Bsbs Why is it important? –“Penguin” loop diagram –SM: dominated by t quark, probes V ts –Non-SM: via loop amplitude; interference on SM and non-SM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rare B Decays Chris Parkes SUPA Postgraduate Lectures Introduction Radiative decays b  s  b  d  Electroweak Penguin b  sl + l - Rate Forward backward.
Advertisements

Electroweak Penguin B Decays: b→s,d  and b→s,d ll Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration LNS Journal Club.
23, June, 2005Beauty2005, Assisi, Italy Electroweak Penguin decays at Belle Akimasa Ishikawa KEK.
X IN L IU ( 劉新 ) Collaborated with Wei Wang and Yuehong Xie Department of Physics, Jiangsu Normal University 17 th Sep.,
1 Charmless Three-body Decays of B Mesons Chun-Khiang Chua Chung Yuan Christian University HEP2007, 20 July 2007, Manchester.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
Non-leptonic b → s,d decays (experiment) CKM 2014, Vienna, Austria 10-Sep-2014b -> s,d roundup, Fergus Wilson, STFC/RAL1.
Electroweak and Radiative Penguin Transitions from B Factories Paoti Chang National Taiwan University 2 nd KIAS-NCTS Joint Workshop on Particle Physics,
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
S-Waves & the extraction of  s Sheldon Stone FPCP 2010, Torino, Italy, May 2010.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
Radiative B Decays (an Experimental Overview) E.H. Thorndike University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration FPCP May 18, 2002.
Current Methods of determining V ub I. Endpoint of the inclusive lepton spectrum II. Exclusive decays Methods of determining V ub with small theoretical.
Radiative LHCb Vanya BELYAEVVanya BELYAEV (NIKHEF/Amsterdam & ITEP/Moscow) Vanya BELYAEV On behalf of LHCb Collaboration.
The physics of b s l + l - : 2004 and beyond Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara January 19, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop University.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
Radiative and Electroweak Penguin Decays of B Mesons Jeffrey D. Richman University of California, Santa Barbara B A B AR Collaboration 11 th International.
CHARM 2007, Cornell University, Aug. 5-8, 20071Steven Blusk, Syracuse University D Leptonic Decays near Production Threshold Steven Blusk Syracuse University.
6 th International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons July 2, 2004 Rare B Decays at LHC Sébastien VIRET Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique.
1 Physics Case of L=10 36 e + e - B Factory Achille Stocchi LAL-Orsay Université Paris-Sud and IN2P3-CNRS.
Bs and Bd mixing Silas Hoffman and Georg Steinbrueck Introduction Current and future measurements B s mixing and physics beyond the SM.
Charmonium Decays in CLEO Tomasz Skwarnicki Syracuse University I will concentrate on the recent results. Separate talk covering Y(4260).
Sin2  1 /sin2  via penguin processes Beauty 2006 Sep.25-29, Univ. of Oxford Yutaka Ushiroda (KEK)
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Belle results relevant to LHC Pheno-07 May 8, 2007 Madison Wisc. S.L. Olsen U of Hawai’i.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
Constraints on  from Charmless Two- Body B Decays: Status and Perspectives James D. Olsen Princeton University Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle.
Radiative Leptonic B Decays Edward Chen, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, David Hitlin Caltech BaBar DOE Presentation Aug 10, 2005.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
Wolfgang Menges, Queen Mary Measuring |V ub | from Semileptonic B Decays Wolfgang Menges Queen Mary, University of London, UK Institute of Physics: Particle.
Measurement of CP violation with the LHCb experiment at CERN
ICFP05, NCU1 B → Kπ decays and new physics in the EW-penguin sector Yu, Chaehyun ( Yonsei University) October 6, 2005 In Collaboration with C.S. Kim, S.
Rare B Decays at Belle Hsuan-Cheng Huang ( 黃宣誠 ) National Taiwan University 2 nd BCP NTU, Taipei June 7 - 9, 2002.
BaBar physics, recent highlights and future prospects Owen Long, BaBar physics analysis coordinator U. C. Riverside & SLAC December 5, 2008.
Time-dependent CP violation measurements in B 0 to charm and charmonium modes T.Aushev (ITEP) 1 st Open SuperKEKB meeting KEK,
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Radiative penguins at hadron machines Kevin Stenson University of Colorado.
1 A New Physics Study in B  K  & B  K*  Decays National Tsing Hua University, October 23, 2008 Sechul OH ( 吳世哲 ) ( 오세철 ) C.S. Kim, S.O., Y.W. Yoon,
1- 2 /2  1- 2 /2 u c dsb A 3 (1-  -i  ) - A 2 t d, s b b V td,V ts B Oscillations A 3 (  i  ) A 2 1 V tb c,u B decays b V ub,V cb Wolfenstein parametrization.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
K.K. Gan The Ohio State University New Results on  Lepton July 17, 2003.
A. Drutskoy, University of Cincinnati B physics at  (5S) July 24 – 26, 2006, Moscow, Russia. on the Future of Heavy Flavor Physics ITEP Meeting B physics.
Inclusive semileptonic B decays: experimental Elisabetta Barberio University of Melbourne FPCP: Vancouver April 2006.
Lake Louise Winter Institute Outlook:  Introduction  LHCb performance  Radiative decays: CP violation Bs  Φγ  Backward-forward Asymmetry B 
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Hadronic B→DX Decays at LHCb and CDF Laurence Carson, Imperial College on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CIPANP 2012, St. Petersburg,FL.
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
15/12/2008from LHC to the UniverseP. Chang 1 CP Violation and Rare R Decays CP Violation and Rare R Decays Paoti Chang Paoti Chang National Taiwan University.
New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at Justin Albert Univ. of Victoria 20 July, 2013 Representing the BaBar.
1 Inclusive B → X c l Decays Moments of hadronic mass and lepton energy PR D69,111103, PR D69, Fits to energy dependence of moments based on HQE.
Anomalies in current data Concezio Bozzi INFN Ferrara May 22 nd, 2014.
Belle and Belle II Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Beauty and charm at the LHC, Jeroen van Tilburg, FOM Veldhoven 2014 Jeroen van Tilburg Beauty and charm at the LHC: searches for TeV scale phenomena in.
Joshua Moss (Ohio State University) on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration ICHEP 2012, Melbourne 6 July 2012 ATLAS Electroweak measurements of W and Z properties.
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
Improved measurements of B → hh decays at Belle
Review of b  s l+ l- and B0  l+ l- Decays
Hadronic B Decays at BELLE and BABAR
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
Polarization in charmless B VV decays
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, 20 Nov 2013
CKM Status In this lecture, we study the results summarized in this plot. November 17, 2018 Sridhara Dasu, CKM Status.
Recent Results on Radiative and Electroweak Penguin B Decays at Belle
Λb and heavy states at Tevatron
Spin-singlet Quarkonia at the LHC
Presentation transcript:

bsbs Why is it important? –“Penguin” loop diagram –SM: dominated by t quark, probes V ts –Non-SM: via loop amplitude; interference on SM and non-SM may result in observable direct CP violating effects manifest in charge asymmetry of B  K* 

Issues Theoretically prefer to measure inclusive decay B  X s  –But harder experimentally… Experimentally measure exclusive decay B  K*  –But harder theoretically …

RefExpt#particlesDecay#eventsBR(x10 -5 ) C7CLEO 2  10 6 BXs BXs  263    5.7  3.5 C2CLEO 9.7  10 6 B 0  K *0  88  .7 .3 C2CLEO 9.7  10 6 B +  K *+  37  .8 .3 C2CLEO 9.7  10 6 B  K * 2  16  .6 .1 C5CLEO 3.3  10 6 b  s  92  10   3.5  3.2  2.6 Ba2BaBar 8.6  10 6 B 0  K *0  48  75.4 .8 .5 Be1Belle 6.1  10 6 BXs BXs  107   5.6  4.2  5 Be1Belle 6.1  10 6 B  K *  ?3.8 A1Aleph 4  10 6 Zb  s  70   8.3  5.3 A1Aleph 4  10 6 ZB  K *  5? A2?Aleph 4  10 6 ZBXs BXs  ? 33.8  7.4  8.5 L1LHCb? B 0  K *0  26,000/10 7 sec; S/N=1 ?

Experimental Systematics CLEO (C2): total of 6.8% dominated by background shape (5%) BaBar (Ba2): total of 8.6% dominated by tracking efficiency (5%) Belle (Be1): total of 12.4% dominated by photon reconstruction (5.3%) and charged track reconstruction (4.7%). They also show separate 15% model error for extrapolating over the full X s mass range.

SM Theory b  s  1 st error: Large dependence on scale  (for m b /2<  <2m b ) –LO ~25% –NLO ~5-10% (need NNLO?) 2 nd error: Next largest dependence on m c /m b –~5% ReferenceBR x 10-5 Hewett & Wells (PRD 55, 5549 (1997) 32.5  3  4 Chetyrkin et al (PLB 400, 206(1997); erratum PLB 425, 414 (1998) 32.8  2.2  2.5

Beyond SM Many authors… –Bobeth et al NP B567, 153 (2000) Calculation where SUSY contribution is of the order of 10% of SM value Present SM theory error (~10%) is about the same size as the non-SM contribution Experiment is at 15% errors now

Conclusions? Need better SM theory predictions (NNLO?) to probe deviations from SM –Need to reduce errors from present 10% to 1%? –What about m c /m b error of 5%, can it be reduced? Experiment by the end of LHCb, BaBar, Belle should be at least systematics dominated (presently 5-10%), but it looks as if those systematics could be reduced? A few percent? –Maybe means that experiment at the end of LHC era will have achieved the necessary experimental precision?

Still missing… Need crisp predictions (including systematics) for –BaBar, Belle, BTeV, LHC(b) –Could not find in the literature… Better understanding of reasonable expectations for the reduction in the SM theory error

References C2 (CLEO): hep-ex/ “Study of exclusive radiative B Meson decays” C5 (CLEO): CONF98-17; ICHEP “Improved measurement of B(b->s gamma)” C7 (CLEO): PRL74, 2885 (1995) “First measurement of the rate for the inclusive radiative penguin decay b-> s gamma” Ba2 (BaBar): SLAC-PUB-8534;hep-ex/ “A measurement of the branching fraction of the exclusive decay B 0 ->K *0 gamma” Be1 (Belle): KEK ; hep-ex/ “A measurement of the branching fraction for the inclusive B0->Xs gamma decays with Belle” A1 (Aleph): Williams thesis “A measurement of the inclusive branching ratio for b->s gamma with the Aleph detector at LEP” A2 (Aleph): PLB429, 169(1998) L1 (LHC): CERN-TH/ ; hep-ex/ “B Decays at the LHC”