Pablo Santos WFO Miami, FL Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS David Sharp WFO Melbourne, FL 2010 AMS Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA PS/MM/DS Determining Optimal Thresholds.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Climate Modeling LaboratoryMEASNC State University An Extended Procedure for Implementing the Relative Operating Characteristic Graphical Method Robert.
Advertisements

SIX INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON TROPICAL CYCLONES 2006 IWTC-VI SAN JOSE, COSTA RICA NOVEMBER 2006 TOPIC 0.1 QUANTITATIVE FORECASTS OF TROPICAL CYCLONES LANDFALL.
1 End-User Evaluation of the NC-CERA Storm Surge Visualization Tool Jessica Losego Institute for the Environment University of North Carolina at Chapel.
Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR Dan Brown and Ed Rappaport, NHC.
Use of Tropical Cyclone Wind Speed Probabilities in Public and Marine Forecasts: An Update Pablo Santos WFO Miami, FL David Sharp WFO Melbourne, FL NOAA.
2012 Project Update: Tropical Cyclone Impacts Graphics Item Note some recent web enhancements. URL; TCIG naming Website redesign KML vs. PNG displays.
Acknowledgments: ONR NOPP program HFIP program ONR Marine Meteorology Program Elizabeth A. Ritchie Miguel F. Piñeros J. Scott Tyo Scott Galvin Gen Valliere-Kelley.
The Storm Surge Toolkit Jamie Rhome Storm Surge Specialist/Team Lead National Hurricane Center Jamie Rhome Storm Surge Specialist/Team Lead National Hurricane.
Applications of Ensemble Tropical Cyclone Products to National Hurricane Center Forecasts and Warnings Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, Ft. Collins, CO.
HFIP Ensemble Products Subgroup Sept 2, 2011 Conference Call 1.
Integrating NDFD with GIS Billy Brooks I.M. Systems Group, Inc. NOAA/NOS/Coastal Services Center NDFD Technical Workshop November 2, 2006.
Analysis of High Resolution Infrared Images of Hurricanes from Polar Satellites as a Proxy for GOES-R INTRODUCTION GOES-R will include the Advanced Baseline.
National Weather Service – Newport/Morehead City NC NHC/WFO Tropical Products…and What’s New for 2012 WFO Newport Hurricane Awareness Seminar July 17,
Advanced Applications of the Monte Carlo Wind Probability Model: A Year 1 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria 1, Stan Kidder 2, Robert.
Advanced Applications of the Monte Carlo Wind Probability Model: A Year 2 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria 1, Robert DeMaria 2, Andrea.
A. Schumacher, CIRA/Colorado State University NHC Points of Contact: M. DeMaria, D. Brown, M. Brennan, R. Berg, C. Ogden, C. Mattocks, and C. Landsea Joint.
Improvements in Deterministic and Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Wind Predictions: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and Ray Zehr NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
The Impact of Satellite Data on Real Time Statistical Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasts Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
Update on Storm Surge at NCEP Dr. Rick Knabb, Director, National Hurricane Center and representing numerous partners 21 January 2014.
Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Dan Brown and Ed Rappaport, NHC HFIP Workshop, 4-8 May 2009.
Applied Meteorology Unit 1 Using Flow Regime Lightning and Sounding Climatologies to Initialize Gridded Lightning Threat Forecasts for East Central Florida.
Hurricane lecture for KMA Ed Szoke 1 October 20, 2004 Overview of 2004 Atlantic Hurricane Season Ed Szoke* NOAA Forecast Systems Laboratory Forecast Research.
The Utilization of the Graphic Forecast Generator (GFE) to Locally Apply CPC’s Week Two Forecast.
The Nation’s Hurricane Program: An Interagency Success Story March 5 - 9, st Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference.
Office of Coast Survey NOAA’s Storm Surge Modeling Capabilities Jesse C. Feyen Storm Surge Roadmap Portfolio Manager.
Guidance on Intensity Guidance Kieran Bhatia, David Nolan, Mark DeMaria, Andrea Schumacher IHC Presentation This project is supported by the.
NOAA’s National Weather Service National Digital Forecast Database: Status Update LeRoy Spayd Chief, Meteorological Services Division Unidata Policy Committee.
Continued Development of Tropical Cyclone Wind Probability Products John A. Knaff – Presenting CIRA/Colorado State University and Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS.
Pablo Santos WFO Miami, FL Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS David Sharp WFO Melbourne, FL rd IHC St Petersburg, FL PS/DS “HURRICANE CONDITIONS EXPECTED.”
Woody Roberts Tom LeFebvre Kevin Manross Paul Schultz Evan Polster Xiangbao Jing ESRL/Global Systems Division Application of RUA/RTMA to AWIPS and the.
In this study, HWRF model simulations for two events were evaluated by analyzing the mean sea level pressure, precipitation, wind fields and hydrometeors.
NOAA’s National Weather Service: Probabilistic Storm Surge (P-Surge) Arthur Taylor, Bob Glahn, Wilson Shaffer MDL / OST November 30, 2005.
