Turning Data Into Action: Using Data to Drive Service, Program and Policy Decisions In Children’s Behavioral Health Services In Maine James T. Yoe, PhD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DDRS Health Homes Initiative: Meeting the Triple Aim through Care Coordination. Shane Spotts Director, Indiana Division of Rehabilitation Services May.
Advertisements

A Service Delivery Strategy for Colorados System of Care Draft July 11, 2012.
Accessing Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services in Washtenaw County Barrier Busters Presentation July 24, 2013.
1 NM Behavioral Health Collaborative New Mexico Behavioral Health Plan for Children, Youth and Their Families March 2007.
Planning for the Future: Understand DMH-DD Systems and Service Options Presented By: Kadesh Burnett; St. Louis County Regional Office Family Support Coordinator.
Tropical Texas Behavioral Health Tropical Texas Behavioral Health provides quality behavioral healthcare with respect, dignity and cultural sensitivity,
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
A Trauma-Informed Answer
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
1 Child Welfare Reform Council August 5, 2014 Transition of Children in Foster Care, Receiving Adoption Assistance and Select Youth in Juvenile Justice.
CSHCS Strategic Planning Michigan Issues George Baker, MD I. CSHCN Definition II. System of Care.
Children’s Mental Health System Change Initiative COSA Conference March 10, 2006 Bill Bouska Matthew Pearl Office of Mental Health & Addiction Services.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
Illinois Children’s Healthcare Foundation CHILDREN’S MENTAL HEALTH INITIATIVE Building Systems of Care: Community by Community Fostering Creativity Through.
Collaborative Mental Health Care Pilot Program Bidder’s Conference October 27, 2014.
Integrating Service Needs for Homeless Children in a Medical Home Christine Achre, MA, LCPC.
Community Services - Eligibility  In order for DMH to reimburse care, the individual must meet both financial and clinical eligibility criteria.  These.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
Children’s Mental Health Crisis Response Services Presentation to the Allied Health Caucus, Virginia General Assembly February 24, 2012.
Pre-work Baseline Data Analysis I. Quality Measures (Annual Dental, Dental Varnishing, ED Utilization, WCV) II. New Measures (BMI, ABCD, Autism, Soc-Emot)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH ADULT SYSTEMS OF CARE – JAIL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT Full Service Partnership.
Preventing Family Crisis Finding the Assistance that your Family Needs.
Overview of Systems of Care Susan Steckel, MSSW Early Connections Network Director Tennessee Department of Mental Health Tennessee Prevention Advisory.
Hamilton County Mental Health and Recovery Services Board Provider Meeting Transforming the Hamilton County System of Care and Community for Transitional.
West Coast University NURS 204
Michael D. Pullmann, Eric J. Bruns, Univerisity of Washington Jody Levison-Johnson, Keith Durham, Louisiana DHH – OBH EVALUATING YOUTH AND SYSTEM OUTCOMES.
Massachusetts Behavioral Health Partnership / ValueOptions
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Joe Vesowate Assistant Commissioner.
Medicaid and Behavioral Health – New Directions John O’Brien Senior Policy Advisor Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group Center for Medicaid and CHIP.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Family Care Community Partnerships (FCCP) Selected Logic Model Outcomes in the System of Care CY14 1 st and 2 nd Quarters Rhode Island Department of Children,
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
A System of Care for Children’s Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base Using the System of Care Practice Review (SOCPR) to Facilitate System Transformation.
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: What do the Data Tell Us? Recovery Community Services Program Grantee Meeting December 14, 2007.
