US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, 2000 - Incandela 1 US CMS Tracker Outer Barrel (TOB) Silicon Project Joe Incandela Fermilab Level.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report from MICE project teams Proposed MICE organogram: revised Revised request for resources for financial year 2003/04 Review of iMICE schedules – status.
Advertisements

1 LHC-DFBX Procurement Strategy Joseph Rasson LBNL Presented at the DFBX Production Readiness Review October 2002, LBNL Brookhaven - Fermilab - Berkeley.
US CMS Silicon Tracker Project – Breakout session Overview - DOE/NSF Review Brookhaven - May 20, Incandela 1 CMS Si Tracker: Breakout Session Dept.
Cost, Schedule & Funding Closeout Jan Joint DOE/NSF CD2/3a Review 1 DOE/NSF Review of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Project SC 6/7 Cost, Schedule.
MEG Review at Brookhaven, Feb 5, 2004 : CMS Si Tracker Project: J. Incandela 1 US CMS Silicon Tracker US LHC Detector Maintenance and Operations Evaluation.
US Tracker Production Meeting, March 8, 2005 J. Incandela 1 Slides for the US Si Tracker Weekly Production Meeting J. Incandela March 8, 2005.
MEG Review at BNL, Jan. 18, 2006 : CMS Si Tracker Project: J. Incandela 1 US CMS Silicon Tracker US LHC Detector Maintenance and Operations Evaluation.
Tracker Week – UCSB Gantry Status – July 20, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Report University of California Santa Barbara UCSB Gantry Team: Andrea Allen Dave.
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 1 Slides for the US Si Tracker Institutional Group Leaders Meeting J. Incandela March.
TEC Production in the US J. Incandela Level 2 Manager US CMS Silicon Tracker Project October 8, 2003.
US CMS Silicon Tracker : Schedule J. Incandela University of California Santa Barbara US CMS Silicon Tracker Project Manager Fermilab PMG April 9, 2004.
US CMS Silicon Tracker : Overview J. Incandela University of California Santa Barbara US CMS Silicon Tracker Project Manager Fermilab PMG April 9, 2004.
DOE/NSF Review, BNL, May 20, Incandela1 CMS Tracker: Cost, Schedule, Planning and M&O Joe Incandela, University of California Santa Barbara US CMS.
1 Long Term Module Testing-Anthony AffolderTPO, December 11, 2003 Current Module LT Testing Capability Only Vienna Boxes Available  10 slots at each site.
MEG Review at FNAL, Jan. 28, 2005 : CMS Si Tracker Project: J. Incandela 1 US CMS Silicon Tracker US LHC Detector Maintenance and Operations Evaluation.
US Module and Rod Production Overview and Plan For the US CMS Tracker Group.
Post Award Workshop April 5, Fiscal Responsibilities 1. University Wide Responsibilities Every university employee has a responsibility to ensure.
US Tracker Group Status Sep. 1, 2005 J. Incandela For the US CMS Tracker Group.
Slide 1Rod Production presented by Jim Lamb (UCSB)April 9, 2004 Rod Production Rod Production, April , presented by Jim Lamb (UCSB)
Brenna Flaugher Oct. 31 th CDF Meeting1 RunIIb Silicon Project Successful Lehman Review Sept Workshop at LBL 10/23-10/25: Wednesday-Thursday  hybrids.
US Module Production June 2, 2005 J. Incandela For the US CMS Tracker Group.
The Finnish CMS Collaboration Helsinki Institute of Physics S. Czellar, A. Heikkinen, J. Härkönen, V. Karimäki, H. Katajisto,R. Kinnunen,T. Lampén, K.
WBS 1.7: AFE II Project Cost and Schedule Alan Bross DZero Run IIb AFE II Director’s Review April 13, 2005.
U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Budget and Schedule Review John Huth Harvard University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven.
W. Freeman, D0 PMG 25-Feb-03 1 Run IIb Schedule Status u Schedule Status u Update on near-term equipment expenditures u Budgeting Update u Summary.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
12 Dec 2005 J. Schukraft1 ALICE USA ALICE position towards US participation EU participation in emcal Requirements Formal steps & schedule.
From Research Prototype to Production
