Nuclear reactions and solar neutrinos

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stellar Structure Section 5: The Physics of Stellar Interiors Lecture 11 – Total pressure: final remarks Stellar energy sources Nuclear binding energy.
Advertisements

Standard Solar Model Calculation of Neutrino Fluxes Aldo Serenelli Institute for Advanced Study NOW 2006 Conca Specchiulla 11-Sept-2006.
SUSSP61: Neutrino Physics - St. Andrews, Scotland – 8 th to 23 rd, August, 2006 Standard Solar Models II Aldo Serenelli Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton.
The Standard Solar Model and Its Evolution Marc Pinsonneault Ohio State University Collaborators: Larry Capuder Scott Gaudi.
1 Fusion enhancement due to energy spread of colliding nuclei* 1. Motivation: anomalous electron screening or what else ? 2. Energy spread  fusion enhancement.
1 The pp-chain and the CNO-cycle after KamLAND Solar neutrinos after SNO and KamLAND The Boron flux The Beryllium flux Nuclear physics of the pp-chain.
1 Neutrino: a spy of the innermost solar interior Nuclear reactions in the Sun and solar neutrinos.
1 Trieste Sept Standard and non-standard solar models Success of stellar evolutionary theory Basic inputs of the theory Standard solar.
15 N Zone 8 Zone 1 Zone 28 p Zone 1 Zone O Zone 1 Zone 4 Zone 8 Zone N 16 O p Reaction rates are used to determine relative abundance of elements.
1 Some key problems and key reactions in Nuclear Astrophysics Main issues: BBN: was the universe always the same? What’s in the core of Sun and other MS.
1 The pp-chain (and the CNO-cycle) after SNO and KamLAND Barbara Ricci, University of Ferrara and INFN Fourth International Conference on Physics Beyond.
1 Nuclear fusion in the Sun The spies of solar interior: –neutrinos –helioseismology What can be learnt about the Sun? What can be learnt about nuclear.
1 B.Ricci* What have we learnt about the Sun from the measurement of 8B neutrino flux? Experimental results SSM predictions SSM uncertainties on  (8B)

