Travel Costs Lecture 15 October 20, 2003 12-706 / 73-359.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
Advertisements

Capacity, Level of Service, Intersection Design (1)
Determining the Free-Flow Speeds in a Regional Travel Demand Model based on the Highway Capacity Manual Chao Wang Joseph Huegy Institute for Transportation.
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION August 2012 The Honorable Larry Phillips Chairman, House Committee on Transportation.
Chapter 14: Basic Freeway Segments and Multilane Highways
Texas has a long legacy of good roads Symbol of our economic prosperity, attracting jobs and people to the State Our roads are used by you to get to work,
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
Chapter 2 (supplement): Capacity and Level-of-Service Analysis for Freeways and Multilane Highways Objectives of this presentation: By the end of this.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.
Travel Costs Lecture 16 October 27, /
You Are the Traffic Jam: Examination of Congestion Measures
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems CE 7640: Fall 2002 Prof. Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.
1 Travel Costs Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /25/2004.
Travel Costs Lecture 14 October 16, /
1 Social Discount Rate Travel Costs Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /15/2003.
Archived Data User Services (ADUS). ITS Produce Data The (sensor) data are used for to help take transportation management actions –Traffic control systems.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Queuing CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
1 Subjective Probability Travel Costs Scott Matthews Courses: /
1 Applications of Simulation Travel Costs Scott Matthews Courses: /
Travel Costs Lecture 12 October 9, /
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
Design Speed and Design Traffic Concepts
Travel Costs Lecture 18 October 31, / /
Urban transport: The public vs private debate LO: Explain the management of transport in urban areas, including the public versus private debate
Microsimulation for Rural and Exurban Regions: Lake County, California David Gerstle (presenting) & Zheng Wei Caliper Corporation.
1 Calculating Mode Shift and Congestion Relief-Related Greenhouse Gas Displacement For the Current Year (see last slide for contact information)
Texas has a long legacy of good roads Symbol of our economic prosperity, attracting jobs and people to the State Our roads are used by you to get to work,
May 7, 2013 Yagnesh Jarmarwala Phani Jammalamadaka Michael Copeland Maneesh Mahlawat 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 21,
Because our customers don’t care about volume to “capacity” ratios, instead they want to know:
 Presentation at the 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, NJ Monday, May 18 th Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
Fossil Fuel Savings Through Traffic Reductions for Laguna Beach Dennis Silverman Physics and Astronomy UC Irvine October 2007.
Methodology for the Use of Regional Planning Models to Assess Impact of Various Congestion Pricing Strategies Sub-network Extraction A sub-network focusing.
Freeway Capacity Analysis
Transportation Engineering
1 THE FACE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION. 2 Public Transportation in the U.S. Today Transit in every state in the Union Of the 464 urbanized areas, all but.
Transportation Concurrency The provision of “adequate transportation facilities” Integrating land use and transportation.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 19:Cost Models for Public Transportation.
ECGD 4121 – Transportation Engineering I Lecture 7 Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department 1 st Semester 2009/2010.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Travel Costs Scott Matthews / /
Making Work Zones Work Better Chung Eng Work Zone Mobility & Safety Team Office of Transportation Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department.
Keeping Texas in Business. Texas has a long legacy of good roads Symbol of our economic prosperity, attracting jobs and people to the State In part, our.
Assessing the Marginal Cost of Congestion for Vehicle Fleets Using Passive GPS Data Nick Wood, TTI Randall Guensler, Georgia Tech Presented at the 13 th.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Presentation to Transportation Planning Board October.
BIT 143: Programming – Data Structures It is assumed that you will also be present for the slideshow for the first day of class. Between that slideshow.
2007 Urban Mobility Report Principal Speaking Points.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute Austin Chamber of Commerce December 2015.
PG Funding and Management Strategies Paris Some thoughts on Road Pricing.
Do Mobility-Based Performance Measures Reflect Emissions Trends? Congestion and Emissions Co-performance Alex Bigazzi & Dr. Miguel Figliozzi ITE Western.
Chapter 12: Urban Transportation Policy “Everything in life is somewhere else, and you get there in a car.” E. B. White, One Man’s Meat, (NY: Harper &
Kanok Boriboonsomsin, Guoyuan Wu, Peng Hao, and Matthew Barth
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
High way and Transportation 2(Lab) LCIV 3034
THE HIGH COST OF FREE PARKING
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Presentation transcript:

Travel Costs Lecture 15 October 20, /

Admin / Announcements zEnergyFest tomorrow in UC 12-6 yhttp:// zFeedback on Early Course Evals zProject Presentation Feedback/Schedule zMidsemester Grades Done (80% A/B - else C,D) yDone to encourage you to keep working hard zMidterm Questions / Due Date ySee TA (jmarriot) with last minute questions yStart #3 as early as possible - get plugins loaded and running, download PDFs, etc. yCheck sample files to recall what I showed in class

