Satellite-based Global Estimate of Ground-level Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2, Lok Lamsal1, Chulkyu Lee1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time series of satellite-based fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) concentrations over China: Guannan Geng, Qiang Zhang, Aaron van Donkelaar, Randall.
Advertisements

Mapping Surface NO 2 and PM 2.5 from Satellite Observations Randall Martin, Dalhousie University with contributions from Aaron van Donkelaar, Dalhousie.
Simulation of Absorbing Aerosol Index & Understanding the Relation of NO 2 Column Retrievals with Ground-based Monitors Randall Martin (Dalhousie, Harvard-Smithsonian)
GEOS-5 Simulations of Aerosol Index and Aerosol Absorption Optical Depth with Comparison to OMI retrievals. V. Buchard, A. da Silva, P. Colarco, R. Spurr.
Junwei Xu 1 Randall V. Martin 1,2, Jhoon Kim 3, Myungje Choi 3, Qiang Zhang 4, Guannan Geng 4, Yang Liu 5, Zongwei Ma 5,6, Lei Huang 6, Yuxuan Wang 4,7.
Time Series Analysis of Satellite-Derived PM 2.5 Brian Boys, Randall V. Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar, Ryan MacDonell, Nai-Yung C. Hsu * NASA/Goddard Space.
Quantitative Interpretation of Satellite and Surface Measurements of Aerosols over North America Aaron van Donkelaar M.Sc. Defense December, 2005.
Global Climatology of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Estimated from Remote-Sensed Aerosol Optical Depth Aaron van Donkelaar 1, Randall Martin 1,2,
Satellite Remote Sensing of a Multipollutant Air Quality Health Index Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Aaron van Donkelaar, Lok Lamsal,
Integrating satellite observations for assessing air quality over North America with GEOS-Chem Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones University of Toronto
Transpacific transport of pollution as seen from space Funding: NASA, EPA, EPRI Daniel J. Jacob, Rokjin J. Park, Becky Alexander, T. Duncan Fairlie, Arlene.
Retrieval of SO 2 Vertical Columns from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development Chulkyu Lee, Aaron van Dokelaar, Gray O’Byrne: Dalhousie.
Long-range transport of NO y and ozone from Asia Thomas Walker Dalhousie University 3 rd GEOS-Chem Users' Meeting April 13, 2007.
Aerosol Simulation Over North America Aaron Van Donkelaar April 2005.
1 Surface nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) rd GEOS-Chem USERS ` MEETING, Harvard University.
Effects of Siberian forest fires on regional air quality and meteorology in May 2003 Rokjin J. Park with Daeok Youn, Jaein Jeong, Byung-Kwon Moon Seoul.
Estimating global climatological PM 2.5 from MODIS and MISR AOD Aaron van Donkelaar and Randall Martin April 2009.
Satellite Remote Sensing of Surface Air Quality
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Overview of Boundary Layer including Surface Science (BLiSS) Activities in Canadian Universities & Some Emerging Remote Sensing Capabilities Randall Martin.
ARSET NASA’s Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training Program Richard Kleidman Science Systems and Applications, Inc. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Visualization, Exploration, and Model Comparison of NASA Air Quality Remote Sensing data via Giovanni Ana I. Prados, Gregory Leptoukh, Arun Gopalan, and.
Satellite Remote Sensing of Global Air Pollution
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Application of Satellite Data to Particulate, Smoke and Dust Monitoring Spring 2015 ARSET - AQ Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training – Air Quality.
U.S. aerosols: observation from space, effects on climate Daniel J. Jacob and funding from NASA, EPRI with Easan E. Drury, Tzung-May Fu Loretta J. Mickley,
Insight from the A-Train into Global Air Quality Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Aaron van Donkelaar, Lok Lamsal, Akhila Padmanabhan,
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Applications of Satellite Remote Sensing to Inform Air Quality Management Randall Martin with contributions from Aaron van Donkelaar, Brian Boys, Matthew.
Long − Range Transport of Asian Sulfate and Its Effects on the Canadian Sulfate Burden Aaron van Donkelaar, Randall V. Martin – Dalhousie University W.
Insight into Global Air Quality using Satellite Remote Sensing and Modeling Randall Martin with contributions from Aaron van Donkelaar, Shailesh Kharol,
Advances in Applying Satellite Remote Sensing to the AQHI Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Aaron van Donkelaar, Akhila Padmanabhan, Dalhousie.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET-AQ Applied Remote SEnsing Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan Gupta Originally.
