David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, 2009 1 Super B The Super Flavor Factory David Hitlin DOE Annual Review of Caltech June 29, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Strategy for Particle Physics 2013 Preparatory group->Strategy group Individual town meetings Town meeting in Krakow: september 2012 Drafting.
Advertisements

Andreas Crivellin Overview of Flavor Physics with focus on the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model and two-Higgs-doublet models Supported by a Marie.
Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
MSSM Precision tests of the flavours in the SM Model Indep. Analysis in  B=2 MFV, mainly high tan  scenarios Achille Stocchi (LAL-IN2P3/CNRS)
Andrey Golutvin Moriond Prospects of search for New Physics in B decays at LHC Andrey Golutvin ITEP / Moscow - In CP - violation - In rare decays.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Edward McKigney Imperial College RAL March 25, 2002 Physics Motivation and Cooling Introduction.
1 SUSY and B physics observables Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii, April 20, 2005.
1 1 Babar TM and © Nelvana David Hitlin DOE Review Caltech July 21, 2004.
David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Super B The Super Flavor Factory David Hitlin DOE Annual Review of Caltech July 10, 2008.
K. Kumar, W. Marciano, Y. Li Electroweak physics at EIC - Summary of week 7 INT Workshop on Pertubative and Non-Pertubative Aspects of QCD at Collider.
This is the last message in this gathering of North American PI’s with an interest in the INFN hosted SuperB project. I will try to deal with issues on.
1 Physics Case of L=10 36 e + e - B Factory Achille Stocchi LAL-Orsay Université Paris-Sud and IN2P3-CNRS.
Toward a B Factory at SLAC? L. Dixon (not a B expert!) for the SLAC Scenarios Study SLUO Annual Meeting, SLAC, 7/11/2003 B physics in 2003: The Standard.
David Hitlin Heavy Flavor Physics DPF July 29, Heavy Flavor Physics Experiment David Hitlin DPF 2009 July 29, 2009.
1 1 Babar TM and © Nelvana David Hitlin Caltech SLUO Annual Meeting July 6, 2004.
Takeo Higuchi Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, KEK Jan 21, 2004 Hawaii, USA Super B Factory Workshop Charged Higgs Search with B  D   
European approval calendar: ECFA meetings in Sept and Nov – first one is closed, and the Nov. meeting is open. Nakada Com. report in Sept, discuss, and.
Paris 22/4 UED Albert De Roeck (CERN) 1 Identifying Universal Extra Dimensions at CLIC  Minimal UED model  CLIC experimentation  UED signals & Measurements.
1. Outline 2 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015.
David Hitlin US/Canada SuperB Meeting July 25, Super B US/Canada Meeting Introduction David Hitlin July 25, 2008.
David Hitlin BEACH 2008 June 27, Super B The Super Flavor Factory David Hitlin BEACH 2008 June 27, 2008.
Summary of Recent Results on Rare Decays of B Mesons from BaBar for the BaBar Collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Chateau Lake Louise February.
P Spring 2003 L14Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.
David Hitlin Aspen Winter Conference Jan. 22, Super B Factories: Motivation and Realization Super B Factories: Motivation and Realization David.
As a test case for quark flavor violation in the MSSM K. Hidaka Tokyo Gakugei University / RIKEN, Wako Collaboration with A. Bartl, H. Eberl, E. Ginina,
Output from this Series of Workshops: A science vision for the RHIC future 1.Provide a science case for the future RHIC program that makes clear its importance.
Wolfgang Menges, Queen Mary Measuring |V ub | from Semileptonic B Decays Wolfgang Menges Queen Mary, University of London, UK Institute of Physics: Particle.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
QCD 与强子物理研讨会, 2010 年 8 月 4 - 10 日,威海 Prospects of Flavor Physics at the LHC 高原宁 清华大学高能物理研究中心 2010/8/61Y. Gao, Prospects of flavor physics at the LHC.
David Hitlin Fermilab Nov. 19, Searching for New Physics at Super B, The Super Flavor Factory David Hitlin Fermilab Colloquium November 19, 2008.
BaBar physics, recent highlights and future prospects Owen Long, BaBar physics analysis coordinator U. C. Riverside & SLAC December 5, 2008.
Charm Physics at Super B Factories after BESIII, Belle and B A B AR David Hitlin The Future of Heavy Flavor Physics ITEP, Moscow July 24, 2006.
Guy Wormser, SuperB workshop, 25 July 2006 Super B Factory workshop Round Table Guy Wormser LAL Orsay.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
Status of the SuperB Project A major new European particle physics project Fergus Wilson, RAL/STFC On behalf of the SuperB Project Beauty 2011, April 8.
New Ideas for Super B Factories for Flavour Physics Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh, Future Directions, BEACH 2006 Lancaster, July 2006.
Higgs Reach Through VBF with ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin-Madison Recontres de Moriond 2004 QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions.
Yingchuan Li Electroweak physics at EIC Brookhaven National Lab Feb. 3rd 2011, BNL.
Douglas Bryman University of British Columbia APS May 3, 2011.
David Hitlin Discrete 08 Dec. 13, Status of the Super Flavor Factory Super B David Hitlin Discrete 08 Valencia December 13, 2008.
Flavour Physics Speaker: Andreas Hoecker Convener: Ewa Rondio Sc.Secretary: Ulrik Egede Orsay, 31’th January 2006.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
SuperB Adrian Bevan Recontres de Moriond XLIV, La Thuile, Italy 7-14 th March 2009.
Direct CP violation in D  hh World measurements of In New Physics: CPV up to ~1%; If CPV ~1% were observed, is it NP or hadronic enhancement of SM? Strategy:
EDMs in the SUSY GUTs Junji Hisano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) NuFact04 6th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories and Superbeams, Osaka University, Japan.
The Linear Collider Roadmap IWLC2010 CERN October 18, 2010 Rolf-Dieter Heuer CERN.
The SuperB Project A major new particle physics centre Fergus Wilson, RAL/STFC On behalf of the SuperB Project STORI 2011, October 11 th 2011.
Physics activities toward the TDR will be coordinated by A. Bevan, D. Brown, M. Ciuchini and A. Stocchi A document, also in Italian is needed by the end.
Photon-Photon Colliders ( Photon-Photon Colliders (  C) Mayda M. Velasco.
Goals and organisation of the Warwick workshop Achille Stocchi LAL -Universite Paris Sud/IN2P3 Workshop on New Physics with SuperB 14th-17th April 2009.
Update: EMC R&D David Hitlin SuperB R&D Meeting September 25, 2008.
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
Physics Progress and Plans Adrian Bevan
SuperB Physics Elba 2011.
SuperB story The INFN roadmap 2006 included a flavour factory in a general framework of development of the Frascati National Labs area From the beginning.
SuperB EMC Computing Foreseen activities and software/computing needs
Super B Physics Opportunities
Super-KEKB Collaboration
Marcello A. Giorgi Università di Pisa & INFN Pisa
Searching for SUSY in B Decays
New Physics from B decays
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK/Sokendai) October 18, 2007
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) FPCP 2004, Deagu, Korea October 7, 2004
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
SuperKEKB Proto-collaboration
Organisation of the Physics activity toward the TDR
Presentation transcript:

