Jodie Corbridge. Utah State University Sponsors: NASA & AFOSR Central Question of Study Does the semiconductor’s bandgap play a role in secondary electron.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ge 116 Module 1: Scanning Electron Microscopy
Advertisements

1 Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. Size Analysis and Identification of Particles Chapter 4 Roger W. Welker.
ECE G201: Introductory Material Goal: to give you a quick, intuitive concept of how semiconductors, diodes, BJTs and MOSFETs work –as a review of electronics.
SEM & TEM in Polymer Characterization
Groups: WA 2,4,5,7. History  The electron microscope was first invented by a team of German engineers headed by Max Knoll and physicist Ernst Ruska in.
AMCF Materials Characterization School 2012 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Tim Morgan.
Introduction Secondary electron secondary electron detector The electron beam interaction with near surface specimen atoms will make a signal which results.
X-radiation. X-rays are part of the electromagnetic spectrum. X-radiation (composed of X-rays) is a form of electromagnetic radiation. X- rays have a.
Dynamic hydrogen isotope behavior and its helium irradiation effect in SiC Yasuhisa Oya and Satoru Tanaka The University of Tokyo.
Characterisation and Reliability testing of THz Schottky diodes. By Chris Price Supervisor: Dr Byron Alderman December 2006 Preliminary.
H - Formation by scattering of hydrogen atoms/ions on carbonaceous surface Y. Xiang, H. Khemliche, A.Momeni, P. Roncin Groupe E L’Institut Science Moléculaire.
The Embedded Ring Approach Applied to Annealed Graphitic Amorphous Carbon Sterling Smith, and J.R. Dennison Department of Physics, Utah State University,
Lab meetings Week of 6 October
Scanning Electron Microscope Jamie Goings. Theory Conventional microscopes use light and glass lenses SEM uses electrons and magnetic lenses to create.
Activities during UK-Japan Young Scientist Workshop Dr Riz Khan Room 31DJ02, x6062, Advanced Technology Institute University.
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy —— Application in Phase-switching Device Study Xinyuan Wang A
Main detector types Scintillation Detector Spectrum.
Erosion Characterization via Ion Power Deposition Measurements in a 6-kW Hall Thruster Rohit Shastry, Professor Alec D. Gallimore, and Dr. Richard R. Hofer.
BY SANTANU PRAMANIK(09369) HITESH KUMAR GUPTA(09320) CHANDAN SINGH(09260) SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE MATERIAL SCIENCE ASSIGNMENT.
Ballistic and quantum transports in carbon nanotubes.
Seminar Author: Bojan Hiti Mentor: doc. dr. Matjaž Kavčič Determination of trace impurities on Si wafers with x-ray fluorescence.
Nitride Materials and Devices Project
Comparison of Field Emission Behaviors of Graphite, Vitreous Carbon and Diamond Powders S. H. Lee, K. R. Lee, K. Y. Eun Thin Film Technology Research Center,
Centre de Toulouse Radiation interaction with matter 1.
Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) 1. Brief History Auger Effect discovered in 1920’s Meitner published first journal Auger transitions considered noise.
X-RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY (XPS)
Methods in Surface Physics Experimentation in Ultra-High Vacuum Environments Hasan Khan (University of Rochester), Dr. Meng-Fan Luo (National Central University)
Electron Microscopes Used to count individual atoms What can electron microscopes tell us? Morphology – Size and shape Topography – Surface features (roughness,
Advanced Analytical Chemistry – CHM 6157® Y. CAIFlorida International University Updated on 9/28/2006Chapter 6Electron Spectroscopy Chapter 6 Electron.
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
Post Anneal Solid State Regrowth
Tshepo Mahafa P-LABS Necsa 1 CHARGED PARTICLE IRRADIATION EFFECTS ON ZIRCALOY-4 Necsa_Wits Workshop, 10 – 11 September 2015, Necsa, Pelindaba.
NANO 225 Micro/NanoFabrication Electron Microscopes 1.
Reminders for this week Homework #4 Due Wednesday (5/20) Lithography Lab Due Thursday (5/21) Quiz #3 on Thursday (5/21) – In Classroom –Covers Lithography,
Top Down Manufacturing
Top Down Method Etch Processes
NANO 230 Micro/Nano Characterization
Scanning capacitance microscopy
Meta-stable Sites in Amorphous Carbon Generated by Rapid Quenching of Liquid Diamond Seung-Hyeob Lee, Seung-Cheol Lee, Kwang-Ryeol Lee, Kyu-Hwan Lee, and.
Conventional SEM Specimen at high vacuum – requires sample fixation and dehydration or freezing. Charging is minimized by coating sample with metal or.
