About N em cut: 20 GeV neutron N(em)=0 N(em)<2 N(em)<5 N(em)<10 N(em)<20 Mean: 140.7 σ: 46.5 Mean: 152.5 σ: 34.5 Mean: 162.1 σ: 31.1 Mean: 167.6 σ: 28.8.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Geant4 simulation of roman pots A. Kupco, P. Ruzicka, M. Tasevsky.
13/02/20071 Event selection methods & First look at new PCB test Manqi Ruan Support & Discussing: Roman Advisor: Z. ZHANG (LAL) & Y. GAO (Tsinghua))
Using  0 mass constraint to improve particle flow ? Graham W. Wilson, Univ. of Kansas, July 27 th 2005 Study prompted by looking at event displays like.
A first look at the digital approach Vishnu V. Zutshi NIU/NICADD.
PFA on SiDaug05_np Lei Xia ANL-HEP. PFA outline Calibration of calorimeter –Done –Not tuned for clustering algorithm Clustering algorithm –Done: hit density.
GEM DHCAL Simulation Studies J. Yu* Univ. of Texas at Arlington ALCW, July 15, 2003 Cornell University (*on behalf of the UTA team; S. Habib, V. Kaushik,
 Performance Goals -> Motivation  Analog/Digital Comparisons  E-flow Algorithm Development  Readout R&D  Summary Optimization of the Hadron Calorimeter.
Status of MAPS Geometry Simulation Yoshinari Mikami University of Birmingham 17th MAY 2006 MAPS Meeting at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Analysis Meeting 12 th June 2007.
MINERvA Simulation - HCAL and ECAL Calorimetry Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA Collaboration Meeting, Sep 29, 2006.
MINERvA Simulation - HCAL and ECAL Calorimetry Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA Collaboration Meeting, Sep 29, 2006.
February 8th, 2007Anne-Marie Magnan - Imperial College London 1 Update on clusterisation studies for MAPS Comparison between 2 methods of clustering Geant4/LCIO.
1 Alternative Sampling Configurations – new study 20 GeV photons 30 x 5/7 X 0 20 x 5/7 X x 10/7 X 0 Total absobed energy Dep energy in Si Leakage.
Potpourri Vishnu V. Zutshi Northern Illinois University.
Results from Non-proj Geom Guilherme, Jeremy and Vishnu.
More on Testbeam Analysis FLZ. Stability Checks for TCMT Pedestal stability already shown by Kurt MIP calibration stability Response stability.
SiD Cal R. Frey1 Some EGS Studies… Compare with Geant4  Questions of range/cutoff parameters EM Resolution understood? Moliere radius – readout gap relation.
Certifying Geant4-based calorimeter simulations for the LCD Dhiman Chakraborty, Guilherme Lima, Jeremy McCormick, Vishnu Zutshi NICADD, NIU ALCWG-Cal Meeting.
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation Report Venkatesh Kaushik 1 Simulation Study of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Venkatesh Kaushik* University of Texas.
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation 2007/Feb/ ACFA ILC Workshop M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO collaborated with Acfa-Sim-J.
Oct. 22, G.Lima1 Delving Deeper into Geant4 Guilherme Lima DHCal Meeting October 22, 2003.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
8/26/02 D0 Calorimeter Task Force Stephanie Beauceron LPNHE - Paris 1 Offline zero suppression Aim: Understand the huge value of Missing E T at 1.5  Principally.
Angular resolution study of GLD Calorimeter 2006/Dec/21 ILC-sousei Annual Meeting M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO.
Status of MAPS Geometry Simulation Yoshinari Mikami University of Birmingham 21 th April 2006 MAPS Meeting at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Update on Mistag in 5GeV Single γ Events Elizabeth Brost, Jim Brau, and Chaowaroj Wanotayaroj SiD PFA Meeting 8/18/
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Two Density-based Clustering Algorithms L. Xia (ANL) V. Zutshi (NIU)
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
ILC Calorimetry Test Beam Status Lei Xia ANL HEP.
Status of Reconstruction in sidloi3 Ron Cassell 5/20/10.
1 Hadronic calorimeter simulation S.Itoh, T.Takeshita ( Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group Contents - Comparison between Scintillator and Gas - Digital.
Individual Particle Reconstruction The PFA Approach to Detector Development for the ILC Steve Magill (ANL) Norman Graf, Ron Cassell (SLAC)
Strip-splitting method for ECAL clustering K. Kawagoe (Kobe) for K. Kotera (Shinshu) CALICE meeting, Casablanca 24th September,
Tracking Variable Study Follow up Ryan Kelley Boris Mangano Vivek Sharma.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
1 Software Meeting Akiya Miyamoto KEK 17 May 2006.
Study of Calorimeter performance using the LC full simulator The 8th ACFA Workshop Yoshihiro Yamaguchi (Tsukuba U.) M. -C. Chang (RCNS, Tohoku U.) K. Fujii.
W Prototype Simulations Linear Collider Physics & Detector Meeting December 15, 2009 Christian Grefe CERN, Bonn University.
Measurement the Higgs mass via the channel: e + e - → Z H → e + e - + X & Analog vs. Digital Energy Reconstruction in the Si-W ECal Youssef KHOULAKI ILCP.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
1 Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation 2007/Feb/5 ACFA ILC Workshop M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO On behalf of the Acfa-Sim-J.
Geant4-based detector simulation activities at NICADD Guilherme Lima for the NICADD simulations group December 2003.
The reading is 7.38 mm. The reading is 7.72 mm.
Shower Fractal Dimensional Analysis at PFA Oriented Calorimeter
Feasibility of neutron asymmetry measurements with NICA MPD K
Status of Reconstruction Studies for a Realistic Detector Ron Cassell SiD Workshop Nov. 15, 2010.
On behalf of the Acfa-Sim-J Group
Parameterisation of EM showers in the ATLAS LAr Calorimeter
Dual Readout Clustering and Jet Finding
Hadronic Shower Structure in WHCAL Prototype
slicPandora: slic + pandoraPFANew
Starting up the CLIC detector design study CLIC Workshop, 15. Okt 2008
Preliminary Results on Non-Projective HCal Simulations
Mokka vs. LCDG4 Comparison
Stand Alone Simulation & Particle Gun Generator
MDC Simulation & Digitization
Mokka vs. LCDG4 Comparison
Argonne National Laboratory
Forward-Backward Asymmetry Study in
Song LIANG ihep.ac.cn CMS-IHEP, China
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
Some EGS Studies… Compare with Geant4 Questions of range/cutoff
Practice Geometry Practice
Presentation transcript:

About N em cut: 20 GeV neutron N(em)=0 N(em)<2 N(em)<5 N(em)<10 N(em)<20 Mean: σ: 46.5 Mean: σ: 34.5 Mean: σ: 31.1 Mean: σ: 28.8 Mean: σ: 27.9 We get better knowledge of energy resolution, when allowing some small number of hits in ECAL

SiD vs. stand alone G4 simulation GeV Mean σ σ/M (σ/M) x√E GeV Mean σ σ/M (σ/M) x√E Stand alone G4 (34 layers) GeV Mean σ σ/M (σ/M) x√E GeV Mean σ σ/M (σ/M) x√E KL0KL0KL0KL0 neutron SiD Projection geometry 7.4mm – 12mm cell size Fixed cell size 10mm 7.0mm fixed cell size: 10 GeV pi- N hits (σ) = 93.9 (17.4) 10.mm fixed cell size: 10 GeV pi- N hits (σ) = 86.6 (16.5)

Number of hit vs. average cell size Cell size = 7.4mm x ( r (mm)/ 1410.mm), average over one event Average 7.4 – 8.2 mmAverage 8.8 – 9.2 mm Average 9.8 – 10.2 mmAverage 10.8 – 12. mm Mean: 34.6 σ: %/√E Mean: 31.5 σ: %/√E

Number of hit vs. average cell size Average 8.8 – 10.2 mm All Mean: 33.9 σ: %/√E Mean: 32.3 σ: %/√E

Neutron – KL response K_L N N N Number of hits Number of hits Number of hits Total E (GeV) K.E. (GeV) P (GeV) Neutron and K_L gives different response