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Super B The Super Flavor Factory David Hitlin DOE Annual Review of Caltech June 29, 2009

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Super B – the Super Flavor Factory  The Caltech group led the way in recognizing the importance of continuing e + e - flavor studies substantially beyond the level of B A B AR and Belle  The crucial role that flavor physics will play in understanding New Physics found at the LHC is becoming ever more clear to the community  There is clear discovery potential  Lepton flavor violation  New sources of CP violation  Rare b,c and  decays that will be crucial to interpreting New Physics found at the LHC  Sensitivity to New Physics at scales accessible to the LHC requires a large data sample: ab -1 ⇒ luminosity of = 15 ab -1 /year  Super B, proposed for construction at or near the INFN Frascati laboratory, can provide this luminosity with low power consumption and manageable backgrounds, using a novel collider concept:  Very low emittance rings, similar to the ILC damping rings and a new final focus scheme – the crabbed waist  The design includes a linearly polarized electron beam (LER), which provides unique capabilities in studies of  production and decay

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, SuperB Perugia June Antonio Masiero at the June 2009 Perugia Workshop

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Primary physics objectives of a Super Flavor Factory  Perform measurements in the flavor sector such that:  If new particles are discovered at LHC we are able to study the flavor structure of the New Physics  If the New Physics scale is beyond the reach of the LHC, explore the New Physics scale More specifically  Is there charged lepton flavor violation (LFV) ?  Are there new CP -violating phases in b,c or  decay ?  Are there new right-handed currents ?  Are there new loop contributions to flavor-changing neutral currents  Are there new Higgs fields ?  Is there new flavor symmetry that elucidates the CKM hierarchy ?  B A B AR provides an excellent base for an upgraded detector that can address these questions in the Super B asymmetric e + e - environment

