INTERACT pilot project : Added value through interregional, economic cooperation  exchange of good practice Lars Tveit Paris 16. March 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme
Advertisements

BARENTS Interreg III B – Work-package 2: Industrial development Sub-group Oil & Gas Supplier.
European Economic and Social Committee Consultative Committee on Industrial Change "CCMI" P r e s e n t a t i o n of J á n o s T Ó T H Member of the EESC.
Open Days 2011 Workshop 11C05 Added value and efficiency through the use of article 37.6(b) and the EGTC Centre Borschette, Brussels 11 October 2011 State.
Regions for Economic Change | LMP Workshop 3C When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform How can INTERACT.
Technical meeting with the Regional representative offices in Brussels Brussels, 17 March 2009 The INTERACT II Programme – Knowledge Management and Capitalisation.
Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Enabling & Industrial Technologies in Horizon 2020 Enabling & Industrial Technologies in Horizon 2020 Research.
1 Regional Policy contributing to smart growth in Europe 2020 Standard presentation Brussels, November 2010 Pierre GODIN Policy Analyst, DG Regional policy.
1 CIE Final Conference, 19 June 2014, Delft EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND CIE Final Conference, 19 June 2014, Delft EU Interregional Cooperation State.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
Lobbying for Food Security: FAO advocacy interventions
European Union | European Regional Development Fund Zooming in Interreg Europe National Info Day 12 May 2015, Paris Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer.
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14 October.
Igor Kaniecki | Joint Secretariat Interreg South Baltic Programme
EU regional support to private sector development, investment, trade, and economic issues in Southern Mediterranean NEAR B.2 - Regional Programmes Neighbourhood.
1 EU Funds for Improvement of Servcies Provided by the Municipalities Future scope of co-operation with EU Structural Funds Thomas Wobben Representation.
16 September 2009, Ryn EUROREGION BALTIC – NEW CHALLENGES.
Part-financed by the European Union The new Baltic Sea Region Programme Susanne Scherrer, Director of the Joint Secretariat Rostock/Riga.
INTERREG IVC 1 EUROPEAN INTERREGIONAL COOPERATION 2007/13 Interreg IVC General overview 21 March 2007.
EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region PA Education WorkingLife - Stockholm – November, 26, 2013.
Eurostars – A Joint Programming Initiative. Implementation and Impacts Georg Licht Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW) Mannheim Innovation: Engine.
Part-financed by the European Union The Baltic Sea Region Programme by the Joint Technical Secretariat BSR INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme.
European Union | European Regional Development Fund From INTERREG IVC to Interreg Europe Info day in Tullamore Akos Szabo| Project Officer Interreg Europe.
Kick-off meeting 16 March 2011 INTERACT Pilot Activity on Cooperation in Objectives 1 and 2 State Development Corporation of Thuringia (LEG) Kathrin Wagner,
Cooperation in the mainstream programmes / article 37-6b example of Limousin (France) inhabitants inhabitants 43 inhabitant / km2 43 inhabitant.
Hamburg – “Gateway to the Baltic Sea” Inter-Sectoral and Inter-Regional Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region (BSR)
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 Interregional Cooperation and the Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas “GROW” Brussels, 18 October 2007 Territorial Co-operation.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
Evaluation workshop on the Economic Development OP Budapest, 24 April 2013 Jack Engwegen Head of Unit, Hungary DG Regional and Urban Policy European Commission.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
INTERACT Pilot Activity on Cooperation in Objectives 1 and 2 Second Event, Bergen, Norway 14 June 2011 State Development Corporation of Thuringia (LEG)
Conference on regional governance in a global context The experience of Emilia Romagna Morena Diazzi Managing Authority ERDF ROP
EU funding Available EU Structural Funds. Objective 2 / Mål 2 Interreg 4A NORD Kolarctic ENPI CBC Northern Periphery Programme Baltic Sea programme North.
Transnacionalno teritorialno sodelovanje Program Jugovzhodna Evropa Margarita Jančič, MOP,DEZI Novo mesto,17. april 2008.
KTForce project Knowledge Transfer joint forces for efficient innovation policies Thematic Seminar 2 “Promoting Entrepreneurship within Universities” Dresden,
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
Part-financed by the European Union Baltic Sea Region 2007– Profile Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar, Riga, 9-11 April 2008.
Financing possibilities for implementation of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region 21 September 2011 | Riga, Latvia.
The European Structural and Investment Funds & the defence sector Paul Anciaux, Helsinki, 25 March 2014.
BaltMet Inno – Innovation Cooperation between Metropolitan Areas in the Baltic Sea Region Joint Innovation Policies for the Baltic Sea Region Workshop.
Launching conference of the ClusterCoop Project The future role of clusters in Central Europe Budapest, 13th of July 2011 Polish clusters and cluster policy.
BMT Transport Solutions GmbH 1 Third BSR INTERREG III B partner search forum in Gdansk Actors perspective on pan-Baltic transport development Lars Källström.
Boosting Innovation Based Jobs. vPA.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Akos Szabo Joint Technical Secretariat 26 June 2014, Brussels.
Part-financed by the European Union Workshop 1 Fostering innovations Moderation: Susann Henning, Managing Authority Baltic Sea Region Programme
Enterprise Directorate General European Commission Kurt König Head of Unit “Communication and Awareness” Innovation Directorate
Filippo Compagni – European Policy and External Funding Manager European and External Funding Unit Powys County Council I-SPEED Information Society Policies.
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat / Eija Eloranta/Communication coordinator/New bridges kick off 4th March 2009 NEW BRIDGES – Strenghtening.
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Interregional Cooperation State of play and future perspectives SHARP final conference – 10 October 2012 Katja Ecke|
1 How to participate in FP7 Miroslav Polzer Austrian Science and Research Liaison Office Ljubljana Centre for Social Innovation ZSI, Vienna / Austria several.
1 European network of regions for sustainable and competitive tourism NECSTouR’s general presentation.
1 The urban dimension of cohesion policy 2014 – 2020.
Open Days 2015 “Interreg Europe: how can Investment for Growth and Jobs programmes benefit? October 15 th, 2015 / Brussels Managing Authority testimony:
BSR STARS - Programme for the Developement of Innovation, Clusters and SME-Networks Rima Putkienė Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Lithuania Maritime.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden BALTIC SEA TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION: RU PERSPECTIVE Irina Karelina.
Rosa Expósito Coordinator of the Liaison Office ENPI CBC Mediterranean Sea Basin Barcelona, 7 July 2016 From ENPI CBC MED to ENI CBC MED : main results.
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14.
German-Uzbek STI Cooperation
PRIORITIES in the area of employment and social policy during the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union 1 January – 30.
BALTIC SEA NETWORK - ESF
TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION:
Transnational Cooperation under the ESF
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Main results from the Interreg IVC Capitalisation project Winnet8
SmartAgriHubs S3P Agri-Food Working Committee Meeting
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
Presentation transcript:

INTERACT pilot project : Added value through interregional, economic cooperation  exchange of good practice Lars Tveit Paris 16. March 2011

BERGEN – the capital of Western Norway  a commercial centre in the past, today and in the future  ”Bryggen” in Bergen is on UNESCO’s World Heritage List, for being almost untouched since 1100  Hanseatic city in the 1300’s - since then involved in substantial, international trade  Centre for the largest oil- and gas companies i Norway (StatoilHydro)  Norwegian Centre of Expertise Subsea  National and, to a large extent, an international centre of education in marine biology  Focus on international cooperation in business and R&D

Technological challenges stimulate and promote international cooperation Industrial focus :  ENERGY (oil, gas, wind, hydro-EL,…)  MARITIME INDUSTRY  MARINE INDUSTRY  SUB SEA OPERATIONS / CLUSTERS  INNOVATION - ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Regional Developement Program (RUP), Hordaland ” INTERNATIONAL TRADING – ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT”  Hordalands equivalent to ”Article 37.6b” (?)  Support regional SME’s in their efforts to succeed in international business (competence raising activities,..)  Stimulate relevant, regional industry to participate in international projects and programs, like EU – programs (INTERREG), programs overseas, etc.  Support international networking, and exchange for experience and good pratice  Establish links and cooperation between Norwegian research programs and industry in an international perspective (international R & D driven development like RFF, VRI, etc.)  Sustainable economic development  Introduce the younger generation (today’s youth) to international economic development and cooperation

