March 3, 20051 Structures and Weights 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February 17, Aerodynamics 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang.
Advertisements

Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review #2 Team Members Oneeb Bhutta, Matthew Basiletti, Ryan Beech, Mike Van Meter.
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Brian Martinez.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane William Gerboth, Jonathan Landis, Scott Munro, Harold Pahlck February 18, 2010.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
1 Structures QDR1 Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones Team 2: Balsa to the Wall Matt Negilski Mike Palumbo Chris Selby Tara Trafton.
Project Presentation Boiler Xpress December 5, 2000 Team Members Oneeb Bhutta Matthew Basiletti Ryan Beech Micheal Van Meter AAE 451 Aircraft Design.
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
D & C PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 November 4, 2003
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Critical Design Review Team 1.
Critical Design Review AAE490 Project 1 March 2003 Nicholas Baker Brian Chernish Andrew Faust Doug Holden Mara Prentkowski Nicholas Setar.
DR2 Stability and Control Preliminary Design Review and Performance PDR October 24, 2000 Presented By: Christopher Peters …and that’s cool Team DR2 Chris.
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
Propulsion QDR #2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 20, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian.
March 8, Propulsion 3 QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang Joe Taylor.
November 12, 2003QDR1 Team 5 Structures and Weights QDR #2 Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile Cyrus Sigari Sarah Umberger Jen Watson.
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok AAE451 Aircraft Design Professor Dominick Andrisani First Flight November 21,
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Structures 1 PDR Team “Canard” October 12th,
Rear spar for control surface hinges Styrene foam wing core Balsa spars carry bending load 0.25 in x 0.25 in T.E. Reinforcement Materials Employed: Balsa:
March 1, Aerodynamics 3 QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang Joe.
March 10, Dynamics & Controls 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Over view Landing Gear Landing Gear Weight Determination Weight Determination Geometric Layout of Wing Structure Geometric Layout of Wing Structure Analysis.
Team 5 Aerodynamics PDR Presented By: Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer.
March 22, Prototype Fabrication Economic & Test Plan QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew.
Team 5 Structures PDR Presented By: Ross May James Roesch Charles Stangle.
Beams Beams: Comparison with trusses, plates t
Minimum Weight Wing Design for a Utility Type Aircraft MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY AE 462 – Aerospace Structures Design DESIGN TEAM : Osman Erdem.
1 AE 440 Structures Discipline Lecture 6 Eric Loth For AE 440 A/C Lecture.
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
Mass Property Analysis
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44.
March 24, Critical Design Review Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang.
Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
December 1, 2003PDR1 Team 5 Structures and Weights PDR #2 Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile Cyrus Sigari Sarah Umberger Jen Watson.
February 24, Dynamics & Controls 1 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Structures PDR 1 Team Boiler Xpress Oneeb Bhutta Matthew Basiletti Ryan Beech Micheal VanMeter October 12, 2000.
April 28, Summary Project Presentation Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
LSA FAA definition Max gross takeoff weight = 1320 lbs Max stall speed = 45 knots Maximum speed in level flight = 120 knots.
Overview of Loads ON and IN Structures / Machines.
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Structures Preliminary Design Review #1 October 12, 2000.
Vehicle Sizing AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 1
Team 3 Structures and Weights PDR 2
SAE Aero 2017 Midterm Presentation Joe Zongolowicz, Nick Montana, Frank Dixon, Kevin Scheventer, Kathy Hansen, Marquis Ward, Gerald Short, Zhangsiwen Xiao,
Team “Canard” September 28th, 2006
Structures and Weights
SAE AERO 2017 Joseph Zongolowicz, Kathy Hansen, Nick Montana, Marquis Ward, Frank Dixon, Thomas Houck, Gerald Short, Zhangsiwen Xiao, Kevin Schesventer,
Structures and Weights 1 QDR
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 2
Propulsion 2 QDR AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
Aerodynamics QDR 1 AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
Structures and Weights Preliminary Design Review
Structures Overview Material Properties Structures Construction
Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis
Propulsion PDR AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis
Structures QDR #2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 13, 2003
Team 5 Structures and Weights QDR #1
Structures and Weights 1 QDR
Structures PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 October 28, 2003
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS QDR 1
Presentation transcript:

March 3, Structures and Weights 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang Joe Taylor Tyler Wilhelm AAE 451: Team 2

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Overview Landing Gear Center of Gravity Weight and Cost Estimation V-n Diagram Structures  Wing  Fuselage  Tail Wing Loading Analysis

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Aircraft 3-View Mission Requirements 15 min. endurance Take-off distance ≤ 60 ft. V stall ≤ 15 ft/s V loiter ≤ 25 ft/s 35 ft. turn radius

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Landing Gear Wire mounting  Rigid  Lightweight  Inexpensive  Easy to construct Interchangeable Smooth takeoff and landing on AstroTurf ® Pictures courtesy of