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Charm FCNC Charm mixing and CPV B Physics:  (4S)  Physics B s Physics:  (5S)

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, The Super B machine design is evolving John Seeman – miniMAC April 2009

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Crabbed waist beam distribution at the IP Crab sextupoles OFF Crab sextupoles ON waist is orthogonal to the axis of bunch waist moves to the axis of other beam All particles from both beams collide in the minimum  y region, with a net luminosity gain E. Paoloni

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Crabbed waist has been convincingly tested at DA  NE

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Klaus Balewski (DESY), John Corlett (LBNL), Jonathan Dorfan (SLAC, Chair), Stuart Henderson (ORNL), Tom Himel (SLAC), Claudio Pellegrini (UCLA), Daniel Schulte (CERN), Ferdi Willeke (BNL), Andy Wolski (Liverpool, phone), Frank Zimmermann (CERN) Closeout report of the second miniMAC review - April 24, 2009 …. “Mini-MAC now feels secure in enthusiastically encouraging the Super B design team to proceed to the TDR phase, with confidence that the design parameters are achievable” The design takes as a constraint the re-use of PEP-II magnet and RF components Many details of the design, of course, remain to be worked out. We aim for a TDR at the end of 2010, with an intermediate report by the end of 2009 The March 2009 design has been reviewed by the Super B Machine Advisory Committee

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29,

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Prospects for Super B  The CERN Strategy Group has “taken note” that the Super B project is consistent with the European HEP roadmap  INFN is working for a funding decision in 2009  The Region of Lazio has committed funds for a tunnel and associated structures, contingent upon Italian central government approval  An excellent bid (15K€/m) for the tunnel + associated structures is in hand  P5 recommended US participation in an overseas B Factory in Scenario B or above  INFN has requested PEP-II and B A B AR components from DOE  The project has published a CDR and a physics update  Work is now underway on comprehensive TDR volumes on the accelerator, detector and physics performance – end of 2010  A Progress Report will be issued by the end of signers 80 institutions

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, SITES : Tor Vergata……..

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, LNF option

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, SuperB Experimental Hall & Transfer Line - +

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Caltech’s role in Super B and the US (proto)collaboration  We originated the concept of a e + e - collider in February, 2001 and ran a year-long workshop “The Discovery Potential of a Super B Factory at Luminosity” in 2003  Caltech has been instrumental in organizing the Super B project and is heavily involved in the TDR activities:  David Hitlin is Deputy Director, a member of the Steering Committee, and has been co-convener of the EMC group  Frank Porter will become co-convener of the EMC group in the Fall  Ren-yuan Zhu is leading development of LYSO crystals for Super B and SLHC  Chih-hsiang Cheng is the fast simulation EMC developer  Alexander Rakitin is optimizing the design of the backward calorimeter  We are playing an important role in preparations for a beam test of an LYSO crystal array of anticipated for November 2009  We will play a leading role in organizing a US detector/physics collaboration when the project is approved by INFN and DOE agrees to US participation  Currently active: Caltech, Cincinnati, LBNL, Maryland, SLAC, ….  We anticipate a US contingent of ~100 members

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Rear endcap Possible barrel extension Forward endcap

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Fast simulation of 2M B   K s events C.-h. Cheng

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, B   decay: stringent limits on New Physics A. Rakitin  Search for a lepton from  decay + missing energy, recoiling against reconstructed hadronic B decay  Sensitivity depends on detector hermeticity  BABAR coverage in backward direction is compromised by DIRC PID  This can be substantially improved in Super B by covering backward solid angle with even a crude calorimeter  Progress report:  Signal  Two background modes thus far: E

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, B   S/B with backward endcap A. Rakitin  S/B is significantly improved for both backgrounds

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Ren-yuan Zhu, with ADR funds, has been for several years, working on the development of LYSO crystals for HEP Very attractive for the Super B endcap EMC and the CMS SLHC upgrade