Children’s Mental Health Reform Overview: North Sound Mental Health Administration Prepared by Julie de Losada, M.S./CMHS
Background Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide a coordinated and comprehensive array of community-based services and supports to families.
1 Minnesota Medical Home Project: Evaluation Feasibility Study Saturday, June 7, 2008 SHRIG Meeting, Academy Health.
Behavioral Health DATA BOOK A quarterly reference to community mental health and substance abuse services Fiscal Year 2010 Quarter 2 March 30, 2010.
ADOLESCENTS IN CRISIS: WHEN TO ADMIT FOR SELF-HARM OR AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR Kristin Calvert.
1. 2 Objectives Explore the impact of trauma and complex trauma Compare and discuss the practices of trauma informed care vs. non-trauma informed care.
Services Overview: Mental Health/Substance Use Disorders Programs and Managed Care Plans 1 Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans (MCP) County Mental Health Plan.
Child/Youth Care Management 2015 training. WELCOME!
Rhode Island Health Home Initiative NASHP 24 th Annual State Health Policy Conference, October 4, 2011 Deborah J. Florio, Administrator Medicaid Division.
Family Care Community Partnerships (FCCP) Selected Logic Model Outcomes in the System of Care CY15 1 st and 2 nd Quarters Rhode Island Department of Children,
THE KATIE A SETTLEMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR CalSWEC Child Welfare Committee Mental Health Committee Oakland February, 2012.
Family Care Community Partnerships (FCCP) Selected Logic Model Outcomes in the System of Care CY14 3 rd and 4 th Quarters Rhode Island Department of Children,
Introduction SOCPR Objectives Document experiences of children with SED and their families enrolled in systems of care. Document adherence to the system.
Fostering Local and National Collaboration to Support Continuous Quality Improvement Angela Sheehan, ORC Macro Beth Dague, Project Director, Project Tapestry.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
Behavioral Health DATA BOOK A quarterly reference to community mental health and substance abuse services Fiscal Year 2015 Quarter 1 March 10, 2015
NY START Systemic, Therapeutic, Assessment, Resources, and Treatment January 2016.
System of Care-Overview Principles and Values. Coordinated System of Care Team An initiative of Governor Bobby Jindal Office of Juvenile Justice Department.
The NC Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Planning Grant DIVISION OF MH/DD/SAS.
March 2004 HIGH COST MEDICAID PATIENTS An Analysis of New York City Medicaid High Cost Patients Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service Center.
Keeping our Commitments to Collaborative Children’s Services.
Influence of Trauma on Service Use and Expenditures for Children with Emotional & Behavioral Challenges James T. Yoe, Ph.D. Rachel Posner, Ph.D. Cynthia.
Behavioral Health Transition to Managed Care Update APRIL 2015 Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHC) Planning Grant and Demonstration.
Jennifer Havens, MD Director, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Bellevue Hospital Center.
House HSS - 1 Bringing (Keeping) the Kids Home Update – February 2009 A collaboration of Department of Health and Social Services, Alaska Mental Health.
1 Bring (& Keep) the Kids Home (BTKH) An update related to Education February 2009 A collaboration of Department of Health and Social Services, Alaska.
1 Child and Family Teaming (CFT) Module 1 Developing an Effective Child and Family Team.
Family Run Executive director leadership Association – FREDLA
Behavioral Health DATA BOOK A quarterly reference to community mental health and substance abuse services Fiscal Year 2012  Quarter 2  April.
Foster Care Managed Care Program
MORES Mobile Outreach Response Engagement Stabilization Service
So far, we have covered: Adolescent Development
Assessing Your System of Care: The System of Care Rating Tool
The context Child welfare New World order
Presentation transcript:

Turning Data Into Action: Using Data to Drive Service, Program and Policy Decisions In Children’s Behavioral Health Services In Maine James T. Yoe, PhD Douglas Patrick, LCSW, JD Lindsey Tweed, MD Maine Department of Health and Human Services Presentation at 23 rd Annual Children’s Mental Health Research and Policy Conference Tampa, Florida March 8, 2010

Turning Data Into Action: The Goals  Review key state-level administrative data sources and strategies for developing and using data to evaluate specific service and system level questions and issues  Review three examples of collaborative studies that were used to examine service, cost, and individual child/family outcomes and discuss key findings and how the results were used to guide system/service change efforts  Discuss key ingredients for successfully using data to drive targeted service and system change efforts

Children’s Behavioral Health Services In Maine Highlights

Children’s Behavioral Health Services: Guiding Principles strengths 1. Services based on the family’s and child’s strengths 2. Families 2. Families are full participants in all aspects of planning and delivery of services comprehensive array 3. Children have access to a comprehensive array of services that meet the child’s physical, emotional, educational and social needs individualized 4. Children receive individualized services guided by an individualized service plan (ISP) least restrictive, most normative environment 5. Children receive services in the least restrictive, most normative environment that is clinically possible integrated services 6. Children receive integrated services with linkages between agencies 7. Early identification and intervention 7. Early identification and intervention for children with emotional problems should be promoted smooth transitions to adult service systems 8. Children are ensured smooth transitions to adult service systems as they reach maturity rights 9. The rights of children should be protected and effective advocacy efforts for emotionally disturbed children and youth be promoted without regard to race, religion, national origin, sex, physical disability or other characteristics sensitive and responsive to cultural differences 10. Children receive services without regard to race, religion, national origin, sex, physical disability or other characteristics and services should be sensitive and responsive to cultural differences

Children’s Behavioral Health Services: Target Populations  Children with Emotional and/or Behavioral Disorders  Children with Developmental Disabilities or Severe Developmental Delays  Children with Mental Retardation or Autism

Children’s Behavioral Health Services: The Service Array  Emergency/Crisis Resolution Services  Targeted Case Management  Outpatient Services  Outpatient Psychotherapeutic Assessment and Treatment  Outpatient Medication Assessment and Treatment  In-Home Treatment Services  Home and Community-Based Treatment  Children’s Assertive Community Teams (ACT)  Day Treatment Services  Children’s Habilitation Services  Out of Home Residential Treatment Services (PNMI)  Inpatient Psychiatric Hospital Treatment  Community Hospital Psychiatric Units  Psychiatric Inpatient Hospitals

Study 1: The Big Picture Examining Public Mental Health Service Use and Costs Among Children & Adolescents in Maine

Study Purpose  Develop methodology to accurately identify and extract MaineCare paid claims for children and youth diagnosed with mental health and/or substance abuse challenges and specifically members that used one or more of the identified Core Children’s Mental Health Services  This analysis specifically focuses on the characteristics of children and youth receiving Children’s Behavioral Health Services and examines MaineCare (Medicaid) service use patterns and expenditures over a two-year study period

Children and Youth: Age and Gender Unduplicated Count (FY ) N = 30,271 Average Age: Male = Female = Total = Percent Child Service Users

Children and Youth: Primary Diagnosis Unduplicated Count (FY ) N = 30,271

Children and Youth: Diagnosis By Gender Percent Child Service Users Unduplicated Count (FY ) N = 30,271

Children and Youth: Comparison of Children With and Without Child Welfare Experience Gender Child Welfare Non-Child Welfare Females46.0%44.9% Males54.0%55.1% Age 0 to 3 Years8.3%3.1% 4 to 5 Years8.4%6.5% 6 to 12 Years32.1%38.7% 13 to 18 Years46.3%38.1% 19 to 21 Years4.9%13.7% Mean Age (Years)* Diagnostic Category Conduct Related5.0%5.6% Stress/Adjustment*42.4%23.7% Neurotic/Depressive*19.2%22.8% Major Mood9.7%10.4% Other Psychotic*4.7%8.1% ADHD Related*14.0%18.9% Substance Abuse*3.5%7.6% * P <.05

Children and Youth: Service Array and Utilization Unduplicated Count (2007)N = 21,520 Unduplicated Count (2008)N = 22,712

Children and Youth: Service Costs Total Expenditures (FY2008) = $216,650,340

Mental Health Service Use: Comparison of Children with and without Child Welfare Experience + Unduplicated Count (2008)N = 22,712 Child Welfare N = 1,817 CBHS Only N = 20,895 Percent Child Service Users

