The Next-Generation Adaptive Optics System at Keck Observatory Introduction & Overview Michael Liu & Claire Max on behalf of the NGAO study group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
Advertisements

Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
NGAO Systems Engineering Status Team Meeting #3 (Video) R. Dekany 13 December 2006.
Why do astronomers need AO? Lick Observatory, 1 m telescope Long exposure image Short exposure image: “speckles” With adaptive optics Three images of a.
Strategic Planning for Adaptive Optics at Keck Claire Max and Mike Liu on behalf of Keck AO Working Group Antonin Bouchez (Caltech), Rich Dekany (Caltech),
Science Group: Status, Plans, and Issues Claire Max Liz McGrath August 19, 2008.
Extragalactic AO Science James Larkin AOWG Strategic Planning Meeting September 19, 2004.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Laser guide star adaptive optics at the Keck Observatory Adam R. Contos, Peter L. Wizinowich, Scott K. Hartman, David Le Mignant, Christopher R. Neyman,
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena, CA V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena,
W. M. Keck Observatory Keck Next Generation AO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Irvine Meeting September 14, 2006 P. Wizinowich for NGAO Executive Committee.
Planets around Low-Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs Michael Liu Bruce Macintosh NGAO Workshop, Sept 2006.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
Future Opportunities for Adaptive Optics Galactic Science Andrea Ghez University of California Los Angeles.
W. M. Keck Observatory’s Next Generation Adaptive Optics Preliminary Design & Path Forward Peter Wizinowich, Sean Adkins, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire.
Keck NGAO Science Requirements Claire Max UC Santa Cruz Caltech NGAO Meeting November 14, 2006.
NGAO System Design Review Response Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting June 18, 2008.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max, Sean Adkins for NGAO Team SSC Meeting February 20, 2008.
Science Team Management Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
Extragalactic Science Case 1.People who worked on this study 2.Example science cases: – Low redshifts: black hole masses in nearby galaxies – Intermediate.
The Need for Contiguous Fields NGAO Team Meeting, Waimea January 22, 2007 Claire Max.
1 NGAO Instrumentation Studies Overview By Sean Adkins November 14, 2006.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. ~ March 20, 2009 February 5, 2009 DRAFT.
Widening the Scope of Adaptive Optics Matthew Britton.
1 The Scientific Context for NGAO Mark Morris, representing the NGAO Scientific Advisory Team (NSAT): Tommaso Treu, Laird Close, Michael Liu, & Keith Matthews.
NGAO Astrometric Science and Performance Astrometric Performance Budget Team: Brian Cameron, Jessica Lu, Matthew Britton, Andrea Ghez, Rich Dekany, Claire.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting April 3, 2007.
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory KPAO Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Keck Precision AO (KPAO) SSC Presentation January.
The Path to NGAO Core Science Requirements Claire Max and Liz McGrath NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
NGAO Meeting #3 Introduction NGAO Meeting #3 Peter Wizinowich December 13, 2006.
NGAO Science Instruments Build to Cost Status February 5, 2009 Sean Adkins.
Galactic Science: Star and Planet Formation
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Science Advisory Team: Introductions & NSAT Charge Taft Armandroff, Mike Bolte, Shri Kulkarni, Hilton Lewis June 11,
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
Next Generation Adaptive Optics (NGAO) System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max Science Case Presenters: Brian Cameron,
The Future of AO at Keck Sept 2004 Mike Brown, for the AOWG and Keck AO team.
NGAO Build to Cost Summary Peter Wizinowich, Sean Adkins, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max & the NGAO Team SSC Meeting April 14, 2009.
NGAO High-Contrast Performance Budget (WBS aka Companion Sensitivity) Initial WFE budget and status report NGAO Team meeting #4, WMKO Kamuela.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting January 24, 2007.
Science Requirements Impacting AO Architecture Claire Max Architecture Meeting July
High Redshift Galaxies: Encircled energy performance budget and IFU spectroscopy Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
NGAO Meeting #5 Introduction NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. December 2, 2008 DRAFT.
W. M. Keck Observatory’s Next Generation Adaptive Optics (NGAO) Facility Peter Wizinowich, Sean Adkins, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team:
Black Holes in Nearby Galaxies Claire Max NGAO Team Meeting March 7, 2007.
Trade Study Report: NGAO versus Keck AO Upgrade NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max, Sean Adkins for NGAO Team SSC Meeting November 6, 2007.
Providing Access for US Astronomers to the Next Generation of Large Ground Based OIR Telescopes 1.Scientific Potential 2.Current Design Efforts 3.Complementarity.
Keck Observatory and The System: Astro2010 Activities Mike Bolte, Shri Kulkarni, Taft Armandroff Keck Strategic Planning Discussions September 18, 2009.
W. M. Keck Observatory Subaru Users’ Meeting
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
Future Giant Telescopes: Evolution in Ground-Space Synergy Richard Ellis Caltech Astrophysics 2020: STScI, November
Future Plan of Subaru Adaptive Optics
CELT Science Case. CELT Science Justification Process Put together a Science Working Group –Bolte, Chuck Steidel, Andrea Ghez, Mike Brown, Judy Cohen,
Keck Observatory in the TMT Era Keck Strategic Planning meeting September 18, 2009.
Mega Telescopes of the 21 st Century Evolution in the Ground-Space Synergy Dr. Marc Postman (STScI) & Richard Ellis (Caltech) James Webb Space Telescope.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Keck Observatory Overview Peter Wizinowich W. M. Keck Observatory AOSC May 31, 2004.
Keck Next Generation AO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Meeting #2 Caltech November 14, 2006 P. Wizinowich for NGAO Executive Committee.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes Center for Adaptive Optics.
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
NGAO System Design Project Plans and Schedule
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