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Location  2 front gears by canard  2 back gears by wing Configuration  Wire strut attached to bottom stringer of outer fuselage with mounting bracket  Interchangeable with wheels, skis, floats attached to mounting blocks Gear Configuration Pictures courtesy of Fuselage Attachment Wheel/Ski/Float Attachment

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Center of Gravity X cg = ft X np = ft Static Margin = 14.8%

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Weight Estimation

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Cost Estimation * Costs of 11 lb f /ft 3 balsa estimated for wing, fuselages, tails, and canard

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, V-n Diagram Level Flight Turning Flight Max Load Factor V dive ~ 50% higher than V cruise n max V loiter = 25 ft/sec Typical limit load factors for general aviation (n positive = 3.0-g, n negative = -1.5-g) from Raymer, Daniel P., Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach p.407

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Properties of Wing Box Shear Web  1.6 in. x in. ( ft. x ft.)  Two stringers: 0.25 in. x 0.25 in. ( ft. x ft.) Wing Spar  Central I beam located at maximum wing thickness  With shear web and two stringers Ribs  20 ribs spaced approximately every 3 inches Stringers  in. x in. ( ft. x ft.) leading edge stringer  in. x 0.75 in. ( ft. x ft.) trailing edge stringer for mounting aileron

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Material Properties Density (lb f /ft 3 )Young’s Modulus (ksi)Yield Stress (psi) Balsa Spruce EPS Foam EPP Foam Epoxy lb/ft Ultrakote lb/ft 2 N/A Values from Fall ’04 AAE 451 projects and

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Balsa construction  Lightweight  Simple, quick construction Ultrakote wing covering All parts: 11 lb f /ft 3 balsa High safety factor (oversized web/stringers) Structural Geometry

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Wing – Fuselage Attachment

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Fuselage Structure Formers  Outer Fuselage (each): Six - 1” radius  Main Fuselage: Four - 2” radius One - 1” radius Stringers  Outer Fuselage (each): Seven – 1/8” x 1/8” x 36” One – 1/8” x 1/2” x 36” (for landing gear mounts)  Main Fuselage: Eight – 1/8” x 1/8” x 20”  Balsa sticks

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Tail Structure Flat Plate  Non-Lifting Surface  No Volume Needed  Ease of Construction  1/8” Balsa - Lightweight

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Wing Loading Analysis Moments and Products of Inertia Constraints Analysis  Load Distribution at Maximum Wing Loading  Maximum Wing Root Bending Moment  Maximum Torsional Moment  Maximum Wing Tip Deflection

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Moments and Products of Inertia Volume Moments of Inertia about World Coordinate Axes Ix: (+/ ) Iy: (+/ ) Iz: (+/- 0.11) Volume Radii of Gyration about World Coordinate Axes Rx: (+/- 1.7e-005) Ry: (+/- 3.3e-005) Rz: (+/- 3.5e-005) Volume Moments of Inertia about Centroid Coordinate Axes Ix: (+/ ) Iy: (+/- 0.28) Iz: (+/- 0.3) Volume Radii of Gyration about Centroid Coordinate Axes Rx: (+/- 1.7e-005) Ry: (+/- 9.9e-005) Rz: (+/- 7e-005) Volume = (+/ ) cubic millimeters Volume Centroid = ,6e-011, (+/- 2.9e-005,9.3e-006,4.5e-006) Volume Moments: First Moments x: (+/ ) y: 1e-008 (+/ ) z: (+/ ) Second Moments xx: (+/ ) yy: (+/ ) zz: (+/ ) Product Moments xy: 8e-008 (+/ ) yz: -6e-009 (+/ ) zx: (+/ ) Calculated from CAD Model Can be easily recalculated with model updates

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Bending Worst case simplification  cantilevered beam  uniform load distribution  negligible outer fuselage mass/support

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Twisting Moment due to lift found from moment coefficient

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Constraints Twisting: less than one degree of twist Bending: bending stress less than balsa yield stress (w/ safety factor of 2)

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Analysis Maximum wing load:  1.97 lbs of lift, assuming uniform distribution and span Maximum bending moment (at root):  ft-lbs Maximum torsional moment (from C m ):  ft-lbs

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Maximum Wing Tip Vertical Deflection Wing loading updated from uniform load to an elliptical distribution Load assumed concentrated on central I beam section Maximum tip deflection: in.

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Summary Landing Gear Center of Gravity Weight and Cost Estimation V-n Diagram Structures  Wing  Fuselage  Tail Wing Loading Analysis Questions?

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Appendix

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Airfoil Selection: Wing Wortmann FX Wortmann FX : M.S.Selig,J.F.Donovan and D.B.Fraser,"AIRFOIL AT LOW SPEEDS” – Wind Tunnel

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Airfoil Selection: Canard NACA 0012

[ Overview | 3-View | Landing Gear 1 2 | CG | Weight | Cost | V-n Diagram | Structures | Wing Loading Analysis ]Overview3-View12CGWeightCostV-n Diagram March 3, Geometric Layout