ATLAS Endcap Muon System WBS 3.5 Frank Taylor MIT M&O Request FY06 Toronto August 3, 2005 V1.1.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 3. Cost Estimate Gines, Fisher 2.Are the estimated cost and proposed schedule ranges realistic, consistent with the technical and budgetary.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Silicon Inner Layer Sensor PRR, 8 August G. Ginther Update on the D0 Run IIb Silicon Upgrade for the Inner Layer Sensor PRR 8 August 03 George Ginther.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
Concluding Summary WBS1.1.2 SCT Subsystem A. Seiden BNL March 2001.
HiLumi LHC is co-funded by the EU FP7 Capacities Programme, Grant Agreement Svet Stavrev (EU Projects Office, CERN) Administrative Manager 17.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.3 Infrastructure and Installation Sims, Edwards 1.Does the conceptual design and planned implementation satisfy the performance specifications.
Silicon Meeting July 10, 2003 Module and Stave Production Status James Fast Fermilab.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese U.S. ATLAS Review Revised Version November 29, 2000.
US CMS Silicon Tracker Project Regina Demina KSU Florida State University May 11, 2002.
DOE Rev of Run IIb Sep 24-26, Detector Production WBS James Fast Fermilab.
Fermilab PMG - Results from module testing - April 9, 2004 – E.Chabalina (UIC) 1 Results from module testing E.Chabalina University of Illinois (Chicago)
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese Revised Version December 18, 2000.
1 W-band Module Production and Other Fermilab Contributions Proposed Significant Partnership in QUIET-II to the Fermilab PAC in November 2009 Modest Fermilab.
Fermilab Presentation Greg Bock, Pepin Carolan, Mike Lindgren, Elaine McCluskey 2014 SC PM Workshop July 2014.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
CMS Si Tracker Project - US CMS Meeting at Riverside – May 19, US CMS Tracker Outer Barrel (TOB) Silicon Project Tim Bolton (for Regina Demina)
UCSC August 12, 2008 U.S. Upgrade R&D Meeting: Strip Detector  Seiden.
FVTX Wedge Assembly WBS , , , , , David Winter Columbia University FVTX Wedge Manager.
Rev of Run IIb, Nov 4-8, 2002, A. Bean 1 Silicon Management  Organization and Management  Schedule  Resources  Conclusions Alice Bean Univ. of Kansas.
DoE Review June 6, 2000 Cost Estimate  New Cost Estimate u Manpower Costs (Op. SWF) u Equipment Costs (Eq. M&S) u Contingency  Conclusions Mike Tuts.
Dzero RunIIb Sensor PRR, August 8, Marcel Demarteau Slide 1 DØ Inner Layer Sensor Production Readiness Review August 08, 2003 M. Demarteau for the.
DZero Run IIb Rev Nov 05 ‘03 1 Kotcher Agenda (from Rebaselining Review)  Introduction (Kotcher – 10’)  Trigger & DAQ/Online (Wood – 30’) u AFE II/TriP.
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Stephen Wolbers CD Accelerator Coordination Meeting September 21, 2004.
Brenna Flaugher Sept. 24 th Lehman Review1 Run IIB Silicon Upgrade: Cost and Schedule Lehman Review Sept. 24, 2002 Brenna Flaugher Run IIB Silicon Project.
1 FVTX Monthly/Quarterly Report January 2009 Cost Summary Schedule Summary Current technical status of each WBS item.
DZero Run IIb PMG December 10, Agenda Run IIb D-Zero PMG December 10, 2002  ESAAB news (Lab, Project, DOE)  Project status, overview (Kotcher)
DPS/ CMS RRB-T Core Software for CMS David Stickland for CMS Oct 01, RRB l The Core-Software and Computing was not part of the detector MoU l.
ESS | title of presentation | 2012-xx-xx | name of presenter Roles and Responsibilities sub title.
Eija Tuominen, coordinatorHIP/UH Detector Laboratory, October 2010 DETECTOR DEVELOPMENT at HELSINKI DETECTOR LABORATORY Detector Laboratory is a joint.
B01.2- Outer Tracker Gino Bolla, L3 Manager, January 31, Director's Progress Review – Outer Tracker.
Cost and Schedule Paul Weinman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
CMS Phase 2 Tracker R&D R. Lipton 2/27/2014
Status of the MICE Construction Project
LHC Science Goals & Objectives
Status Caltech meeting – discussions of assembly centers, US responsibilities We will try to organize a PS module assembly workshop at Brown April 30 –
2S module geometry updates Module positioning concepts
Rod adaptors for module tests Module positioning studies
FNAL Production Experience
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Presentation transcript:

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 1 US CMS Tracker Outer Barrel (TOB) Silicon Project Joe Incandela Fermilab Level 2 Manager US CMS Silicon Tracker Project

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 2 Si Tracker Group Fermilab B. Flaugher, J. Goldstein, J. Incandela, R. Lipton, P. Lukens, S. Mishra, T. Nelson, P. Rapidis, L. Spiegel, D. Stuart, S. Tkaczyk Kansas State University T. Bolton, R. Demina, W. Kahl, A. Khanov, S. Korjenevski, W. Reay, F. Rizatdinova, R. Sidwell, N. Stanton Northwestern University D. Buchholz University of California, Santa Barbara C.Campagnari,(J.Incandela) University of Illinois, Chicago C.Gerber,K.Papageorgiou University of Kansas M. Bailey, P. Baringer, A. Bean, X. Zhao A University of Rochester S.Blusk,A.Hocker, P.Tipton

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 3 Tracker Consortia 4 Consortia: Central Europe: All Forward Modules and installation in petals. Final assembly of forward tracker. CERN Overall integration, general support structures, cooling and inert gas flow. Position monitoring and alignment. Mechanics, cooling and final assembly of the outer barrel…. INFN Responsible for Inner barrel modules (TIB) TIB Mechanics and assembly of the inner barrel. USA All Outer barrel modules (TOB) and installation on rods assemble some support structures for inner barrel

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 4 Module

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 5 Rod

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 6 Wheel Stereo modules are comprised of two single-sided modules. These are installed back to back with small overlap in z in a drawer-like “rod”. Rods slide into slots in the C-fiber endplate system with very high precision alignments from one rod to next.

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 7 Tracker Inner Barrel Supports

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 8 The Plan Build ~6000 modules Place them in ~750 Rods Fly them to CERN and install & test them Build the TIB cylinders and ship them to Pisa Help commission the tracker Analyze data

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 9 September Review Project files: Resource loaded schedule WBS dictionary Cost estimates Basis for estimate of each task Contingency analysis Institutional responsibilities Task managers Reviewed by PMG committee Sep M. Crisler – chair Recommendations received and responses returned Nov. 1, 2000

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 10 Re: Specifications/procedures Recommendations to US CMS Silicon : Project managers should work with the CERN Project Management Group to develop written specifications for mechanical tolerances, level of testing, QA/QC requirements and documentation. Specifications and procedural documentation for CMS Silicon work: Sensors: Module specifications, assembly procedure, and quality control: Module testing: Burn-in: The US CMS Silicon group has made numerous contributions to the specifications and procedures. See for instance:

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 11 Re: Management Committee Report, Section 1: Management Issues Recommendations to US CMS Silicon: 1.Create an organization chart for the project with all L3 managers identified. Establish roles, responsibilities and authority for each L3 manager and each institution's CMS primary interface person, including budget authority and reporting responsibility. 2.Continue to refine the level of commitment of groups and institutions. Look to better define the scope of work and commitment for present groups and the possible addition of new institutions to the project. 3.Develop a signed MOU with each participating institution that clearly establishes responsibility and commitments.

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 12 Organization in US CMS

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 13 Physicist Manpower

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 14 Institutional Manpower

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 15 Re: Management (2) Committee Report, Section 1: Management Issues Recommendations to US CMS Silicon: 3.Develop a signed MOU with each participating institution that clearly establishes responsibility and commitments. Response Have all information for Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs). Final SOWs and MOUs will be generated via US CMS project office software from the project file as soon as the project is approved and baselined. …then signed and incorporated into the US CMS project.

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 16 Re: Technical Feasibility Committee Report, Section 2: Technical Feasibility Recommendations to US CMS Silicon: Procure and commission a gantry system this year. Response Ordered a gantry from Aerotech. Delivery date is Jan 2, All ancillary equipment ordered. Will arrive in early 2001.