Summary of Results  A total of 30,271 children received a core MaineCare mental health service during the two-year study period – 21,520 in FY 2007 and 22,172 in FY 2008 – accounting for 14.5% of eligible children in 2007  Most children (77%) were between the ages of 6 and 18 years with more males represented in the younger age groups and more females in older age groups  Most common diagnoses were: Stress/Adjustment (24%), Neurotic/Other Depression (23%), and ADHD related (19%)  Males were more likely to receive Conduct, ADHD, and Other Psychotic related diagnoses  Females were more likely to receive Stress/Adjustment and Mood Related diagnoses  Inpatient Psychiatric Hospital and Out-of-Home Residential Treatment accounted for 60% of the overall mental health expenditures in FY 2008 and represented 13% of child service users  Children in the Child Welfare system were more likely to use inpatient psychiatric, residential, medication management, outpatient, crisis intervention, in-home behavioral, and Children ACT services  Most frequently used services in 2007 and 2008 included: Outpatient-Clinical Services (53%, 54%), Targeted Case Management (33%, 31%), Hospital Related Outpatient Treatment (36%) and Medication Assessment & Treatment (21%, 20%)

Study II: Results of a Pre-Post Study of Service and Cost Outcomes Exploring Children’s Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) & Home and Community-Based Treatment Services (HCT)

Study Purpose  Explore MaineCare mental health service use and expenditure trends for children and youth enrolled in Children’s Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) and Home and Community- Based Treatment Services (HCT)  Compare changes in mental health service use and costs pre and post enrollment in service between ACT and HCT  Develop a descriptive profile of child and youth users of these services

ACT/HCT Study Target Services  Children’s Assertive Community Treatment  Home & Community-Based Treatment  Outpatient Clinical Treatment  Emergency Crisis Resolution Services  Outpatient Medication Assessment and Treatment  Out-of-Home Residential Treatment Services  Hospital Inpatient Treatment  Community Hospital Psychiatric Units  Psychiatric Inpatient Hospitals  Hospital Emergency Room Services for MH Reason

Children and Youth: Age and Gender Average Age: Male = Female = Total = Unduplicated Count N = 336 Percent Child Service Users

Children and Youth: Age and Gender Average Age: Male = Female = Total = Unduplicated Count N = 1,953 Percent Child Service Users

ACT/HCT Study Period: Service Use ACT Services  336 children received treatment during the study period  No ACT services received for 6 months pre-treatment  2 post treatment time periods created:  Months 1 to 6 (Post 1)  Months 7 to 12 (Post 2)  253 children received and left ACT Treatment during first 6 months post treatment with an average length of treatment of 3.83 months HCT Services  1,972 children received treatment during the study period  No HCT services received 6 months pre-treatment  2 post treatment time periods created:  Months 1 to 6 (Post 1)  Months 7 to 12 (Post 2)  1,091 children received and left HCT Treatment during first 6 months post treatment with an average length of treatment of 3.33 months

ACT Pre-Post Service Use: Selected Mental Health Services Unduplicated Count N = 336 Percent Child Service Users

HCT Pre-Post Service Use: Selected Mental Health Services Unduplicated Count N = 1,972 Percent Child Service Users

HCT and ACT Study Users: Pre-Post Average Costs Services HCT (n=1,972) ACT (n=336) Pre-Entry (6 mos.) to Tx: Avg. Cost per HCT User Post HCT (1-6 mos.) to Tx: Avg. Cost per HCT User Post HCT (7-12 mos.) to Tx: Avg. Cost per HCT User Pre-Entry (6 mos.) to Tx: Avg. Cost per ACT User Post ACT (1-6 mos.) to Tx: Avg. Cost per ACT User Post ACT (7-12 mos.) to Tx: Avg. Cost per ACT User ACT Services$41$29$111$0$9,192$1,094 HCT Services$0$4,894$1,525$131$45$219 Crisis Resolution & Support $268$205$148$471$563$212 Crisis Stabilization Unit$113$99$49$29$93$11 Residential (PNMI) Services $3,070$1,731$3,036$5,221$3,391$5,019 Inpatient Psychiatric$3,462$2,854$2,156$4,175$4,780$2,614 Emergency Room - Psychiatric $50$45$36$84$89$49 Medication Assessment & Tx $157$189$116$148$40$119 All Mental Health Services $10,319$13,441$9,571$12,430$19,571$11,345

