AURA 2 Sep 2004. Context  National Academy’s Decadal Review recommended a ‘large synoptic survey telescope’ (LSST) 6m class aperture –dedicated wide-field.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUCLID : From Dark Energy to Earth mass planets and beyond Jean-Philippe Beaulieu Institut dAstrophysique de Paris Dave Bennett University of Notre Dame.
Advertisements

General Astrophysics with TPF-C David Spergel Princeton.
Distance Ladder. Pre-class Problem You stand are looking at “famous local landmark” from two positions on either side of the “other famous local place”.
KIDS compared to PanSTARRS: specs and status
Ultimate wide field Imaging: The Large Synoptic Sky Survey Marek Kowalski Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn.
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
KIDS: mapping the universe with weak lensing Konrad Kuijken, Leiden.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
Brian Schmidt, Paul Francis, Mike Bessell, Stefan Keller.
KDUST Supernova Cosmology
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: Optical I: Big Apertures Geoff Bower.
Nikos Nikoloudakis and T.Shanks, R.Sharples 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Athens, Greece September 20-24, 2009.
Supernovae Historically: “new stars” in sky Seen in 1006, 1054, 1181, 1572, 1604, 1680 SN 1054 visible in daytime sky for many months (Chinese records)
30 March 2006Birmingham workshop1 The Gaia Mission A stereoscopic census of our Galaxy.
May stars be the actors and dark energy direct shoot a movie in the sky Chihway Chang Oct.8 ‘2008.
Hubble Symposium 5 May 04. BVIBVI SN1a are standardizable candles: Bright = slow Dim = fast One parameter yields 10% luminosity distances SNIa Similarity.
Pan-STARRS and TGBN Paul Price Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii.
Detection of Terrestrial Extra-Solar Planets via Gravitational Microlensing David Bennett University of Notre Dame.
Synergies with multi-wavelength surveys Matt Jarvis University of Hertfordshire.
Pan-STARRS PY2 EOC Review #2 3 August 2004 U NIVERSITY OF H AWAII I NSTITUTE FOR A STRONOMY Approved for Public Release - Distribution is Unlimited 1 Astro.
X-ray Optical microwave Cosmology at KIPAC. The Survey 5000 square degrees (overlap with SPT and VISTA) Five-band (grizY) + VISTA (JHK) photometry to.
Quotes from NWNH 2/3/ Two complementary approaches to understanding dark energy have been considered by this survey: one on the ground and the.
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Philip A. Pinto Steward Observatory University of Arizona for the LSST Collaboration Legacy Projects Workshop 17 May,
1 New Frontiers with LSST: leveraging world facilities Tony Tyson Director, LSST Project University of California, Davis Science with the 8-10 m telescopes.
UKIRT: Current Status and Future Plans Natonal Astronomy Meeting 20 th April 2009 Professor Gary Davis, Director.
1 The Precision Radial Velocity Spectrometer Science Case.
1 Linking Optical and Infrared Observations with Gravitational Wave Sources. Christopher Stubbs Department of Physics Departme nt of Astronomy Harvard.
Transient Sources S. R. Kulkarni California Institute of Technology Pasadena.
A Search for Earth-size Planets Borucki – Page 1 Roger Hunter (Ames Research Center) & Kepler Team March 26, 2010.
The Search for Extrasolar Planets Since it appears the conditions for planet formation are common, we’d like to know how many solar systems there are,
The Origins Billion Star Survey K. Johnston, B. Dorland, R. Gaume, R. Olling,, (U.S. Naval Observatory), K. Seidelmann (University of Virginia), S. Seager.
