Robo-AO Replicable Robotic Laser Adaptive Optics and Science System for 1-3 m Telescopes Christoph Baranec Caltech Optical Observatories Laboratory development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GLAO Workshop, Leiden; April 26 th 2005 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics, N. Hubin Ground Layer Adaptive Optics Status and strategy at ESO Norbert Hubin European.
Advertisements

1 Keck LGS AO Planning Workshop: Overview, Requirements & Schedule December 5, 2004.
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
Thomas Stalcup June 15, 2006 Laser Guidestar System Status.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
Reminder:. Robo-AO at South Pole Station Tony Travouillon Thirty Meter Telescope / Caltech Richard Dekany Associate Director for Instrumentation Development,
“Riding the Hub”: The MMT Adaptive Secondary Douglas Miller University of Arizona The AO System Current Performance of the MMT AO System Ongoing Development.
LBT AO Progress Meeting, Arcetri Walter Seifert (ZAH, LSW) The LBT AO System and LUCIFER 1.Requirements for the commissioning of LUCIFER:
Why do astronomers need AO? Lick Observatory, 1 m telescope Long exposure image Short exposure image: “speckles” With adaptive optics Three images of a.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Laser guide star adaptive optics at the Keck Observatory Adam R. Contos, Peter L. Wizinowich, Scott K. Hartman, David Le Mignant, Christopher R. Neyman,
Developments at Palomar S. R. Kulkarni California Institute of Technology.
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena, CA V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena,
PALM-3000 Status of the PALM-3000 high-order adaptive optics system A.H. Bouchez, R.G. Dekany, J.R. Angione, C. Baranec, K. Bui, R.S. Burruss, J.R. Crepp,
Planets around Low-Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs Michael Liu Bruce Macintosh NGAO Workshop, Sept 2006.
PILOT: Pathfinder for an International Large Optical Telescope -performance specifications JACARA Science Meeting PILOT Friday March 26 Anglo Australian.
GMT Phasing GLAO – not needed LTAO – Phase stabilization done at ~1kHz with edge sensing at M1 and M2 – Phase reference set at ~.01Hz using off-axis star.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
CAMERA Compact Automated MEMS Rayleigh Adaptive Optics System C. Baranec, S. Kulkarni, R. Dekany, N. Law, E. Ofek, M. Kasliwal, V. Velur, & A. Ramaprakash.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
CAMERA A Compact, Automated MEMs-based Rayleigh Adaptive Optics System Matthew Britton, Nick Law, Viswa Velur, Christoph Baranec.
1 Laser Guide Star Wavefront Sensor Mini-Review 6/15/2015Richard Dekany 12/07/2009.
Widening the Scope of Adaptive Optics Matthew Britton.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Architecture Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Status A.H. Bouchez, J.E. Roberts Project 1640 Las Vegas Summit 1/28/2010.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting April 3, 2007.
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory KPAO Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Keck Precision AO (KPAO) SSC Presentation January.
Varun Bhalerao Dual Channel Photometer for KBO search by occultations Varun Bhalerao Advisor: Shri Kulkarni 24 Sep 2007.
P3K WFS development meeting #2 V Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena, CA
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
PALM-3000 Instruments update A. Bouchez Team Meeting #9 22 Oct
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team (with input from Sean Adkins, Matthew Britton, Ralf.
Don Gavel: Keck NGAO meeting April 25, LAO Activities Relevant To Keck NGAO Donald Gavel NGAO Team Meeting 6 April 26, 2007.
Diffraction-limited imaging in the visible at the WHT Craig Mackay, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge. 22 March 2010: Science with WHT.
Robo-AO First Science Workshop May 20, The Demo Period Robo-AO Science Workshop Agenda.
PALM-3000 Systems Engineering R. Dekany, A. Bouchez 9/22/10 Integration & Testing Review.
What Requirements Drive NGAO Cost? Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
Next generation wide field AO (GLAO) and NIRMOS for Subaru Telescope.
Big Bear Solar Observatory NST Main Features  All reflecting, off-axis Gregory optical configuration  PM: 1.6 m clear aperture with f/2.4  Figuring.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics Ground layer wavefront reconstruction using dynamically refocused Rayleigh laser beacons C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart,
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
1 FRIDA Engineering Status 17/05/07 Engineering Status May 17, 2007 F.J. Fuentes InFraRed Imager and Dissector for Adaptive Optics.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
1 Palomar Tomograph V. Velur 1, B. Platt 2, M. Britton 1, R. Dekany 1 1 Caltech Optical Observatories, California Institute of Technology 2 Interferometry.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
OC, June 3, SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.
Early scientific goals for the MMT’s multi-laser-guided adaptive optics Michael Lloyd-Hart, Thomas Stalcup, Christoph Baranec, N. Mark Milton, Matt Rademacher,
February 2013 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics (GLAO) Experiment on Mauna Kea Doug Toomey.
SAM PDR1 S OAR Adaptive Module LGS LGSsystem Andrei Tokovinin SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
Design and Implementation of a Fast-Steering Secondary Mirror System Maryfe Culiat Trex Enterprises July 25, 2007.
Ground Layer AO at ESO’s VLT Claire Max Interim Director UC Observatories September 14, 2014.
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
Adaptive Optics for Astronomy Kathy Cooksey. AO Basics Photons –Travel in straight lines Wavefront –Line perpendicular to all photons’ paths Atmospheric.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Wavefront sensors, correctors François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Dynamic Andromeda: Novae and Variable Stars in M31 Yi Cao 2 nd year graduate at Caltech On Behalf of the Palomar Transient Factory collaboration.
Overview Science drivers AO Infrastructure at WHT GLAS technicalities Current status of development GLAS: Ground-layer Laser Adaptive optics System.
System Performance Metrics and Current Performance Status George Angeli.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes Center for Adaptive Optics.
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Robo-AO: Demo Period Nicholas Law.
Keck Observatory Status
Adaptive optics Now: Soon: High angular resolution
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