Results: ACT/HCT Mental Health Service Use  Compared to HCT participants, ACT service users were significantly more likely to use:  Crisis Resolution and Support Services  Residential (PNMI) Services  Inpatient Psychiatric Services  Emergency Rooms for MH Reason  Medication Assessment and Treatment Services

ACT/HCT Results: ACT/HCT Pre-Post Service Use  Among ACT users, the use of:  Inpatient Psychiatric Treatment, Crisis Intervention, and Emergency Rooms decreased between pre and post study periods, while  Use of residential treatment did not decrease significantly between pre-post study period  Among HCT users, similar to ACT, the use of:  Inpatient Psychiatric Treatment, Crisis Intervention and Emergency rooms decreased between pre and post study periods, while  Use of residential treatment did not decrease significantly between pre-post study period

Study Results: Cost of Services ACT Cost Summary  Overall ACT service costs for ACT study users (n=336) for the 12- month post treatment period was $3,456,097 with an average per child cost of $10,286  Overall mental health service costs (including ACT) for ACT study users over the 12-month post treatment period was $10,387,834 with a per user cost of $30,916 – nearly 3x the annual cost of the overall CBHS service group at $11,175 HCT Cost Summary  Overall HCT service costs for HCT study users (n=1,972) for the 12-month post treatment period was $12,658,100 with an average per HCT user cost of $6,419  Overall mental health service costs (including HCT) for HCT Study users over the 12-month post treatment period was $45,380,000 with a per user cost of $23,012 – nearly 2x the annual cost of the overall CBHS service group at $11,175

Study III: Exploring Services, Costs, and Outcomes Influence of Trauma on Service Use, Costs and Outcomes for Children with Emotional and Behavioral Challenges

Study Hypotheses  Child and youth trauma survivors will be more likely to:  Use and will use more high-cost psychiatric inpatient, crisis stabilization, and residential treatment services  Use and will use more public mental health services and supports at higher expense  Use and will use more general health/medical services at higher expense  Exhibit less functional improvement as a result of services received

Study Selection Criteria Study Sample: Selection Criteria  Sample of 492 children and adolescents enrolled in Targeted Case Management Services in FY 2000 and FY 2001  Study sample was divided into two groups: 1.Identified trauma experience group (n=227) 2.Non-trauma experience group (n=265)  All study participants were enrolled in Targeted Case Management Services for at least 12 months with functional and/or behavioral assessments completed at baseline at 6 months and 12 months  All study participants were active Medicaid recipients with at least some mental health service use during FY 2000 or FY 2001

Children and Youth: Comparison of Children With and Without Trauma Experience Gender Trauma Non-Trauma Females32.6%29.8% Males67.4%70.2% Age Under 10 Years27.3%17.7% 10 to 12 Years24.2%28.3% 13 to 15 Years29.1%22.6% 15 years and Older19.4%31.3% Mean Age (Years)* Diagnostic Category Adjusted Related Disorder4.8%3.4% Conduct/Opposition Disorders20.7%24.5% Anxiety Disorders (non-PTSD)**0.9%5.3% Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder27.3%0.0% ADHD/ADD**16.3%27.5% Bipolar Illness/Affective Psychosis13.7%15.5% Depression13.7%18.1% Psychosis1.3%3.8% Substance Abuse6.6%7.9% Other1.3%1.9% * P <.05 ** P <.01