Characterization of Nanomaterials…
SEM Scanning Electron Microscope
Chapter 8 Charges in Magnetic Fields. Introduction In the previous chapter it was observed that a current carrying wire observed a force when in a magnetic.
In order to satisfy the requirements of focusing high-power density for high-energy-density physics and inertial-fusion targets, we should be able to transport.
Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center Substrate Preparation Techniques Lecture 7 G.J. Mankey.
Techniques for Nuclear and Particle Physics Experiments By W.R. Leo Chapter Eight:
The Nanoparticle Field Extraction Thruster (NanoFET) is an electric propulsion device that charges and accelerates nanoparticles using electrostatic fields.
CONTROL OF ELECTRON ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS THROUGH INTERACTION OF ELECTRON BEAMS AND THE BULK IN CAPACITIVELY COUPLED PLASMAS* Sang-Heon Song a) and Mark.
2. Design Determine grating coupler period from theory: Determine grating coupler period from theory: Determine photonic crystal lattice type and dimensions.
Particle in a “box” : Quantum Dots
Questions/Problems on SEM microcharacterization Explain why Field Emission Gun (FEG) SEM is preferred in SEM? How is a contrast generated in an SEM? What.
El-Mul Technologies Ltd – Confidential & Proprietary El-Mul Technologies El-Mul Technologies Ltd – Confidential & Proprietary Prof. Eli Cheifetz, Chairman.
Radiation Damage Quick Study Edward Cazalas 3/27/13.
A. Orozco, E. Kwan, A. Dhirani Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY: A NEW CHM 326 LAB.
Mg Films Grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition as Photocathodes: QE and surface adsorbates L. Cultrera INFN – National Laboratories of Frascati.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
Presentation on SEM (Scanning of Electron Microscope) Represented by:-Ravi Kumar Roll:- (BT/ME/1601/006)
Electron microprobe in Askja
Particle in a “box” : Quantum Dots
Progress report on the internal target
Laboratory equipment Lecture (3).
Study of vacuum stability at cryogenic temperature
Institute of Electronics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,
NANO 230 Micro/NanoFabrication
Introduction to Materials Science and Engineering
Nanocharacterization (III)
Nanocharacterization (II)
Semiconductor Detectors
Surface analysis techniques part I
Presentation transcript:

Jodie Corbridge. Utah State University Sponsors: NASA & AFOSR Central Question of Study Does the semiconductor’s bandgap play a role in secondary electron emission? Abstract Secondary electron (SE) yield is the number of electrons emitted when an electron beam is incident on a surface. Determination of SE yields is critical in accurately modeling the extent and effects of spacecraft charging. As a spacecraft orbits, charged particle bombardment induces electron emission and charges the spacecraft. Arching between different potential surfaces then occurs, damaging computers and electronics, or even disabling the entire spacecraft. Our research into the underlying physics of SE yields fosters important advances needed for appropriate choices of spacecraft materials and in mitigating deleterious effects of spacecraft charging. Other relevant applications of SE yields include scanning electron microscopy, plasma fusion chambers, electron multipliers, vacuum tubes, and flat panel displays. Preliminary data has indicated a relationship between bandgap width and magnitude of SE yield, showing a 30% increase in SE yield of graphitic amorphous carbon (g-C) above nanocrystalline graphite. My work extends this research to establish the nature of the correlation of small bandgap width to SE yield. These trends are compared with current semiempirical models of two limiting cases, conductors and large bandgap semiconductors. Specifically, g-C samples were vacuum annealed from 0º-1050º, producing samples of decreasing bandgap width of from ~0.5 eV to ~0 eV. My measurements include SE yields, backscattered yields and electron emission spectra, as well as characterization with electron microscopy, photoyields, Auger spectroscopy, resistivity, and Raman spectroscopy. Supported by the NASA SEE Program, AFOSR, Boeing Corp. and USU Research Office Council on Undergraduate Research 7 th Annual Poster Session on Capitol Hill 2003 Utah State University Student: Jodie Corbridge Advisor: JR Dennison Secondary Electron Emission of Graphitic Carbon Small Bandgap Semiconductors Annealing at: 350 °C 650 °C 850 °C 1050 °C Graphite Graphitic amorphous carbon (g-C) PropertyHOPGAquadag TM g-C Density2.267 gm/cm 3 ~ 2.0 gm/cm gm/cm 3 Surface Roughness <1 nm>1 um< 1 nm ContaminationSi: 25% O: 25%O: 3%Si: 15% O: 16% Resistivity5 x10 -2 S-cm (interlayer) 4 x10 -5 S-cm (basal plane) ~ 50 S-cm5x10 -1 S-cm