The Next-Generation Adaptive Optics System at Keck Observatory Introduction & Overview Michael Liu & Claire Max on behalf of the NGAO study group.

NGAO Study Contributors Solar System: Franck Marchis (UC Berkeley) –Maté Adamkovics (UC Berkeley), Antonin Bouchez (Caltech), Josh Emery (NASA-Ames), Keith Noll (STScI), Galactic Astronomy: Michael Liu (Hawaii) –Andrea Ghez (UCLA), Tom Greene (NASA-Ames), Lynne Hillenbrand (Caltech), Jessica Lu (UCLA) Bruce Macintosh (LLNL), Stan Metchev (UCLA), Nevin Weinberg (Caltech) Extragalactic Astronomy: Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) –Mark Ammons (UCSC), Aaron Barth (UC Irvine), Rich Dekany (Caltech), Don Gavel (UCSC), David Koo (UCSC), Patrick Jonsson (UCSC), David Law (Caltech), James Larkin (UCLA), Laura Melling (UCSB), Greg Novak (UCSC), Tommaso Treu (UCSB), Chuck Steidel (Caltech) Technical and Science Instruments: Peter Wizinowich (WMKO) –Sean Adkins, Brian Bauman, Jim Bell, Antonin Bouchez, Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Don Gavel, Olivier Lai, David Le Mignant, Bruce Macintosh, Keith Matthews, Chris Neyman, Viswas Velur

Agenda for today’s presentations 1.NGAO science case: led by AOWG Introduction & Executive Summary (30 min) Extragalactic Science (20 min) Galactic Science: Star & Planet Formation (20 min) Solar System Science (15 min) Galactic Science: Galactic Center (10 min) Summary 2.NGAO technical case: led by WMKO Introduction & Point Design (15 min) Performance Budgets (30 min) Point Design Feasibility and Subsystems (25 min) Science Instruments (10 min) Management & Budget plan (20 min) Summary

Recall the Keck Strategic Plan: Twenty-year strategic goals for astronomy Leadership in high angular resolution astronomy Leadership in state of the art instrumentation Highly efficient observing Complementarity with ELTs NGAO addresses all of these!

Keck Next-Generation Adaptive Optics (NGAO) will provide a powerful new suite of capabilities 1.Near diffraction-limited in the near-IR (K-Strehl >80%) A PSF with unprecedented precision, stability and contrast. 2.Vastly increased sky coverage and multiplexing Enables a much broader range of science programs. 3.AO correction at red optical wavelengths (  m) Highest angular resolution of any filled-aperture telescope.

Keck AO has been a tremendous success thus far NGS AO LGS AO Titan AU Mic debris disk Kuiper Belt objects TitanGalactic Center Merging galaxiesSubstellar binaries

Refereed science papers from LGS AO: Keck has already had a big impact in first 1.5 yrs Keck LGS

Competitive landscape: Other 8-10 meter telescopes are aggressively pursuing new AO systems. Other observatories are focusing on high-contrast imaging or ground-layer AO 1.High-contrast (Extreme AO): powerful, but highly specialized –Gemini (GPI, NICI), VLT (SPHERE), Subaru (HiCIAO) 2.Ground-layer AO (“Seeing Improvement”) –VLT (to feed MUSE and HAWK-I) –Gemini study Only Gemini is pursuing well-corrected wider-field AO –Multi-Conjugate AO (~2’ FOV, K-Strehl~0.4) Current Keck AO system is ~10 years old.

