Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Lunar and Planetary Science Conference LRO Overview Session March 13, 2008 Multispectral Mapping Surface Operations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M3 Instrument Design and Expected Performance Robert O. Green 12 May 2005.
Advertisements

WorldView-1 By Michael Jones. Abstract  The WorldView-1 satellite is one part of what is to be a three satellite constellation. The group includes QuickBird,
+ Craters in Younger Lunar Mare Units Seen in LROC NAC Images Hallie Gengl Mark Robinson Ernest Bowan-Ciscneros Reinhold Povilaitis Space Grant Symposium.
Jose Castellano, Daniel McNeel Dr. Paul Higbie, Dr. Boris Kiefer Department of Physics i160.photobucket.com/.../shs_moonWater-1.jpg.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter NASA’s Next First Step To The Moon Noah E. Petro NASA Goddard Space Flight Center May 12 th, 2009.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is the first mission in NASA's Vision for Space Exploration, a plan to return to the moon and then to travel to.
LRO/LEND LEND 1 LCROSS Site Selection Workshop October 16 th 2006 Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector Evaluation of Potential LCROSS Impact Sites Igor Mitrofanov.
LROC TARGETING OPERATIONS Shane Thompson, Julie Stopar, Ernest Bowman-Cisneros, Mark Robinson.
Imaging Mercury surface The SIMBIO-SYS Experiment for the BepiColombo Mission Enrico Flamini – Roma
Images and Cartographic Products to Support Lunar Simulations, Training, and Landing Brent A. Archinal U.S. Geological Survey Flagstaff, AZ Go for Lunar.
School of Earth and Space Exploration Existing Lunar Datasets M. S. Robinson School of Earth and Space Exploration Arizona State University.
Malapert Mountain as a Lunar Outpost Paul Lowman Planetary Geodynamics Lab Title Slide.
History and Features of Landsat 7 By: Andy Vogelsberg Photo of Landsat 7 taken from tures/litho/landsat/land.jpg.
WAC1 Problems, Advantages of Swapping out with WAC2 June 4, 2008.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lunar Mapping and Modeling Project Summary and Status Go for Lunar Landing Conference Tempe,
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
Satellite Thermal Remote Sensing of Boiling Springs Lake Jeff Pedelty NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Goddard Center for Astrobiology.
Lunar Observations of Changes in the Earth’s Albedo (LOCEA) Alexander Ruzmaikin Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology in collaboration.
Progress Report on separating topographical and compositional information in the Clementine UVVIS data Paul Withers 22 April 1999 Remote Sensing of Planetary.
Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS Instrument & VIRS Calibration.
LCROSS Our next mission to the surface of the Moon. Developed and managed by NASA Ames Research Center in partnership with Northrop Grumman. Goal: to.
LRO System Requirements Review Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment Requirements Marc C. Foote Lunar Diviner System Engineer Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
“ PHOBOS - SOIL ” Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. goals, methods of study A.Zakharov, Russian academy of sciences Russian aviation.
Solar System Physics Group Open Day Manuel Grande Aberystwyth in Space – the Moon ExoMars Chandrayaan STEREO Bepi VEX Solar B SDO LoFAR IHY.
INTERPLANETARY MATTER ON THE MOON V.V.Shevchenko Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University THE SECOND MOSCOW SOLAR SYSTEM SYMPOSIUM MOONS OF.
Polar Topographic Knowledge Prior to LCROSS Impact David E. Smith 1, Maria T. Zuber 2 1 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
1 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Overview 4/13/2005 Craig Tooley.
18-April-2006XRT Team1 Initial Science Observations Solar-B XRT Ed DeLuca for the XRT Team.
Track 1. Track 2 TRACK LIST 1.An introduction to synthetic aperture radar 2.Mini-RF on LRO 3.The moon as seen by radar 4.The search for ice 5.Conclusions.
: THE PEOPLE'S CAMERA FOR THE 2005 MARS RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER. USGS Virginia Gulick (NASA Ames/SETI Institute), Alfred McEwen (LPL, University of Arizona),
Slide: 1 The first Moscow Solar System Symposium (1M-S3) >> Phobos Digital Terrain Model (DTM)and Coordinate Refinement for Phobos-Grunt Mission Support.
Remote Sensing SPOT and Other Moderate Resolution Satellite Systems
USGS DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS AND MOSAICS FOR LMMP M. R. Rosiek, E. M. Lee, E. T. Howington-Kraus, R. L. Fergason, L. A. Weller, D. M. Galuszka, B. L. Redding,
1 USGS Lunar Updates Oct UVVIS and NIR Warp Mosaics Lunar Orbiter (jpeg2000 mosaic) NASM1KM Topography JPL’s onMoon GIS Server LO UVVIS Basemap Merge.
1 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Overview CRaTER PDR 6/27/2005 Craig Tooley.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Mark Robinson, PI Arizona State University School of Earth and Space Exploration Resource Mapping Surface Operations.
Dr. Richard R. Vondrak Director, Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters September 2004 NASA Robotic Lunar Exploration.
Dawn Interaction of Energy and Matter: Dawn Mission Instrumentation Framing Cameras 1.
Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Evaluation of Impact Sites Martin Slade October 16, 2006 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion.
1Ellen L. Walker 3D Vision Why? The world is 3D Not all useful information is readily available in 2D Why so hard? “Inverse problem”: one image = many.
LRO SRR LRO Mission Overview.
SHOEMAKER CRATER – GOING WHERE WE CAN “SEE” Carlton Allen NASA JSC.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO SRR LRO Mission Level 1 Requirements.
Lunar Surface Atmosphere Spectrometer (LSAS) Objectives: The instrument LSAS is designed to study the composition and structure of the Lunar atmosphere.
ISUAL Design Concept S. Mende. SDR 7 Jun NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL Design Concept S. Mende Sprite Example Sprite Image obtained by Berkeley/NCKU 1999.
Is there Ice on the Moon? Presentation to the Haggerty School March 29 th, 2005 Source: aerospacescholars.jsc.nasa.gov.
Mission: Moon!. What is it like on the Moon? Length of Day Atmosphere Temperature Water Radiation Gravity Landscape.
Ice At the Moon - How the Moon Mineralogy Mapper on Chandrayaan-1 Will Help Noah E. Petro NASA Goddard Space Flight Center March 4 th, 2009.
2015 GSICS Annual Meeting, Deli India March 16~20, 2015 Xiuqing Hu National Satellite Meteorological Center, CMA Yupeng Wang, Wei Fang Changchun Institute.
Lunar Calibration based on SELENE/SP data
OSIRIS Full Team Meeting Welcome, Introduction, Logistics
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
Introduction of the SCIAMACHY SBAF web tool
Update on Advancing Development of the ROLO Lunar Calibration System
What Made the Doughnuts Inside Lunar Concentric Craters?
Toru Kouyama Supported by SELENE/SP Team HISUI calibration WG
First Assessments of EUVI Performance on STEREO SECCHI
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera
XRT Performance Update
Lunar reflectance model based on SELENE/SP data
R.A. Yingst, F.C. Chuang, D.C. Berman, S.C. Mest
Arturo Martinez Mark Robinson Mentor Sam Lawrence Project Manager
OSIRIS-REx: The Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, Security, Regolith Explorer is a.
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)
Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics , Chinese Academy of Science
During its two-year primary science mission, the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter will conduct eight different science investigations at Mars. The investigations.
Presentation transcript:

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Lunar and Planetary Science Conference LRO Overview Session March 13, 2008 Multispectral Mapping Surface Operations Planning Landing Site Selection Small Impactor Hazard Regolith Properties

2 LROC Objectives 1. Sub-meter resolution imaging to select landing sites 2. Repeat imaging (100 m/pixel) of poles to identify regions of permanent shadow and (nearly?) continuous illumination 3. Half meter scale mapping of polar regions with (nearly?) continuous illumination 4. Overlapping observations to enable derivation of meter-scale topography 5. Global multispectral imaging for mineralogy and resource identification 6. Global morphology base map with high quality control 7. Characterize regolith (lunar soil) properties 8. Determine current impact hazard by re-imaging Apollo era images to count new craters NACWAC SCS

3 LROC Instrument Overview Two Narrow Angle Cameras (NACs) for Landing Site Certification (50 cm/pixel) One Wide Angle Camera (WAC) to Monitor Polar Lighting and Map Resources (100 m/pixel) NAC WAC

4 1. Landing Site Selection Hundreds of potential sites imaged at 0.5 meter/pixel Unambiguous identification of meter sized hazards –blocks –small craters 5000 meter wide coverage with two NACs Plus derived topography Apollo 15 set down on the rim of a small crater, damaging the engine bell and tilting at ~10°. LROC will help determine safe Landing sites.

