Comparisons between Testbed and Finnish national observation network Jani Poutiainen Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) Observation Services 12.2.2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The WMO Vision for Global Observing Systems in 2025 John Eyre, ET-EGOS Chair GCOS-WMO Workshop, Geneva, January 2011.
Advertisements

How do meteorologists make weather observations? Measuring the Weather.
An Intercomparison of Surface Observations and High-Resolution Forecasting Model Output for the Lake Okeechobee Region By Kathryn Shontz July 19, 2006.
“ Multi-functional Mesoscale Observing Networks in Support of Integrated Forecasting Systems” A Report on a USWRP Workshop Organized by: Fred Carr, University.
Will Pendergrass NOAA/ARL/ATDD OAR Senior Research Council Meeting Oak Ridge, TN August 18-19, 2010 Boundary–Layer Dispersion Urban Meteorology 5/20/2015Air.
How to obtain data, Researcher’s Interface 1.Overview 2.Self-registration walk through and listing the data 3.Creation of user-accounts 4.Hands-on experiments.
Tor Håkon Sivertsen. Bioforsk Plant Health and Plant Protection,
Development of high spatial resolution Forest Fire Index for boreal conditions Applications to Helsinki Testbed area - Preliminary results- Andrea Vajda,
The 8 th GAME International Science Panel Meeting (Thailand, November, 2003) Dr. C. H. Cho Meteorological Research Institute, KMA
FMI’s special measurement sites - Jokioinen and Sodankylä 1)Basic infrastructure and routine operations 2)Special instrumentation and research Sodankylä.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
Weather Forecasting – The Traditional Approach Pine cones open and close according to air humidity. An open pine cone means dry weather. Ash leaf before.
FMI contribution to WGii first report Requirements from the forecasters and from the cuntomers Janne Kotro Jukka Julkunen Juha Kilpinen.
Helsinki Testbed Mesoscale weather research Forecast and dispersion models development and verification Information systems and technology integration.
12/03/041 Remote sensing in Weather applications We produce algorithms and prototypes of products for FMI forecasters and customers. Our tools include.
UNDERSTANDING TYPHOONS
Southern Ocean Air-Sea Flux Observations Eric Schulz, CAWCR, BoM.
Dr Mark Cresswell Model Assimilation 69EG6517 – Impacts & Models of Climate Change.
Leon Tolstoy, UPRM, UMASS Elena SaltikoffVaisala Internship in Helsinki, Finland January - February 2006.
Assessment of Localized Urban Climates and Associations with Air Pollution and Synoptic Weather Patterns Aaron Hardin, MS Candidate, Texas Tech University.
Unit 4 Lesson 5 Weather Maps and Weather Prediction
Section 12.3 Gathering Weather Data
The polar sea ice covers are large Tens of millions of square kilometers, and empty.
Guided Notes on Gathering Weather Data
© Crown copyright 2011 Met Office WOW - Weather Observations Website Crowd-sourced weather obs for real OGC TC 79 Brussels, Chris Little & Aidan.
The Hydrometeorology Testbed Network. 2 An AR-focused long-term observing network is being installed in CA as part of a MOA between CA-DWR, NOAA and Scripps.
Documentation of surface observation. Classification for siting and performance characteristics Michel Leroy, Météo-France.
20.5 Forecasting Weather Objectives
Polar Communications and Weather Mission Canadian Context and Benefits.
Mid-Atlantic Mesonet Consortium Founded through the State Climate Offices at: the University of Delaware and Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
© TAFE MECAT 2008 Chapter 6(b) Where & how we take measurements.
Automated Weather Observations from Ships and Buoys: A Future Resource for Climatologists Shawn R. Smith Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies.
SATELLITE METEOROLOGY BASICS satellite orbits EM spectrum
