Steve Smith for J. Frisch, T. Borden, H. Loos, T. Montagne, M. Ross, D. Schultz, J. Wu, et al April 20, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patrick Krejcik May 3-6, 2004 Patrick Krejcik R. Akre, P. Emma, M. Hogan, (SLAC), H. Schlarb, R. Ischebeck (DESY), P. Muggli.
Advertisements

Soft X-ray Self-Seeding
INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN Fast Real-time SANS Detectors Charge Division in Individual, 1-D Position- sensitive Gas Detectors Patrick Van Esch.
S Digital Communication Systems Fiber-optic Communications - Supplementary.
LC-ABD P.J. Phillips, W.A. Gillespie (University of Dundee) S. P. Jamison (ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory) A.M. Macleod (University of Abertay) Collaborators.
05/03/2004 Measurement of Bunch Length Using Spectral Analysis of Incoherent Fluctuations Vadim Sajaev Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory.
E. Schneidmiller and M. Yurkov (SASE & MCP) C. Behrens, W. Decking, H. Delsim, T. Limberg, R. Kammering (rf & LOLA) N. Guerassimova and R. Treusch (PGM.
Laser / RF Timing (Engineering of Femtosecond Timing Systems)
First THz Measurements at FACET Ziran Wu, Alan Fisher, Henrik Loos FACET 2011 Users Meeting
Paul Emma LCLS FAC April 16, Initial Experience with Injector Commissioning P. Emma, et al. Facilities Advisory Committee.
Juhao Wu Feedback & Oct. 12 – 13, 2004 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Longitudinal Feedback with CSR as Diagnostic.
Preliminary Results from HOM Measurements at the Tesla Test Facility (SLAC) Josef Frisch, Kirsten Hacker, Linda Hendrickson, Justin May, Douglas McCormick,
Longitudinal instabilities: Single bunch longitudinal instabilities Multi bunch longitudinal instabilities Different modes Bunch lengthening Rende Steerenberg.
RF Synchronisation Issues
Reports of optical fiber communication systems
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
Review Doppler Radar (Fig. 3.1) A simplified block diagram 10/29-11/11/2013METR
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 2 February 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Background Issues: Real Time Radiation Measurement S.M.Yang EPC.IHEP Mini-Workshop on BEPCII Background Study March 2008 Institute of High Energy.
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
07/27/2004XFEL 2004 Measurement of Incoherent Radiation Fluctuations and Bunch Profile Recovery Vadim Sajaev Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory.
ILC EMI and bunch length measurements Gary Bower, SLAC Nick Sinev, U. Oregon, speaker Sean Walston, LLNL.
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Dept. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility FEL Bunch length.
Coherent Diffraction Radiation experiment Konstantin Lekomtsev, Grahame Blair, Gary Boorman, Pavel Karataev, Maximilian Micheler John Adams Institute at.
X-RAY LIGHT SOURCE BY INVERSE COMPTON SCATTERING OF CSR FLS Mar. 6 Miho Shimada High Energy Research Accelerator Organization, KEK.
P.W. Gorham et al.. TEST BEAM A SLAC Time relative to beam entry Antenna V/V rms Time relative to beam entry Antenna V/V rms close to shower maximumshower.
S. Molloy, P. Emma, J. Frisch, R. Iverson, M. Ross, D. McCormick, M. Woods, SLAC, CA, USA S. Walston, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA, USA V.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Adams Accelerator Institute 10 - E. Wilson - 1/24/ Slide 1 Lecture 14 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2004 E. J. N. Wilson.
NON-INTERCEPTING DIAGNOSTIC FOR HIGH BRIGHTNESS ELECTRON BEAMS USING OPTICAL DIFFRACTION RADIATION INTERFERENCE (ODRI) A. Cianchi #1,2, M. Castellano 3,
P. Krejcik LINAC 2004 – Lübeck, August 16-20, 2004 LCLS - Accelerator System Overview Patrick Krejcik on behalf of the LCLS.
1 ATF 2 Nanobpm (Q BPM) Electronics. Mark Slater: Cambridge Yury Kolomensky, Toyoko Orimoto: UCB Stewart Boogert, Steve Malton, Alexi Liapine: UCL Mike.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
Lessons Learned From the First Operation of the LCLS for Users Presented by Josef Frisch For the LCLS March 14, 2010.
Laser-driven Terahertz frequency transverse deflectors (?) Steven Jamison Accelerator Science and Technology Centre (ASTeC) STFC Daresbury Laboratory S.P.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting Bolko Beutner, DESY First results of micro-bunching and COTR experiments at FLASH Bolko Beutner, Winfried Decking,
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Polarized Injector Update
Bunch Length Monitor Development
LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
Accelerator Physics Topic VIII Coherent Synchrotron Radiation
Spectral methods for measurement of longitudinal beam profile
An X-band system for phase space linearisation on CLARA
ILC EMI and bunch length measurements
ATF nanoBPM system - nanoGrid ATF2 Movers TTF HOM – dipole / monopole
Accelerator Physics and Engineering Update Jan 6, 2010
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Few Slides from RF Deflector Developments and Applications at SLAC
Instrument Considerations
Diagnostics overview and FB for the XFEL bunch compressors
Accelerator Physics and Engineering Update Jan 6, 2010
LCLS Injector Diagnostics
LCLS bunch length monitor utilizing coherent radiation
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Linac Diagnostics Patrick Krejcik, SLAC April 24, 2002
Transverse coherence and polarization measurement of 131 nm coherent femtosecond pulses from a seeded FEL J. Schwenke, E. Mansten, F. Lindau, N. Cutic,
Diagnostics RF and Feedback
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback System and Bunch Length Monitor Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS DOE Review, February 08, 2006 LCLS longitudinal.
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Steve Smith for J. Frisch, T. Borden, H. Loos, T. Montagne, M. Ross, D. Schultz, J. Wu, et al April 20, 2006

