Observational Evidence for Cross-field Diffusion of Neutral Filament Material Holly Gilbert & Gary Kilper Rice University 10/29/07.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Science of Solar B Transient phenomena – this aim covers the wide ranges of explosive phenomena observed on the Sun – from small scale flaring in the.
Advertisements

Physics of fusion power
Coronal Prominence Cavities: Magnetism and Dynamics Sarah Gibson, Giuliana de Toma, Therese Kucera, Kathy Reeves, Donald Schmit, and Alphonse Sterling.
The Sun The Sun is a star. The Sun is a star. It is 4,500 million years old It is 4,500 million years old It takes 8 minutes for its light to reach.
Determination of 3D structure, avg density, total mass and plasma properties of an EUV filament observed by SoHO/CDS, SoHO/SUMER and VTT/MSDP Pavol Schwartz.
Physics of Fusion Lecture 1: The basics Lecturer: A.G. Peeters.
Magnetic Reconnection Across the HCS Mark Moldwin UM and Megan Cartwright UC-Berkeley Isradynamics April 2010 With thanks to Mark Linton at NRL Linton.
Coronal Mass Ejections without photospheric/chromospheric signatures Session organizers: Alexei Pevtsov (NSO) and Vasyl Yurchyshyn (BBSO) Discussion leaders:
A Method of Resolving the 180- Degree Ambiguity by Employing the Chirality of Solar Features S. F. Martin, Y. Lin, O. Engvold 2008, Sol. Phys. 250, 31.
Hard X-ray Production in a Failed Filament Eruption David, Alexander, Rui Liu and Holly R., Gilbert 2006 ApJ 653, L719 Related Paper: Ji. H. et al., 2003.
Holly Gilbert: NASA GSFC. SDO AIA composite made from three of the AIA wavelength bands, corresponding to temperatures from.7 to 2 million degrees (hotter.
Non-Equilibrium Ionization Modeling of the Current Sheet in a Simulated Solar Eruption Chengcai Shen Co-authors: K. K. Reeves, J. C. Raymond, N. A. Murphy,
General Properties Absolute visual magnitude M V = 4.83 Central temperature = 15 million 0 K X = 0.73, Y = 0.25, Z = 0.02 Initial abundances: Age: ~ 4.52.
Estimating the Chromospheric Absorption of Transition Region Moss Emission Bart De Pontieu, Viggo H. Hansteen, Scott W. McIntosh, Spiros Patsourakos.
Review Vocabulary magnetic field: the portion of space near a magnetic or current-carrying body where magnetic forces can be detected The Sun contains.
7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Observing prominence dynamics with STEREO David Alexander, Rui Liu, and Holly Gilbert Rice University
Magnetic Fields at Mt. Wilson and MDI. The 150-foot Tower Spectrograph Measures 12 line pairs simultaneously The long-term program uses The full.
Physics of fusion power
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Properties of Prominence Motions Observed in the UV T. A. Kucera (NASA/GSFC) E. Landi (Artep Inc, NRL)
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
The Sun The Sun in X-rays over several years The Sun is a star: a shining ball of gas powered by nuclear fusion. Luminosity of Sun = 4 x erg/s =
Properties of stars during hydrogen burning Hydrogen burning is first major hydrostatic burning phase of a star: Hydrostatic equilibrium: a fluid element.
5. Simplified Transport Equations We want to derive two fundamental transport properties, diffusion and viscosity. Unable to handle the 13-moment system.
Review of Conditions for the Formation and Maintenance of Filaments Paper by Sara F. Martin, 1998 Review presented by Samuel Tun October 13, 2005
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
What stellar properties can be learnt from planetary transits Adriana Válio Roque da Silva CRAAM/Mackenzie.
Solar Rotation Lab 3. Differential Rotation The sun lacks a fixed rotation rate Since it is composed of a gaseous plasma, the rate of rotation is fastest.
