Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Advertisements

Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW)
Reflection Seismic Processing
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Multiple Removal with Local Plane Waves
Processing and Binning Overview From chapter 14 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
Using 3D Seismic Imaging for Mine and Mineral Exploration G. Schuster University of Utah.
Processing: zero-offset gathers
Near-surface Imaging at Meteor Crater, Arizona Soumya Roy, Ph. D. Student Advisor: Dr. Robert R. Stewart AGL Annual Meeting University of Houston, 2 nd.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Seismic Reflection: Processing and Interpretation Katie Wooddell UW Madison.
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Closure Phase Statics Correction Closure Phase Statics Correction University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Fundamentals Introduction Seismic waves: Propagation Velocity and Amplitudes Seismogram Measurement systems Sources, receivers, Acquisition strategies.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Reflection GPH492 By: Jonathan Payne Peter Bernhard Eve Marie Hirt.
Advanced Seismic Imaging GG 6770 Variance Analysis of Seismic Refraction Tomography Data By Travis Crosby.
UTAM 2004 Travis Crosby. UTAM 2004 Travis Crosby Very Low Frequency EM Surveys for the Purpose of Augmenting for the Purpose of Augmenting Near-Surface.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Reflection Field Methods
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,
Kirchhoff vs Crosscorrelation
Key Result Seismic CAT Scan vs Trenching.
Acquisiton of Passive Seismic Data at Tooele Army Depot, Utah David Sheley, Travis Crosby, Jianming Sheng.
Autocorrelogram Migration of Drill-Bit Data Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz, Fred Followill, and Gerard T. Schuster.
Reflection Survey Todd Hansen Diana Hooper Michelle Heimgartner.
Applications of Time-Domain Multiscale Waveform Tomography to Marine and Land Data C. Boonyasiriwat 1, J. Sheng 3, P. Valasek 2, P. Routh 2, B. Macy 2,
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
Interferometric Multiple Migration of UPRC Data
Autocorrelogram Migration for Field Data Generated by A Horizontal Drill-bit Source Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz Fred Followill and Gerard T. Schuster.
Stacking  Statics  Residual statics in combination with the velocity analysis  Muting  Approximated zero offset section.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
AGU 2015 Fall Meeting Session ID: 8656 Session Title: New development in open source and academic seismic software Conveniors: Majdański, Polkowski.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey
Lab 8 NMO and Residual Velocity Analysis Objectives: Apply NMO CMP Stack the NMO (for later comparison) Compute Residual Statics Apply Residual statics.
Motivation To characterize the shallow subsurface at Wadi Qudaid for its water storage and reuse potential.
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Reflection seismograms
AUTOMATON A Fuzzy Logic Automatic Picker Paul Gettings 1 UTAM 2003 Annual Meeting 1 Thermal Geophysics Research Group, University of Utah.
Multiscale Waveform Tomography C. Boonyasiriwat, P. Valasek, P. Routh, B. Macy, W. Cao, and G. T. Schuster * ConocoPhillips * **
Interferometric Traveltime Tomography M. Zhou & G.T. Schuster Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Processing Seismic Reflection Data of La Bajada Fault Ryan Lester.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
. Lakeside Drive and Manzanita Lane to the north corner of Jasper Lane and Manzanita Lane.
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 Vertical Seismic Profiling– Nov 2, 2015
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 ERB 5104 Lecture 7 – Sept 16, 2015
MD+AVO Inversion: Real Examples University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
R. G. Pratt1, L. Sirgue2, B. Hornby2, J. Wolfe3
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Super-virtual interferometry
Processing of KAUST Golf Data
SEISMIC DATA GATHERING.
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Processing and Binning Overview
Bison – 120 Channels.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu

Outline AcquisitionAcquisition Reflection ProcessingReflection Processing Refraction ProcessingRefraction Processing InterpretationInterpretation ConclusionsConclusions

Survey Location North 1 Mile Mandate: Image Bedrock Interface Bedrock Depth: 2 – 200? m