12C(p,g)13N g III. Nuclear Reaction Rates 12C 13N Nuclear reactions
Guest Lecturer: Dr W J Chaplin
1 The standard solar model and solar neutrinos Episode I: Solar observables and typical scales Episode II: Standard and non-standard solar models Episode.
January 19, 2006 Lecture 1 - The Solar Interior oTopics to be covered: oSolar interior oCore oRadiative zone oConvection zone.
October 3, 2003IFIC, UVEG-CSIC A road map to solar fluxes, osc. param., and test for new physics Carlos Pena Garay IAS ~
Reaction rates in the Laboratory Example I: 14 N(p,  ) 15 O stable target  can be measured directly: slowest reaction in the CNO cycle  Controls duration.
Reminder n Please return Assignment 1 to the School Office by 13:00 Weds. 11 th February (tomorrow!) –The assignment questions will be reviewed in next.
25 9. Direct reactions - for example direct capture: Direct transition from initial state |a+A> to final state B +  geometrical.
Chapter three Sun’s model Major contributions in building the Sun’s model have been made by Eddington (1930’s), Hoyle (1950’s),Bahcall, Clayton (1980’s)
Pierre Descouvemont Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium The 12 C(  ) 16 O reaction: dreams and nightmares theoretical introduction.
Lecture 10 Energy production. Summary We have now established three important equations: Hydrostatic equilibrium: Mass conservation: Equation of state:
Lecture 3 Spectra. Stellar spectra Stellar spectra show interesting trends as a function of temperature: Increasing temperature.
Shall We Play a Game of Thermonuclear War?. 2Thermonuclear Energy Thermonuclear Energy Sources Electrostatic Potential Electrostatic Potential E c ~ e.
李玉峰 中科院高能所 JUNO中微子天文和天体物理学研讨会
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass 1 Confidence Intervals and Upper Limits Confidence intervals (CI) are related to confidence limits (CL). To calculate.
YET ANOTHER TALK ON BIG BANG NUCLEOSYNTHESIS G. Mangano, INFN Naples STATUS OF BIG BANG NUCLEOSYNTHESIS.
Solar Neutrinos Perspectives and Objectives Mark Chen Queen’s University and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)
Stellar structure equations
Energy production in star For 3rd year physics honours Sukla Debnath.
Nuclear Level Densities Edwards Accelerator Laboratory Steven M. Grimes Ohio University Athens, Ohio.
Lecture 13. Review: Static Stellar structure equations Hydrostatic equilibrium: Mass conservation: Equation of state: Energy generation: Radiation Convection.
University of Victoria Astr 501 Matt Penrice
Lecture 2: Formation of the chemical elements Bengt Gustafsson: Current problems in Astrophysics Ångström Laboratory, Spring 2010.
The Standard Solar Model and Experiments Predictions versus experiments Uncertainties in predictions Challenges and open questions BP00: astro-ph/
Weighing neutrinos with Cosmology Fogli, Lisi, Marrone, Melchiorri, Palazzo, Serra, Silk hep-ph , PRD 71, , (2005) Paolo Serra Physics Department.
Lecture 11 Energy transport. Review: Nuclear energy If each reaction releases an energy  the amount of energy released per unit mass is just The sum.
Advanced Burning Building the Heavy Elements. Advanced Burning 2  Advanced burning can be (is) very inhomogeneous  The process is very important to.
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) Eildert Slim. Timeline of the Universe 0 sec Big Bang: Start of the expansion secPlanck-time: Gravity splits off.
Kopylov A.V. Erice School/Workshop 2009 on Neutrinos in Cosmology, in Astro, in Particle and in Nuclear Physics in Erice/Trapani/Sicily/Italy on September.
Lesson 13 Nuclear Astrophysics. Elemental and Isotopic Abundances.
What temperature would provide a mean kinetic energy of 0.5 MeV? By comparison, the temperature of the surface of the sun  6000 K.
Dr Matt Burleigh The Sun and the Stars. Dr Matt Burleigh The Sun and the Stars The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram (E. Hertzsprung and H.N. Russell) Plot.
 ( E ) = S(E) e –2   E -1 2      m  m   m   m   Reaction Rate(star)    (E)  (E) dE Gamow Peak  Maxwell Boltzmann.
 ( E ) = S(E) e –2   E -1 2       m  m   m   m   Reaction Rate(star)    (E)  (E) dE Gamow Peak  Maxwell Boltzmann.
Nucleosynthesis in AGB Stars: the Role of the 18 O(p,  ) 15 N Reaction Marco La Cognata.
Astroparticle physics 1. stellar astrophysics and solar neutrinos Alberto Carramiñana Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica Tonantzintla,
Lecture 6 p+p, Helium Burning and Energy Generation.
THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS OF THERMONUCLEAR RATES P. Descouvemont 1.Reactions in astrophysics 2.Overview of different models 3.The R-matrix method 4.Application.
SAGE: status and future SAGE: V.N. Gavrin Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
Experimental Nuclear Astrophysics: Key aspects & Open problems Marialuisa Aliotta School of Physics University of Edinburgh Nuclear Physics Autumn Retreat.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1.
Solar Neutrino Results from SNO
October 14th, 2006LONU-LENS, Virginia Tech Solar Luminosity by Neutrinos Solar Luminosity by Neutrinos Carlos Pena Garay IFIC, Valencia ~
Lecture 8: Stellar Atmosphere 4. Stellar structure equations.
 -capture measurements with a Recoil-Separator Frank Strieder Institut für Physik mit Ionenstrahlen Ruhr-Universität Bochum Int. Workshop on Gross Properties.
Solar neutrino physics The core of the Sun reaches temperatures of  15.5 million K. At these temperatures, nuclear fusion can occur which transforms 4.
Solar Neutrinos on the beginning of 2017
SOLAR ATMOSPHERE NEUTRINOS
The Sun The Sun’s Spectrum
Chapter 9 The Main Sequence.
SOLAR ATMOSPHERE NEUTRINOS
Constraints on Nuclear Fusion Reactions
The pp-chain and the CNO-cycle after KamLAND
Building the Heavy Elements
7. Internal structure. II.
Shall We Play a Game of Thermonuclear War?
Presentation transcript:

Nuclear reactions and solar neutrinos Trieste 23-25 Sept. 2002 Episode III Nuclear reactions and solar neutrinos

Nuclear reactions and solar neutrinos The basis of Nuclear Astrophysics The spies of nuclear reactions in the Sun The luminosity constraint The pp chain -pp neutrinos -Be neutrinos -B neutrinos What have we learnt about the sun from solar neutrino experiments?

