Dark Matter Overview Harry Nelson UCSB INPAC Oct. 4, 2003
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 2 Outline Axions Massive Particles Direct Detection Weakly Interacting No Strongly Interacting (interesting opportunities) See talks of Dave Cline (ZEPLIN), Patrizia Meunier (CDMS-II)
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 3 Usual Simplifications of Dark Matter Local energy density, speed of DM Consists of one elementary particle (!) 0? ( )( ) … from galactic astrophysics , e , e -, p, n - 7 in our few percent of Univ. 2 are composite… n ?? The DM particle that provides the clearest signal in a search might not be the most abundant – a strong argument for an eclectic mix of search techniques.
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 4 Advice of Dennis the Menace
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 5 DM not baryons (CBR, BBN; Eros/MACHO) DM was once in thermal equibrium Usual Simplifications of Dark Matter mass > few keV (large scale structure) mass < 340 TeV (unitarity) cross section with us weak ( cm 2 )… little unknown missing energy at LEP, Tevatron… mass>10’s GeV SUSY restored just above weak scale gives WIMPS W eakly I nteracting M assive P articles DM at rest: v DM =0 (sun plowing through at v 0 220 km/s) v DM 1/2 300 km/s… useful to approximate 0 2 …Attractive candidates (axions, `*zillas’, etc.) were never in thermal equilibrium…
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 6 a axion, couples to … non- thermal, very light Round up the Usual Suspects e e - 0 p n -- Our Matter 0 (SUSY, neutralino, WIMP)
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 7 Direct Detection Momentum Transfer v0v0 Convert a to photon – detect it axion m v0v0 target Cause target recoil – detect it Massive Particle
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 8 Axions (and similar) (Dark matter) axion models eV ( ADMX, LLNL-Florida-Berkeley-NRAO )
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 9 Primakoff Conversion, Microwave Detection Solenoid Amplifier – power pours out of cavity when B 0 applied Cavity, `TM’ mode (E parallel to B 0 : 0 - ) L B = 50 cm Lower noise allows faster scanning….
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 10 Signal Level and Noise W from Pioneer 10 Spacecraft, km away HEMT W (s/n) (time) Substantial improvements in T s are on the horizon (X30) from increased cooling, SQUIDS
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 11 Nuclear Recoil – Cross Section A4A4
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 12 WIMP Region Large Exposure, Background: DAMA (58K kg-days, NaI) ZEPLIN (230 kg-days, Xe) IGEX (276 kg-days, Ge Ioniz) Small Exposure, Background: CDMS (28 kg-days, Ge P/I) Edelweiss (12 kg-days, Ge P/I) (DRIFT - gaseous, recoil dir.)
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 13 Event Rates... Rick Gaitskell Xe Nuclear Form Factor ~ several ev/kg/d/keV
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 14 Compare with Common Background Rate Shield (shield radioactive too!)… 1 ev/(kg d keV) typical Reduce the background… HDMS, IGEX, Genius (Ge Ionization) Exploit astron. properties (year cycle, directionality) DAMA, DRIFT Devise detectors that can distinguish nuclear recoil from electron recoil… Edelweiss, CDMS, Xenon.. DRU
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 15 v DM 1/2 300 km/s 2 v DM 1/2 =0 km/s 2 DAMA:Annual Modulation in Rate `Usual Simplification’: Halo particles are at rest, on average Sun moves through Halo - `apparent’ wind Earth modulates `wind’ velocity yearly Peak-to-peak up to 40% DAMA at Gran Sasso Fig. from DRIFT
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 16 through 2000 … 4 DAMA Background and Signal through 2003 … 6.3 Bernabei et al., astro-ph/ Energy Spectrum Bkgd 1 cpd/kg/keV 2-6 KeV 8-24 KeV Na(23) KeV I(127) cpd/kg/keV
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 17 DAMA noise... >1 pe threshold <10 -4 cpd...
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 18 DAMA Allowed Regions through 2003through 2000 (standard halo) p (cm 2 ), = 0 / Variation mainly due to changes in halo parameters two plots not directly comparable (different halos used) With new result, DAMA ceases to employ `standard Maxwellian halo’ - comparisons challenging I 33 44
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 19 DAMA vs. Super-K Model dependent… but less so than I thought. Spin-dependent (Sun) Scalar (Earth) Desai, IDM 02
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 20 00 v/c 7 Nucleus Recoils Dense Energy Deposition v/c small; Bragg Discrimination of Recoils Signal ErEr v/c 0.3 Electron Recoils Background Sparse Energy Deposition ErEr Differences the Basis of Discrimination
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 21 Simulation (by DRIFT) 40 keV Ar in 1/20 atm Ar13 keV e - in 1/20 atm Ar 5 cm Ar pushes other Ar atoms, none go very far. Electron pushes other electrons, all go far
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 22 Simultaneous Measurement of Phonons(Heat) + Ionization Temperature-20 mK Temp)/ (Energy) Temp) NTD Ge Slow (10’s ms) Ionization - E applied E Background (e - from ) … strong ionization signal… equal phonon signal Nuclear recoil… reduced (by 1/4) ionization signal, strong phonon signal Edelweiss
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 23 Edelweiss (depth: 4500 mwe) 0.32 kg/ Ge detector 3×0.32kg Germanium Detectors Roman Lead L. Chabert, EPS `03 Aachen
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 24 Edelweiss Data: ’s Suppressed by 1000 ● 7.51 kg.d exposure (fiducial volume) ● Best charg. channel : 1 keV (FWHM) ● 20 keV threshold ● 3.72 kg.d (fiduc.) ● Smaller exposure due to electronics problems ● 30 keV threshold ● kg.d (fiducial) ● Good phonon channel 300 eV (FWHM) resolution during most of the runs ● Noisy charge channel ● 30 keV threshold Bolometer 1Bolometer 2 Bolometer 3 L. Chabert, EPS `03 Aachen
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 25 Betas... Germanium Electrode Implants E External Ionization electrons get trapped in this electrode Those electrons never drift over to the other electrode… ionization signal reduced… but, all the phonons/heat still present… (ionization)/(phonons) < 1 z CDMS effort: measure z
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 26 CDMS-II Projections ~1cal year, initial deployment
UCSBHNN 10/4/03 INPAC 27 Some conclusions Axions searches about to become much more sensitive WIMPs… Next few years should get factor of 100 sensitivity High Mass, Bkgd versus Low Mass, Bkgd: How well do very high mass detectors self shield? Can low mass, bkgd be mass produced with ever- lower background requirements? Is Xe, with ionization, `middle way’? INPAC...