Astrometry & the Yale/WIYN ODI Survey. Potential astrometric projects Local luminosity function (van Altena, et al.) obtain  ≤ 0.10 parallaxes to 150.
Search for HPM stars in UWISH2 D. Froebrich. Thank you very much for your interest!
Pan-STARRS The Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System Stefanie Phleps (MPE Garching, Decrypting the Universe, Edinburgh,
Introduction to the modern observational cosmology Introduction/Overview.
1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.
Explorations of the Outer Solar System B. Scott Gaudi Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Quality Assurance Benchmark Datasets and Processing David Nidever SQuaRE Science Lead.
Surveying the Universe with SNAP Tim McKay University of Michigan Department of Physics Seattle AAS Meeting: 1/03 For the SNAP collaboration.
Chinese- international collaboration solved the central question: ”How common are planets like the Earth”
Wide-Field Imaging Surveys from the Ground S. M. Kahn Stanford U./SLAC and J.A. Tyson University of California, Davis.
Arecibo Frontiers – 12 Sep Beyond the Frontiers: The Road From Arecibo to The Radio Synoptic Survey Telescope (RSST) Steven T. Myers National Radio.
The Taiwanese-American Occultation Survey (TAOS) Matthew Lehner ASIAA.
Wide Field Astronomy from Space Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute January 9, 2002.
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: The power of wide-field imaging Michael Strauss, Princeton University.
1 Imaging Surveys: Goals/Challenges May 12, 2005 Luiz da Costa European Southern Observatory.
A Search for Earth-size Planets Borucki – Page 1 W.J. Borucki & Kepler Team (NASA Ames Research Center) NASA Academy 14 July 2010.
Pan-STARRS and SNe Paul Price Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii.
LSST and VOEvent VOEvent Workshop Pasadena, CA April 13-14, 2005 Tim Axelrod University of Arizona.
Pan-STARRS Seminar: IPPEugene Magnier Pan-STARRS Image Processing Pipeline An Overview IFA Pan-STARRS Seminar 735 October 6, 2004.
Dept. of Astronmy Wide Field Surveys and Astronomical Discovery Space A. Lawrence / Astro-ph: Byeon Jae Gyu.
MMT Observation Database for Light Curve Analysis Vladimir Agapov Presentation for the WG1 session 33rd IADC meeting, Houston.
Jovan Aleksić Serbia Level 1 Transient events (variable and moving objects) Level 2 Static objects (catalogs, images) Level 3 User services.
Surveys with OmegaCAM / VST KIDS Koen Kuijken, Leiden.
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Astronomy 3040 Astrobiology Spring_2016 Day-7. Homework -1 Due Monday, Feb. 8 Chapter 2: 1, 3, 16 23, 24, 26 29, 30, , 54, 56 The appendices will.
Chapter 25 Galaxies and Dark Matter. 25.1Dark Matter in the Universe 25.2Galaxy Collisions 25.3Galaxy Formation and Evolution 25.4Black Holes in Galaxies.
Sample expanded template for one theme: Physics of Galaxy Evolution Mark Dickinson.
NIRSS: the Near-Infrared Sky Surveyor WFIRST Meeting 2011 February 3 Daniel Stern (JPL/Caltech)
2010 – Ji-Beom Ham OUTBURST EVENT WITH LSST Giant Telescope Science 2011 Spring.
Transient Identification and Classification with WISE Doug Hoffman R. Cutri & T. Jarrett The Eventful Universe, 2010.
Astronomy toolkits and data structures Andrew Jenkins Durham University.
1 ASTRON is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy Astronomy at ASTRON George Heald.
Galaxy Evolution and WFMOS
Pan-STARRS observational requirements specification.
The Kepler Mission S. R. Kulkarni.
Modern cosmology 1: The Hubble Constant
LSST : Follow-up des SN proches
The Faulkes Telescope Project Deep Impact & Bioastronomy
Presentation transcript:

AURA 2 Sep 2004

Context  National Academy’s Decadal Review recommended a ‘large synoptic survey telescope’ (LSST) 6m class aperture –dedicated wide-field optical imager –all-sky survey to enable multiple science goals –applications from solar system to cosmology –strategic emphasis in NEO threat  LSST is assumed to accept natural seeing for many applications the figure of merit is then simply the etendue: A  an alternative to a single 6m telescope is an array of smaller telescopes with the same total area A many pros and cons, the major advantages are: –single: no duplication of detectors, can go fainter faster –distributed: cheaper, faster to build, more flexible

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Pan-STARRS Design Philosophy  Given the following constraints: Construction time ~ 1 year per meter aperture Telescope cost rises faster than D 2 Pixel size limited to >10  m, desire 0.3” pixels requires a focal length of <8m Optical design for a large  becomes very expensive for fast f-ratios Costs of CCD detectors have been falling –(O)MEGACAMs: ~$8-10M for ~3x10 8 pixel or ~2-3c/pixel –Today it is possible to do a factor of 10 better  We believe it is cheaper and better to build an a survey instrument from an array of telescopes and detectors.

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Pan-STARRS in a Nutshell  Telescopes Four 1.8m R-C + corrector 7 square degree FOV Sited on Mauna Kea or Haleakala  Operation mode: Broad band optical imaging Four telescopes view the same field to detect transient or moving objects and build up a deep image of the sky  Partners: IfA: science, detectors, pipelines MHPCC: production DP, infrastructure SAIC: databases and mass storage systems MIT-Lincoln Lab: detectors  Detector and controllers ” pixels per camera Image motion compensation 512 channel controller 2 second readout 4e - read-noise  Data-Processing System Multicolor summed images Difference images for detection of moving and variable objects Catalogs of static, moving, transient objects  Science: “Killer Asteroids” (PHAs) Huge range of other science topics – presently imagination limited

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Pu`u Poliahu UH 0.6-m UH 2.2-m

AURA 2 Sep 2004 UKIRT CFHT

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Science Overview  Time domain astronomy Transient objects Moving objects Variable objects  Static sky science Enabled by stacking repeated scans to form a collection of ultra-deep static sky images Observing Programs Science Programs  Very extensive overlaps between observational requirements of science programs!

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Pan-STARRS Surveys  Solar System (Ecliptic Plane) – used primarily to satisfy the observing requirements imposed by the PHO, NEO, MBA, KBO and other SS programs.  3  – used primarily to satisfy the observing requirements of the WL, LSN census, and EG object detection & classification programs; primary cadence drivers are the LSN census (and other proper motion studies)  Medium-Deep – the SNe, LSS, and the EG object detection & classification programs; primary cadence driver being SNe  Ultra-Deep – EG object detection & classification and, to some extent, SNe programs  Object Variability/Auxiliary – mostly user-defined supporting programs such as stellar variability and the search for extra-solar planets

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Design Reference Mission ModePSYAreaCad.wgrizy SS NEO 1.1d 0.2b 7000h/d/m SS KBO 1.0d 0.2b 33 hdmy Var. 0.8d 0.8b 1334 min 3 1.3d 2.5b 33 14d Med. Deep 0.6d 0.9b 12004d Ultra Deep 0.5d 0.7b 284d  limit (AB) Total int. (min)

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Science with Pan-STARRS  Moving Object Science NEO – Near Earth Object threat OSS/MBO – Main Belt and Other Solar System science KBO – Kuiper Belt Objects SOL – Solar Neighborhood (parallaxes and proper motions)  Static and Invariable Object Science WL – Weak Lensing LSS – Large Scale Structure LSB – Low Surface Brightness and dwarf galaxies SPH – Spheroid formation EGGS – Extragalactic and Galactic Stellar science  Transient and Variable Object Science AGN – Active Galactic Nuclei SNE – Supernovae GRB – Gamma Ray Bursts and afterglows EXO – Exoplanets (from occulation) YSO – Young Stellar Objects VAR – Variability Science (especially stars)  TGBN (Things that go Bump in the Night)

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Near Earth Asteroids Local Regional Global 10 8 Mton m1km10km 2x10 5 5x10 8 year Size Time Interval Energy

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Damage vs Size

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Risk Reduction vs Time (200m) (50m) (500m) (1000m) PS LINEAR LSST

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Inner Solar System Science  ~10 7 asteroids Families Orbit parameter space structure  ~10 4 NEOs Phase-space distribution Hazardous asteroids  Comets

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Outer Solar System Science  Kuiper Belt Objects Orbital distribution Formation and evolution  Trans-Neptunian Objects  Interlopers on hyperbolic orbits

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Stars and the Galaxy  Parallax survey Complete stellar census to 100pc  Proper motions Formation history  Other goals: Stellar variability Low mass stars Extra-solar planets

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Moving Objects  KBO – 20,000 KBOs over 10 years; all sky, unbiased. ~100 in binary pairs  OSS – many more asteroids and comets (~20x) 5x10 6 million main belt, 10 5 Jupiter Trojans, etc.  SOL – parallaxes to ~100pc in 10 years Best substellar IMF available (better than UKIDSS) x more brown dwarfs than SDSS or 2MASS  EGGS – proper motions of most stars in the Milky Way Accuracy of 2.5 km/s at 1kpc.