Cross sections of astrophysical interest The Gamow formula: exp is the penetration probability through barrier, determined by Coulomb interaction S is the astrophysical factor, determined by nuclear physics, depending on the process involved ( strong, e.m, weak)

Stellar burning rates The relevant quantity is: Gamow peak Tunnel effect exp[-b/E1/2] Maxwel Boltzmann exp[-E/KT] where f(E) is the velocity distribution The main contribution arises from nuclei near the Gamow peak, generally larger than kT: Eo  ( 1/2 Z1Z2T)2/3 » 10-20 KeV Gamow Energy

Stellar burning rates vs temperature The strong energy dependence of the cross section translates into a strong dependence of the rate on the temperature. This dependence is usually parametrized by a power law: e.g. : p+p -> d+e++ne a=4 3He(3He,2p)3He a =16 7Be(p,g)8B a =13 This dependence which will be crucial for the determination of neutrino fluxes a a=dlog<sv>/dlogT

Determination of the astrophysical S- factor Nuclear physics is summarized in S(E), which (in absence of resonances) is a smooth function of E. S [Kevb] 3He(4He,g)7Be The measurement near the Gamow peak is generally impossible, one has to extrapolate data taken at higher energies. Sun

The lowest energies frontier Significant effort has been devoted for lowering the minimal detection energy Since counting rates become exponentially small, cosmic ray background is a significant limitation. This has been bypassed by installing acelerators deep underground*. *Fiorentini, Kavanagh and Rolfs (1991)

LUNA result* LUNA at LNGS has been able to measure 3He+3He at solar Gamow peak. 2 events/month ! S(0)=5.32 (1± 6%)MeVb *PRL 82(1999) 5205

The spies of nuclear reactions in the Sun The real proof of the occurrence of nuclear reactions is in the dectection of reaction products. For the Sun, only neutrinos can escape freely from the production region. By measuring solar neutrinos one can learn about the deep solar interior (and about neutrinos…)

The luminosity constraint The total neutrino flux is immediately derived from the solar constant Ko: If one assumes that Sun is powered by transforming H into He (Q=26,73MeV): 4p+2e- -> 4He + ? = if L and L e are conserved 2ne ? Then one has 2ne for each Q of radiated energy, and the total neutrino produced flux is:

Towards neutrino energy spectra To determine Ftot we did not use anything about nuclear reactions and solar models. In order to determine the energy distribution of solar neutrinos one has to know the producing reactions rate and their efficiency in the Sun

The pp-chain 99,77% p + p  d+ e+ + e 0,23% p + e - + p  d + e 86% d + p  3He + ~210-5 % 14% 3He + 4He 7Be +  13,98% 0,02% 7Be + e-  7Li + e 7Be + p  8B +  3He+3He+2p 7Li + p ->+ 8B  8Be*+ e+ +e 2 3He+p+e++e pp I pp II pp III hep

Main components of solar neutrinos name: reaction: spectrum: [MeV] abundance: [cm -2 s-1] uncertainty: (1s) production zone: pp p+pd+e++e £0.42 5.96 .1010 1% 0.1 Ro 7Be 7Be+e-7Li+e 0.861 (90%) 0.383 (10%) 4.82 .109 10% 0.06 Ro 8B 8B8Be+e++e £15 5.15 .106 18% 0.05 Ro from: Bahcall et al ApJ 555(2001) 990

A group photo (1) Neutrino flux [cm-2 s-1 ] Neutrino Energy [Mev]

A group photo (2) The fraction of neutrino produced inside the sun within dR

Remarks: The production efficiency of the different neutrinos depends on: 1) Nuclear inputs (cross sections) 2)Astrophysical inputs (Lum.,opacity, age,Z/X…) which affect physical conditions of the medium where they are produced: particle density and (most relevant) temperature Uncertianties on the predicted neutrino fluxes depend thus on nuclear physics and astrophysics (Z/X, opacity age, Lum….). To a good approximation these latter can be reabsorbed in the solar temperature. Remarks: uncertianties on fluxes are correlated, since they depend on uncertianties on the same physical parameters, i.e. one cannot tune the parameters in order to deplete Be-neutrinos without changing B-neutrinos

Dependence on Tc FBe~ Tc 10 FB ~ Tc 20 Fpp~ Tc-0.7 By building different solar models, with varied inputs parameters (within their uncertainties) and by using a power law parametrization, one finds (approximately): FBe~ Tc 10 FB ~ Tc 20 Fpp~ Tc-0.7 Be neutrinos strong depends on Tc, due to Gamow factor in 3He+4He B neutrinos has the strongest dependence due both to 3He+4He and (mainly) to 7Be+p For the conservation of total flux, pp neutrinos decrease with increasing Tc

For the sake of precision All physics cannot be exactly summarized in a single parameter Tc By using a power law parametrization Fi~Pi b P=Sij, L,Z/X, opa,age and by varying the SSM inputs around their uncertainties, one has: Spp S33 S34 S17 L Z/X opa age pp 0.14 0.03 -0.06 0 0.73 -0.08 0.008 -0.07 Be -0.97 -0.43 0.86 0 3.4 0.58 -0.08 0.69 B -2.59 -0.40 0.81 1 6.76 1.3 2.6 1.28 N -2.53 0.02 -0.05 0 5.16 1.9 -0.1 1.01 O -2.93 0.02 -0.05 0 5.94 2.0 -0.12 1.27 T -0.14 - - - 0.34 0.08 0.14 0.08

