March 31, 20041 Status of the TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detector Packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Laboratory Mice Collaboration Meeting March.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Simulation Status/Plans Malcolm Ellis Sci Fi Tracker Meeting Imperial College, 10 th September 2004.
Advertisements

PID activities 1. Summary of work/activities since last CM in Berkeley 2. PID parallel session in Frascati 3. Topics specific to each subdetector CKOV1.
FIGURE OF MERIT FOR MUON IONIZATION COOLING Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 28 July 2004.
1 Scintillating Fibre Tracker Simulation Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Tuesday 9 th March 2004.
Particle ID in the MICE Beamline MICE Collaboration Meeting 30 March Paul Soler, Kenny Walaron University of Glasgow and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
1 EMCal & PID Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 26/6-05.
1 PID, emittance and cooling measurement Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE Analysis phone conference.
Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.
SLIDE Beam measurements using the MICE TOF counters Analysis meeting, 23 September 2008 Mark Rayner.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
1 Downstream PID update Rikard Sandström PID phone conference
Analysis Meeting – – Slide 1 Beam momentum measurement using TOFs: progress report Analysis Meeting, February 2008 Mark Rayner.
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
Alain Blondel MICE: Constraints on the solenoids 2.Field Homogeneity: or ? this will be dictated by the detector requirements. TPG will be.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
Sci Fi Simulation Status Malcolm Ellis MICE Meeting Osaka, 2 nd August 2004.
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
Global Particle Identification Software Requirements Steve Kahn Mice Collaboration Meeting 31 March 2004.
Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Reconstruction & a little about Online Monitoring Linda R. Coney 18 August, 2009.
Status report about the e-  identifier Study of shielding against the stray magnetic field at the downstream end of the spectrometer F. Huveneers, Gh.
Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
GlueX Simulations Status Report on CD3 geometry Richard Jones GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, January 10-12, 2008.
MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
Software parallel session summary MICE collaboration meeting INFN, Frascati 27/6-05.
Diffuser in G4MICE Victoria Blackmore 09/03/10 Analysis Meeting 1/8.
1 Losses in the Cooling Channel Malcolm Ellis PID Meeting 1 st March 2005.
Progress and plans on PID simulation and reconstruction Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university St. Kliment Ohridski.
1Malcolm Ellis - Software Meeting - 31st May 2006 Data Challenge Requirements  First list of requirements, based on Yagmur’s document: u
1 G4MICE Analysis of KEK Test Beam Aron Fish Malcolm Ellis CM15 10th June 2006.
Progress on PID studies Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE Analysis meeting.
28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn1 Update to the Upstream Cherenkov  -  Separation Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab May 2, 2005 Detector Tele-Meeting.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn October 15, 2003.
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
RF background simulations MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
Stephen KahnParticle ID Software Mice Collaboration Meeting Page 1 Particle ID Software Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 27 March 2003.
27 Jun 2005S. Kahn -- Tof/Ckov Status1 Status of TOF and Ckov Sub- packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn 27 June 2005.
1 G4MICE TOF Reconstruction & KEK Test Beam Analysis Update Aron Fish Tracker Phone Conference May 25, 2006.
1 EMCal design MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
Analysis of MICE Chris Rogers 1 Imperial College/RAL Thursday 28 October, With thanks to John Cobb.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
20 October, 2004GlueX Detector Review 1 The GlueX Detector Curtis A. Meyer This talk Next talk.
Software Overview David Lawrence, JLab Oct. 26, 2007 David Lawrence, JLab Oct. 26, 2007.
Physics Program and Runs: Autumn 2011 & Step IV V. Blackmore MICE Project Board, 08/03/12.
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
1 Recon tests, Sci Fi status and Sci Fi design iteration Malcolm Ellis MICE Software Phone Meeting Wednesday 28 th April 2004.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
27/6/05 Frascati1 M. Bonesini INFN Milano MICE TOF stations updates.
Software Status  Last Software Workshop u Held at Fermilab just before Christmas. u Completed reconstruction testing: s MICE trackers and KEK tracker.
S. Kahn 5 June 2003NuFact03 Tetra Cooling RingPage 1 Tetra Cooling Ring Steve Kahn For V. Balbekov, R. Fernow, S. Kahn, R. Raja, Z. Usubov.
MICE PID size &scraping MICE CM16, RAL, Oct V. Palladino, Univ & INFN Napoli for R. Sandrstrom and others contributing to this effort Yagmur, Holger,
11 Nov 2008PC Analysis PC Schedule 2008 Tuesdays fortnightly 9 September  23 September  2 October  CM22  11 November  25 November 9 December.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
SksMinus status Hyperball collaboration meeting 2009/3/11 K. Shirotori.
MICE: The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment MOPLT106 Abstract The provision of intense stored muon beams would allow the properties of neutrinos.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
1M. Ellis - NFMCC - 31st January 2007 MICE Analysis.
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
Software Overview 1M. Ellis - CM21 - 7th June 2008  Simulation Status  Reconstruction Status  Unpacking Library  Tracker Data Format  Real Data (DATE)
ch/~bdl/lepc/lepc.ppt 1 MICE Status and Plans Rikard Sandström Université de Geneve International Scoping Study CERN,
TOF Emittance Pion Emittance Measurement with the TOFs? Mark Rayner 11 December 2008.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
CKOV1 design status 1. Generation of muon and pion beam files 2. PID performances with water radiator 3. Does it help with fluorocarbon FC72 ? 4. Conclusion.
This presentation will describe the state of each element in the beam line with regards to the current update being undertaken. Firstly, it will describe.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
MEASUREMENT OF EMITTANCE AND OTHER OPTICS QUANTITIES V. Blackmore MICE Optics Review 14 th January, /22.
TOF Software and Analysis Tools
Global PID MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick
Presentation transcript:

March 31, Status of the TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detector Packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Laboratory Mice Collaboration Meeting March 31, 2004

S. Kahn Status of TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detectors Page 2 Changes in the Both the Upstream and Downstream Particle ID Detectors Recently there have been changes made to both the upstream and downstream particle ID detectors. –I will summarize the changes that have been made and those that are yet to be made. These include positioning and segmentation changes to the upstream time-of-flight detectors. Positioning changes of the upstream Cherenkov chamber. Positioning and dimensional changes to the downstream Cherenkov. –I would also like to discuss future plans for improvements. Also I will describe some of the difficulties encountered in the use of the virtual detector

March 31, 2004S. Kahn Status of TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detectors Page 3

March 31, 2004S. Kahn Status of TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detectors Page 4 The Time-of-Flight System : Tof0 The Tof0 plane is now situated in the first of the beam line final focusing triplets. –Tof0 is situated between Q4 and Q5 triplet quads. This station will see a high rate and consequently will require a high resolution PMT such as R4998. The Tof0 plane is situated at where the magnetic field is (hopefully) small. The size of the Tof0 plane has been increased to an active area of 24 cm  24 cm. There are now X, Y planes each with six 4 cm slabs. There is no overlap of adjacent slabs. The dE/dx should now be uniform across the plane.

March 31, 2004S. Kahn Status of TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detectors Page 5 The Tof1 Plane The Tof1 plane is now situated in the second of the beam line final focus triplets. –Tof1 is situated between Q8 and Q9. This should also be in a low field area. –Placing the focusing elements between the Tof planes should improve the rate into the cooling channel and consequently increase the rate at Tof1. We are likely to use the high resolution PMT since we are concerned with the high rate and are not worried about large fringe fields from adjacent magnets. We now have X, Y planes at Tof1 We have 48  48 cm planes with with eight 6 cm slabs.

March 31, 2004S. Kahn Status of TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detectors Page 6 Tof 2 Downstream Detector The Tof2 downstream detector has the same geometry as Tof1 however it uses the R7761 fine mesh PMT since it is in a higher magnetic field. Although the geometry of Tof1 and Tof2 are the same the detector response is different since they use different PMTs. –The different detector responses still needs to be coded.

March 31, 2004S. Kahn Status of TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detectors Page 7 Upstream Ckov The upstream Ckov is now situated between the two beam line final focus triplets. It is midway between Q6 and Q7. –This should be in a field free area. –The position of Ckov1 has been updated in the dataCards.

March 31, 2004S. Kahn Status of TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detectors Page 8 Downstream Cherenkov Detector The downstream Ckov detector geometry has not yet been revised. –I need to verify if dimensions have changed. –I need to revise the geometry to the 8 PMT picture. Currently I have a 4 PMT description. I would like to implement a full cherenkov photon tracking version for Ckov2. –Currently the Ckov2 response is the intersection of the cherenkov cone with the PMT acceptance.

March 31, 2004S. Kahn Status of TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detectors Page 9 Virtual Detector Status The virtual detector is a scoring volume that can be placed along the beam line for the purpose of providing theoretical variables for analysis especially for the calculation of emittances, but not limited to that. –An alternate version referred to as a Special Virtual volume can be attached (a daughter volume of) coils and absorbers for the purpose of investigating energy deposit. There are currently limitations to how the virtual volumes can be used. –The current scheme only allows the virtual detector to be placed as the daughter of the overall detector mother volume. It cannot be easily placed inside other detectors such as the SciFi. –This would be of value to the SciFi particularly since there could be a direct comparison of the reconstructed track variables to the corresponding theoretical variables. –We have attempted to address this by specifically coding a call to a virtual detector in the SciFiTracker volume. There are however problems in getting Geant to actually enter this volume. –This problem has not been solved as of this moment.

March 31, 2004S. Kahn Status of TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detectors Page 10 Status Summary Tof Detectors –Geometry/Segmentation changes to bring DetModel up to date ☺☺☺ –Need to correct detector response for Tof1 using different PMT from Tof2. Should be straight forward.☺☺ Upstream Ckov –Position updated. ☺☺☺ Downstream Ckov –Verify positions and dimensions correspond to current PID picture. ☺☺ –Update to 8 PMTs. ☺ –Add facility to track č photons. ☺ Virtual Detectors. –Fix problem with using virtual detectors with SciFi.  –Fix problem with energy deposit in front part of absorbers. Probably similar to SciFi problem. 