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, A beam test of the forward EMC endcap configuration in tagged photon and e - beams is planned for LNF in November A 5x5 projective LYSO array will be used with a CsI(Tl) surround to catch the outer few percent of shower CMS APD readout module 5mm x 5mm APD will be used (10x10mm APDs are now available) Photodiodes are also under consideration We have borrowed 16 spare CLEO-II CsI(Tl) crystals for the outer section

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Is there a fourth quark generation ?  A fourth generation CKM-like mixing matrix has  2 additional quark masses  3 additional mixing angles  2 additional CP -violating phases  A recent analysis by Bobrowski, Lenz, Reidl and Rohrwild shows that large regions of the new parameter spaces are still allowed  Super B will be the primary tool to close down, or, perhaps find, non-zero values of these fourth generation parameters        

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, LFV in t decays: Super B capability Super B sensitivity directly confronts many New Physics models BABAR Super B sensitivity For 75 ab -1 We expect to see LFV events, not just improve limits

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Flipping the helicity of the polarized electron beam allows us to determine the chiral structure of dimension 6 four fermion lepton flavor-violating interactions Polarized  ’s can probe the chiral structure of LFV Dassinger, Feldmann, Mannel, and Turczyk JHEP 0710:039,2007; [See also Matsuzaki and Sanda arXiv: [hep-ph]

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Why do we need a very large sample ~75ab -1 ? Im (  13 ) LL Re (  13 ) LL SM Example: CPV in loop B decays Determination of coupling [in this case : (  13 ) LL ] with 10 ab -1 and 75 ab -1

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29,  High statistics flavor physics (50-75 ab -1 ) with Super B will provide discovery potential and information vital to interpret New Physics found at LHC  The achievable levels of sensitivity in rare b, c and t decays allow substantial coverage in the parameter space of new physics  Super B presents a strong physics opportunity for the US community  US participation in Super B will leverage $270M of PEP-II and B A B AR components through an in-kind contribution  New funding of $10-20M/year over the TDR and construction period will also be needed to allow US participation in design and construction of the collider and detector upgrade  Such participation in encouraged by P5 in Scenario B and above  We are working towards a turn-on date of 2015/16  The Caltech group can, as it did in PEP-II and B A B AR, play a central role in Super B and the construction of a US contingent of the Collaboration  We are transitioning from the current intense analysis phase of B A B AR into the TDR phase of Super B Conclusions

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29,

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, SuperB + Lattice improvements Interplay between metrology and New Physics sensitivity Today  = ±  = ±  = ±  = 0.344± Improving the precision of Unitarity Triangle measurements, along with reducing theoretical uncertainties, can provide evidence for New Physics

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, CMSSM :   e  vanishes at all SPS points MVF-NP extensions :   e  vanishes as s 13  0    is independent of s 13 LFV 2 5  disc B B

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, B (     M 1/2 SuperB SO(10) MSSM LFV from PMNS LFV from CKM Beyond MFV SUSY GUT now Super B Recent work : J.K.Parry, H.-H. Zhang hep-ph/ Allowed by  m s From B s phase now Super B

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Flipping the helicity of the polarized electron beam allows us to determine the chiral structure of dimension 6 four fermion lepton flavor-violating interactions Polarized t ’s can probe the chiral structure of LFV Dassinger, Feldmann, Mannel, and Turczyk JHEP 0710:039,2007; [See also Matsuzaki and Sanda arXiv: [hep-ph]

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, SPS4 is ruled out by exp value of B (B  s  ) SPS1a is the least favorable for flavor effects, but Super B and only Super B can observe 2  deviations in several observables Minimal Flavor Violation : SNOWMASS points

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Many channels can show effects in the range  S~( ) New Physics in CPV: sin2  from “s Penguins”… SuperB (*) theory limited dd s b W-W- B0dB0d t s s  K0K0 g s b b s ~ ~ ~ X

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29,  is measured with a significance >3  away from zero Arg(  23 ) LR =(44.5± 2.6) o = (0.026 ± 0.005) 1 10 g s b b s ~ ~ ~ New Physics contribution (2-3 transitions) MSSM + generic soft SUSY breaking terms Flavor-changing NP effects in the squark propagator  NP scale SUSY mass  flavor-violating coupling X

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Exhibit B: SM Branching fractions: Current  10ab -1  75ab -1 Actual limit

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, CP Violation in charm NOW Super B

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, polarized e- beam: reduced background Very important order of magnitude  Complimentarity with    e  A Super Flavor Factory is also a  factory Lepton Flavor Violation