Phoebe A wiki-based pedagogic planner to promote innovative practice in Design for Learning Liz Masterman Oxford University Computing Services with Marion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DeSILA Designing and Sharing Inquiry-based Learning Activities JISC Design for Learning Programme Dr Philippa Levy & Dr Sabine Little (CILASS) John Stratford,
Advertisements

Supporting further and higher education e-Learning and Pedagogy overview Helen Beetham Programme Consultant.
Directorate of Human Resources Understanding design for learning Dr. Rhona Sharpe Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Our vision for a pedagogic planning tool Practical assistance for lecturers designing blended learning activities Both literature-based and adaptable in.
Designing Technology Enhanced Learning activities PGCAPP U6 Workshop 3 Geraldine Jones
Customised training: Learner Voice and Post-16 Citizenship.
Supporting further and higher education Learning design for a flexible learning environment Sarah Knight and Ros Smith Pedagogy Strand of the JISC e-Learning.
Engaging Learners at Multiple Levels: Innovations to support the development of professional practice in e-learning Adrian Kirkwood, Robin Goodfellow &
TKT Essentials Routes to excellence. TKT Essentials TKT Essentials course The TKT Essentials course provides a basic introduction to English language.
Developing our digital literacies: the imperative Dr. Rhona Sharpe Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development Changing the Learning Landscape, 29.
Transforming lives through learning Assessing Progress and Achievement Professional Learning Resource Scottish Learning Festival September 2014.
JISC LLL WFD Assembly Maximising Impact – assembling & leveraging the evidence base Dr Rachel Harris Inspire Research Ltd 10 th January 2011.
Dr Jo Maddern Centre for the Development of Staff and Academic Practice Institute of Education, Graduate and Professional Development INSPIRING TEACHING,
Leanne CameronEuropean LAMS Conference, June 2008No 1 Could a Pedagogical Planner be a useful LD tool for university lecturers? Leanne Cameron Macquarie.
Design for learning – processes for active learning Robin Graham – Christchurch Polytechnic Institute of Technology Martin Jenkins – University of Gloucestershire.
Lynn Stockley & Associates Introduction to Behavioural Change Lynn Stockley.
Phoebe: Web 2.0 Technology to Support Innovation and Collaboration Among Teachers Aim of the Phoebe project To build an online pedagogic planning tool.
Pedagogic Planning Tools Liz Masterman Oxford University Computing Services for World ORT, 8 th.
Pedagogic Planning Tools and Effective Design for Learning Liz Masterman Oxford University Computing Services Marion Manton Department of Continuing Education,
Introduction to Phoebe A pedagogical planner tool – helping people to design for learning.
Phoebe: A Pedagogic Planner to Promote Innovative Practice in Design for Learning Marion Manton TALL, University of Oxford.
Disrupt or co-opt? The role of a pedagogic planning tool in promoting effective design for learning Liz Masterman Oxford University Computing Services.
Phoebe Pedagogic Planner: Over view demonstration Liz Masterman Marion Manton 26 th October 2006.
1 Motivation and Engagement in Online discussion : improving the students’ experience. Laura Lannin & Elisabeth Skinner University of Gloucestershire.
C LASS #3: P LANNING TO T EACH S CIENCE P ART 1 Chapter 5: Teaching Science Chapter 9: Differentiated Instruction Chapter 10: Learning in Secondary Schools.
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
Network of School Planners in Ireland Mark Fennell 28 th April 2012 Implementing effective changes to improve student learning:
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
Developing a Strategy for Technology Enhanced Learning at UEL.
The use of ‘exploratory learning’ for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments Freitas, S. d. & Neumann, T. (2009). The use of ‘ exploratory.
David Lord Matthew Pearson University of Huddersfield Experiences of common module delivery using Blackboard.
Markus Mostert & Lynn Quinn Rhodes University Grahamstown South Africa Using ICTs in Teaching and Learning: Reflections on Professional Development of.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Rethinking eLearning: Bridging the Technology-Pedagogy Divide with an Appropriate Theoretical Framework Julie Gannon The Futures Academy Faculty of the.
Dr Fiona J. L. Handley Centre for Learning and Teaching.