Robo-AO Replicable Robotic Laser Adaptive Optics and Science System for 1-3 m Telescopes Christoph Baranec Caltech Optical Observatories Laboratory development system

Robo-AO - Overview  New astronomy capability Able to allocate large amounts of time to diffraction- limited astronomy, previously not possible  Rapidly develop and deploy low cost adaptive optics (AO) system for 1-3 meter telescopes Use low-risk technologies Ease of use, fully robotic Integrated visible and near IR science instruments Emphasis on high observing efficiency

Robo-AO - AO Science  Extensive targeted searches (1000+ objects) Stellar, sub-stellar companion searches Lensed quasars ( new over 9 months time) Asteroid binarity  Astrometry Dedicated telescope can optimize stability High Strehl in H improves precision HE gravitational lens, Blackburne et al HST (left) seeing limited (right). Robo-AO will be able to resolve these objects. 1”

Robo-AO Science  Rapid transient characterization Respond to transients identified by other systems (e.g. Palomar Transient Factory, Catalina Sky Survey, PanSTARRs) Rapid near-IR photometry  Time-domain astronomy Long term, high resolution monitoring Solar system objects Repeating transients Orbits Swift J , complex and poorly understood light curve, Kasliwal et al Robo-AO could easily perform this observation within minutes of detection.

System Design  12x12 Boston Micromachines MEMS DM  Physik Instrumente Tip/Tilt mirror  Shack-Hartmann WFS (SciMeasure/E2V 39)  IR and visible (600 nm to 2.3 μm, 2’ FoV) science detectors (double as tip/tilt sensors)  ‘Gaming’ CPU running Linux/C++  Rayleigh LGS  Autonomous robotic operation

Deformable mirror MEMS Deformable mirror on a chip (Boston Micromachines) 3.5 µm stroke, 140 actuators, 8 kHz, USB interface, very economical Bonus: FP Electronics drive tip/tilt mirror

Rayleigh LGS  >10 W JDSU 301-HD  Solid state tripled Nd:YAG  Q-Switched (10 kHz)  650 m range gated at 10 km with Pockel’s Cell  Approved for safe use by the FAA (no spotters)  Unfortunately still have abide by USSTRATCOM PA

Robo-AO Error Budget Assuming mV = 17 T/T guide star

Performance – H-Strehl At Zenith Greater than 40% Strehl with mV = 19 T/T in median conditions FWHM at H < 0.26” in even 75% worst seeing conditions

Optomechanical design

Nicholas Law CAMERA: Low-cost Robotic LGS AO for Small Telescopes Optomechanical design

Robinson laboratory development system

Closed-loop in lab (2007)  Testbed running with closed loop at 120 Hz  Fully remote operation, including simulated queue scheduled observations

Robo-AO - Status  On-sky system development with partners from IUCAA (Pune, India) and support from the NSF: AST  Rebuilt lab system in Cahill Center.  Built new development CPU.  WFS running at 3.5 kHz.  Developed new Linux driver library for DM.

Near Future  Purchasing UV laser and optics later this month (testing summer 2010)  Reintegrating TTM and DM into lab system, demonstrate 1.2+ kHz operation by end of year  System Design Review in Spring 2010

Robo-AO (2011+)  Goal is to provide routine efficient diffraction- limited science (visible and NIR) with a dedicated 1-3 m telescope.  One month demonstration of Robo-AO, Spring 2011, with science to follow immediately.  Clone Robo-AO many times over, deploy on other telescopes around the world!

Robo-AO team  Robo-AO instrument team: C. Baranec (Principal Investigator), A. N. Ramaprakash (Co-Investigator, IUCAA), R. Riddle, S. Tendulkar, M. Burse (IUCAA), P. Chordia (IUCAA), H. Das (IUCAA), S. Punnadi (IUCAA), J. Fucik, J. Zolkower  Robo-AO science team: N. Law (Project Scientist, U. Toronto), A. N. Ramaprakash (IUCAA), C. Baranec, R. Dekany, E. Ofek, M. Kasliwal, S. Tendulkar, S. Kulkarni  CAMERA testbed team: M. Britton (now at tOSC), N. Law, V. Velur, D. Beeler (Pomona), L. Ratschbacher (U. Vienna), P. Choi (Pomona), B. Penprase (Pomona)