Trauma and Non-Trauma Groups: Comparison of Baseline Behavioral/Functional Profiles CALOCUS Subscales CALOCUS Subscales + Groups differ significantly, p <

Trauma and Non-Trauma Groups: Comparison of Mental Health Service Use Service Area Trauma Identified (n=227) Non-Trauma (n=265) Odds Ratio Crisis Outreach56.4%44.9%1.59** Crisis Residential13.7%7.2%2.05** Inpatient Psychiatric Services41.9%30.6%1.63** Residential/Group Treatment Services31.3%21.9%1.62** Out-of-Home Treatment59.9%43.8%1.92** Outpatient/Clinical Services76.7%67.9%1.55** Medication Management61.7%47.9%1.75** Substance Abuse Treatment10.1%9.8%1.04** Behavioral Health Pharmacy84.6%84.5%0.97** Targeted Case Management100.0% In-Home Behavioral Services58.6%52.8%1.26** Intensive Home-Based Services26.9%20.0%1.47** Community Support Services27.3%21.9%1.34** Day Treatment Services6.6%4.5%1.49** MR/DD Services1.8%3.8%0.46** ** Odds ratio significant, p <.01* Odds ratio significant, p <.05

Trauma and Non-Trauma Groups: Comparison of Behavioral/Functional Change Between Baseline and 12 Months + Groups differ significantly, p <

Results Summary: Service Use, Expenditures, Outcomes Child and youth trauma survivors:  Were significantly more likely to use high-end mental health services, including: inpatient psychiatric hospitalization, residential/group treatment, and crisis intervention services at significantly higher cost  1.92 times more likely to use out-of-home treatment  1.55 times more likely to use outpatient mental health treatment services  1.75 times more likely to use medication management services  1.61 times more likely to use and used more emergency department services  Used more targeted case management services at significantly higher expense  Used outpatient-clinical and medication management services at significantly higher cost  Had 75% higher health service expenditures and 51% higher overall treatment expenditures  Were significantly less likely to exhibit behavioral/functional stability or improvement over the study period Than children and youth without a trauma history

Key Ingredients: Turning Data into Action  Access to data and analytic capacity to use it effectively  Ability to link administrative data sets, for example:  Child welfare data  Medicaid paid claims data  Child functional outcome data  Standard methods for extracting data and identifying service populations, grouping services/procedures, etc.  Understand stakeholder/user needs and the service system context  Partnerships with State child serving offices, family and/or stakeholder organizations, and policy makers  Involve stakeholders in all aspects of the evaluation, such as:  Planning/design  Analysis  Interpretation of the results  Create multiple forums/venues for feedback, review and discussion of data focused topics  Provide consultation and technical assistance on the appropriate use and interpretation of the data to drive quality improvement  Organizational support and culture for using data

Children’s Behavioral Health Services: Data Driven Policy & Service System Initiatives  Contract established with Administrative Services Organization for MaineCare Behavioral Health Services since December 2007  Development and implementation of a Trauma-Informed System of Care (THRIVE Initiative) and implementation System of Care Principles statewide  Implementation of two trauma-specific evidence-based treatments in THRIVE SOC, including: TF-CBT and Child Parent Psychotherapy  Target resources to increase the use of effective, intensive community- based treatments and reduce the use of high cost, out-of-home treatment  Initiation of Child Steps, an evidence-based mental health research project in three Maine clinics to evaluate the effectiveness of manualized clinical interventions and use of “family partners” for children ages 8 to 14  Mental health screening of all children who have contact with Child Welfare System  Enhance the role of families and youth at all levels of CBHS program operations, including: policy development, quality improvement activities and training

Contact Information James T. Yoe, PhD Director, Maine Department of Health & Human Services Office of Continuous Quality Improvement Services Douglas Patrick, JD, LCSW Children’s Behavioral Health Community Systems Manager Office of Child & Family Services Children’s Behavioral Health Services