© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)

Advertisements

Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.

Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools.

Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.

Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.

Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.

Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.

Context for El Paso’s K-16 Partnership K-12 Enrollment in twelve El Paso area school districts:167,269 Ethnic breakdown of student enrollment: Hispanic:88.1%

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

© 2006 Michigan State University, PROM/SESupported by NSF Cooperative Agreement EHR PROM/SE Science Associates Winter Institute SMART Consortium.

PROM/SE Summer Science Institute © 2005 MSU PROM/SE Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education, Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement.

Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.

Closing the Gap for Mathematics in Middle School and High School Visionary Leadership for the 21st Century: Closing the Gaps That Matter February 22-24,

Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.

August Professional Development 1 Janise Lane, Interim Executive Director of Teaching and Learning Linda Chen, Chief Academic Officer August 25 – 28, 2015.

Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.

This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.

Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.

Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.

1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.

1 Higher Education Engagement with K-12: Partnerships, Possibilities, and Pitfalls Nancy S. Shapiro Office of Academic Affairs University System of Maryland.

Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

Cindy M. Walker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No

Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.

Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D., Acting Secretary.

Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.

Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.

Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.

Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.

Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol

Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.

Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.

Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.

DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.

Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)

Quarterly Update Blue Ribbon Commission’s Recommendations of the 2009 Criterion Referenced Competency Test (CRCT) Erasure Investigation Dr. Beverly L.

The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.

1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.

A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.

Data for Student Success Using State Assessment Data to Identify School Improvement Goals Lani Seikaly Professional Development Coordinator Data for Student.

E.M.P.O.W.E.R.R. Project (Elementary Mathematics Partnership Opening Windows to Excellence, Rigor & Relevance) BOR/IDE MSP Grant from Title II BOR/IDE.

The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.

The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.

S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.

Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.

Science Education in the United States: An International Perspective Oregon Summer Institute August 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.

Presented to:Bellefontaine City Schools RECOGNIZING TEACHING EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]

 Algebra Preparedness for Higher Achievement Beyond the MSP: Project ALPHA’s Strategies for Institutional Change CAMSP Learning Network Meeting April.

BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,

SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.

Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.

Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.

Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,

Pennsylvania’s State Personnel Development Grant “Improving Student Results: A Focus on Highly Qualified Special Education Personnel” An Overview PDE Conference.

Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,

Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.

The Math Science Partnership of Greater Philadelphia A Program of the National Science Foundation at La Salle University.

Supporting Secondary-to-Postsecondary Collaboration To Support Rigorous, Effective Instruction Planning for the 2016 GEAR UP Summer Institute February.

THE APPALACHIAN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP.

Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.

Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.

Bridge to College Courses Funded by College Spark Washington Washington Bridge to College Project: Setting a Context for Principals Dr. Kathe Taylor Assistant.

Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.

PROM/SE Summer Science Institute

Adult College and Career Education Leadership

Science Education in the United States: An International Perspective Oregon Summer Institute August 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.

PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education February, 2006.

Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and

Presentation transcript:

© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004

What is PROM/SE?

© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE is a comprehensive research and development effort to improve mathematics and science teaching and learning in grades K-16, based on evidence about students and teachers, improvement and alignment of standards and instruction, and preparation and professional development of teachers – all aimed at improving student learning.

This work is supported by The National Science Foundation/ Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement EHR

© 2004 Michigan State University Evaluator Administrative Personnel Exec. Management Committee Action Teams National Advisors STEERING COMMITTEE Partner Site Coordinators Project Organization

PROM/SE Partners Ingham, MI Intermediate School District St. Clair County, MI Intermediate School District Calhoun County, MI Intermediate School District SMART Consortium – Cleveland, Ohio Area High AIMS Consortium – Cincinnati, Ohio Area Michigan State University

Project Leaders: Joan Ferrini-Mundy, Associate Dean, College of Natural Science, and Director, Division of Science & Mathematics Education William Schmidt, MSU Distinguished Professor, College of Education Partner Site Contacts: Terry Krivak, Executive Director, and Nancy Burce, Director of Staff & Services for Education, SMART Consortium, greater Cleveland Area Robert Yearout, Executive Director, and Susan Brown, Project Director, High AIMS Consortium greater Cincinnati Area Mary Gerhig, Director of Curriculum, Calhoun ISD Martha Couretas, PROM/SE Coordinator, Ingham ISD Terry Parks, Director of Math & Science Center, St. Clair ISD

PROM/SE Scope ~350,000 K-12 students ~65 school districts ~1200 PROM/SE associates ~5000 inservice teachers ~ 800 preservice teachers

© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE Goals Gathering and analyzing data to inform curriculum and instruction decisions Helping all teachers to teach to high standards Building capacity among teachers Improving teacher education Improving student achievement

Project Design, year-by-year Year 1: set up and organize project management and structure gather baseline evidence: –student achievement –teachers’ topic emphasis survey –curriculum and standards –professional development –teacher and student background select PROM/SE Mathematics Associates begin Leadership Professional Development: PROM/SE Mathematics Associate/Administrator Institute, August, 2004

Year 2: Detailed analysis of baseline data Interpretation of data with PROM/SE Associates Action plans (Associates and districts) Select PROM/SE Science Associates Teaching to Michigan and Ohio Standards Academic year workshops, Associates Initial work in buildings and districts, Associates Ongoing research and evaluation Summer Institute for Associates

Year 3: Mathematics Associates -- engaged in building and site level initiatives, locally designed PROM/SE Virtual Resource -- planning and piloting underway with Associates Science Associates -- weekend workshops Targeted follow-up assessment, linkage to state assessments Years 4 & 5: Targeted follow-up assessment, linkage to state assessments Associates collaborating in buildings, districts Virtual PD Resource

© 2004 Michigan State University Gather Data Implement Changes Design Solutions Conjectur e Reasons Identify Challenges Analyze Data Interpret Data The PROM/SE Process

© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE Associates A goal of the PROM/SE grant is for each school building in the project to have a PROM/SE Associate. Associates will play a key role in the success of the project and the improvement of mathematics and science education. Associates will be involved in professional development for themselves as well as playing a role, with the principal and central office, in the planning, coordinating, and implementing of professional development for others in their building.

© 2004 Michigan State University Associate Roles and Opportunities Teacher Leader Learner Resource broker Designer

© 2004 Michigan State University Principal Roles and Opportunities Building administrator Instructional leader Learner Resource broker Designer

© 2004 Michigan State University Central Office Roles & Opportunities District administrator Instructional leader Learner Resource broker Designer

© 2004 Michigan State University Teacher Roles and Opportunities Teacher Learner Participant in “building level” learning community

© 2004 Michigan State University Focus of Summer Institute: August 2004 Review and analysis of mathematics data and student achievement Review and reflection of mathematics standards, district curriculum and alignment, and student achievement Discussion and elaboration of Associates roles Begin to develop plans and identify next steps

© 2004 Michigan State University Questions for development of action plans: What is the most serious challenge in improving mathematics teaching and learning in your school? What is your evidence?