D. Peterson, Cornell CLEO group meeting, Oct 23, 2003 1 Cornell Contributions to Infrastructure: Track Reconstruction Track Finding ---------------------

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Calibration of a Modular Straw-Tube- Tracker for the COSY-TOF Experiment Sedigheh Jowzaee 3-6 June 2013, Symposium on Applied Nuclear Physics and Innovative.
Advertisements

D. Peterson, “TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction”, ALCPG Arlington 09-Jan TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction.
Analysis of the Stereo Hits and the 2D Circle Fitter Hans Wenzel, Hogan Nguyen Feb 9 th, 2011 Introduction Hans implemented stereo hits, formed by the.
The CLEO-III Drift Chamber Vienna Conference on Instrumentation, 19-February-2001 Daniel Peterson, Cornell University K. Berkelman R. Briere G. Chen D.
D. Peterson, tracking presentation to ATLAS representatives 12-Oct Charged Particle Tracking at Cornell: Gas Detectors and Event Reconstruction.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
TRACK DICTIONARY (UPDATE) RESOLUTION, EFFICIENCY AND L – R AMBIGUITY SOLUTION Claudio Chiri MEG meeting, 21 Jan 2004.
D. Peterson, “TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction”, Victoria, 29-July TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction.
D. Peterson, “LDC question TR_7”, ALCPG, Snowmass, 25-August LDC question TR_7: Magnetic Field What quality of the field do we need in the TPC,
The Drift Chamber, D. Peterson
D. Peterson, “TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction”, Round Table, 23-Jan TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction.
Track Fitting and Comparator Results Emu UC Davis Feb. 26, 2005 Yangheng Zheng University of California, Los Angeles  Motivation & Introduction.
D. Peterson, “TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction”, LC-TPC-LBL, 18-Oct For example: TPC: 2.0 m O.R., 0.5 m I.R., 150  m spatial.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Preliminary Studies of the Tracking Resolution at DESY Hakan Yilmaz.
D. Peterson, “TPC Digitization and Reconstruction: Noise”, Vienna, 16-November TPC digitization and track reconstruction: efficiency dependence.
D. Peterson, “TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction”, Paris, 22-April For example: TPC: 2.0 m O.R., 0.5 m I.R., 150  m spatial.
D. Peterson, tracking presentation to CMS representatives 07-Oct Charged Particle Tracking at Cornell: Gas Detectors and Event Reconstruction Dan.
Atmospheric Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University June 2004.
D. Peterson, “TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction”, SLAC, 07-Jan For example: TPC: 2.0 m O.R., 0.5 m I.R., 150  m spatial.
D. Peterson, discussion with CMS representatives, FermiLab, 12-July Charged Particle Reconstruction at Cornell Dan Peterson, Cornell University.
10/04/05Allen Sussman, Track Finder Visualization, Cornell CMS Meeting1 Track Finder Visualization Allen Sussman Dan Peterson Improvements:  Allow user.
D. Peterson, “TPC Digitization and Reconstruction: Noise ”, LCWS07, DESY, 30-May TPC digitization and track reconstruction: efficiency dependence.
10/06/05Allen Sussman, Track Finder Visualization, LPC Tracking Meeting1 Track Finder Visualization Allen Sussman Dan Peterson Cornell University, LEPP.
D. Peterson, tracking presentation to CMS representatives 15-April Charged Particle Tracking at Cornell: Gas Detectors and Reconstruction Software.
What’s the object(ive) of tracking? some things: – hits, wires, clusters, track segments, tracks, trajectories, outer detector matching hits, ….. some.
FTPC calibration status Joern Putschke for the STAR FTPC group STAR Analysis Meeting 2002 October 22-24, 2002.
Vertex Reconstructing Neural Networks at the ZEUS Central Tracking Detector FermiLab, October 2000 Erez Etzion 1, Gideon Dror 2, David Horn 1, Halina Abramowicz.
Some mediation on fast track reconstruction of BESIII Wang Dayong Mar 10,2004.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
The CLEO-c Detector Steve Gray Cornell University BESIII Workshop January 13, 2004.
PHENIX Drift Chamber operation principles Modified by Victor Riabov Focus meeting 01/06/04 Original by Sergey Butsyk Focus meeting 01/14/03.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
Workshop on B/Tau Physics, Helsinki V. Karim ä ki, HIP 1 Software Alignment of the CMS Tracker V. Karimäki / HIP V. Karimäki / HIP Workshop.
GEM MINIDRIFT DETECTOR WITH CHEVRON READOUT EIC Tracking Meeting 10/6/14 B.Azmoun, BNL.
STAR Collaboration Meeting Rene Bellwied – Wayne State University July 2004 SVT Calibration and STI tracking status An update of work since the SVT review.
PS 225 Lecture 20 Linear Regression Equation and Prediction.
Status of Pattern Recognition for the T-Tracker Hans Wenzel, Hogan Nguyen March 12 th, 2011 Introduction Hans implemented stereo hits, formed by the intersection.
Dan Peterson, Cornell University Presented at the Workshop on Detector R&D Development of a Low-Material TPC Endplate for the ILD Experiment at.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
MDC Simulation Yuan Ye BESIII Collaboration Meeting.
What is in my contribution area Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
LCWS 06 Bangalore, India, March Track fitting using weight matrix Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System Zepu Mao IHEP BESIII Annual Meeting 2005/05/29.
Calorimeter Assisted Track Finder Tracking Infrastructure Dmitry Onoprienko Kansas State University Linear Collider Workshop 2007 May 30 – June 3, 2007.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
2002 LHC days in Split Sandra Horvat 08 – 12 October, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Potential is here...
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set R. Burrell, G.P. Gilfoyle University of Richmond, Physics Department CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating.
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
Current Status of MDC Track Reconstruction MdcPatRec Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao
SIlicon VErtex TrAcker Rather than fixed common geometry the common analysis and simulation tools are needed. Such software package should provide : 
January 13, 2004A. Cherlin1 Preliminary results from the 2000 run of CERES on low-mass e + e - pair production in Pb-Au collisions at 158 A GeV A. Cherlin.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
Tracking software of the BESIII drift chamber Linghui WU For the BESIII MDC software group.
The CDF Upgrade - Incandela -CERN - January 26, 2001 slide 1 96 wire planes –(8 superlayers) –50% are 3 o stereo –Uniform drift (0.88 cm cell) –30,240.
M.C. Studies of CDC Axial/Stereo Layer Configuration David Lawrence, JLab Sept. 19, /19/08 1 CDC Tracking MC Studies -- D. Lawrence, JLab.
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Garfield studies of cell layouts
Predrag Krstonosic - ILC Valencia
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
HARPO Analysis.
Shifter Instructions regarding the ZD, Dan Peterson
DC monitoring - calibration - simulation - corrections
Alignment of the PHENIX Silicon Vertex Tracker (VTX) in 2014
Presentation transcript:

D. Peterson, Cornell CLEO group meeting, Oct 23, Cornell Contributions to Infrastructure: Track Reconstruction Track Finding dpp Calibration Nadia Adam, David Urner Fitting Weights Jim Pivarski Alignment Jim Pivarski, Nadia Adam Kalman Fitter Werner Sun, Jim Pivarski Another related and important part of this puzzle is determining the entrance angle corrections, a function of signed drift distance and signed entrance angle. This is done by Mickhail Dubrovin (Wayne State).

D. Peterson, Cornell CLEO group meeting, Oct 23, Tracking reconstruction How to we transform the hardware output (times and pulse heights, threshold discriminated) to a product that provides some insight into a physical process ?

D. Peterson, Cornell CLEO group meeting, Oct 23, Track finding Track finding starts with the integer tracker. “Integer because only wire locations are used (no drift times), and because the calculations are all in integer arithmetic. Basic clean segments are found, “SF”. Clean segments can be extended, in and out, into noisy areas. Clean segments can be merged into longer segments. “Z” calculations are performed at each change in stereo angle. “Z” calculations are used in the predicted wire locations when extending inward, into the ZD.

D. Peterson, Cornell CLEO group meeting, Oct 23, Track finding Correlations in residuals are used in the 2 nd and 3 rd stages. 2 nd stage determines most of the left/right hit assignments, uses groups of hits within super-layers with correlated residuals, refines the r  and z fits. 3 rd stage can extend the track into more ambiguous areas: into the silicon, extend a curling track into complicated, noisy, areas. Therefore, these stages are dependent on the t 0 drift function (time-to-distance relation) alignment. These stages depend on the other work that will be described. Errors will cause wrong assignments. But required accuracy is about 500  m.

D. Peterson, Cornell CLEO group meeting, Oct 23, calibration yellow lines :  m Calibration includes the time-to-distance relation and t 0. The time-to-distance relation used in track finding is single-sided and has no propagation correction, matches the needs of finding. (At the time of making this display) the ZD has imperfect t 0, resulting in an E/W difference, and, sometimes, wrong assignments. Correction is iterative.

D. Peterson, Cornell CLEO group meeting, Oct 23, alignment Alignment covers a broad range of problems. Rotation of one endplate to the other, twist. DR3: inch/diameter, DR2:.014, ZD:.002 (smaller diameter) Rotation of the an element, such as the ZD, relative to a larger system. DR3 rings: on order of.003 inch/diameter. Translations in x-y-z. There are independent translations of the ZD on East and West. These are all on the order of.010 inch, 250  m. DR3 rings: on order of.005 inch These do not affect track finding, but greatly affect track fitting.

D. Peterson, Cornell CLEO group meeting, Oct 23, alignment The miss-alignments discussed on the previous page can be determined with tracks in the calibration process. They show up as shifts and oscillations of the Bhabha momentum. The miss-alignments can also be determined in a dedicated study of residuals, where the (group of) layer(s) is deweighted in the fit. Alignment is an iterative process, with the calibration Jim will discuss current work on the more perplexing alignment issues which can be interpreted as possible physical imperfections of detector elements, misunderstanding of the charge collection center / electrical center / wire center / and geometric center of cells. DR2 was abounding with these types of problems Jim will describe. However, we did not know the shape of the endplate nor could we use the stereo wire measurements to determine it.

D. Peterson, Cornell CLEO group meeting, Oct 23, Final fitter The track finding process includes  2 fits in projections. It does not provide precision measurements. Finder fitting: K0 resolution is  ~ 5 Mev. After Kalman fitter: K0 resolution is  ~2 Mev. The Kalman fitter includes the best interpretation of the electronic signals translated into hit positions and accuracies. It starts with the hits from the finder, then includes… calibration, alignment, fitting weights, and hit deletion.