Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark Tillack (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein (ANL) Laser-IFE Program Workshop February 6-7, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Advertisements

2003 International Congress of Refrigeration, Washington, D.C., August 17-22, 2003 CFD Modeling of Heat and Moisture Transfer on a 2-D Model of a Beef.
Progress Report on SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Simulation Code Farrokh Najmabadi and Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting February 5-6, 2004 Georgia Institute of.
DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 1 Results from parametric studies of thin liquid wall IFE chambers D. A. Haynes, Jr. Fusion Technology Institute University.
April 6-7, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber 1 Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi, Z. Dragojlovic,
DAH, RRP, UW - FTI ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 1 Thin liquid Pb wall protection for IFE chambers D. A. Haynes, Jr. and R. R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute.
Vapor Conditions Including Ionization State in Thick Liquid Wall IFE Reactors Presented by D. A. Haynes, Jr. for the staff of the Fusion Technology Institute.
September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 Liquid Wall Ablation under IFE Photon Energy Deposition at Radius of 0.5 m A. René Raffray and Mofreh Zaghloul University of.
Design Considerations for Beam Port Insulator Rings
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley C.S. Debonnel 1,2, S.S. Yu 2, P.F. Peterson 1 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department.
Laser Treatment Modeling Capabilities at Rensselaer-Hartford Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete Rensselaer at Hartford
A. R. Raffray, B. R. Christensen and M. S. Tillack Can a Direct-Drive Target Survive Injection into an IFE Chamber? Japan-US Workshop on IFE Target Fabrication,
September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 ARIES-IFE ARIES Project Meeting Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia September 3-4, 2003 Summary of Issues, Results,
Advanced Energy Technology Group Mechanisms of Aerosol Generation in Liquid-Protected IFE Chambers M. S. Tillack, A. R. Raffray.
Chamber Dynamic Response, Laser Driver-Chamber Interface and System Integration for Inertial Fusion Energy Mark Tillack Farrokh Najmabadi Rene Raffray.
Overview of Inertial Fusion Energy Technology Activities at UC San Diego Mark S. Tillack Briefing to the Advanced Energy Technology Group June 2001.
EFFECTS OF CHAMBER GEOMETRY AND GAS PROPERTIES ON HYDRODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF IFE CHAMBERS Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of California.
April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Chamber Clearing Code Development 1 Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code Development Effort A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi,
HYDRODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF IFE CHAMBERS WITH DIFFERENT PROTECTIVE GASES AND PRE-IGNITION CONDITIONS Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of.
Impact of Liquid Wall on Fusion Systems Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego NRC Fusion Science Assessment Committee November 17, 1999.
IFE Chambers: Modeling and Experiments at UCSD Farrokh Najmabadi 5 th US-Japan Workshop on Laser IFE March 21-23, 2005 General Atomics, San Diego Electronic.
Integrated Effects of Disruptions and ELMs on Divertor and Nearby Components Valeryi Sizyuk Ahmed Hassanein School of Nuclear Engineering Center for Materials.
Prediction of Fluid Dynamics in The Inertial Confinement Fusion Chamber by Godunov Solver With Adaptive Grid Refinement Zoran Dragojlovic, Farrokh Najmabadi,
June7-8, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Completion of Assessment of Dry Chamber Wall Option Without Protective Gas, and Initial Planning Activity for Assessment.
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.
Action Items For ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES Project Meeting June 19-21, 2000 University of Wisconsin, Madison Electronic copy:
October 24, Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.
Image courtesy of National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under cooperative agreement.
Progress Report on Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark S. Tillack, John Pulsifer, Zoran Dragovlovic (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein.