TypeSemi-metal Semiconductor Band Gap 0.00 eV  0.05 eV0.10 eV  0.05 eV 0.65 eV  0.05 eV 1)Production of SE Mean free path determines deposition profile SE production processes 2)Transport of SE to surface SE energy loss mechanisms Metals: e - -e - scattering Insulators: phonons & e - - h + recombination 3)Emission of SE from surface Surface barrier Metal: Work Function Insulators: Electron affinity Stages of Secondary Electron Emission Semiconductor theory must be inferred from qualitative insulator theory Production Transport Emission Spin-off Applications of SE Studies Flat Panel Displays: Spacers between anodes and cathodes are required to be insulating and have low SE yields. Plasma Fusion: SE yield of chamber wall materials is important in determining plasma conditions. Spacecraft Charging: SE yield is an important modeling parameter of the NASA spacecraft analyzer program NASCAP. High Power Arching: SE yield of materials determines arc initiation. Scanning Electron Microscopy: Number of produced SE’s is dependent on the geometry of sample and materials studied. Electron Multipliers: Use high SE yield materials, for dynodes. Vacuum Tubes: Need low SE yield materials. (Left) Scanning electron microscopes like the one at the USU Electron Microscopy Facility are based on electron emission. (Bottom Left) Scanning electron micrograph of carbon nanotube Y junction which has important applications in nanoscale transistors and other electronic nanodevices. (Bottom Right) SEM applications in biology often coat samples with carbon. Electron emission has important applications in state- of-the-art technologies for next generation flat panel displays. Shown above is the first HyFED TM (hybrid field emission device) demonstration device using carbon nanotubes developed by Applied NanoTech, Inc. (Left) Disordered carbon is used to coat the inside of the Princeton Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor. The coating reduces secondary electron emission that inhibits controlled fusion reactions. (Right) Almost one third of all spacecraft failures and anomalies due to the space environment result from plasma- induced spacecraft charging resulting from electron emission. g-C 0.6 eVHOPG 0.0 eV 1050 °C g-C 0.1 eV Photoyield shows annealing decreases bandgap toward 0 eV. Graphitic Carbon: Photoyield Spectra ARPES of Graphite McGovern, Eberhardt, Plummer & Fisher, Physica 99B, 415 (1980). (e,2e) of annealed g-C Kurp, Canney, Vos, Kheifets & Weigold, JESRP, 87,231, (1998). Graphitic Carbon: Band Structure Raman spectra taken by Tim Dallas and Mark Holtz at Texas Tech [3] Raman spectroscopy probes intermediate range order in Carbon Annealed ~1 hr at: 0 °C 350 °C 650 °C 850 °C 1050 °C Annealing causes structural changes of g-C towards nanocrystalline graphite Graphitic Carbon: Raman Spectroscopy Presence of similar fine structure peak at 7±1 eV in all spectra indicates electronic structure is similar below ~5 eV for all carbon samples. Graphitic Carbon Electron Emission Spectra g-C 30% higher  max than HOPG 1050 °C g-C has same  max as HPOG Measurements of other annealed g-C in progress Graphitic Carbon: SE Yield   max found to scale with bandgap. Measured 30% increase in  max for g-C with a ~0.65 eV increase in bandgap.  max for 1050 °C annealed g-C same as graphite Other material parameters (e.g. Z, density, surface roughness or contamination) do not explain the increased SE yield. Additional measurements of other annealed samples in progress to corroborate trend Bandgap has been established as an important parameter in the SE emission of a small bandgap semiconductors. Results & Conclusions PropertyMetalsSemiconductorsInsulators Conductivity:goodsensitive to impurities low Bandgap:none~0-4 eV> 4 eV Maximum SE Yield:~1~1-2~1-10+ Temp dependence of SE yield: slight?significant Key parameter of SE yield: Work Function ? Bandgap and e - Affinity Satellite moving through ambient plasma Studies in USU vacuum chamber Electron interactions with materials Secondary electrons produced by incident electrons, ions, and photons. Backscattered electrons reflected from the material. (Top): Exposed interior of sample stage. (Right): Stage Carousel and Retarding Field hemispherical grid (RFHG) (Bottom): Empty 1 cm diameter sample module Ground-Based Studies of Electron Emission and Spacecraft Charging STM image of graphite. (30 Ǻ x 30 Ǻ ) Sample stage & retarding field detector USU Fatman UHV chamber for SE/BSE studies & surface analysis Stage holds 11 samples/devices Detachable cable allows swift change of samples Each sample can be positioned before various detectors and electron, ion, and photon sources Chamber equipped with electron, ion, and photon beams, detectors, & analysis Experiments performed in UHV to ensure material cleanliness capabilities