Hordaland county

Baltic Sea Region Programme Northern Periphery Programme INTERREG VIB North Sea Region Programme INTERREG IVC Transregional cooperation Other EU programs were Norway, through the EEA, is invited to take part (INTERREG IVA, 7 th Framework Programme, …).. alternative solutions ?? or EU – programs available to Norway

Eligibility – Common interests – Potential partners – Financial platforms

”Pick your partners with care” Hordaland has been cooperating, and building networks with Freistat Thüringen since COMETT II program 1992 – 95 2.Exchange of university students and academic personnel 3.Leonardo da Vinci programme 1995 – …. (visits, excursions, meetings,…) 4.SAFEGAS 1997 – School class / upper secondary School – Erfurt, …. 6.“ENABLE” (Enabeling European Entrepreneurship) 2003 – 2007 / INTERREG IIIC (mini-programme / Regional Management Operation) 7.Applications / proposals for INTERREG IVC projects (“Humans”, “Talents”, …) 8.6th Framework Programme : OMC – NET / “Europeer SME” (Peer-reviewing European Good Practices in Innovation Promotion for SME) 2006 – Visits from Hordaland : -Regional politicians -Regional Executive Forum (RNF) -Educational committee 10.Youth Programme, Voss – Erfurt, Cooperation agreement / “Communiqué”, ….  ERDF-, ESF- funding / Norwegian public money / RUP  Access to cooperating EU-networks

Alternative routes to successful cooperation models INPUT : Patients & creativity INTERREG 4C Application NOT APPROVED NOT APPROVED New approach SUCCESS INTERREG 3C INTERREG 4C Application SUCCESS NOT APPROVED PLATTFORM Article 37.6b

Potential, transnational activities and initiatives between Thüringen and Hordaland Cooperation platform:  “Communiqué” between Free State of Thuringia and Hordaland Strategic platform & funding The overall focus for the two regions is to intensify a common interest in transnational cooperation, and equally to continue a successful cooperation between Freistat Thüringen and Hordaland for nearly 20 years. For Thüringen the strategic and financial platform lies within the framework of the ERDF and ESF. For Hordaland the Regional Development Programme (RUP) is the strategic platform, and project funding is provided on basison RUP Funds. Objectives  Economic development and growth  Exchange of information, experience, good practice and results, related to selected topics, expressed in strategic documents in both regions.  Coordination of actions for the purpose of promoting innovation, and initiate new courses of action Instruments  ERDF / RUP. …: Innovation – Research – Economic Development  ESF / RUP……..: Education – Employment – Mobility

1. REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP 13 representatives) “POLICY MAKER” 2. COUNTY COUNCIL PARLIAMENT (57 politicians from 8 policital parties) ”DECISION MAKERS” 3. COUNTY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION ”ADMINISTRATORS” Project B  nasjonal  internasjonal Prosject C Project A ”Regional development program” Partner A Partner BPartner D Partner E Partner C Out- scoursing

ERDF - European Regional Development Fund Politically selected topics EU / Thüringen RUP - Regional Development Fund Politically selected topics Norway / Hordaland LEG & HCC - Dialog - Meetings - Visits - Marketing - Partner search - EU contact - Conferences Call for project proposals  ERDF Call for project proposals  RUP Partner search German partners Search for international Partners (incl. Norwegian) Project proposal Thuringen / ERDF  1. stepProject proposals Hordaland / RUP  1. step Partner search Norwegian partners Search for international Partners (incl. Norwegian) Evaluation / German partners LEG Project proposal / 1. step Evaluation / Norwegian partners HCC Project proposal / 1. step Extended project proposal Thuringen / ERDF  2 nd step Not approved Approved Not approved Evaluation / German partners Extended project proposal / 2. step Project Approved Hordaland & Thüringen Approved Dialog / meetings Dialog / meetings / visits Not approved Lars Tveit

