DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DATA DEMAND AND USE: S HARING I NFORMATION AND P ROVIDING F EEDBACK Session 5.
Advertisements

Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement.
GENERATING DEMAND FOR DATA Module 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making  Understand the role of.
Begin with the End in Mind
Developing and Testing a Framework and Approach for Measuring Success in Repositioning Family Planning Nicole Judice Elizabeth Snyder MEASURE Evaluation.
Module 1: Key concepts in data demand & use
LINKING DATA TO ACTION Session 6. Session Objectives By the end of this session, you will be able to:  Identify priority decisions and programmatic questions.
Dissemination and Use of Results from OVC Program Evaluations Florence Nyangara, PhD MEASURE Evaluation/Futures Group Dissemination Meeting, September.
Context of Decision Making
UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.
CONTEXT OF DECISION MAKING Module 2. PART 1: DETERMINANTS OF DDU.
Review of key themes. Module 1: Data demand & use key concepts  Data are needed to improve the delivery of services  Providers play a critical role.
Data Demand & Use (DDU) Why we collect health-related data.
Increasing district level evidence-based decision making in Côte d’Ivoire Tara Nutley MEASURE Evaluation / Futures Group Mini University, Washington DC.
Building Capacity on Program Evaluation in Latin America: The Experience of the Partnership between Mexico’s National Institute of Public Health (INSP)
Technical Approach to and Experiences from Strengthening National Monitoring and Evaluation System for Most Vulnerable Children Program in Tanzania Prisca.
Strengthening Health Information Systems: Creating an Information Culture Manila, June 14, 2011 Theo Lippeveld, MD, MPH,
Case management versus M&E in the context of OVC programs: What have we learned? Jenifer Chapman, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap Session 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data- informed decision making  Understand.
PLACE Method Priorities for Local AIDS Control Efforts 1 1 MEASURE Evaluation, A Manual for implementing the PLACE Method.
Linking Data with Action Part 1: Seven Steps of Using Information for Decision Making.
Regional Forum: Use of Gender Data in Sub-national Decision-making Kigali, Rwanda August 2012 Key Gender Terms and Concepts.
Using Data for Decision Making. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: 1. Raise awareness of the importance of using.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.
WHY IS THIS HAPPENING IN THE PROGRAM? Session 5 Options for Further Investigation & Information Flow.
Introduction to Group Work. Learning Objectives The goal of the group project is to provide workshop participants with an opportunity to further develop.
Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Session 1: Setting the Gender Policy Context.
Unmet Need Exercise  Review the trends in CPR. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Review trends in unmet.
Day 4: Field Practicum This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency for.
STUDY IMPLEMENTATION Day 2 - Session 5 Interview guides and tips for effective strategies.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.
Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.
Data Demand & Use: Information Use Map Webinar Series #2 Tuesday, January 24, 2012 Presenters: Eric Geers and Tara Nutley.
Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 9:
Data Quality Assurance Workshop
Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:
RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 10:
Data Quality Assurance
Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment
Session: 8 Disseminating Results
Introduction MODULE 6: RHIS Data Demand and Use
Right-sized Evaluation
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
Measuring Success Toolkit
MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero
Monitoring and Evaluation of HIV/AIDS Programs Workshop Overview
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 4:
Overview of the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool
Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification
Complementing Routine Data with Qualitative Data for Decision Making: Understanding the "Why" Behind Program Data Day 1 - Session 1 Note to Facilitator:
Assessment Training Session 9: Assessment Analysis
Training Content and Orientation
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 3:
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Session: 6 Understanding & Using the RDQA Tool Output
Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources
Siân Curtis, PhD OVC Evaluation Dissemination Meeting,
Data and Interoperability:
Use of Information for Decision Making
Measuring Data Quality
Introduction to Health Informatics
Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Willis Odek, PhD Chief of Party/Senior Technical Advisor,
Presentation transcript:

DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2

Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential barriers to data use  Introduce the Assessment of Barriers to Data Use tool

Session Overview  Determinants of data use  Barriers to data use  Assessing Barriers to Data Use  Small Group Activity 2: Action Plan to Address Barriers to Data Use

Data Demand & Use

What Determines Data Demand & Use? - ORGANIZATIONAL TECHNICAL BEHAVIORAL * Based on PRISM analytical framework (LaFond, Fields et al. (2005). The PRISM: An analytical framework for understanding performance of health information systems in developing countries. MEASURE Evaluation).