Keck AO Strategic Plan AO strategic plan established by Keck AO Working Group in Nov 2002, reaffirmed in Sep 2004: “AOWG vision is that high Strehl, single-object, AO will be the most important competitive point for Keck AO in the next decade.” Late 2005: New AOWG tasked by Observatory and SSC to develop science case for next-generation Keck AO.

Overview of this year’s NGAO study Solicit broad participation from science & technical expertise in Keck community General approach: –Analyze a limited set of key science cases, spanning the range of community interests. –Develop science requirements for AO and science instruments –Generate simulations of NGAO performance –Iterate on science requirements. –Develop point design Mar: Science workshop at CfAO/UCSC 2006 Apr: Technical retreat in Indian Wells, CA 2006 May: Work meeting at SPIE meeting in Orlando, FL

Science requirements for NGAO High-level summary of required AO capabilities

NGAO will allow us to tackle many high impact science areas 1.Near diffraction-limited in the near-IR (Strehl >80%) Direct detection of planets around low-mass and young stars Astrometric tests of general relativity in the Galactic Center Detailed structure/kinematics of high redshift galaxies 2.Vastly increased sky coverage and multiplexing Multi-object IFU surveys of GOODS-N, COSMOS, etc. Resolving the earliest stages of star + planet formation 3.AO correction at red optical wavelengths (  m) Scattered-light studies of debris disks and their planets Masses and composition of asteroids and Kuiper Belt objects Kinematic mass determinations for super massive black holes

NGAO Architecture Tomography to measure wavefronts and overcome cone effect IR tip-tilt stars, partially AO- corrected, for broad sky coverage Closed-loop AO for narrow fields Open-loop AO for deployable IFUs

What is Tomography ? 90 km

Key performance metrics: Strehl vs. observing wavelength

Key performance metrics: Sky coverage and Strehl vastly better with NGAO For narrow-field science, Keck NGAO produces high Strehl ratios over most of the sky in the near-IR. K-band Strehl Sky coverage all-sky average r 0 = 18 cm, z=30°

NGAO has dramatically better sensitivity: Example of near-IR IFU spectroscopy Plot shows S/N ratio for redshifted H , OSIRIS-like IFU: for 0.6 < z < 2.3, NGAO shows factor of 3 to 6 improvement in signal to noise ratio. Factor of 9 to 36 shorter integration times (!) If IFU has 6 deployable units, multiply by another 6x NGAO + d-IFU has x higher throughput than LGS AO today!

NGAO has dramatically better sensitivity: Point source sensitivity (1 hour, 5  ) FilterCurrent LGS AO 330 nm WF error Proposed NGAO 140 nm WF error Magnitude improvement V R I J H K’ L’ Ms

NGAO: Science Instrument Priorities 1.Near-IR imager 2.Visible imager 3.Near-IR IFU (OSIRIS?) 4.Visible single-field IFU 5.Thermal near-IR imager 1.Deployable near-IR multi-object IFU (N~6) Single-objectMulti-object

NGAO risk reduction: Key technical elements are already being tested in the lab and on the sky Lasers –Situation much improved in last few years Tomography –Gemini-South, solar, VLT/MAD, Palomar NGS Visible-wavelength AO –Air Force (demonstrated), Mt. Wilson (demonstrated), Palomar, Lick MEMS deformable mirrors –N act =1024 working in UCSC lab, funded by consortium up through N act =4096 Open-loop AO –Testing now at Lab for Adaptive Optics –On-sky demonstration coming to Lick

Important linkages between Keck NGAO and TMT NFIRAOS: high-order correction, narrow-field MCAO –Lessons Learned about: IR tip-tilt sensors,sky coverage issues, multiple laser guide stars, optical design of relay IRMOS: multi-object AO system with deployable IFUs –We envision the Keck NGAO deployable-IFU system to be analogous to TMT IRMOS, but much less complex –Half a dozen IFUs instead of –More forgiving optical design –We are benefiting from two excellent TMT feasibility studies for IRMOS TMT invested ~$2 M in feasibility studies for NFIRAOS and IRMOS In the opposite direction, Keck NGAO experience will help TMT –Continuing R & D, validation tests –Earlier implementation on telescope

Uniqueness space for Keck NGAO Enables a wide variety of new science within the interests of the Keck Community High Strehl in near-IR “Precision AO” - both high Strehl and more stable PSF AO at optical wavelengths  Takes full advantage of the unsurpassed aperture size of our 10-m telescope (and opens a new long-term opportunity for WMKO). Deployable AO-corrected IFU instrument Takes advantage of world-class AO expertise in the Keck Community