Applications of Bunch Length Beam longitudinal profile for “accelerator physics” Calibrated profile needed to understand machine Measurement can be low rate, invasive Bunch length signal for feedback Non invasive Signal at full repetition rate of beam Only need an output which is monotonic and stable with respect to bunch length tuning phases

Bunch Length Monitor Requirements After BC1: 80 to 360 microns at 1nC 130 – 600 GHz Gaussian width 25 to 120 microns at 0.2nC 400GHz – 2THz Gaussian width After BC2: 8 to 40 microns at 1nC 1.2THz to 6 THz 4 to 20 microns at 0.2nC 2.4THz to 12 THz Bunches not Gaussian  frequency distribution will be somewhat different. Goal for commissioning run: Instrument and commission BC1 Gain operational experience Discussion here almost entirely for BC1

Measurement Options Temporal Spectral Works like a high speed oscilloscope. Transverse deflection Cavity (LOLA) Electro-optical measurement Spectral Measure power spectrum radiated by beam Coherent radiation Any kind: Synchrotron Edge Diffraction Gap Spectral measurement does not include phase information is lost.

Precision Measurement Transverse RF deflection structure (LOLA) High resolution directly calibrated using known phase shifts. Measurement from LOLA: TTF at DESY 4 micron resolution (13 fs) demonstrated  Intercepting 13 femtosecond FWHM spike! 1 picosecond LOLA deflection cavity installed in LCLS will be used as the “Gold Standard” bunch length measurement Beam physics experiments Calibration of “spectral” detectors Run LOLA at some slow rate (as needed) to maintain calibration of non-intercepting bunch length monitors

Coherent Radiation Detectors BC1 range is 100GHz to 1THz (BC2 to 10THz) Corresponds to the 100um to few mm wavelength range for BC1 Two approaches: Waveguides Optics Standard microwave waveguide techniques difficult above 10 GHz near impossible at THz Free space quasi-optical techniques difficult at longer wavelengths (mm) due to diffraction. Materials absorption not well known in this frequency range. Calibrated measurement difficult Saved by LOLA Use both free-space and waveguide technology at BC1

Spectral Measurements Detect coherent radiation two ways: CSR or Edge radiation in a bend Coherent radiation from ceramic gap Both provide order of a microJoule of energy. CSR/edge radiation provides somewhat more power and lower divergence easier to collect on the detector. Radiation from last bend of BC1 available BL11 is CSR/edge radiation detector Easy to add ceramic gap downstream. BL12 is gap radiation detector Calibration of bunch length vs. spectral power: difficult to do from first principles but we have transverse cavity (LOLA) As long as signal is monotonic and reproducible, we can do periodic calibrations Eliminates the most serious problems with spectral detection.