5 2. Polar Illumination WAC image of each pole every orbit over full year (time lapse movie) Identify extent of permanently shadowed cold traps (potential volatile reservoirs) Identify highly illuminated peaks - thermally benign landing sites (-53°C  10°C) Partial look at lunar north pole illumination from Clementine over 10 week period in summer (Bussey et al 2005). NAC: Summer - synoptic polar mapping, winter - repeat imaging highly illuminated peaks. -173°C to 116°C at lunar equator over a day (-280°F to 240°F)

6 3. Meter Scale Polar Mapping NAC meter scale polar mapping (binned 2x for SNR and coverage), summer mosaics of each pole for morphology and permanent shadow analysis Winter observations repeat coverage of highly illuminated peaks/ridges, capable of finding small regions of “perma-light” LROC NAC resolution at 1 m/pixel is 25x better than existing Clementine HIRES data.

7 4. High Resolution Topography Stereo (3-D) coverage –Requires LRO to point off- nadir, easy at poles more difficult at equator –5 meter (or better) stereo correlation patch Photometric Stereo (3-D), multiple nadir observations of same region with varying lighting angles –Three or more images per site, 1 to 2 m/p topography –Very successful with NEAR images of Eros (Gaskell, JPL) Directly supports landing site certification, and science investigations View of Apollo 17 site reconstructed from Apollo era high resolution topography

8 5. Global Multispectral Mapping WAC UV / Visible –315, 360, 415, 560, 600, 640, 680 nm bandpasses –Acquire global dataset at 100 m/pixel VIS, 400 m/pixel UV –Map TiO 2 soils (hold H, He) –Pyroclastic glasses (volatiles) –Olivine Mg/Fe ratio (magmatic processes) –Anorthosite (origin of crust) LROC WAC bandpasses and key lunar mineral spectra (12063R Rock, 12070S Soil) IlmeniteBasalt

9 6. Global BW Basemap Acquire 100 m/pixel high SNR global BW imaging, with optimal lighting for morphology Key for establishing relative age dates through crater counting (ultimately absolute) Enable accurate mapping of tectonic features Also provide regional images of landing sites and resources Replace Clementine m/p high Sun basemap (0-35° incidence at equator) with 100 m/pixel low Sun basemap (55-75° incidence angle at equator)

10 7. Regolith Characterization Product of impacts: big, small, microscopic Lots of time… How thick? How blocky? Small scale crater morphology Morphology indicates thickness Quaide and Oberbeck Method Each scene 119 m wide

11 8. Current Impact Rates Critical measurement for understanding most dangerous impact hazards on Moon Re-image Apollo Pan coverage at same lighting (high and low Sun) at 1 m/p Should have been 900 (or more) craters >10 m/diameter formed since 1972 over whole Moon Re-image 1% of Moon at 1 m/pixel - should find at least 9 craters according to current models Apollo 17 site in A17 Pan Frame 2314 (Camelot 600 m diameter NAC pixels). Camelot

12 LROC Public Target Request Webpage Prototype - Place a dual NAC footprint on target - Enter confirmation - Target Name - Sun angle - Type keyword - Rationale - Submit

LROC Overview Backup Slides

14 Narrow Angle Camera NAC 700 mm focal length, f/3.59, 2.86° FOV Richey-Chretien telescope (0.05 radian) 5000 pixel line array detector (Kodak KLI 5001-G 7  m pixels) 0.5 meter/pixel at 50 km orbit (10  radian IFOV) 2 NACs provide double the swath width (5000 m total), precision geometry and redundancy SNR 40:1 worst case (2x binning at poles) 7.6 kg, 8.8 W pk, 70 cm x 24 cm System MTF 0.2

15 NAC Status March 2008 NAC Flight Unit 1 –Calibrated –Vibration complete –In TVAC for Focus Confirmation –Depart for GSFC ~March 25 NAC Flight Unit 2 –End of thermal focus tests of telescope this week –Telescope delivery to MSSS expected ~March 18 –Calibration begins late March –Vibration –TVAC –Deliver GSFC April 15

16 NAC Flight Unit 1 Calibration Feb 2008

17 Wide Angle Camera WAC Short focal length, FOV 90° Visible, 60° UV (1.57, 1.05 radian) 1024 x 1024 pixel CCD (Kodak KAI 1001) 100 m/pixel at 50 km orbit (1.57 mradian IFOV) 7 filter bands (290 to 690 nm) Global coverage with all 7 WAC bands, mesh with Clementine IR coverage ( nm) 0.9 kg, 4 W, 15x9x8 cm System MTF 0.3

18 WAC Status First unit assembled –Calibration complete –Vibration Test Complete –In TVAC Ship to GSFC March 25 Second Unit awaiting new filter (and improved) filter assembly from Barr