Laser IFE Program Workshop –5/31/01 1 Output Spectra from Direct Drive ICF Targets Laser IFE Workshop May 31-June 1, 2001 Naval Research Laboratory Robert.
1 of 16 M. S. Tillack, Y. Tao, J. Pulsifer, F. Najmabadi, L. C. Carlson, K. L. Sequoia, R. A. Burdt, M. Aralis Laser-matter interactions and IFE research.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 1. Pre-Shot Aerosol Parameteric Design Window for Thin Liquid Wall 2. Scoping Liquid Wall Mechanical Response to Thermal Shocks.
Aug. 8-9, 2006 HAPL meeting, GA 1 Advanced Chamber Concept with Magnetic Intervention: - Ion Dump Issues - Status of Blanket Study A. René Raffray UCSD.
Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.
Highlights of ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi VLT Conference Call April 18, 2001 Electronic copy: ARIES Web Site:
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Update on IFE Aerosol Analysis J.P. Sharpe INEEL Fusion Safety Program.
ILE, Osaka Concept and preliminary experiment on protection of final optics in wet-wall laser fusion reactor T. Norimatsu, K. Nagai, T. Yamanaka and Y.
1 MODELING DT VAPORIZATION AND MELTING IN A DIRECT DRIVE TARGET B. R. Christensen, A. R. Raffray, and M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
RRP:10/17/01Aries IFE 1 Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics Aries Electronic Workshop October 17, 2001 Robert R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute University.
A Plan to Develop Dry Wall Chambers for Inertial Fusion Energy with Lasers Page 1 of 46 DRAFT.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering University.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.
Moving Solid Walls Type of Moving Walls: 1- Solid pebbles falling down under gravity for intercepting ion and X-ray radiation. 2- Moving metallic surfaces.
Chamber Development Plan and Chamber Simulation Experiments Farrokh Najmabadi HAPL Meeting November 12-13, 2001 Livermore, CA Electronic copy:
Point Source in 2D Jet: Radiation and refraction of sound waves through a 2D shear layer Model Gallery #16685 © 2014 COMSOL. All rights reserved.
Laser Energy Transport and Deposition Package for CRASH Fall 2011 Review Ben Torralva.
Progress Report on SPARTAN Simulation of IFE Chamber Dynamics Farrokh Najmabadi and Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting March 3-4, 2005 Naval Research Laboratory.
Cavitation Models Roman Samulyak, Yarema Prykarpatskyy Center for Data Intensive Computing Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy
RPI Master’s Project Proposal Noel A. Modesto-Madera September 28, 2010 Numerical Investigation of Supersonic Flow Over a Blunt Body.
University of Wisconsin Chambers Work John Santarius, Greg Moses, and Milad Fatenajed HAPL Team Meeting Georgia Institute of Technology February 5-6, 2004.
SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Code Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of California in San Diego HAPL Meeting, June 20-21, 2005, Lawrence Livermore.
February 5-6, 2004 HAPL meeting, G.Tech. 1 Chamber Tasks Coordination Presented by A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from J. Blanchard and the HAPL.
Temperature Response and Ion Deposition in the 1 mm Tungsten Armor Layer for the 10.5 m HAPL Target Chamber T.A. Heltemes, D.R. Boris and M. Fatenejad,
Target threat spectra Gregory Moses and John Santarius Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison HAPL Review Meeting March 3-4, 2005.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, BNL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak in collaboration with Y.
Liquid Walls Town Meeting May 5, 2003, Livermore, CA Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence.
Progress Report on SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Simulation Code Farrokh Najmabadi, Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting April 8-10, 2003 Sandia National Laboratory,
Modeling of Z-Ablation I. E. Golovkin, R. R. Peterson, D. A. Haynes University of Wisconsin-Madison G. Rochau Sandia National Laboratories Presented at.
Unstructured Meshing Tools for Fusion Plasma Simulations
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
Can a Direct-Drive Target Survive Injection into an IFE Chamber?
Integrated Modeling Approach and Plans
IFE Wetted-Wall Chamber Engineering “Preliminary Considerations”
M. S. Tillack and F. Najmabadi
University of California, San Diego
VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005
Aerosol Production in Lead-protected and Flibe-protected Chambers
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
14. Computational Fluid Dynamics
Presentation transcript:

Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark Tillack (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein (ANL) Laser-IFE Program Workshop February 6-7, 2001 Naval Research Laboratory Electronic copy: UCSD IFE Web Site:

 Statement of Work: Initiate development of a fully integrated computer code to model and study chamber dynamic and clearing. Deliver the core of the code including the input/output interfaces, the geometry definition and the numerical solution control for multi-species (multi-fluid), 2-D transient compressible Navier Stokes equations. Provide chamber wall-interaction modules, which include physics of melting; evaporation and sublimation; sputtering; macroscopic erosion; and condensation and redeposition. Scope the range of chamber dynamics and clearing experiments that can be carried out in a facility producing ,000 J of X-ray.  Deliverables: The core of the code including the input/output interfaces, the geometry definition and the numerical solution control, and 2-D hydrodynamics module: Oct. 1, 2001 Implementation of various physics modules: Jan. 31, 2002 Experimental plans: Jan. 31, 2002  Budget: Code development: (190k UCSD, 175k ANL), Experiment planning (75k UCSD) Statement of Purpose and Deliverables

 The rep-rate is limited by the time it takes for the chamber environment to return to a sufficiently quiescent and clean, low-pressure state following a target explosion to allow a second shot to be initiated (goal: ms). Understanding Chamber Dynamics and Clearing is a Critical R&D Item Gas dynamics: Compressible Radiation heat transport Dissipative processes … Volume interactions: In-flight evaporation In-flight re-condensation Chemistry … Surface Physics: Melting & melt layer behavior Evaporation/sublimation Sputtering Macroscopic erosion Condensation and redeposition …  Many complex phenomena should be understood and modeled.

 “First pass” of target-released energy through the chamber – “fast” time scale (ns to several  s). Propagation of X-rays and ions through the chamber; Re-radiation of the ions & X-ray energy deposited in the chamber gas. At the completion of this phase, chamber volume is in a non- equilibrium state and material is released from the wall.  Relaxation of chamber environment to a equilibrium state – “slow” time scale (several  s to hundreds of ms). Mass and heat transport in the chamber & to/form chamber wall Relaxation to “residual” chamber environment (“pre-shot” environment) The “pre-shot” environment affects target injection & tracking, laser propagation, … Response of Chamber to Target Explosion Covers Two Vastly Different Time Scales

1-D Codes such as Bucky & Ablator Experiments such as shots on Z Codes such as TSUNAMI (2-D) and DSMC (3-D) Previous research is mainly for thick liquid walls “Fast” time-scale processes “Slow” time-scale: processes Non-Equilibrium Environment “Pre-shot” Chamber Environment Target injection, Laser propagation, …

 TSUNAMI (UC Berkeley) : 2-D gas-dynamic equations with no viscosity, no heat conduction (not important), no radiation heat transport, Relatively simple wall boundary conditions: p=saturated vapor pressure, u=0, and n derived from EOS in the outer cell, Mainly exercised for thick liquid wall concepts, Used to model solid wall chambers as Master thesis by one our students.  DSMC* (NASA): DSMC solves Boltzman’s equation via Monte Carlo Method Used by ILE researchers to model KOYO chamber (wetted wall concept) Results were compared with TSUNAMI models * TSUNAMI & DSMC Codes Have Been Used for Chamber Clearing Modeling

 Literature survey of work with TSUNAMI & DSMC indicates: It is essential to include proper initial condition (energy distribution in the chamber) and boundary conditions (wall interaction). Most of the work, however, used simple models and approximations for initial and boundary conditions. It is essential to include multi-dimensional effects (UCB, ILE, UCSD work). Need to include viscosity (ILE, UCSD work) and radiation transport.  Large body of work in the past 10 years on Computational Fluid Dynamics: relevant to chamber dynamics & clearing: Flame front propagation and combustion, Aerospace plane, … Most large scale codes use variation of CGF algorithm with adaptive mesh techniques.  Simulation experiments to benchmark calculations and validate physics models are essential. Review of Previous Work