A Preliminary Verification of the National Hurricane Center’s Tropical Cyclone Wind Probability Forecast Product Jackie Shafer Scitor Corporation Florida.
An Improved Wind Probability Program: A Year 2 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO Stan Kidder,
An Improved Wind Probability Program: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO Stan Kidder,
Probabilistic Hurricane Storm Surge (P-Surge) Arthur Taylor MDL / OST December 4, 2006.
ATCF Requirements, Intensity Consensus Sea Heights Consistent with NHC Forecasts (Progress Report) Presenter Buck Sampson (NRL Monterey) Investigators.
Storm Surge Modeling and Forecasting LTJG Jeffrey Pereira, NOAA Storm Surge Unit National Hurricane Center NOAA Storm Surge Workshop May 2011 LTJG Jeffrey.
1 Advisory Committee on Water Information Emergency Response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Scott Kiser Tropical Cyclone Program Manager NOAA/NWS January.
Caribbean Disaster Mitigation Project Caribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology Tropical Cyclones Characteristics and Forecasting Horace H. P.
Hurricane Irene August 2011 Hurricane Irene August 2011 NOAA Service Assessment Frank Marks and Wes Browning (Co-team leads) November 27, 2012.
61 st IHC, New Orleans, LA Verification of the Monte Carlo Tropical Cyclone Wind Speed Probabilities: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update John A.
Probabilistic Hurricane Storm Surge (P-Surge) Arthur Taylor Meteorological Development Laboratory, National Weather Service January 20, 2008.
NHC/JHT Products in ATCF Buck Sampson (NRL, Monterey) and Ann Schrader (SAIC, Monterey) IHC 2007 Other Contributors: Chris Sisko, James Franklin, James.
The Future of WFO Hurricane Products in the Digital Age Effective Threat Communications for Every Customer Barry S. Goldsmith, Senior Forecaster NWS Forecast.
2/10/03F.Marks1 Development of a Tropical Cyclone Rain Forecasting Tool Frank D. Marks NOAA/AOML, Hurricane Research Division, Miami, FL QPE Techniques.
Development of Probabilistic Forecast Guidance at CIRA Andrea Schumacher (CIRA) Mark DeMaria and John Knaff (NOAA/NESDIS/ORA) Workshop on AWIPS Tools for.
Tom LeFebvre GSD/ESRL 20 November What is FDSE? The NWS Weather Ready Nation Roadmap outlines concepts for the future of forecasting in the NWS.
Item 12-20: 2013 Project Update on Expressions of Uncertainty Initiative.
NOAA/NWS Digital Services 1 National Weather Service Forecast Evolution and Delivery in a Digital Era Glenn Austin / Mark Tew Office of Climate, Water,
The Impact of Lightning Density Input on Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensity Change Forecasts Mark DeMaria, John Knaff and Debra Molenar, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort.
Enhanced Wording within the ZFP and CWF Products as Generated by the GFE Text Formatter (Employing Tropical Cyclone Wind Probabilities) Pablo Santos and.
2011 Project Update: Tropical Cyclone Impacts Graphics Item SR-16.
Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensity Change Forecasting Using Lightning Data during the 2010 GOES-R Proving Ground at the National Hurricane Center Mark DeMaria.
1 Vision for Marine and Coastal Services Digital Products Jamie Vavra Marine and Coastal Weather Services Branch Office of Climate, Water and Weather Services.
Development of a Rapid Intensification Index for the Eastern Pacific Basin John Kaplan NOAA/AOML Hurricane Research Division Miami, FL and Mark DeMaria.
Improved Statistical Intensity Forecast Models: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Year 2 Project Update Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO John A. Knaff,
Nathalie Voisin 1, Florian Pappenberger 2, Dennis Lettenmaier 1, Roberto Buizza 2, and John Schaake 3 1 University of Washington 2 ECMWF 3 National Weather.
2015 Production Suite Review: Report from NHC 2015 Production Suite Review: Report from NHC Eric S. Blake, Richard J. Pasch, Andrew Penny NCEP Production.
Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR.
Diagnostic verification and extremes: 1 st Breakout Discussed the need for toolkit to build beyond current capabilities (e.g., NCEP) Identified (and began.
Development and Implementation of NHC/JHT Products in ATCF Charles R. Sampson NRL (PI) Contributors: Ann Schrader, Mark DeMaria, John Knaff, Chris Sisko,
National Hurricane Center 2009 Forecast Verification James L. Franklin Branch Chief, Hurricane Specialist Unit National Hurricane Center 2009 NOAA Hurricane.
Item SR-15: 2011 Project Update on Expressions of Uncertainty Initiative.
AOML Research Review Postmortem Robert Atlas Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory May 1, 2012 Welcome and introduction.
Storm Surge Forecasting Practices, Tools for Emergency Managers, A Probabilistic Storm Surge Model Based on Ensembles and Past Error Distributions.
Probabilistic forecasts
Storm Surge Modeling and Forecasting
Verification of Tropical Cyclone Forecasts
Hurricane Season Preparedness 2019
Presentation transcript:

Pablo Santos WFO Miami, FL Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS David Sharp WFO Melbourne, FL 2010 AMS Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA PS/MM/DS Determining Optimal Thresholds of Tropical Cyclone Incremental Wind Speed Probabilities to Support Expressions of Uncertainty within Text Forecasts

2 Probability Definitions Cumulative – The probability of sustained winds reaching or exceeding the specified wind speed threshold between the 00 hour forecast and a specified forecast hour. Available in Grid (NDFD)/Graphic Forms as well as within PWSAT# product. Individual (Interval) – The probability of sustained winds reaching or exceeding the specified wind speed threshold beginning during a specified forecast period ending at the specified forecast hour (e.g., period of onset). Computed from Cumulative and explicitly available in PWSAT# text product. Incremental –The probability of sustained winds reaching or exceeding the specified threshold during a specified forecast period ending at the specified forecast hour. Available in Grid (NDFD) but not within the PWSAT#. These are the probabilities referenced throughout this presentation. (A Quick Review)

3 Hypothetical Test Case Wind Impacts Are A Concern Well Outside Of The Error Cone 3 Based on 1938 Long Island Express Hurricane - a large fast-moving storm Tropical Storm Force wind probabilities are almost certain in a large area from the Carolinas to New England well outside the cone!

4 During potential high impact weather events such as tropical cyclones (TC), users not only demand a WFO’s ‘best forecast’, but also require a corresponding expression of uncertainty for decision- making purposes. Therefore, a methodology was developed that uses TC Incremental Wind Speed Probabilities to elevate the utility of official text forecast products: ZFP CWF –By including situational expressions of uncertainty within the Zone Forecast Product (ZFP) and the Coastal Waters Forecast (CWF) which responsibly ‘scopes’ NHC’s forecast (temporally and spatially) for use within local forecasts. For WFOs, this effort crosses a major threshold for incorporating probabilistic data (other than PoP) within their text forecast products. Proposed WFO Use Proposed WFO Use (Item from NOAA Hurricane Conference, 2005)

5 (The Nine Expressions of Uncertainty) HURRICANE CONDITIONS * HURRICANE CONDITIONS EXPECTED HURRICANE CONDITIONS POSSIBLE TROPICAL STORM CONDITIONS * TROPICAL STORM CONDITIONS * WITH HURRICANE CONDITIONS POSSIBLE TROPICAL STORM CONDITIONS EXPECTED TROPICAL STORM CONDITIONS EXPECTED WITH HURRICANE CONDITIONS POSSIBLE TROPICAL STORM CONDITIONS POSSIBLE TROPICAL STORM CONDITIONS POSSIBLE WITH HURRICANE CONDITIONS ALSO POSSIBLE The * phrases are equivalent to imminent or ongoing conditions as reflected in the hour period simultaneously by the hazard, wind, and probability grids. The word EXPECTED is used in situations mainly during the Warning period, but is also selectively used in the Watch period (e.g., Day 1 & 2, or out to period 4). The word POSSIBLE is used during the extended period (e.g., Day 3 - 5), but is also used in specific situations within Watch/Warning period. Also, certain situations require compound phrases (e.g., when there is a Tropical Storm Warning with a Hurricane Watch). Baseline Phraseology