US Aerosols : Observation from Space, Climate Interactions Daniel J. Jacob and funding from NASA, EPRI, EPA with Easan E. Drury (now at NREL), Loretta.
Applications of Satellite Remote Sensing to Estimate Global Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian.
1 Ground-level nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from the satellite-borne Ozone Monitoring Instrument Lok Lamsal and Randall Martin with contributions.
Using Satellite Remote Sensing to Estimate Global Outdoor Air Pollution Exposure Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Aaron van Donkelaar,
Where are we now and where are we going? Capabilities in Remote Sensing and Air Quality Applications ARSET - AQ Applied Remote SEnsing Training – Air Quality.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote SEnsing Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan Gupta Satellite.
1 Inferring Ground-level Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations from OMI Martin Steinbacher, Empa Edward Celarier, SGT Inc. Eric Bucsela, NASA GSFC.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Space-based Constraints on Global SO 2 Emissions and Timely Updates for NO x Inventories Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Chulkyu Lee,
Retrieval of Vertical Columns of Sulfur Dioxide from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development, Validation, and Error Analysis Chulkyu Lee.
Satellite Remote Sensing of NO 2 as an Indicator of Aerosol Pollution: Opportunities from GEMS (and GOCI) Observations Randall Martin with contributions.
Transpacific transport of anthropogenic aerosols: Integrating ground and satellite observations with models AAAR, Austin, Texas October 18, 2005 Colette.
Estimating PM 2.5 from MODIS and MISR AOD Aaron van Donkelaar and Randall Martin March 2009.
Two New Applications of Satellite Remote Sensing: Timely Updates to Emission Inventories and Constraints on Ozone Production Randall Martin, Dalhousie.
Some Applications of Satellite Remote Sensing for Air Quality: Implications for a Geostationary Constellation Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian.
Chemical Data Assimilation: Aerosols - Data Sources, availability and needs Raymond Hoff Physics Department/JCET UMBC.
Ground-level NO 2 Concentrations Inferred from OMI Lok Lamsal, Dalhousie University Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Aaron van Donkelaar,
Transpacific transport of anthropogenic aerosols and implications for North American air quality EGU, Vienna April 27, 2005 Colette Heald, Daniel Jacob,
ORIGIN OF BACKGROUND OZONE IN SURFACE AIR OVER THE UNITED STATES: CONTRIBUTION TO POLLUTION EPISODES Daniel J. Jacob and Arlene M. Fiore Atmospheric Chemistry.
Observing Air Quality from Space Randall Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar, Lok Lamsal, Chulkyu Lee, Carolyn Verduzco Undergraduate Science Conference 25 September.
Satellite Remote Sensing of the Air Quality Health Index Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Aaron van Donkelaar, Lok Lamsal, Dalhousie University.
Global Air Pollution Inferred from Satellite Remote Sensing Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian with contributions from Aaron van Donkelaar,
Introduction To Remote Sensing for Air Quality Application ARSET - AQ Applied Remote SEnsing Training – Air Quality A project of NASA Applied Sciences.
An Introduction to the Use of Satellites, Models and In-Situ Measurements for Air Quality and Climate Applications Richard Kleidman
N. Bousserez, R. V. Martin, L. N. Lamsal, J. Mao, R. Cohen, and B. R
Randall Martin Dalhousie University
Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian
ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL: suspension of condensed-phase particles in air
Satellite Remote Sensing of a Multipollutant Air Quality Health Index
Using dynamic aerosol optical properties from a chemical transport model (CTM) to retrieve aerosol optical depths from MODIS reflectances over land Fall.
Estimating Ground-level NO2 Concentrations from OMI Observations
with contributions (alphabetical) from
Satellite Remote Sensing of Ground-Level NO2 for New Brunswick
Global Climatology of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Estimated from Remote-Sensed Aerosol Optical Depth Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2,
Retrieval of SO2 Vertical Columns from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development and Validation Chulkyu Lee, Aaron van Dokelaar, Gray O’Byrne:
Global Climatology of Aerosol Optical Depth
Presentation transcript:

Satellite-based Global Estimate of Ground-level Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2, Lok Lamsal1, Chulkyu Lee1 and Xiong Liu3 Atmospheric Composition Constellation June 2009 1Dalhousie University 2Harvard-Smithsonian 3NASA Goddard

Approach Estimated PM2.5 = η· τ η We relate satellite-based measurements of aerosol optical depth to PM2.5 using a global chemical transport model Following Liu et al., 2004: Estimated PM2.5 = η· τ Combined MODIS/MISR Aerosol Optical Depth vertical structure aerosol type meteorological effects meteorology diurnal effects η GEOS-Chem

MODIS and MISR τ τ [unitless] MODIS τ MISR τ MODIS MISR Mean τ 2001-2006 at 0.1º x 0.1º MODIS τ 1-2 days for global coverage Requires assumptions about surface reflectivity MODIS r = 0.40 vs. in-situ PM2.5 MISR τ 6-9 days for global coverage Simultaneous surface reflectance and aerosol retrieval MISR r = 0.54 vs. in-situ PM2.5 τ [unitless] 0 0.1 0.2 0.3

Combining MODIS and MISR improves agreement 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 Combined MODIS/MISR r = 0.63 (vs. in-situ PM2.5) τ [unitless] MODIS r = 0.40 (vs. in-situ PM2.5) MISR r = 0.54 (vs. in-situ PM2.5)

Global CTMs can directly relate PM2.5 to τ η [ug/m] Detailed aerosol-oxidant model 2º x 2.5º 54 tracers, 100’s reactions Assimilated meteorology Year-specific emissions Dust, sea salt, sulfate-ammonium-nitrate system, organic carbon, black carbon, SOA GEOS-Chem

Significant agreement with coincident ground measurements over NA MODIS τ 0.40 MISR τ 0.54 Combined τ 0.63 Combined PM2.5 0.78 Annual Mean PM2.5 [μg/m3] (2001-2006) Satellite Derived Satellite-Derived [μg/m3] In-situ In-situ PM2.5 [μg/m3]

Method is globally applicable Annual mean measurements Outside Canada/US 297 sites (107 non-EU) r = 0.75 (0.76) slope = 0.89 (0.96) bias = 0.52 (-2.76) μg/m3

Insight into Aerosol Sources/Type with Precursor Observations OMI SO2 Retrieved with Local Air Mass Factor Improves Agreement of OMI SO2 versus Aircraft Observations (INTEX A & B) Orig: slope = 1.6, r=0.71 New: slope = 0.95, r=0.92 Lee et al., JGR, submitted

Coincident PM2.5 error has two sources Estimated PM2.5 = η· τ Model Affected by aerosol optical properties, concentrations, vertical profile, relative humidity Most sensitive to vertical profile [van Donkelaar et al., 2006] Satellite Error limited to 0.1 + 20% by AERONET filter Implication for satellite PM2.5 determined by η

CALIPSO allows profile evaluation Model (GC) CALIPSO (CAL) Altitude [km] CALIPSO allows profile evaluation Coincidently sample model and CALIPSO extinction profiles Jun-Dec 2006 Compare % within boundary layer Optical Depth from TOA Optical Depth at surface τ(z)/τsurface

Potential for profile and τ bias define error Satellite-Derived PM2.5 [μg/m3] Vary satellite-derived PM2.5 by profile and τ biases 99.8% within ±(5 μg/m3 + 25%) of original value Contains 98.0% of NA data In-situ PM2.5 [μg/m3] Potential Bias [%]

Satellite-Derived PM2.5 [μg/m3]

Satellite-Derived PM2.5 [μg/m3]

Satellite-Derived PM2.5 [μg/m3]

High global impact of PM2.5 Loss in Expected Lifetime [years] Using 0.61±0.20 years lost per 10 μg/m3 [Pope et al., 2009] Satellite-PM2.5 + population map + lost-life relationship → Global estimate of decreased life expectancy due to PM2.5 exposure 10% of eastern North Americans lose ~1 of life expectancy from PM2.5 40% of eastern Asia exposed to > 40 μg/m3 Population [%] PM2.5 Exposure [μg/m3]

Significant Spatial Correlation in Satellite-derived and In-Situ AQHI (OMI-derived NO2 and O3, MODIS/MISR-derived PM2.5) Combined effect from numerous species → Use Canadian AQHI (Stieb et al., JAWMA, 2008) AQHI ≈ 0.09 x NO2 (ppbv) + 0.05 x PM2.5 (μ/m3) + 0.05 x O3 (ppbv) AQHI ≈ Excess Mortality Risk (%) Mean values over June – August 2005 for North America Satellite-derived AQHI In Site AQHI AQHI

Summary Satellite-derived PM2.5 asset to global air quality monitoring Quantifiable Error Coincident: ±(5 μg/m3 + 25%) Sampling: ±(2 μg/m3 + 10%) Potential for health studies Combined with satellite NO2 and O3

Additional Slides

Evaluate Monthly Mean Satellite τ with AERONET by Region Regions Determined with MODIS Albedo Ratios Reject Retrievals for Regions with Error > 0.1 or 20% May albedo ratios

Sampling frequency varies with region Potential loss of representativeness relative to annual mean

Sampling error is regional Compare continuous and coincident model results Plot sampling-induced error in excess of ±2 μg/m3 Sampling Error [%] Sampling-Induced Error = Annual PM2.5 – Coincident PM2.5 ± 2 μg/m3 Annual PM2.5

In-situ agrees better with satellite-derived PM2.5 0.1ºx0.1º r = 0.75 (0.76) slope = 0.89 (0.96) bias = 0.55 (-2.76) μg/m3 Satellite-Derived 2ºx2.5º r = 0.69 (0.71) slope = 0.58 (0.64) bias = 4.53 (1.60) μg/m3 GEOS-Chem 2ºx2.5º r = 0.52 (0.62) slope = 0.52 (0.56) bias = 8.09 (3.05) μg/m3 Annual mean measurements 298 sites (108 non-EU)