Enhancing student learning through assessment: a school-wide approach Christine O'Leary, Centre for Promoting Learner Autonomy Sheffield Business School.
Learning design as a foundation for the future success of e-learning Diana Laurillard 2007 European LAMS Conference University of Greenwich 5 July 2007.
A Model to Facilitate Effective Blended E-learning within Universities in Developing Countries B. Aguti, R. J. Walters, G. B. Wills Electronics and Computer.
Transforming lives through learning Curriculum Expectations Sadie Cushley HMIE Feb 2014.
Joint Information Systems Committee 14/10/2015 | | Slide 1 Effective Assessment in a Digital Age Sarah Knight e-Learning Programme, JISC Ros Smith, GPI.
The Principles of Learning and Teaching P-12 Training Program
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
Enquiring into Entrepreneurial School Leadership Sue Robson.
Facilitating reflective practice – experiences to date. Dr Alan Masson Director: CETL(NI) for Institutional E- learning Services (CIES), University of.
1Management Sciences for Health Principles of Curriculum Development.
Moving to distance using Moodle and e-learning Tessa Welch and Greig Krull, CUEA, 24 November 2011.
Collaborative Learning Using iPads Sara Hattersley, E-Learning Manager Centre for Lifelong Learning.
EQAL, E-Learning and Effective Embedding Dr Neil Ringan Centre for Learning & Teaching.
Isobel Falconer & Allison Littlejohn Caledonian Academy, Glasgow Caledonian University JISC Design4Learning Programme MOD.
March E-Learning or E-Teaching? What’s the Difference in Practice? Linda Price and Adrian Kirkwood Programme on Learner Use of Media The Open University.
4Faculty.org Online Professional Development Resources.
Supporting further and higher education Situating e-portfolios: what do learners need? Helen Beetham Consultant in Pedagogy JISC e-learning programme.
Northampton – Development Opportunities …. Developed 2013 in response to: review of the existing PGCTHE provision and institutional.
Innovation What does it look like in Adult Learning?
2 EC SIG 7/12/06 JISC Design for Learning Programme What is it?  2 year project - till May 2008  Part of the pedagogy strand of the JISC eLearning Programme.
Christchurch New Zealand October 2009 Integrating new technologies to empower learning and transform leadership.
Achieving quality in technology-supported learning: the challenges for elearning and distance education. Ron Oliver Edith Cowan University Perth, Western.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Enriching and enhancing teaching and learning.
This resource has been released by the University of Bath as an Open Educational Resource. The materials are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike.
Strategies for blended learning in an undergraduate curriculum Benjamin Kehrwald, Massey University College of Education.
Company LOGO ATP Connected Learning in an Open World ‘‘Developing new ideas and escaping from the old ones’ - A collaborative E learn course development.
LAMS: The Learning Activity Management System James Dalziel Professor of Learning Technology & Director, Macquarie E-Learning Centre Of Excellence (MELCOE)
This resource has been released by the University of Bath as an Open Educational Resource. The materials are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike.
Planning Literacy Learning Essential Skills Practitioners Level 3.
Designs and testing for a ‘pedagogic planning tool’ A User-oriented Planner for Learning Analysis and Design - Overview Review meeting 23 January 2007.
Course Work 2: Critical Reflection GERALDINE DORAN B
What is meant by methodology and why is it important? Methodology refers to the ‘how’ of teaching - how teaching and learning is planned, organized, conducted,
Learning type: Acquisition
Support for English, maths and ESOL Module 12d: Developing functional mathematics with vocational learners - training the trainers.
Education Transform Resources
Presentation transcript:

Phoebe A wiki-based pedagogic planner to promote innovative practice in Design for Learning Liz Masterman Oxford University Computing Services with Marion Manton & David Balch Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford

Overview Introduction:  Design for learning and the role of pedagogic planning tools General challenges to the design of pedagogic planning tools Design principles for Phoebe Quick tour of Phoebe A complementary tool: the London Planner Jonathan San-Diego, London Knowledge Lab Comments, questions, suggestions, bouquets, brickbats… To what extent is there a need for these tools? Is it possible to create a tool for all? (Discuss further on Thursday!)