Thüringen ERDF – projects with Norwegian partners 2 nd Call / 2009 YEAR OF CALL PROJECT TITLE (acronym) TOPICS / FOUCAL AEREAS PARTNERSBUDGETS 2009 ERDF European Micro Nano Broker Platform (EU MN Broker) Establish an Internet-based European Information- and Competanc Platform of Micro- & Nanotechnologies, based on the preliminary studies and activities performed by ”mnst brokers” 1. IMN MacroNano, Technishe Universität Ilmenau, Thüringen - DE 2. CiS Forchungsinstitut für Mikrosensorik und Photoviltaik Gmbt – Thüringen - DE 3. Betreibergesellshaft für Applikastions- und Technologiezentren Thüringen mbh BATT – DE 4. MNT Micro-Nanotechnologie Thüringen e.V. Thüringen – DE 5. Area m styria Gmbh, Steiermark - AUS 6. Universitetet i Bergen, Institutt for Fysikk & Teknologi, Bergen – NO 7. Universitè de Technologie de Compiègne, Picadie – FR 8. Conseil règional de Franche-Comitè, Franch – Comtè – FR APPROVED (SALMON) Monitoring of water quality, including biological parameters to get knowledge of the marine environment and to ensure the sustainable environmental quality of the oceans. 1. Technishe Universität Ilmenau, Institut fûr Automatisirungs- & Systemtechnik, Thüringen – DE 2. -4H- JENA enegineering GmbH, Thüringen – DE 3. Fraunhofer Anwendungszentrum Systemtechnik, Thüringen – DE 4. Norwegian Institute for Wather Research (NIVA) Bergen, Hordaland - NO NOT APPROVED (Songs2See) Develop basic technologies and interactive software applications to motivate and assist children and adolescents with music education, Interactive score sheets, instrument-specific animations and rhytmic visualizations. 1. Fraunhofer Institut für Digitale Medientechnologie, Ilmenau - DE 2. ”Sweets for Brains”, Thüringen – DE 3. Kids Interactive Gmbt Thüringen – DE 4. Grieg Musik Education AS, Hordaland – NO 5. TU Tampere, Audio Recharch Group, Länsi – Suomi – FIN 6. Høgskulen Stord / Haugesund, Hordaland - NO APPROVED

YEAR OF CALL PROJECT TITLE (acronym) TOPICS / FOUCAL AEREASPARTNERSBUDGETS 2010 ERDF Solar.Park.Statio n Development of carports for e- mobility as lightweight- structures with integrated flexible thin-film solar elements 1. Bauhaus Universität, Weimar, Thringen, DE 2. ALTEC Solartechnik, Crispendorf, Thüringen, DE 3. Jet Energie, Picardie, FR 4. Bergen Arkitektskole, Hordaland, NO NOT APPROVED SALMON Sea Water Quality Monitoring and Management 1. Technische Universitet Illmenau, Thüringen, DE 2. 4H-Jena enegineering GmbH, Thüringen, DE 3. Fraunhofer – Anwendungssentrum Systemtechnik, Thüringen, DE 4. Institute of Maritime Research, Hordaland, NO 5. Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, LT 6. University of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, DK APPROVED Data traffic Sustainable and green solutions for online media in enhanced networks 1. Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Media Technologies, Thüringen, DE 2. Franz List Hochschule für Musik Weimar, Thüringen, DE 3. Bach Technology AS, Hordaland, NO 4. Universitetet i Bergen, Inst. for Informatikk, Hordaland,NO 5. Microgenesis SA, Madrid, SP APPROVED GreenSens Development and testing of miniature sensors for measuring and regulating flowing substances (i.e. gas) on a wide range of applications. 1. Nano Analytik GmbH, Illmenau, Thüringen, DE 2. S3 Solutions Gmbh, Illmenau, Thüringen, DE 3. Techniche Universität, Illmenau, Thüringen, DE 4. University of Bergen, Dep. of Physics & Technology, Hordaland, NO 5. University of Oulu, Dep. Of Electrical & Information Engeneering, FI 6. VTT Technical Research Centre Finland, Länsi – Suomi, FI NOT APPROVED Thüringen ERDF – projects with Norwegian partners 3 rd Call / 2010

Thank you for your attention !!