….anyhow pp, Be and B neutrinos are mainly determined by the central temperature almost independently of the way we use to vary Tc. Fi/FiSSM Tc/TcSSM

Recent experimental data on B-n Superkamiokande (n+e--> n +e- ): F(B)SK = 2.32 (1± 3.5%) 106 cm-2 s-1 (ne,nm,nt) SNO - CC (ne+d-> n+n+e+ ): F(B)SNO=1.75 (1 ± 8.0%) 106 cm-2 s-1 (ne) Combined*: F(B)EXP = 5.20 (1 ±18%) 106 cm-2 s-1 flux of total active neutrinos produced in the Sun agreement with recent SNO - NC (n+d-> n+p+n): F(B)NC = 6.42 (1 ±25%) 106 cm-2 s-1 SSM: 5.15 (1 ±18%) 106 cm-2 s-1 * see. Fogli, Lisi,Montanino, Villante PRD 1999; Fogli, Lisi, Montanino, Palazzo PRD 2001

What have we learnt on the Sun from solar neutrinos? (1) The measurement of the (total active) B-neutrino flux, from SK and SNO provides a confirmation to the 1% level of the “central” solar temperature (i.e the temperature at the B-neutrinos production zone, »0.05 Ro)* Gallium expts (GALLEX and SAGE) have provided the proof the Sun is powered by nuclear reactions (pp-low energy neutrinos have been detected) * Fiorentini and B.R. PLB 526 (2002) 186

What have we learnt on the Sun from solar neutrinos? (2) These are wonderful confirmations of the SSM, but no quantitative improvement of our knowledge of the solar interior Future experiment, where individual neutrino fluxes will be measured, and the knowledge of neutrinos survival, will allow the dream of learning on the Sun from neutrinos….

Episode IV... next year?

Remarks So far we neglegcted the energy carried by neutrinos. The general formula for the luminosity constraint is: Actually the average neutrino energies <E>~ 0.3 MeV can be neglected for an approximate estimate. i=different species of neutrinos

CNO be-cycle This cycle is responsible for only 1.5% of the solar luminosity 17F 16O 17O (p,) (p,) (e+,e) 13C 13N 15N 12C 15O 14N CN 1,49% NO 0,01% The overall conversion of 4p into He is achid with the aid of 12C, the total energy release is 26.7 MeV This cycle is governed by the slowest reaction: 14N+p

CN-neutrinos F 17F17O+e++e £2 5.63 .106 25% 0.05 Ro name: reaction: spectrum: [MeV] abundance: [cm -2 s-1] uncertainty (1s) production zone: N 13N13C+e++e £1.2 5.48.108 19% 0.05 Ro O 15O15N+e++e £1.7 4.80 .108 22% 0.05Ro

Status of S17 19+4-2 eVb* (1967) (1983) (2001) (2002) Junghans et al PRL 88 (2002) 041101 Junghans 19+4-2 eVb* (1967) (1983) (2001) (2002) * racomanded value in Adelberger 1998 compilation, (1s)

Sterile neutrinos? We have seen: F(8B)EXP=5.20 (1 ± 18%) 106 cm-2 s-1 F(8B)SSM=5.15 (1 ± 18%) 106 cm-2 s-1 very good agreement between EXP and SSM similar errors affects both determinations we can derive an upper bound for sterile neutrinos: F(8B)sterile< 2.5 106 cm-2 s-1 (at 2s) if sterile neutrinos exist, F(8B)EXP is a lower limit

B-neutrinos and “Tc” Power laws: Contribution to uncertainty: 12% Constrain on Tc from FB, EXP : 11%

Helioseismology and Be-neutrinos Helioseismology can provide information also on the nuclear cross sections of 3He+3He -> a +2p 3He+4He -> 7Be +g These govern Be-neutrino production, through a scaling law: F(Be) a S34/S331/2 Can one measure F(Be) by means of Helioseismology?

S34 /S34 S34/S34SSM S33/S33SSM S34 is costrained at 25% level S33/S33SSM stay in 0.64-1.8 Since F(Be) a S34/S331/2 =>F(Be) is determined to within 25% Also u=P/r satisfies the same scaling relation u = u (S34/S331/2 ) <-> F(Be) n(Be) waste more energy than n(pp) . If their production is larger, more H->He is burnt for the same e.m. energy and the molecular weight increases Since T does not depend on S34 or S33 , sound speed decreases when n(Be) is increased.