Campus Core Research Facilities Teri Melese Director of Research Technologies and Corporate Alliances UCSF School of Medicine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Step 4: Strategy Implementation. Learning Objectives Understand the elements and benefits of developing an action plan Value the involvement of internal.
Advertisements

Training/Technical Assistance RFP information. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grant U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) Administration.
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
National Health Policy Forum William Winkenwerder, Jr., M.D. Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) January 28, 2004.
Five Guiding Themes Provide Civic Leadership through Partnerships --Lead as a civic partner, deepen our engagement as a critical community asset, demonstrate.
SEM Planning Model.
Analysis and Next Steps. Summary Nevada’s final score of ranks 24 out of the 36 states that applied Among the ten grant recipients,
Chapter 14 Assessing the Value of IT. Traditional Financial Approaches  ROI – Return on Investments Each area is considered an investment center ROI.
1 Academic Senate May 16, 2011 Pre-award Implementation The Principles Proposed Governance Performance/Metrics Programmatic Groupings for Pre-award Teams.
0 Private and Confidential Team Presentations Finance and Infrastructure & IT Track Team Dr. M. Abul-Hamayel Dr. Musa Sayyad Dr. Ma’an Kousa Mr. Shaibu.
(Your hospital’s format/logo) Hospital X Strategic Energy Management Plan 20__ to 20__ Executive Summary NAME(S) Title(s)
Biomedical Research Core Facilities Cassandra Wong Administrative Director Nov. 1, 2011.
Chapter 11.  The board is ultimately responsible for risk management  Oversee strategic risks, operational risks, and financial risks  Many federal.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
IT Governance Steering Committee December 2, 2010.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
Information Systems Planning
Group March18 March19 March 4:00 pm 5:30 pm Checklist of problems Checklist of objectives based on the problems identified Examine the case Brainstorming.
1 APPENDIX A Cluster 1 Modifications and Cluster 2 Design September 2009 HR Solutions Center.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
UCSF IT Update November 2013 Presenter: Joe Bengfort.
IT Governance Committee on Education Technology December 9, 2010.
February 3, Strategic Planning Update University Senate February 3, 2003.
Strategic Management of IS/IT: Organization and Resources
UCSF HUMAN RESOURCES SERVING THE ACADEMIC AND STAFF COMMUNITY School of Medicine Faculty Council, June 21, 2012.
Integrated Human Resources Information Systems: Presentation to COIT December 4, 2006 Philip A. Ginsburg, Human Resources Director Charles Thompson, Interim.
BEFORE TRAILS AFTER TRAILS 75 total miles 50 connected miles 250 mile vision.
BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE: Research & Professional Development for Improving “Academic Fundamentals” Background/HistoryBackground/History Research PhaseResearch.
Fred H. Cate Vice President for Research September 18, 2015 Grand Challenges.
Rutgers University Libraries Reorganization March 3, 2006 Marianne Gaunt University Librarian.
Alter – Information Systems © 2002 Prentice Hall 1 The Process of Information System Planning.
战略规划 北京银行. Definitions SBU is the abbreviation for Strategic Business Unit What we have studied so far are SBUs, because each has a unique SBU Strategy.
Implementing Strategies: Marketing, Finance/Accounting, R&D, and MIS Issues Chapter 6.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Award Monitoring Update National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations October 22, 2003 Mary Santonastasso, Director, Division.
The Regionalization Project New Regional Field Coordinator Orientation.
IT Governance Committee on Education Technology January 13, 2011.
Recharge and Related Issues Basic Core Financial Structure University Rules for Recharge Operations Incongruities Dan Pinkel November 6, 2007.
MATOC Trial Phase Dec 2008 to Jun 2009 Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Richard W. Steeg, PE Chair MATOC Steering Committee VDOT Regional.
Huron Consulting Report: Review of Oversight & Compliance for Research-Intensive ISOs CRAD Meeting April 23, 2015.
Libraries NI Irene Knox Chief Executive. Delivering Tomorrow’s Libraries Lifelong learning, formal and informal Access to digital skills and services.
State Budget and Election Fall 2010 University Priorities Questions/comments/discussion.
OIT Reorganization August 27, Today’s Agenda Principles of Reorganization Survey Feedback Organization Chart Leadership Team Structure Items to.
Total Cost of Ownership for Technology Resources at Mission College Description and Recommendations.
UPDATE TO THE IT GOVERNANCE STEERING COMMITTEE BY THE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY (CBT) NOVEMBER 1, 2012.
New Frameworks for Strategic Enrollment Management Planning
Changing Perspectives on Workforce System Performance Workforce Innovations Conference July 2004 Employment and Training Administration Performance and.
Community Budget Forum FY 2015 Budget Development Dr. Patrick K. Murphy, Superintendent Deirdra McLaughlin, Assistant Superintendent, Finance & Management.
Meeting of the Finance Committee New Internal Financial Model November 8, 2012.
IT Governance Committee on Research Technology December 9, 2010.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Office of Core and Shared Resources Faculty Council Meeting October 9, 2012.
1 February 23, 2015 Teresa A. Costantinidis Budget and Resource Management UCSF Facilities & Administration Presentation.
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
Spring,  STEP ONE: Core Services Matrix  Each administrative and student support department (including division offices) will complete a core.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Estates across STFC This presentation is to give PPD the opportunity to respond to proposals for the future management of Estates across STFC The proposals.
The Role of Higher Education in Promoting Stability in Afghanistan Joseph B. Berger Center for International Education (CIE) University of Massachusetts.
Presentation to the Finance and Administration Advisory Group ▸Implementing a New Space Request Process ▸Process for requesting additional space.
Risk Differentiation in LFA Deliverables LFA Finance Training October-November 2013.
Superior Infrastructure – Phase One Lenora Chapman & Michelle Stevenson Presenting.
Forward Together: UW Madison’s Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee Shared Governance (Faculty, staff,
Role Responsibilities
RF Service Centers RF Symposium March 24, 2015.
Strategic Planning Committee 2017 Year End Update
Portfolio Management Approach-Research infrastructure Projects
By Jeff Burklo, Director
VisionVisionVi The Simulation program:
Project Management Method and PMI ® PMBOK ® Roles
Presentation transcript:

Campus Core Research Facilities Teri Melese Director of Research Technologies and Corporate Alliances UCSF School of Medicine

My Experience Running Cores 4 years at Cancer Center with responsibility for business oversight of 12 cores Wrote standard operating procedures with Directors, Managers and Finance Staff Commissioned development and implementation of online system for scheduling, ordering and tracking work performed in cores Received expanded authority from Budget Office to operate cores

Core Research Facilities Provide advanced, innovative instrumentation and/or specialized services beyond the reach of individual investigators The current situation: Cores have been developed ad hoc by departments, ORUs, programs, clusters of investigators to address specific needs Cores have been developed ad hoc by departments, ORUs, programs, clusters of investigators to address specific needs Lack of central information produces overlapping services and competition, insufficient user base, differential access and recharges, poor administrative practices Lack of central information produces overlapping services and competition, insufficient user base, differential access and recharges, poor administrative practices Cores lack resources to update instruments, or for staff to develop new technological capabilities Cores lack resources to update instruments, or for staff to develop new technological capabilities Lack of central oversight compromises quality and needs assessments, decision-making to expand or downsize Lack of central oversight compromises quality and needs assessments, decision-making to expand or downsize

Campus Core Research Facilities (CCRFs) Provide instrumentation and services needed by broad segment of research community; available to all Campus-wide organizational needs: Coordinated oversight and decision-making for designating and evaluating CCRFs, strategic planning, prioritization Coordinated oversight and decision-making for designating and evaluating CCRFs, strategic planning, prioritization Sound business practices that ensure economic success and responsible delivery of services Sound business practices that ensure economic success and responsible delivery of services Continuous acquisition and creation of new instrumentation and development of new capabilities Continuous acquisition and creation of new instrumentation and development of new capabilities

Genomics: benefits accruing from first CCRF Consolidated administration, services across facilities at PH, MB, MtZ, Gladstone: 9 positions eliminated Consolidated administration, services across facilities at PH, MB, MtZ, Gladstone: 9 positions eliminated Eliminated service redundancies, releasing space and funds to establish new service capabilities Eliminated service redundancies, releasing space and funds to establish new service capabilities Reduced equipment redundancies, allowing increased services, reduced costs Reduced equipment redundancies, allowing increased services, reduced costs Brought together campus experts in genomic technologies, enhancing service and education Brought together campus experts in genomic technologies, enhancing service and education Coordination of financial management, expanded authority for rate adjustments that better reflect actual use Coordination of financial management, expanded authority for rate adjustments that better reflect actual use Mechanism to coordinate needs assessments and assure broad campus constituency Mechanism to coordinate needs assessments and assure broad campus constituency

Coordinating Services Allowed New Technologies & Focused User-base Precoordination Gladstone –Affymetrix expression arrays BRC –Sequencing (old technology) Cancer Center –Sequencing (old technology) –Quantitative PCR –Small scale genotyping Human Genetics –Sequencing (new technology) –Large scale genotyping –Quantitative PCR Cancer Center –CGH Postcoordination Gladstone –Affymetrix expression arrays (few) –Affymetrix Genotyping (transition from Kwok lab) BRC –Sequencing (old technology) Cancer Center –Sequencing (old technology) –Sequenome/methylation –Quantitative PCR –Small scale genotyping Human Genetics –Sequencing (new technology) –Large scale genotyping (Illumina) –Quantitative PCR Cancer Center –CGH

Proposed CCRF management and support structure Director: oversees business and operations administration, coordinates acquisition of resources Director: oversees business and operations administration, coordinates acquisition of resources Faculty Steering Committee: works with Director, strategic planning, evaluate existing CCRFs, establish or terminate CCRFs Faculty Steering Committee: works with Director, strategic planning, evaluate existing CCRFs, establish or terminate CCRFs Centralized, web-based business management system for oversight of operations, tracking of services, recharge collection Centralized, web-based business management system for oversight of operations, tracking of services, recharge collection Costs of services to be covered by recharge income within three years of CCRF establishment Costs of services to be covered by recharge income within three years of CCRF establishment Institutional support required for capital equipment acquisition and updating, professional staff development of new capabilities, education of users Institutional support required for capital equipment acquisition and updating, professional staff development of new capabilities, education of users

CCRF proposal to Executive Budget Committee Funds to set up CCRF administrative structure, and to establish three CCRFs (genomics, mass spectrometry, biostatistical analysis): $4.2 million over three years Funds to set up CCRF administrative structure, and to establish three CCRFs (genomics, mass spectrometry, biostatistical analysis): $4.2 million over three years Anticipate needs for perhaps three more CCRFs (e.g., imaging, flow cytometry, transgenic/targeted mutagenesis): ~~$1-1.5 million/ yr Anticipate needs for perhaps three more CCRFs (e.g., imaging, flow cytometry, transgenic/targeted mutagenesis): ~~$1-1.5 million/ yr Other institutions? Some doing nothing, some doing more Other institutions? Some doing nothing, some doing more Expect substantial return in increased indirect cost Expect substantial return in increased indirect cost A crucial institutional “value added” for the research potential of UCSF faculty, students, staff A crucial institutional “value added” for the research potential of UCSF faculty, students, staff