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Cosmology – Weak Lensing  Total mass power spectrum P(k) to large scales Test of inflation theory Evolution of P(k)  Higher order statistics Gravitational instability theory  Cluster mass function  Cosmology Cosmological parameters Geometric tests World model

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Static and Invariable Objects  WL – Weak lensing over 1000 sq deg. Large-scale structure of mass on large scales (wide area) and small scales (high density of objects) as a function of redshift, evolution of mass clustering. Mass profiles of galaxies  SPH, LSB, AGN – Evolution of galaxies Pan-STARRS will survey 4x the area of SDSS, will have the same photometric accuracy but 3-4 mag fainter, good sensitivity at 1um (y band). Reionization, metal formation, spheroid formation, AGN activity, galaxy merging, and cluster formation.

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Cosmology – Supernovae  Hubble diagram Dark energy equation of state w(z) Cosmological parameters  Supernova physics  Star formation history

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Transient and Variable Objects  SNE – 10,000’s of SNIa to z=1 Measure time (redshift) evolution of dark energy  AGN – Dropouts to z=7, variability identification Reionization, metals, spheroid formation, nature of radio sources, stellar disruptions, etc.  GRB – Optical counterparts (~100 per year) Possibly V~8 declining to V~20 in one day  EXO – Occultations of stars by planets Pan-STARRS is sensitive to Jupiters around sub- solar mass stars or Earths around brown dwarfs.  VAR – Stellar variability White dwarfs, binaries, Cepheids, Miras, RR Lyrae, microlensing, supergiants, etc, etc.

AURA 2 Sep 2004 TGBN  The Pan-STARRS survey is times SDSS, Megacam survey, Vista, etc. in extent, but…  We are repeating it 30 – 500 times!  We will be the first to have extensive time domain information, designed with useful and interesting cadences, well controlled selection and systematics, and huge samples.  There is a high likelihood for unanticipated discoveries Unexpected variable objects Extremely rare objects Very large scale patterns

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Data Volume  Expect 700 images = 6 Tb per night raw; 3 Tb per night = 1 Pb per year reduced!  We have to be prepared not to “save the bits”  We must create a reliable enough pipeline that we tap all the science we want as the data flow through, and then throw the bits on the floor. (This has never been achieved before.)

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Image Processing Pipeline Phase 1 Detector Calibration (Calibration and Instrument Correction Processes) Phase 2 Map and Warp to Sky (Image Manipulation Processes) Phase 3 Create Sky Image (Image Combination Processes) Interface 1 Interface 2Interface 3Interface 4Interface 5 Data Storage Data Storage Data Storage Telescope Cameras Science Clients Phase 6 Science Client Interfaces TCS and Environment Monitoring Phase 4 Augmented Image Processing Data Storage Interface 7 Chip Level Telescope and System Level Interface 6 Phase 5 Science Client Product Generation Data Storage Data Storage System Level Image Capture Scheduler Phase 0 Internal Product Generation Internal Product Generation Mission Planning…pre-staging of each night’s scheduling and supporting data…TBD NB: specifics have changed!

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Confusing Issues  LSST should not be discussed as an either – or competitor to Pan-STARRS; Pan-STARRS will exist before LSST begins construction. Therefore: Astro-photo precursor survey will have been done, A robust data pipeline will have been shaken down, 50% of 300m PHAs will have been discovered, etc, etc.  What etendue is really needed? Etendue is A  those last two factors are important! SDSS at A  CFHT at 10, Suprime at 13 cannot approach LSST science because of limited  and/or  Pan-STARRS at A  is designed to have superb  and  and the software and scheduling to maintain LSST science. Pan-STARRS will improve on the present state of the art (SDSS, upcoming synoptic surveys) by at least an order of magnitude in science productivity.

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Design Reference Mission ModePSYAreaCad.wgrizy SS NEO 1.1d 0.2b 7000h/d/m SS KBO 1.0d 0.2b 33 hdmy Var. 0.8d 0.8b 1334 min 3 1.3d 2.5b 33 14d Med. Deep 0.6d 0.9b 12004d Ultra Deep 0.5d 0.7b 284d  limit (AB) Total int. (min)

AURA 2 Sep 2004 Final Data Products  Sky, the wallpaper: 10 Tpix x 6 colors x N versions  Sky, the movie: 10 Tpix x 6 colors x 50 epochs  Sky, the database: 2x10 10 objects (x 6 colors x epochs) –Photometry to < 0.01 mag, astrometry to < 50 mas –Photometric redshifts of most of these objects 10 9 proper motions (complete over 3  ) 10 8 variable stars and AGN 10 7 asteroids (10 4 NEO/PHA) 10 7 transients (SN, GRB, etc.) 3x10 5 stars within 100 pc (with good parallax)