Data often are underutilized because of… Technical constraints  Technical skills  Availability of computers  Data system design  Definition of indicators  Lack of data quality assurance protocols

Data often are underutilized because of… Organizational constraints  Structural – roads, telecommunications  Organizational – clarity of roles, support, flow of information  Political interference

Data are often underutilized because of… Individual constraints  Decision-maker attitudes  Staff motivation  Lack of “data culture”

What Determines Data Demand & Use? ORGANIZATIONAL TECHNICAL BEHAVIORAL POLITICS CULTURE SOCIETY * Based on PRISM analytical framework (LaFond, Fields et al The PRISM: An Analytical Framework for Understanding Performance of Health Information Systems in Developing Countries. MEASURE Evaluation).

What barriers have you faced to using or getting others to use data and information? Group Participation

Assessment of Data Use Constraints Tool  Purpose  To improve understanding of the demand for data and the constraints on data use  Description  Key informant interview guide designed to identify constraints  Identifies effective practices in data use  Two versions - Facility level assessment & national and subnational assessments

Assessment of Data Use Constraints Tool Technical Constraints Technical constraints are related to the ability to generate high-quality data and analyses. RA8Have you ever had an experience while making a policy or program-related decision when you were concerned about the quality of the information being used? RA9Are there multiple sources of information or statistics for issues of importance to you, and have you experienced any problems caused by having different estimates? RA10I am interested in knowing about technical capacity for collecting and using information. Does your agency have the technical capacity to produce reliable information without a lot of external technical assistance? RA11Does your agency have the technical capacity to ensure access to and availability of reliable data? RA12Has there been an occasion when data quality or local technical capacity made it difficult for you to use information in making a decision? RA13How would you have gone about preventing this situation?

Barrier: Steps Involved Person Responsible Other Stake- holders General Timeline Action Plan for Addressing Barriers to Data Use

Key Messages  Determinants of data use are technical, behavioral, and organizational  Decision making occurs within political, cultural, and social contexts  The Assessment of Data Use Constraints tool can help to clarify the barriers in your organization  Plan interventions to overcome barriers to data use

Small Group Activity 2: Instructions Choose a reporter. Discuss barriers to data use experienced in your work. Here are some questions to start your discussion:  Have you ever had an experience while making a policy or program-related decision when you were concerned about the quality of the information being used?  Does your agency have the technical capacity to ensure access to and availability of reliable data?  What specific challenges have you experienced among your staff when it comes to using data?  How does your organization support having the necessary information to make decisions? Time for activity: 1 hour

Barrier: Lack of technical capacity in M&E Steps Involved Person Responsible Other Stake- holders General Timeline Proposed Intervention: Train all program managers in X organization on basic monitoring and evaluation (indicators, developing M&E plan, documenting results, managing toward results, etc.) Identify funding DirectorDeputy, program mgr January 2008 Seek out trainers and curricula M&E Specialist Deputy director, Training coordinator February 2008 Action Plan for Addressing Barriers to Data Use

Small Group Activity: Report Back  Share priority barriers  Discuss solutions crafted  Present action plan for two priority barriers  Time for report back: Each group has 10–15 minutes

THANK YOU! MEASURE Evaluation is a MEASURE project funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development and implemented by the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with Futures Group International, ICF Macro, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, and Tulane University. Views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the U.S. Government. MEASURE Evaluation is the USAID Global Health Bureau's primary vehicle for supporting improvements in monitoring and evaluation in population, health, and nutrition worldwide. Visit us online at