Laws and Properties of the attraction, before we enquire the Cause by which the Attraction is perform'd, The Attractions of Gravity, Magne- tism and Electricity, react to very sensible distances, and so have been observed by vulgar Eyes, and there may be others which reach to so small distances as hitherto escape obser- vation; and perhaps electrical Attraction may react to such small distances, even without being excited by Friction.

Query 31 The Parts of all homogeneal hard Bodies which fully touch one another, stick together very strongly. And for explaining how this may be, some have invented hooked Atoms, which is begging the Question; and others tell us that Bodies are glued together by rest, that is, by an occult Quality, or rather by nothing; and others that they stick together by conspiring Motions, that is, by relative rest amongst themselves. I had rather infer from their Cohesion, that their Particles attract one another by some Force, which in immediate Contact is exceeding strong, at small distances performs the chymical Operations above mention'd, and reaches not far from the Particles with any sensible Effect. Maybe not F  1/r 2 ?

Query 31 …the Attraction [between glass plates separated by a thin film of Oil of Oranges] may be proportionally greater, and continue to increase until the thickness do not exceed that of a single Particle of the Oil.

Query 31 There are therefore Agents in Nature able to make the Particles of Bodies stick together by very strong Attractions. And it is the business of experimental Philosophy to find them out. (This business will take us nearly five weeks)

Binding Energies from Various Sources Magnetic   1  2 /r Log (Potential Energy) kcal/mol Gravitational  m 1 m 2 /r Coulombic  q 1 q 2 /r Chemical Bond (similar to 1 e Coulombic) (What of Kinetic Energy?) (216 kcal/mol) : Proton-Electron at 1.54Å ( kcal/mol) : Electron Spins at 1.54Å (5 x 10 7 kcal/mol) : Proton-Neutron in Deuterium Nucleus (3 x kcal/mol) : C atoms at 1.54Å (90 kcal/mol) : C-C at 1.54Å “Strong” Binding

Is there a Chemical Force Law?

How far can you Stretch a Chain of Atoms before it Snaps?

Force Laws & Molecular Structure Spring (ut tensio sic vis) Electrical Charges (gravity, etc.) Balanced minimumBalanced minimum ! F = -k  x  F  = k / (  x) 2 Potential Energy Single MinimumDouble Minimum x  x sum Slope = F nd Spring (weaker, opposing) 3 rd Stronger Body E = k/2 (  x) 2 E = -k/(2 |  x|)

Demonstration with Magnets

(but not with ions or magnets) Thus with springs you might make a stable polyatomic molecule from point atoms. However Hooke’s Law bonds would never break.

Fixed Neighbor Mathematically convenient approximation for realistic bond energies (proposed 1929) Sum Morse Potential Second Fixed Neighbor

Morse Potential Snaps at Inflection Point (Change from direct to inverse force)

What ARE bonds?

Why do Elements Differ? 1861 Different # for different atoms: H(1), C(4), O(2), N(3) NH 3 and NH 4 Cl or 5? ) 19 th Century Experiments led to VALENCE numbers

Gertrude and Robert Robinson (1917) Might Latent Valence Loop explain trivalence of pentavalent N? What does the loop mean? “partial dissociation” Such slippery concepts “explain” so much that they convince you of nothing. “latent” valence loop Why/When ? Why/When ? reactionproduct Reaction Scheme Might Partial Dissociation explain amine/HCl reactivity?

Electron Discovered 1897

The Cubic Octet of G. N. Lewis ( ) as Harvard Undergraduate ~1894 as Harvard Instructor ~1902 © E. S. Lewis, by permission

Octet to "Explain" Periodicity & Electron Transfer (1902 teaching notes)

Octet Predicts Shared Pair Bonding ? shared edge shared face

Cubic Octet to Tetrahedral Octet to Tetrahedral Octet N N :: (G. N. Lewis 1916) Tetrahedral distribution of the bonds from C had already been known in organic chemistry for 40 years!

Good Theory should be Realistic & Simple In regard to Facts it should allow: Prediction Suggestion Explanation Classification & Remembering as as possible Postdiction: Realm of Lore

From Number of Valence Electrons we would like to predict: Constitution (valence numbers for different atoms) Structure (distances & angles ) Energy Content Reactivity Charge Distribution

Lewis Explains Constitution “the nature and sequence of bonds” H B C N O F H N H H Why Octet? Why Pair for H / He? (Electrons, Valence, and Unshared Pairs)

H H H N + H H H B HCN H C Tetravalent N is positive. N C H N C H N Tetravalent B is negative. NH 3 BH 3 H 3 N-BH 3 + H H H N H H H B Bookkeeping of “Formal” Charges (each atom is assigned half-interest in bonding pairs) Puzzle: 2 BH 3  B 2 H 6 + ~40 kcal/mol What is the “glue”? (Answer in Lecture 16)

+ - *) Energy of a proton on the “molecular surface” Surface Potential* of H 3 N-BH 3 (from Quantum-Mechanics) HIGH (+ 25 kcal/mole) (-41 kcal/mole) LOW

Lewis Explains “Pentavalent” N. Actually Tetravalent - thus Charged. N H H H H + Cl

Amine R R R N S R R Sulfide O Oxide O O oxide one

also for HCNO (CNO in all six linear orders plus ring) Draw Lewis Dot Structures for: H N C (in the order shown) Start Lewis-Drill Problems:

Start Memorizing Functional Groups

Double Minimum equilibrium EQUILIBRIUM vs. RESONANCE O HCN + - HCN O + - all octets charge sepn  all octets still charge sepn  poorer site for -  N position Energy midway left shift : to eliminate charge sepn.shift : to restore octet N closer to C than to O N ~midway between C and O Geometric Implication? but maybe in truth…

EQUILIBRIUM vs. RESONANCE HC O N + - N position Energy midway left Single Minimum resonance O HC N + - single compromise position for N

Choice between Resonance and Equilibrium must be based on experimental facts (or a better theory) that can distinguish single from double minimum

Equilibrium vs. Resonance AB AB Two Real Species One Real Species Two “Reasonable” Structural Formulas Failure of Simplistic Notation Unusually Stable Compared to what?

Equilibrium vs. Resonance H C O O H HC O O H H C O O HC O O Two Species Two Species? H C O O HC O O One Nuclear Geometry! One Species! (Evidence: Infrared Spectroscopy) LORE (Evidence: Electron Paramagnetic Resonance)

End of Lecture 2 Sept 5, 2008