6 Determining Optimal Probability Thresholds NHC verification program evaluates gridded products. In this case as it pertains to WFO Forecast applications. –Sample: 19 storms cases with U.S. hurricane warnings along East and Gulf of Mexico Coasts from Brownsville, TX to Portland, Maine. All probability runs starting 3 days before 1 st warning. –2008 MC model re-runs for 400 forecast cases. Evaluated probabilities at 343 coastal “breakpoints” as well as 286 inland points (approx. 50 km inland). –Use Threat Score or ROC diagrams to select optimal probability thresholds. Emphasis placed on 12 h incremental probabilities. Results for 34 & 64 knot probabilities were based on –6 hourly NHC best track wind radii interpolated every hour to produce the model verification grid (used to determine points with observed hurricane/tropical storm force winds).

2010 Wind Speed Probability Model Track and Intensity error statistics updated with previous 5 year sample – Track error distributions stratified by Goerss Predicted Consensus Error (GPCE) –GPCE estimates track forecast uncertainty from model spread and other forecast parameters GPCE version implemented at NHC in 2010 –Includes option to run without GPCE input 2010 model (GPCE and non-GPCE versions) run for all WFO test cases –Coastal and inland points 7

8 Storm Cases For 400 MC Model Runs Coastal Points Inland Points

9 Conversion of Probabilities into Yes-No Forecast Pick probability threshold (P t ) If P ≥ P t, forecast YES If P < P t, forecast NO Best choice of P t depends on particular application Use appropriate validation metric to select P t objectively Metrics determined from contingency table

10 Contingency Table for Validation of Yes-No Forecasts Observed Yes No Yes Forecast No a b c d Threat Score (TS) = a/(a + b + c) Hit Rate (HR) or Probability of Detection (POD) = a/(a + c) False Alarm Rate (FR) = b/(b + d)

11 Regional Stratification Estimate optimal probabilities using Threat Score –ROC score probabilities too low Region 1 –Brownsville, TX to Mobile, AL Region 2 –Mobile, AL to GA/SC Border Includes all Florida breakpoints Region 3 –GA/SC Border to Eastport, ME

12 Optimal 34 knot Probability Thresholds (Coastal vs. Inland) Based on Threat Score…collectively, and by each region.

13 Optimal 64 knot Probability Thresholds (Coastal vs. Inland) Based on Threat Score…collectively, and by each region.

14 Optimal 34 & 64 knot Probability Thresholds (Combined) Based on Threat Score…by region, for all points.

15 Associated Reliability Diagrams (Coastal vs. Inland)

16 Associated Reliability Diagrams (Combined)

2010 Evaluation of GPCE input: Reduction in Brier Score 17

18Summary Optimal Probability Threshold curves decrease almost exponentially with time (for both 34 & 64 knot). Optimal thresholds are correspondingly larger for inland points, particularly in the shorter ranges (e.g., watch/warning periods). Optimal thresholds are a function of geographical location: –More so for 34 knot probabilities, in the short range, and for coastal points. Overall, probabilities are deemed to be “reliable” although: –They tend to under predict 64 knot or greater events particular for coastal points. For all points combined, this bias is smaller. Results indicate that the empirically-derived thresholds (original; based on histograms) need an upward adjustment in the short range to better support operational use.

19Summary That there is inherent operational sensitivity regarding event-specific reliability and continuity (forecast-to- forecast, region-to-region, coastal-to- inland, etc.), That the current ZFP/CWF text formatters will only support one set (each) of 34 and 64 knot thresholds, And that newer Monte Carlo based results by region are still forthcoming which will also include more cases, …the following (interim) values to the right are the ones currently in effect for operational use. PeriodPWS64PWS hr30%55% hr25%45% hr20%40% hr15%35% hr10%30% hr7%25% hr6%20% hr5%15% hr4%12.5% hr3%10% So Given this and… Proposed Single Set Values

20 Future Work Iteratively transition optimal thresholds to ZFP and CWF text formatters, as well as point-n-click web forecast code. –single set –multi-set coastal vs. inland by region Complete verification using 2010 version of the Monte Carlo model by regions.