Observations From the Global AMDAR Program Presentation to WMO TECO May 2005 by Jeff Stickland Technical Coordinator, WMO AMDAR Panel.
Modeling the upper ocean response to Hurricane Igor Zhimin Ma 1, Guoqi Han 2, Brad deYoung 1 1 Memorial University 2 Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
Why We Care or Why We Go to Sea.
National Weather Service Goes Digital With Internet Mapping Ken Waters National Weather Service, Honolulu HI Jack Settelmaier National Weather Service,
Cloud Evolution and the Sea Breeze Front
–thermometer –barometer –anemometer –hygrometer Objectives Recognize the importance of accurate weather data. Describe the technology used to collect.
Gathering Weather Data pg. 79. Surface Data Instruments thermometer- filled with mercury or alcohol; expands when heated barometer- measures air pressure;
Needs & Challenges for Urban Weather Observations Challenges in Urban Meteorology: A Forum for Users and Providers September 2004 Rockville, Maryland.
Significance of Helsinki Testbed in research Overall themes: Mesoscale atmospheric research Forecast models development and verification Dispersion models.
RICO Modeling Studies Group interests RICO data in support of studies.
Shipboard Automated Meteorological and Oceanographic System (SAMOS) Initiative: A Key Component of an Ocean Observing System Shawn R. Smith Center for.
Autonomous Polar Atmospheric Observations John J. Cassano University of Colorado.
Evaluation of the Real-Time Ocean Forecast System in Florida Atlantic Coastal Waters June 3 to 8, 2007 Matthew D. Grossi Department of Marine & Environmental.
Satellite based instability indices for very short range forecasting of convection Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service Contributions from Marianne.
METEOROLOGICAL DATA COLLECTION NETWORK OF IMD. Meteorological instrument Observer Meteorological Observation (In situ & Remote sensing)
Layered Water Vapor Quick Guide by NASA / SPoRT and CIRA Why is the Layered Water Vapor Product important? Water vapor is essential for creating clouds,
Forecasting the weather
Instruments. In Situ In situ instruments measure what is occurring in their immediate proximity. E.g., a thermometer or a wind vane. Remote sensing uses.
05/03/2016FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE Jarmo Koistinen, Heikki Pohjola Finnish Meteorological Institute CARPE DIEM FMI (Partner 5) progress report.
Model calculationsMeasurements An extreme precipitation event during STOPEX I J.Reuder and I. Barstad Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Norway.
Unit 4 Lesson 5 Weather Maps and Weather Prediction Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
Tayba Buddha Tamang Meteorology/Hydromet Services Division Department of Energy Ministry of Economic Affairs South Asian Climate Outlook Forum (SASCOF-1)‏
SmartMet Lea Saukkonen FMI What is SmartMet? A software tool for visualizing and editing meteorological data.
Vaisala Capabilities in Hydrometeorology Nicholas W. S. Demetriades and Ronald L. Holle Vaisala, Inc. Tucson, Arizona Fourth Symposium On Southwest Hydrometeorology.
Unit 4 Lesson 5 Weather Maps and Weather Prediction
Weather Forecasting.
Atmosphere & Weather Review
Essential Questions Why is accurate weather data important?
Journal #58 List the instruments used to measure lower atmospheric conditions: List the the instruments used to measure upper atmospheric conditions:
Group interests RICO data required
The influence of air mass circulation patterns on the urban heat island intensity and fire risk weather in Helsinki Testbed Andrea Vajda, Achim Drebs Finnish.
Assorted Observation Systems
Weather Instruments.
Section 3: Gathering Weather Data
WMO RA I WIGOS Workshop on AWS NETWORKS
Group interests RICO data in support of studies
Presentation transcript:

Comparisons between Testbed and Finnish national observation network Jani Poutiainen Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) Observation Services

2 Observations - Background -Information production of 1D, 2D and 3D state of the atmosphere. -Users and applications include: meteorologists, citizens, government organizations, researchers, companies, collaborative organizations, automated processes (like weather and air quality forecasting models). fsl/lg/bams_cover_lt.gif fsl/lg/bams_cover_lt.gif fsl/lg/bams_cover_lt.gif Snow depth

3 Finnish national operational observation networks Helsinki Testbed Consortium, project phase 1,

4 National network - FMI weather stations, Automatic weather station (AWS) 169Data are collection: stations via public switched modem line and 1-3h interval, - 14 stations have frequent modem collection, 30 minute interval, - 53 stations leased/packet switched line (GSM/GPRS, Ethernet- LAN, VTS-network) typically 10 minute interval. - Of the total number, 20 stations are Milos 200 and the rest Milos 500 stations. - Of the AWS stations, 39 are marine weather stations. - At 43 AWS stations are also done manual observations 1). Mast station10Leased line, real-time data display. Radar station8Leased line, 5 minute interval. Country wide coverage. Lightning locating network receiver 5+3Leased lines, real-time data transmission. Country wide coverage. Satellite reception for operational weather services 2NOAA, Meteosat (& readyness to Metop) Air quality measurement station 18Leased line or GSM/GPRS, once an hour. Radioactivity measurement station 8Public switched modem line, once a day. Solar radiation/sun shine duration measurement station 31TCP/IP-connection (leased line or GSM/GPRS), sun shine data at 1 minute interval, solar radiation one hour interval. Part of observations at AWS stations, collection interval varies. Transmitting precipitation station 119Public switched telephone network via operator’s commercial service, once a day. Mailing precipitation station156Via mail, once a month. 2) Manual weather station25Via data collection terminal, 3h interval. 1) Sounding station3Twice a day. 1) Manual observation work will end ) Manual observation work will end almost entirely. About 100 precipitation stations will be replaced with automatic gages.

5 Surface observations / Estimated changes Base AWS network (WMO requirements, safety weather services, climatological time series, geoclimatological coverage) Complementing AWS network (special service needs: nowcasting, agricultural observations, commercial special needs, other reasons) Automated precipitation measurements (included in base and complementing AWS networks) AWS stations total Precipitation stations; manual Weather stations; manual (FMI)20-2 Climate stations; manual All stations total Sounding stations; manual/automated 2/10/2 Estimated changes in the national FMI weather observation network and new classification - Definitions and grounds for definitions - Numbers of stations

6 National network - various observations Automatic surface station Marine station Radio sonde auto launcher Satellite dishes Lightning detection Radio mast

7 8 radar sites C-Band Doppler radars Built in Gematronik HW & Sigmet SW Fully automated Using 128 kB fixed lines Design, planning, purchase, installation and maintenance by FMI Data availability 99% Weather Radars

8 Special measurement sites: Jokioinen observatory, since 1957 (FMI information database) Sodankylä Arctic Research Centre, since 1858 (Kivi et al. 1999), and 1949 (FMI information database). Nearby special sites: Luosto weather radar and measurement platform, Pallas Global Atmospheric Watch station. Versatile infrastructure Long-term high quality routine operations (incl. human observations) Special instrumentation, observations and research SODANKYLÄ JOKIOINEN Jokioinen: 60  49'N, 23  30'E, 104 m asl Sodankylä: 67  22'N, 26  39'E, 178 m asl

9 Testbed observation stations status

10 Red: Functioning WXT510 mast stations Blue: Traditional network Road weather stations Masts with 3 heights, middle height doubled

11 Helsinki Kaivopuisto testbed Helsinki Bulevardi testbed Helsinki Roihupeltotestbed Helsinki city center (YTV) testbed Helsinki Vallila (YTV) testbed Vantaa Tikkurila (YTV) testbed Espoo Leppävaara (YTV) testbed Helsinki Olympic stadium (x3)testbed/WCA2005 Espoo Otaniemi testbed/WCA2005 Helsinki Hietalahtitestbed/WCA2005 Helsinki Hietaniemitestbed/WCA2005 Helsinki Finlandia housetestbed/WCA2005 Helsinki Market squaretestbed/WCA2005 Helsinki KaisaniemiFMI AWS Helsinki Itä-Pakilaheat island Vantaa Pakkalaheat island Vantaa Asolaheat island Helsinki Tapulikaupunkiheat island Sipoo, Östersundomheat island Kirkkonummi Sundsbergheat island Vantaa Riipilä hillheat island Vantaa Riipilä valleyheat island Helsinki Harju heat island Helsinki Pitäjänmäkiheat island Helsinki Itä-Pakilaheat island Total27 pcs. © Kaupunkimittaus Helsinki 2005 Central city real-time stations/WCA2005 Urban surface stations in August 2005