Acquisition Parameters Hz geopones Hz geopones 5 m receiver spacing5 m receiver spacing 2.5 m source spacing2.5 m source spacing Split spreadSplit spread 2630 m total line length2630 m total line length 1056 shot gathers1056 shot gathers EWG source (5 stacks)EWG source (5 stacks)

EWG Source

Recording Parameters 1 ms sample interval1 ms sample interval 1500 samples/record1500 samples/record 120 active channels120 active channels 4-Hz low cut filter4-Hz low cut filter 500-Hz high cut (Nyquist) filter500-Hz high cut (Nyquist) filter

Outline AcquisitionAcquisition Reflection ProcessingReflection Processing Refraction ProcessingRefraction Processing InterpretationInterpretation ConclusionsConclusions

Reflection Processing Flow Reformat Data CSG, CRG Editing Band-Pass Filtering Hz Hz Automatic Gain Control (AGC)

Reflection Processing Flow Reformat Data CSG, CRG Editing Band-Pass Filtering Hz Hz Automatic Gain Control (AGC) Refraction and Refraction and Surface Wave Mute

CMP 1179: Trace Editing Time (ms)

CMP 1179: SW and Refr. Mute Time (ms)

Reflection Processing Flow Reformat Data CSG, CRG Editing Band-Pass Filtering Hz Hz Automatic Gain Control (AGC) Refraction and Refraction and Surface Wave Mute Velocity Analysis NMO Correction Residual Statics

Reflection Processing Flow Reformat Data CSG, CRG Editing Band-Pass Filtering Hz Hz Automatic Gain Control (AGC) Refraction and Refraction and Surface Wave Mute Velocity Analysis NMO Correction Residual Statics BP Filtering and BP Filtering and Amplitude Scaling F-X Prediction Filtering Filtering Trace Mixing and AGC Scaling AGC Scaling Output Result

Final Reflection Section: Time Time (ms) Offset (m)

Final Reflection Section: Depth Depth (m) Offset (m)

CMP’s 599 and 600 Time (ms)

Final Reflection Section: Time Time (ms) Offset (m) CMP 600 CMP 1180

CMP’s 1179 and 1180 Time (ms)

Outline AcquisitionAcquisition Reflection ProcessingReflection Processing Refraction ProcessingRefraction Processing InterpretationInterpretation ConclusionsConclusions

117,000 First Arrival Picks Time (ms)

Inversion Parameters 117,000/127,000 picks117,000/127,000 picks 2.5 m grid size2.5 m grid size 2.5 m source spacing2.5 m source spacing 2730 x 220 m model (x,z)2730 x 220 m model (x,z) 160 x 80 max smoothing size160 x 80 max smoothing size 40 x 20 min smoothing size40 x 20 min smoothing size

Tomographic Residual Traveltime Residual (ms) Iteration 160 x x x 40

Velocity Tomogram Depth (m) Offset (m) Velocity (m/s)

Tomogram & Raypath Density Depth (m) Offset (m) Depth (m) Offset (m) Velocity (m/s) # of Rays

Outline AcquisitionAcquisition Reflection ProcessingReflection Processing Refraction ProcessingRefraction Processing InterpretationInterpretation ConclusionsConclusions

Refraction/Reflection Comparison Depth (m) Velocity (m/s) Offset (m) Depth (m) Offset (m)

Refraction/Reflection with Wells Depth (m) Velocity (m/s) Depth (m) Offset (m)

Interpretation Depth (m) Velocity (m/s) Depth (m) Offset (m)

Outline AcquisitionAcquisition Reflection ProcessingReflection Processing Refraction ProcessingRefraction Processing InterpretationInterpretation ConclusionsConclusions

Conclusions Refraction tomography provides confidence in the reflection image.Refraction tomography provides confidence in the reflection image. 40-Hz geophones did not sufficiently attenuate surface wave energy.40-Hz geophones did not sufficiently attenuate surface wave energy. Source induced noise contaminated near offset traces.Source induced noise contaminated near offset traces. The source produced adequate energy to image the bedrock contact.The source produced adequate energy to image the bedrock contact.