Detectors High performance mm-wave detectors are cryogenic. Used for astronomy, etc. Avoid cryogenics if possible Room temperature detectors in principle have an energy sensitivity of Ethermal ~ kBT ~10-20J. Real detectors much worse Two common technologies: Pyroelectric Diodes

Diodes vs. Pyroelectrics Diodes limited to ~750GHz Diodes have better sensitivity Diodes have worse dynamic range, ~10,000:1, but this is probably not a limit Diodes more expensive ($5K at high frequencies), rather than $500 (including preamplifier for pyro Diodes are more damage sensitive.

Waveguide Attenuation Waveguides available as small as WR-0.51 Internal Dimensions: 130um X 65um Frequency 1.4-2.2 THz Attenuation can be very high for small waveguide 3dB/M at 100GHz 17dB/M at 300GHz 100dB/M at 1THz (attenuations from empirical fit to data) Limits use of waveguide at high frequency

Waveguide vs. Free space Compare Rayleigh length for free space with sigma = .5cm relative to length for 10dB attenuation in Waveguide Approximate cross-over At 400GHz

Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Narrow opening angle, large transverse size at end of magnet suggest use of free space optics to image onto detector. Expect order of 1uJ collected on detector. >1000X Pyroelectric sensor sensitivity. No advantage to diodes here Since free space optics works well at high frequencies, this seems a good solution for frequencies >~250GHz

Conceptual Design Diagnostics Focusing 200mm DR Bend 10mm ER Mirror f = 200mm SR 38mm 200mm

BL11 Bunch length monitor Use CS/edge radiation free space pyroelectric detector. Systems like this already in use M. Hogan at SPPS Retractable mirror in vacuum. Use flat mirror Off axis parabola would collect slightly more signal but has difficult alignment issues Slight modification of existing vacuum chamber and insertion design Hole for beam passage Small optical table for detector components Insertable wavelength filters. Alignment diode has phase space similar to mm-wave radiation

BL 11 Quasi-Optical / Pyroelectric Monitor Image coherent synchrotron & edge radiation on pyroelectric detector

BC1 Radiation Distribution Wavelength 1mm 200mm downstream of BC1 Near field integration of “acceleration field” Edge length « λγ² Mainly ER from both bend edges, 4x larger than SR Radiation from Entrance edge hits vacuum chamber Horizontal Pol. Vertical Pol.

Propagate Gauss-Laguerre Modes Use Gauss-Laguerre modes with radial mode number 1 for field of each polarization Needs γ/2 transverse modes to get correct far field distribution Horizontal polarization at magnet edge λ = 1cm γ = 500

CER Transmission Through Optics For one polarization, normalized to total 2π emission 3 cm-1 at detector 15 cm-1 3 cm-1 15 cm-1

Transverse Profile Through Optics 3 cm-1 15 cm-1

Is Interference of CER & CDR a Problem? Get field at detector for CER and CDR CDR is not focused on detector Wave front curvature differs from CER Intensity at detector shows narrow fringe pattern Fringes much faster than changes in form factor Conclusion: CDR can be ignored

Predicted Detector Signal vs Bunch Length

Pyroelectric Detectors Crystal which converts thermal directly to electrical output LiTaO3 “physics” is fast – nanosecond coatings can slow down the detectors. Integrate all input energy (DC-gamma rays) Very good linearity up to damage threshold. Act as current sources, approximately 1uC/J Noise limited by preamplifier.

Pyroelectric Detector Sensitivity ELTEC420m3 5mm diameter detector (20mm2). 0.3 uC/Joule sensitivity Detector capacitance Cd ~100 pF A good charge preamplifier (Amptek A250F) should see 300 electrons RMS noise based on 100pf capacitance Corresponds to 0.15nJ detector noise. Parts cost: Detector $75 Pre-amplfier about $500. Threshold sensitivity ~ 7.5pJ/mm2

BL11 Bunch Length Monitor: Development Plan Use of flat mirror in vacuum and existing chamber / mover design minimizes engineering before installation Optics and detectors on table can be modified as needed only humidity proof cover required Serves as a model for the BC2 bunch length monitor Short bunch length / high frequencies requires pyro detectors allows for easy use of free space optics .