12 Testbed mast station photos Liljendahl, Mickelspiltom Hyvinkää, Kaukas Ground level 81m

13 Helsinki Roihupelto 100m N

14 Testbed function vs. Operational network (Dabberdt et al 2004)

15 Observation network characteristics Traditional networkHelsinki Testbed Designed, operated and maintained FMITestbed project (incl. FMI,Vaisala, Unibase) Statusoperationalquasi-operational Characteristicshigh accuracy, continuity, climatological time series, synoptic scale representativity, nation wide geospatial coverage, data submission to international data banks and GTS multilateral: operations (incl. models), service and research orientation high temporal resolution, high spatial resolution, real-time data, bulk surface layer profiles, lower-cost technology, R&D environment for atmospheric study and modeling, observations, service and business models, and ICT-development AWS reporting interval10 min-3h (selected data 1 min)5 min (selected data 1 min) Testbed estimate (2005) for 90x90 km intense area: 16 (FMI), Vaisala, Kumpula, 30 link masts, 20 other WXTs and standalone loggers, 9 precip stations, and 23 road stations.  100 pcs.  Avg station distance of 9 km Compare to 169 automated FMI stations in the whole country  Avg station distance of 45 km

16 Future vision on mesoscale networks (Dabberdt et al. 2004) Surface network requirements: Station distance: flat country 25 km, coast 10 km, mountainous land <25 km, urban area <10 km Reporting interval: 5 min for basic variables; wind, temperature, humidity, pressure, rain amount. Additional variables: precipitation type, ground temperature, ground moisture, radiation, cloud height, and visibility. Buoy distances: 100 km for basic variables; wave height and direction, salinity and temperature profiles. Surface observation network supporting other measurements: wind profiler network (100km distances), radar and satellite observations, and lightning locating system. Boundary layer observations are essential for forecasting of mesoscale phenomena. Single methods produce usable data only for some parts, variables or weather conditions (e.g. cloudy vs. clear) in the boundary layer.  Combination and integration of data is necessary as well as network design as a whole having observations complementing each other. Dabberdt, W. F., T. W. Schlatter and F. H. Carr with E. W. J. Friday, D. Jorgensen, S. Koch, M. Pirone, M. Ralph, J. Sun, P. Welsh, J. Wilson and X. Zou (2004): Design and Development of Multifunctional Mesoscale Observing Networks in Support of Integrated Forecasting Systems, Submitted October 1, 2004 to Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

17 Future visions cont’d / challenges and steering ideas for network evolution: Mesoscale data-assimilation and modeling requirements: In temporal and space scale it is needed at least 6-8 measurements with respect to the size of the phenomenon 3D distribution (mass, wind, humidity) 10 km (200 m) in horizontal (in vertical) resolution in the lower troposphere, and km (500 m) upper troposphere; temporal resolution 1-3 hours. More precise rain intensity measurements including quality control 3D distribution of hydrometeors Diabatic heating profile in cloud Cloud and other microphysical measurements (e.g. mixing rate, drop size distribution) Ground temperature and moisture profiles at daily level, canopy type and condition, snow cover observation and snow depth, sea surface temperature Turbulent flow, fluxes, and stability at 0-2 km level; temporal resolution 15 minutes Boundary layer height and structure More detailed observations in coastal and mountainous areas Tropopause topology with 10 km horizontal resolution O 3, CO 2, H 2 O and cloudiness for radiative transfer models E.g. aerosols, chemical compounds, and surface temperature Preceding list excludes the types of observations considered to be detailed enough (in US), i.e. radio soundings, weather radars, wind profilers.