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 17 Re: Schedule Committee Report, Section 3: Schedule Recommendations to US CMS Silicon : 1)Develop together with CMS management a delivery schedule of parts and identify responsible persons for the parts. 2)The TOB has to be installed first. Agreement should be reached with CMS management on setting priority on the delivery schedule. 3)Work out fallback plans with CMS on parts delivery. 4)Adopt a reasonable but aggressive schedule as the baseline that shows explicit contingency to account for delay in delivery of parts.

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 18 New Delivery Schedule In October we established a new schedule with the tracker group TOB is ~33% of the total parts count for the tracker. We requested ~50% increase in parts delivery rate during production in order to create explicit schedule contingency. The tracker group was able to do this since it represents only ~16% increase in overall parts flow rate.

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 19 Tracker Task Managers

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 20 Tracker Task Managers (2)

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 21 Parts Delivery Fallback plans The most likely source of delay is component processing within the CMS tracker group We have now made preparations to assist in processing the parts we need: Pitch adaptor wirebonding on hybrids Manufacture of frames Sensor probing Dummy rods Finally, we have contingency to allow an extension of the module production period

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 22 Schedule at Review Main Production Period: ~3 months of explicit float

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 23 Schedule Now Main Production Period: ~ 8 months of explicit float

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 24 Re: Cost Committee Report, Section 4: Cost Recommendations to US CMS Silicon : 1)Re-evaluate the cost of infrastructure (special environment control, burn-in stations), and engineering for ramp-up time. 2)Transfer the cost of an additional K&S 8090 purchase from contingency to the base estimate. 3)Contingency percentage should be calculated based on the Total Base Cost estimate rather than on the Total Base Cost for US CMS.

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 25 Costs At Review (FY00$) 520k$ of this is covered by the original barter agreement between FNAL and Int’l CMS

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 26 Costs Now (FY00$) Price has risen 450k$. 520k$ of this is covered by the original barter agreement between FNAL and Int’l CMS

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 27 Contingency Contingency for labor remains a healthy 56%

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 28 Re: Availability of Resources Committee Report, Section 5: Availability of Resources Recommendations to US CMS Silicon : 1)The US CMS silicon project managers should work with CMS and with their own project plans to try and utilize the currently projected excess of available technicians at SiDet in FY01. Response It is not possible to advance the production of modules. However, Engineering of the burn-in stand, test boxes, dummy rods, transport boxes will start as soon as we are base-lined: These will require FNAL technician manpower for assembly in FY01. We will soon setup the first gantry. We will manufacture the frames for mechanical modules production. We may manufacture the frames for the first 80 TOB prototype modules. The production of the first 80 modules will require technicians for assembly, inspection, wirebonding, and testing. We are working with INFN Pisa to advance the schedule for production of the TIB cylinders. NEW

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 29 Action Items Action Items for the US CMS Project: 1)Develop a schedule based on reasonable but aggressive production rate assumptions and based on a realistic parts delivery schedule which shows explicit schedule contingency and schedule float. 2)Respond to the recommendations of this review by November 1, 2000 so that the project can be baselined Response 1.We have developed a new schedule exactly as recommended. 2.We have submitted our responses to the committee recommendations on November 1, 2000.

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 30 Action Item for FNAL Action Item for the Fermilab Management: 1)Assure that there is a cohesive plan for the management, design leadership and fabrication of both the CMS silicon tracker and the Run IIb silicon upgrades for CDF and D0. Work with US/CMS silicon tracker managers and the CDF/D0 leadership to establish a plan of bow both sets of projects (CMS and Run IIb upgrades) will be accomplished.

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 31 Comment on Run 2b “The CMS silicon project managers have recently led CDF and D0 Run 2b silicon study groups. Our exposure to … CMS … enabled us to provide important new concepts to the Run 2b effort... We will carefully consider the roles we can play in the Run 2b projects …after taking into account all of our existing commitments. Many of the scientific personnel of the CMS silicon tracker group have interests in the Run 2b silicon projects. This is driven by physics interests... This situation is not unusual in our field. We have made every possible effort to ensure a positive synergy between these dual interests… We will make every effort to plan our activities such that we can use our expertise, manpower, and equipment in the most efficient ways, and to the benefit of both the Tevatron and LHC programs.”

US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 32 Conclusions We have been reviewed CMS needs us to build this outer tracker and we need to get started We have prepared a good project plan with truly excellent and effective groups We have responded to all of the review committee recommendations A good project is now an even better one We’re ready to go! It’s time to be base-lined!