Megan Campbell Jen Hill Mariko Osada Emily Otto Debbie Spencer Becky Vick.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Birth Order Study Jamie Monzo, Saleha Chaudhry, Ann Kimble, Maria Lim, and Sara Torelli.
Advertisements

JENN WILLIAMS AND BRET MIZE HANOVER COLLEGE PSY 220: RESEARCH DESIGN AND STATISTICS WINTER 2009 The Effects of Body Type and Diet on First Impressions.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon (2007) Single-Variable, Independent-Groups Designs Graziano and Raulin Research Methods: Chapter 10 This multimedia product and.
Emoticons in IM Conversations  Past Research: –IM supplies a flexible medium for a wide range of conversations (Nardi et al., 2000). –According to the.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon (2010) Single-Variable, Independent-Groups Designs Graziano and Raulin Research Methods: Chapter 10 This multimedia product and.
Motivation and Memory Processes By James W. Erikson Hanover College.
Ashley Adams & Whitley Holt Hanover College
Social Acceptability of Sport Fan Aggression Based on Gender and Age Jeannie Curry Amy Manning Noelle Smith Martha Young.
Can You Match These Friends? A Test of Genetic Similarity Theory Katrina M. Sandager, Stephanie R. A. Maves, Sarah L. Hubert, and April Bleske-Rechek University.
Female Mock Jurors and the Child Victim: An Assessment of Age and Sex as Factors in Trial Sentencing Theresa Bardy Amanda Dubs Beverly Guilbault Christine.
The Effects of Extrinsic Motivation and Subsequent Absence on Test Taking Performance Kimala Bennet, Aja Crockett, Sophia Hsu, Lisa Poulin, Dina Zelyony.
Effects of Attending an All-Women’s College on Women’s Recognition of Facial Emotional Expressions in Males and Females Alexandrina M. Gomes Petya D. Radoeva.
The Effects of Positive and Negative Self- Presentation on Female Self- Esteem and Relationship Choices Stephanie Gunderson Robyn Hooker Hanover College.
The Effects of Priming Success and Level of Behavioral Involvement on Mount Holyoke Women December 4 th, 2002 By: Erin Grimshaw, By: Erin Grimshaw, Mary.
The Effect of Leading Questions and Time Elapsed on Eyewitness Accuracy in Identifying a Perpetrator in a Crime David Browne, Elizabeth Foster, Elizabeth.
Perceptions of Sexual Identity Based Upon Physical Cues Nichole Austin Lindsey Wolf Michelle Yount.
The Effects of Type of Stimulus and Time of Day on Memory Accuracy Rebecca Bartlett, Heather Ferguson, Laura Frasco, Abigail Poole, & Emily Sylvester Mount.
The Likelihood of Revealing Secrets Based on Severity and Consequence
Social Science Department
Factorial Experiments Factorial Design = experiment in which more than one IV (factor) at a time is manipulated Uses all possible combinations of the levels.
Complex Design. Two group Designs One independent variable with 2 levels: – IV: color of walls Two levels: white walls vs. baby blue – DV: anxiety White.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900 Lecture 14: Factorial ANOVA.
The Effects of Social Presence and Modeling on Gestures Patricia Mullings-Thomas, Christy E. O’Brien, Lillan Schatvet, Sarah Shattuck and Yifat Tamir Mount.
Suggestibility Affecting Perception Carolina Fox Maggie Zager David Elkin Fran Gottenkieny.
The Impact of Gendered Physical Activities and Athletic Participation on Sex Roles Jennifer Holberg, Kate Jubinville, Rebekka Lee and Elizabeth Steinberg.
The empathy fillip: Can training in micro expressions of emotion enhance empathic accuracy?
ANOVA: Factorial Designs. Experimental Design Choosing the appropriate statistic or design involves an understanding of  The number of independent variables.
 Increasing the amount of hours spent studying and doing homework on a daily basis  Increasing the amount of work completed while studying on a daily.
Research Strategies, Part 2
Debriefing in Online Experiment Harryadin Mahardika, PhD.
COMPLEX EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Behavioral Research Chapter 9 “Conducting the Experiment”
Slide 1 Two-Way Independent ANOVA (GLM 3) Prof. Andy Field.
THE IMPACT OF ANTI-DEPRESSANTS AND COGNITIVE THERAPY ON PANIC DISORDER Christopher Cannizzaro Rowan University Abnormal Psychology.
Selecting and Recruiting Subjects One Independent Variable: Two Group Designs Two Independent Groups Two Matched Groups Multiple Groups.
GROUP PRESENTATION THE BRAND PERSONALITY OF LARGE SPORTS EVENTS ADAM, ANDY, ASHLEY, CODY, MATT, MIKE.
Revision of key terms Write down the 12 key terms for the definitions on the slides.
The Effects of Focused Attention and Varied Peripheral and Central Changes on Change Blindness and Change Detection Teal Maxwell Emily Welch Naomi Janett.
Andrew Pennington and Nathan Hickman Hanover College.
Unit 2 Research Methods: Thinking critically with psychological science.
INTRODUCTION HYPOTHESES MEASURES RESULTS Correspondence to: at the 27 th Association for Psychological Science Conference,
10 Experimental Research: One-Way Designs What types of evidence allow us to conclude that one variable causes another variable? How do experimental research.
Introduction to Social Psychology
Categorical Independent Variables STA302 Fall 2013.
Personality and Politics-I Authoritarianism Michael Milburn Psychology 335.
Acknowledgments We thank Dr. Yu, Dr. Bateman, and Professor Szabo for allowing us to conduct this study during their class time. We especially thank the.
CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH Asks what several events have in common Asks whether knowing one event can allow prediction of another event Does not imply causation.
Welcome to Social Psychology: Lecture #1 topics  Who is So-Jin Kang?  Your expectations for this course  Course syllabus  Research in social psychology.
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I May 9, 2003 Chapter 6 and 7 (Ray) Control: The Keystone of the Experimental Method.
Experimental Procedure.  Hypothesis – a statement of the results that the experimenter expects – not what he/she already knows – must be made prior to.
Definition Slides Unit 2: Scientific Research Methods.
Definition Slides Unit 1.2 Research Methods Terms.
Research in Psychology A Scientific Endeavor. Goals of Psychological Research Description of social behavior Are people who grow up in warm climates different.
METHODS IN BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH
CEN3722 Human Computer Interaction User Testing
Nature of Science Writing Answers.
Experimental Research Designs
Single-Variable, Independent-Groups Designs
Formation of relationships Matching Hypothesis
Media Stereotypes and Perceived Facial Threat
By: Krystal Peplinski Minnesota State University Moorhead
By: Emily Pekas Minnesota State University Moorhead
2 independent Groups Graziano & Raulin (1997).
Sexual Consent: Changing the Gender Stereotype
Main Effects and Interaction Effects
Experimental Design.
The Sexual imprinting of facial hair preference on female mate selection By, Sierra koskela.
Introduction to Complex Designs
The process of experimentation
Complex Experiments.
Presentation transcript:

Megan Campbell Jen Hill Mariko Osada Emily Otto Debbie Spencer Becky Vick

Background Information  Alcock, Solano, Kayson (1998)  Baumeister and Boden (1998) Ego Threat  Bjorkqvist (1992) Indirect Aggression in Women Introduction

Variables Independent Variables~ IV1 Attractiveness 2 Levels1~ average attractiveness 2~ above average attractiveness IV2 Scenario 2 Levels1~apologetic 2~unapologetic Dependent Variable~ Indirect Aggression Measure~ Self-reported Questionnaire

Hypothesis  Above Average Attractive Photographs & Unapologetic Response Scenario= Highest Amount of Aggression  Average Attractive Photographs & Apologetic Response Scenario= Lowest Amount of Aggression

Rationale Viewing attractive women will elicit ego threat. In order to protect their ego women will indirectly aggress.

Method  Participants ~105 female Mount Holyoke Students ~Randomly assigned into four groups: 1.average attractive photos & apologetic scenario (n=28) 2.average attractive photos & unapologetic scenario (n=25) 3.above average attractive photos & apologetic scenario (n=28) 4.above average attractive photos & unapologetic scenario (n=24)

Materials  Consent form  2 Power point slide shows of 15 photos of women’s faces. ~Above average attractive women faces ~Average attractive women’s faces

 Scenario~paper form ~Apologetic ~Unapologetic  Indirect Aggression Questionnaire  Debriefing Statement

Procedure  Consent Form  Ps randomly assigned into one of four groups  Ps view 2 min. 20 second slide show of assigned make-over condition  Ps read assigned scenario  Ps fill out aggression questionnaire  Debriefing statement

Results  Analysis~ 2(attractiveness: above average attractive vs. average attractive) x 2(scenario: apologetic vs. unapologetic) independent groups ANOVA  Main effect ~No main effect for attractiveness F(1,101)=.01, MSe=49.99, p>.05

 Interaction ~No significant interaction between attractiveness and scenario F(1,101)=.008, MSe=49.99, p>.05 ~Marginally significant main effect for scenario F(1,101)=3.40, MSe=49.99, p=.068

Discussion  Hypothesis was not supported by the results  Alcock et al study (1998) ~similar main effect for scenarios ~difference in result for attractiveness ~no interaction between attractiveness and scenario

Future Directions  Manipulation wasn’t strong enough  To strengthen manipulation: Scenario~more Ps to add power and significance Revise pilot study~longer viewing time Stronger measure~revise questionnaire

QUESTIONS?