The Dangers of Solar Storms and Solar Cycles.  For every 1 million atoms of hydrogen in the entire sun  98,000 atoms of helium  850 of oxygen  360.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Beijing UniversityTuesday 18-May-2010 Quiescent Prominence Instabilities Hinode/SOT and AIA Explorations Thomas Berger Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics.
Stellar structure equations
Atmospheric transport and chemistry lecture I.Introduction II.Fundamental concepts in atmospheric dynamics: Brewer-Dobson circulation and waves III.Radiative.
Exploring the Active Sun PA STEM monthly meeting Lincoln HS, Philadelphia October 14, 2014.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
Why plasma processing? (1) UCLA Accurate etching of fine features.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Lessons Learnt from SOHO: CME Onsets CME Properties: to kg km/s Average span 45 o Significance: - Coronal evolution - Space weather.
The Dangers of Solar Storms and Solar Cycles.  Radius = 696,000 km  Mass = 2E30 kg  Luminosity = 3.8E26 W  Rotation Rate  25 days at the equator.
NoRH Observations of Prominence Eruption Masumi Shimojo Nobeyama Solar Radio Observatory NAOJ/NINS 2004/10/28 Nobeyama Symposium SeiSenRyo.
The Sun Stellar Evolution: Low Mass Stars White Dwarfs
A comparison of CME-associated atmospheric waves observed in coronal (Fe XII 195A) and chromospheric ( He I 10830A) lines Holly R. Gilbert, Thomas E. Holzer,
Spectral Signature of Emergent Magnetic Flux D1 神尾 精 Solar Seminar Balasubramaniam,K.S., 2001, ApJ, 557, 366. Chae, J. et al., 2000, ApJ, 528,
1. active prominences - solar prominences that change in a matter of hours.
CME-associated dimming regions Alysha Reinard 12, Doug Biesecker 1, Tim Howard 3 1 NOAA/SEC 2 University of Colorado 3 Montana State University SHINE 2006.
Coronal loops: new insights from EIS observations G. Del Zanna 1,2, S. Bradshaw 3, 1 MSSL, University College London, UK 2 DAMTP, University of Cambridge,
Prominence Dynamics: the Key to Prominence Structure Judy Karpen Naval Research Laboratory SVST.
The Sun: Part 2. Temperature at surface = 5800 K => yellow (Wien’s Law) Temperature at center = 15,000,000 K Average density = 1.4 g/cm 3 Density at center.
The Sun, our favorite star!
Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,
Flare Ribbon Expansion and Energy Release Ayumi ASAI Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University Explosive Phenomena in Magnetized Plasma – New Development.
The Sun Part 2.
The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) has continuously measured the vector magnetic field, intensity, and.
Shine 2004, A. Sterling CME Eruption Onset Observations: Dimmings Alphonse C. Sterling NASA/MSFC/NSSTC.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Sun: Magnetic Structure Feb. 16, 2012.
Solar Convection Simulations Robert Stein, David Benson - Mich. State Univ. Aake Nordlund - Niels Bohr Institute.
The Slow Solar Wind Tom Holzer NCAR/HAO NCAR/HAO.
Lecture 8: Stellar Atmosphere 4. Stellar structure equations.
ASTR 2310: Chapter 7, “The Sun” Observable Layers of the Sun  (Interiors deferred to Ch. 15, ASTR 2320)‏ Solar Activity Angular Momentum of the Sun.
Saturn Magnetosphere Plasma Model J. Yoshii, D. Shemansky, X. Liu SET-PSSD 06/26/11.
Our Sun. About the Sun The sun is by far the largest object in the solar system, containing more than 99.8% of the total mass of the solar system (Jupiter.
The Sun. Sun Fact Sheet The Sun is a normal G2 star, one of more than 100 billion stars in our galaxy. Diameter: 1,390,000 km (Earth 12,742 km or nearly.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
The Sun.
Sun: General Properties
Limb prominences seen in UV, EUV and SXR
What is the fate of our sun and other stars?
The Sun.
A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR DERIVING PROMINENCE MASS FROM SOHO/EIT Fe XII (19
The Sun – Our Favorite Star
Presentation transcript:

Observational Evidence for Cross-field Diffusion of Neutral Filament Material Holly Gilbert & Gary Kilper Rice University 10/29/07

Some relevant questions regarding the relationship between CMEs and prominences Do prominences act as anchors? Does mass loss in prominences initiate CMEs? Does prominence density, magnetic structure, and pre-eruptive dynamics tell us something fundamental about the magnetic structure and available energy of the CME? Motivation…..

Approach to addressing those questions…. Determine total prominence mass Determine how much mass is being lost and how much is replinished Understand which mechanisms are responsible for mass variation –Once identified, determine the relative importance of those mechanisms Find spatial and temporal variation of mass

 = e -  n  ds N =  n ds N = -  -1 ln  M p = m  N da  1.3m H N A eff Obtaining total prominence mass… Extinction factor Column density Total prominence mass Results: Average mass of quiescent prominences is Average mass of eruptive prominences is Mass of a typical CME: ~10 15 – g (Assume  is constant through prominence)  = mean absorption cross section n=total prom. number density m=mean mass per particle Prominence mass loss could be important in CME initiation!!

z y x B g Dip Model Flux-rope model Simple Prominence Support Models Mass loss via. Cross field diffusion? (Gilbert et al. 2002; 2007)

Force Balance in a Multi-Constituent Prominence Plasma General Momentum Balance Equation ( j th particle species) EXAMPLE: Proton Force Balance z-component: y-component:

Perpendicular Flow in a H-He Prominence Plasma z y x B g g  B

Time Scales for Neutral Atom Loss Loss Times for Helium and Hydrogen Helium: Hydrogen: General Relations = 1 day ~ 22 days

H  ( =656 nm) He I ( =1083 nm) H  ( =656 nm) Initial Comparison of H and He Observations

Quantitative Analysis Study temporal and spatial Changes in the relative H and He in filaments via the absorption and He I / H α absorption ratio Chose different types of filaments: large/stable, small/stable, & eruptive that could be followed across the solar disk Used co-temporal H α (6563 Å) and He I (10830 Å) images from the Mauna Loa Solar Observatory in 2004 Kilper (Master’s thesis) Developed an IDL code that scales and aligns each pair of images, selects the filament, and calculates the absorption ratio at every pixel Alignment of images is key to a pixel-by-pixel comparison

He/H absorption Darker pixel ↔ Helium deficit Brighter pixel ↔ Helium surplus “Edge effects”

January 2004 “Large & stable”

10/15 16:5410/15 22:46 1/19 17:441/19 23:431/20 18:121/21 02:06 January 2004 October 2004 “small & stable”

May 2004 Partial eruption: Absence of “edge effects”

Top view at disk center Cylindrical representation of a filament View along filament axis Larger vertical column density Small vertical column density Filament axis What do we expect?? Geometrical considerations: the simplest picture Dark = relative He deficit

Bottom edge with white bands Top edge with dark band Bottom edge with white bands Somewhat more realistic geometry Dark = relative He deficit White = relative He surplus Observed near east limb center disk west limb

Interpretation of “Edge effects” Far from disk center, one edge is at the top, and one at the bottom (where the barbs appear) Far from disk center, one edge is at the top, and one at the bottom (where the barbs appear) In a relatively stable filament, He drains out of the top rapidly (relative He deficit) In a relatively stable filament, He drains out of the top rapidly (relative He deficit) He draining out of bottom is replaced by He draining down from above (no relative He deficit) He draining out of bottom is replaced by He draining down from above (no relative He deficit)

How does the absorption ratio vary on shorter time scales?? And what about eruption??

Erupting Filament

Eruption ~22:30 UT Filament : Average He/H Ratios He I/H  Ratio UTC Time 14:00 16:00 18:0020:0022:0000:00 02: Aug Aug. 12

Diffusion timescales In the context of filament threads….. Coronal plasma in between threads Coronal plasma can readily ionize neutral material draining into it Expect very short draining timescales….. However……

Coronal plasma in between threads For high density filament threads, draining timescale will not be too small– it depends on vertical column density

Ongoing related work Study prominence absorption in coronal lines: Fe XII 195 Å (SOHO/EIT, TRACE), and Mg X 625 Å (SOHO/CDS) to obtain relative mass abundances (Gilbert, Kilper, Kucera, in preparation) Study prominence absorption in coronal lines: Fe XII 195 Å (SOHO/EIT, TRACE), and Mg X 625 Å (SOHO/CDS) to obtain relative mass abundances (Gilbert, Kilper, Kucera, in preparation) Investigate the absorption “gradient” visible in 195 (i.e., initial results show the absorption is deeper at the bottom- another observational indication of cross-field diffusion?) Investigate the absorption “gradient” visible in 195 (i.e., initial results show the absorption is deeper at the bottom- another observational indication of cross-field diffusion?) Distinguish between gravitational settling and cross-field diffusion in observations Distinguish between gravitational settling and cross-field diffusion in observations Estimate fraction of prominence mass lost and determine how this is related to CMEs