Project Groups / Clients zLanka/Abhijit (Parking) zTroy/Karina/Guus (Brad - FMS) zSandor (Michael Baker) zAurora/Jared/Paulina (EH&S-Recycling) zAnuja/Iris/Kaiting (FMS - Brad) zShavon zEdward/Cheng-Chien/Junbeum zRobert zRoger

Early Evaluation Comments - “Positive” zGoals clear zWell Organized zGood examples in lecture zResponsive/answers questions zHW Hard but fun zAnalogies/stories good (new rule: 1 per class) zEnthusiastic (that’s a new one) z“Snazzy dresser” (got to be kidding)

Early Comments - “Negative” Not meant to be defensive zTalk too fast (tell me!) zOpen ended questions (I warned you!) zMore on board (ok, more coming too) zToo many slides / lecture (don’t HAVE to print) zMore case studies (coming now) zMaybe more hws, less questions per hw (?) zWebsite needs new photo (of me?) zMake more people talk (ok!) zNeed more details on final (?) zNot everything related to CBA (outline says this)

Value - travel time savings zMany studies seek to estimate VTTS yCan then be used easily in CBAs zBook reminds us of Waters 1993 (56 studies) yMany different methods used in studies yRoute, speed, mode, location choices yResults as % of hourly wages not a $ amount yMean value of 48% of wage rate (median 40) yNorth America: 59%/42%

Government Analyses zTypically 40-60% of hourly rate in CBAs zUS (FHA) 60% - Canada 50% zAgain, travel versus leisure important yWide variation: 1:1 to 5:1! zIncome levels are important themselves yVTTS not purely proportional to income yWaters suggests ‘square root’ relation yE.g. if income increases factor 4, VTTS by 2

Another Item from TCRP?

Introduction - Congestion zCongestion (i.e. highway traffic) has impacts on movement of people & goods yLeads to increased travel time and fuel costs yLong commutes -> stress -> quality of life yImpacts freight costs (higher labor costs) and thus increases costs of goods & services yhttp://tti.tamu.edu/inside/hdv/programs/ama /mobility/study/report.stm (TTI report)

Literature Review zTexas Transportation Institute’s 1999 Annual Mobility Report y15-year study to assess costs of congestion yAverage daily traffic volumes yBinary congestion values x‘Congested’ roads assumed both ways yAssumed 5% trucks all times/all roads yAssumed 1.25 persons/vehicle, $12/hour yAssumed roadway sizes for 3 classes of roads yFour different peak hour speeds (both ways)

Results zAn admirable study at the national level zIn 1997, congestion cost U.S. 4.3 billion hours of delay, 6.6 billion gallons of wasted fuel, thus $72 billion of total cost zNew Jersey wanted to validate results with its own data

New Jersey Method zUsed New Jersey Congestion Management System (NJCMS) - 21 counties total xHourly data! Much more info. than TTI report yFor 4,000 two-direction links xFreeways principal arteries, other arteries yDetailed data on truck volumes yAverage vehicle occupancy data per county, per roadway type yDetailed data on individual road sizes, etc.

Level of Service zDescription of traffic flow (A-F) yA is best, F is worst (A-C ‘ok’, D-F not) zPeak hour travel speeds calculated yCompared to ‘free flow’ speeds yA-C classes not considered as congested yD-F congestion estimated by free-peak speed zAll attempts to make specific findings on New Jersey compared to national zhttp://

Definitions zRoadway Congestion Index - cars per road space, measures vehicle density yFound per urban area (compared to avgs) y> 1.0 undesirable zTravel Rate Index yAmount of extra time needed on a road peak vs. off-peak (e.g = 20% more)

Definitions (cont.) zTravel Delay - time difference between actual time and ‘zero volume’ travel time zCongestion Cost - delay and fuel costs yFuel assumed at $1.28 per gallon yVTTS - used wage by county (100%) yAlso, truck delays $2.65/mile (same as TTI) zCongestion cost per licensed driver yTook results divided by licenses yAssumed 69.2% of all residents each county

Details zCounty wages $10.83-$23.20 per hour zFound RCI for each roadway link in NJ yAggregated by class for each county

RCI result: Northern counties generally higher than southern counties New York City

TRI result: Northern counties generally higher than southern counties

Avg annual Delay = 34 hours! Almost a work Week!

Effects zCould find annual hours of delay per driver by aggregating roadway delays yThen dividing by number of drivers zTotal annual congestion cost $4.9 B yOver 5% of total of TTI study y75% for autos (190 M hours, $0.5 B fuel cost) y25% for trucks (inc. labor/operating cost) yAvg annual delay per driver = 34 hours

Future zPredicted to only get worse yCongestion costs will double by 2015