 Stage 1: Code infrastructure: module definitions and interfaces, I/O, geometry definition, Transient compressible Navier Stokes solver (most tests on simple 2-D geometries) including dissipative effects, Simple model for radiation transport, Use results from BUCKY as initial condition, Develop detailed wall-interaction modules (boundary conditions).  Stage 2: Adaptive mesh routines, most tests with simple and/or complex 2-D shapes. Detailed radiation transport model, New physics modules based on stage 1 code results and experiments  Stage 3: Tuning the code for complex 3-D geometries New physics modules based on stage 2 code results and experiments Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code Development Is Broken Into Three Stages This year proposal

Stage-1 code Stage-2 codeExperiments Breakdown of Chamber Clearing Research Application: Experiment planning Design study support Stage 2 Code development Core development Wall-interaction modules Validation & Module Integration Doc. Documentation & release of the code Validation & Module Integration Adaptive Mesh routines Doc. App. Experiment planning Experiment Design Experiment Implementation 1 st year2 nd year Radiation transport

 Transient compressible Navier Stokes solver: CFG algorithm-based numerical routines.  Mesh construction routines: Map simple 2-D physical domain(s) with regular boundaries (e.g., cylinders) into rectangular logical meshes. Gross mesh adaptation routines will be tested and implemented in stage 1.  Radiation transport: Simple radiation transport model based on implicit time stepping.  Wall-interaction modules (led by ANL): Melting & melt-layer behavior Evaporation & sublimation Sputtering Macroscopic erosion Condensation & redeposition  Module definition & interfaces (C++) Components of Stage 1 Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code

Chamber Dynamics Simulation Experiment – Exploration and Planning  Simulation experiments are essential to Benchmark simulation codes; Ensure all relevant physical phenomena is taken into account  Relatively new field. Previous experimental work focused on shock propagation and/or condensation of wetted chamber walls.  Eventually, we need scaled experiments to screen concepts for implementation on IRE.  Two major areas should be investigated first: 1.A source of energy to produce prototypical environment for experimentation, 2.Experiment characterization and array of diagnostics.

Scaled Simulation Experiments can Help Address Many Chamber Issues 100–500 J Large-volume tests for geometrically prototypical testing 1–10 kJ Integrated (simultaneous) surface and volume effects Chamber dynamics in limited volume (~1 liter) 1–10 J Beam propagation and focusing Near-surface physics Diagnostic development and experimental techniques >10 MJ Integrated prototypical chamber testing Incl. neutrons Possible clean sources of energy include lasers and plasma focus

Chamber Dynamics Simulation Experiment – Experimental Characterization and Diagnostics  Chamber responses include transient temperatures, pressures, mass composition and physical forms in the chamber volume.  Three distinct time scales: Target yield and instantaneous surface response (~ ns time scale), Gas-dynamics (  s), Thermal recovery (1-100 ms).  For example, possible methods for temperature measurement: Fast time scale: optical spectroscopy? Gas dynamics & thermal recovery: high-temperature thermal sensors located directly in the medium? Chamber wall temperature: IR camera?

 Such a predictive capability requires: Computer simulation of increasing sophistication; Simulation experiments to bench mark the core and ensure that all relevant phenomena are taken into account.  Our Approach: Problem is complex and includes diverse phenomena. A joint proposal from UCSD and ANL to initiate the activity. We encourage and welcome collaborations. Utilize expertise in CFD community, import best numerical algorithms and focus on understanding phenomena relevant to high-average power laser chambers. Staged approach to code development and experiment planning: Clear deliverables at each stage and simulation/experiments progress sets development priorities for next stages. Long-term goal of this proposal is to develop a predictive capability for chamber dynamics and clearing (available for IRE)