21 END

22 Discussion Items to Official Implementation of EoU Problems Encountered During 2010 Season: –ER problem with phrases dropping Wx in presence of EoU. Investigating. –Offices editing probability grids and questioning EoU with winds of 10 to 15 mph. Training Issue. –However, technical team suggests we can consider dropping the phrase if winds less than 15 kts and there is no warning. Iteratively transition optimal thresholds to ZFP and CWF text formatters, as well as point-n-click web forecast code. –single set, multi-set, coastal vs. inland, by region

23 Discussion Items to Official Implementation of EoU Back Up sites will need training to be aware of this capability. Configuration wise it should not be a problem. Public and Marine Directives will need to be updated to include set of rules that prompts EoU. Work on instructions for field offices to enable Tropical SAF Formatter. MIA and MLB already have it. Baseline code is the same as the ZFP. It is a matter of configuration. RECOMMENDATION: Official or Not? Reconvene Wind Team to oversee all issues above are taken care of whether it is by 2011 or 2012.

24 BACK UP SLIDES

25REFERENCES DeMaria, M., J. A. Knaff, R. Knabb, C. Lauer, C. R. Sampson, and R. T. DeMaria, 2009: A new method for estimating tropical cyclone wind speed probabilities. Wea. Forecasting, 24, Santos, P., D. Sharp, M. DeMaria, and S. Kiser, 2009: The Determination of Optimal Thresholds of Tropical Cyclone Incremental Wind Speed Probabilities to Support Expressions of Uncertainty in Text Forecasts. Preprints, Symposium on Urban High Impact Weather/89 th AMS Annual Meeting, P1.5, Phoenix, AZ. [Available online Santos, P., D. W. Sharp, M. Volkmer, and G. Rader, 2008: Employing Hurricane Wind Probabilities to Convey Forecast Uncertainty and Potential Impact Through NWS Field Office Forecast Products. Preprints, Tropical Meteorology Special Symposium/19 th Conf. on Prob. And Statistics, JP1.3, New Orleans, LA. [Available online Sharp, D. W., P. Santos, M. Volkmer, G. Rader, and M. Sardi, 2006: Employing Hurricane Wind Probabilities to Enhance Local Forecasts and Improve Guidance for Decision-Makers. Preprints, 27th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, 9A.3, Monterey, CA. [Available online

26 Wind Impacts Are A Concern Well Outside Of The Error Cone 26 Based on 1938 Long Island Express Hurricane - a large fast-moving storm Hurricane-force winds extended outside the cone over much of NJ, srn NY, LI, and CT Hypothetical Test Case

27 Storm Cases For 400 MC Model Runs

28 Optimal 34 and 64 kt Probability Thresholds based on Threat Score and ROC Diagram for Coastal Points

29 Note: Go to weather.gov Click on Graphical Forecasts Scroll to the Bottom Click on Tropical Notice both Cumulative and Incremental Probabilities are available here Notice the Resolution What About Interval or Individual Probabilities? Tropical Cyclone Wind Speed Probabilities Through NDFD

30 How Can I get the grids from the NDFD Download DeGrib (NDFD GRIB2 Decoder from): Then go to this site and read on how turn the NDFD gridded data into GIS Files (Creating GIS files from the downloaded NDFD grids):

31 P t Optimization Procedures Threat Score –Threat Score useful for low probability events since it does not include No-No cases –TS ranges from 0 to 1 (1 is best) –Pick P t that maximizes TS Hit Rate/False Alarm Rate –Plot HR vs. FR in 2-D plane for range of P t Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) diagram –Pick P t for point closest to upper left corner in ROC diagram Upper left corner has Hit Rate=1, False Alarm Rate=0

32 Hurricane Charley - Update

33 Hurricane Charley (ZFP) CHARLEY (ZFP) * Punta Gorda Advisory Time: _1500 (0-12 Hours – First Period) A Second Algorithm Example

34 Fay – WFOs MFL and MLB