Radiation from Gap 1 nC, 200micron bunch, 1cm gap gives about 2 uJ total energy Calculations fro Juhao Wu Radiation is distributed over a wide area – difficult to collect. Corresponds to about 1.6nJ/mm2 for a 2cm radius gap Pyroelectric detectors (7.5pJ/mm2) marginal (especially for a 0.2nC bunch). Diode detectors (.03 to 0.4 pJ/mm2 depending on wavelength) look OK. RF horn will gain 10-20dB in diode detectors but probably lose 10dB in waveguide at high frequencies Looks reasonable, limited by waveguide, and diode frequency response to frequencies below about 500GHz.

BL12 Bunch Length Monitor Located just after the BL11 monitor Uses gap and diode detectors Only vacuum component is conventional ceramic gap Initially instrument with 100GHz diodes Add higher frequency diodes as needed Diodes used in pairs to reduce effect of beam motion 20cm waveguide used to disperse pulse (~1ns), keep peak power reasonable on diodes. 20dB gain horns on diodes

BL12 Waveguide / Diode Monitor

RF Diode Detectors Very fast diode to rectify the input signal Vout  Pin for input voltages < diode drop Typically modest output impedance (~ few KOhm). Linear output range limited to ~100mV. Use waveguide dispersion to stretch mm-wave pulse to keep diode in linear range. Very high sensitivity ~1V/W, or 1mC/J . Typically connected to waveguide Many vendors for F<~130GHz Few (only Virginia diodes found so far) for higher frequencies up to ~800GHz.

RF Diode : 100 GHz Millitech DXP-10 WR10 input waveguide Active area 3mm2. 20dB gain horn available. Approx 2KOhm output impedance Output charge 0.15mC/J. Capacitance small ~1pf. Assume A250F charge amplifier expect ~100 electrons noise corresponds to 0.1pJ detector noise Maximum linear signal ~500pJ Cost ~$1K, preamplifier $500 Threshold sensitivity 0.03 pJ/mm2 (energy density)

Microwave Diode at 300GHz Virginia Diodes WR-2.2ZBD WR-2.2 input waveguide Active area 0.16mm2 20dB gain horn avaialble Output impedance ~3KOhm Output charge ~ 1mC/J Capacitance small ~1pf. With A250F charge amplifier, expect ~100 electrons noise, corresponds to 0.016 pJ detector noise. Max linear signal 0.1nJ Cost $5K, preamplifier $500 Sensitivity 0.1pJ/mm2 Note, for 750GHz diode get threshold sensitivity ~0.4pJ / mm2

BL12 Development Plan Similar diodes operating at 100GHz tested in End Station A. Additional test in end station A in April 2006 using same electronics as LCLS Will use pair of diodes to check measurement noise. Initial test in LCLS will be done with a pair of 100GHz detectors. As shorter bunch length measurements are required, additional diodes and waveguide can be added Use of optical breadboard makes installation of new diodes (on optical clamp mount) straightforward. Will try using a pyroelectric detector mounted next to the gap. Should be able to measure total mm-wave power compare with toroid current measurement to get bunch length signal Very simple and inexpensive system if it works. In principal extends to very short bunch lengths Must be calibrated with LOLA

Controls Interface Pyroelectric detectors, and diodes will use very similar “nuclear physics” type charge sensitive preamplifiers Signals can be read with a conventional GADC (gated ADC). Initially will use SLC CAMAC ADC Existing software for control and histories Can provide slow feedback to main LCLS EPICS control system for feedback tests. For high bandwidth feedback convert to EPICS GADC in VME. Other controls interface is straightforward pneumatic actuators temperature monitoring

Summary Two coherent radiation bunch-length monitors for BC1 Measure bunch length every pulse non-intercepting BL11 Quasi-optical Pyroelectric readout BL12 Waveguide Diode readout Both are calibrated by transverse deflecting cavity