Aligning our understandings: Design for learning “the process by which teachers – and others involved in the support of learning – arrive at a plan or structure or design for a learning situation” (Beetham & Sharpe, 2007, p. 7) that strikes “an appropriate balance between e-learning and other modes of delivery” (JISC, 2004, p. 11). Design, rather than planning, because:  Simultaneously a systematic and a creative activity (Winograd, 1996)  “learning can never be wholly designed, only designed for” (Beetham & Sharpe, 2007, p.8)

Aligning our understandings: Pedagogic planning tools Purpose-built applications that guide teachers through the construction of plans for learning sessions that make effective use of technology where appropriate Pedagogic planning:  Concept of “lesson” alien to HE  Pedagogy “embraces an essential dialogue between teaching and learning” (Beetham & Sharpe, 2007, p. 2)

Aligning our understandings: Pedagogic planning tools =Where the individual practitioner starts getting to grips with technology and exploring its implications: “E-learning is often talked about as a ‘trojan mouse,’ which teachers let into their practice without realizing that it will require them to rethink not just how they use particular hardware or software, but all of what they do.” (Sharpe & Oliver, 2007, p. 49) “It fundamentally made me think about what I actually do in the class. … The VLE really made me think about ‘how am I going to project what it is that I give to a lesson when I’m face to face on this screen?’… Usually I don’t have to plan my lessons, I just go in and do it.… What it brought me back to was the actual lesson plan, you know, like when you first started off … it was like that all over again.” (School teacher)

Challenges to the design of pedagogic planning tools Range of approaches:  “The starting point would be the assessment criteria/expected learning outcomes. This would be balanced by the students’ needs and level of learning.”  “I usually start by thinking about the knowledge or skills learners need, whilst keeping a strong eye on the assessment. This then develops into aims and outcomes.” Range of tools:  “I use pen and paper to collect ideas, Post-its to sort main headings. I like to lecture from a hand-written outline.”  “1. Pen and paper — broad conceptual overview, key learning activities mapped as a storyboard/concept map. 2. Formalise this map in Word or PowerPoint. 3. Detailed matrix of [learning outcomes], activities and assessment in Excel for detailed analysis etc.”

Forms of representation Tools to support creation of these representations Moving from one form of representation to another Challenges to the design of pedagogic planning tools

JISC Design for Learning programme May 2006-February 2008 Phoebe  Planning at the session level London Planner  Planning at both the course (module) and session levels

Phoebe Aim:  Enable teachers in post-compulsory education to develop their confidence and skills in designing technology-mediated learning experiences Principles:  Propagate effective practice to a wide audience  Allow option to use familiar planning tools Rationale:  Learning Design tools and LAMS in limited use; output XML  Successful IT projects build on the way users work, don’t force them to adapt

Phoebe Envisaged context of use  Initial teacher training  Staff development: engage the reluctant and/or curious  Productivity tool and source of further inspiration for experienced practitioners  Community tool to be “owned” and customised by individual institutions Development methodology (see poster):  “Informant Design”  Activity Theory analysis of Learning Design Tools project data Phase 1 proof-of-concept prototype:  “A wiki within a wiki”

Phoebe

Future directions: Phoebe phase 2 Expand the content Evaluate in a range of contexts Explore Phoebe as a community-owned tool  Ensure relevance to users through customisation  A way to tackle long-term sustainability? Consider the future research agenda for planner tools Integration with other planner tools  The London Planner