In deeds mediation, questions are open; in politics, then, why are they closed? The de Borda Institute www.deborda.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Voting Systems Explained
Advertisements

Electoral systems used in the UK
Electoral Systems Women and Elections
Presented by: Katherine Goulde
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. CHOOSING.
Mark Wang John Sturm Sanjeev Kulkarni Paul Cuff.  Basic Background – What is the problem?  Condorcet = IIA  Survey Data  Pairwise Boundaries = No.
Spanish Politics and Society The Institutions of Spanish Democracy: the electoral system. Anthony Gilliland Office
Electoral Systems & Party Systems The causes and consequences of multiparty competition.
Alternative Electoral Systems Read and précis notes will be checked before this Lecture is delivered … 1.
CS 886: Electronic Market Design Social Choice (Preference Aggregation) September 20.
PO377 ETHNIC CONFLICT AND POLITICAL VIOLENCE Week 17 Seminar: Institutional Design as Conflict Management: Executive Structures and Electoral Systems in.
Why two (or more) parties? PS 450. Duverger’s Law Part societal cleavages –Capital v. workers –Wealthy vs. less wealthy –owners vs. producers –Dichotomous.
The Mathematics of Elections
Northern Ireland Sovereignty Referendum 1973 Alex and Bryce.
Making Legislatures More Representative Bob Richard Californians for Electoral Reform.
THE INADEQUATE STUDY OF SOCIAL CHOICE THEORY AND ITS WORLD-WIDE CONSEQUENCES 欢迎 Peter Emerson The de Borda Institute 德博达研究所.
TOWARDS A ‘PEACE-FUL’ DEMOCRACY The de Borda Institute
1.1, 1.2 Ballots and Plurality Method
VOTING THEORY: DECISION-MAKING In th following profile, 12 voters – Messrs. i to u cast their prefereences on five different options, A.B, C, D and E.
CRITERIA FOR A FAIR ELECTION
Topics for Today Civil Society and Institutional Design: Electoral Systems 1.Finish group discussion activity. 2.Characteristics and consequences of three.
Institutions Much of political science is interested in political institutions (institutionalist, neoinstitutionalist, rational choice) Institutions affect.
Making your vote count Understanding the different electoral systems Source:
Group Decision Making Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Political Parties and Elections in Canada D Brown St Francis Xavier University Winter term 2010.
Choice Voting- Proportional Representation
Alternative Electoral Systems for BC Deliberative Phase: Weekend 4.
Single Transferable Vote. Multi Member Constituencies Only Voting is Preferential meaning voters indicate preference by numbers, In order of their favourite.
Objective Assess the reasons for the two-party system in the U.S., and decide whether there should be reforms fostering 3 rd parties. Assess various electoral.
January 26,  In representative democracies, their purpose is to allow voters to express their political preferences  Elections provide an opportunity.
Democracy, Elections & Electoral Systems. This week 1.Democracy 2.Electoral systems.
Alex Tabarrok. Individual Rankings (Inputs) BDA CCC ABD DAB Voting System (Aggregation Mechanism) Election Outcome (Global Ranking) B D A C.
In mediation, the questions are open; In politics, they are closed! The de Borda Institute
Democracy Government. “Democracy is government of the people, by the people, and for the people.” Abe Lincoln.
Proportional Representation (PR-List) Systems Weekend 4 : Session 1.
Your Vote Is Your Voice Produced by the League of Women Voters® of Oregon Education Fund.
In Canada and Around the World. Before you can understand voting you need to see the results so you know what we are talking about. The following slides.
BC Electoral Experiments & Reform Initiatives and Impulses Weekend 2 : Session 3.
Electoral System Families The Rockridge Citizens’ Assembly April 21, 2004.
Voting System Reform in Canada. Fair Vote Canada Multi-partisan Group formed in 2000 People from all regions, all walks of life, all points of view, all.
Other Voting Systems Although FPTP and AMS are used in British Parliamentary elections, there are other voting systems you should be aware of 1.Alternative.
Mixed Systems Weekend 4 : Session 3. Mixed Systems Mix different formula at different stages of the seat allocation process Austria Mix different formula.
REPRESENTATION.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 14 Voting and Apportionment.
Explaining party systems The role of electoral systems.
Great Theoretical Ideas in Computer Science.
Electoral Systems & N of Parties Moser. Basis §Duverger’s hypothesis on single-member plurality elections §Will it hold true in post-communism? l Russ,
Electoral Systems. Why do we have elections? Should all citizens be allowed to vote?
PUBLIC CHOICE AND GOVERNMENT FAILURES Miloš Fišar BPV_APEC PUBLIC ECONOMICS.
SA1: Living in a Democracy Electoral Systems. Proportional Representation Aims: Define Proportional Representation (PR) Examine different types of PR.
VOTING PARADOXES AND HOW TO DEAL WITH THEM Hannu Nurmi University of Turku Turku, Finland.
Electoral Systems and Reform How democratic is our democracy?
Warm-Up Rank the following soft drinks according to your preference (1 being the soft drink you like best and 4 being the one you like least)  Dr. Pepper.
Voting Methods Introduction.
The Mathematics of Voting Chapter 1. Preference Ballot A Ballot in which the voters are asked to rank the candidates in order of preference. 1. Brownies.
The mathematics of voting The paradoxes of democracy.
Institutional Design: Electoral Systems Plan for Today 1. Understand the characteristics and democratic consequences of three basic types of electoral.
Democratic Electoral Systems Weekend 3 : Session 1.
Allison Botkin M1L1 BLOG ASSIGNMENT.  Democracy is a type of government where the power is derived from the people based on their preferences  The people.
Voting Theory Part II: Solutions. Proposed Solutions Approval Voting Range Voting Instant Runoff Voting Borda Count Modifications –Borda Preferendum –Quota.
SO, WHAT IS DEMOCRACY ANYWAY?
1.3 The Borda Count Method.
Social Choice Theory [Election Theory]
Proportional Representation Referendum
Electoral Reform in BC …….but, why? (or why not?)
Introduction to Social Choice
Comparative Analysis of Democratization prof. Fulvio Venturino
Voting Methods Introduction.
Edexcel Politics A-level
Elections and Electoral Systems
Presentation transcript:

In deeds mediation, questions are open; in politics, then, why are they closed? The de Borda Institute

MAJORITARIANISM “Democracy rests upon the principles of majority rule.” “Democracy rests upon the principles of majority rule.” “Democracy works on the basis of a decision by the majority.” “Democracy works on the basis of a decision by the majority.” “Democracy is based on majority decision.” “Democracy is based on majority decision.”

SWEDEN – 1955 Referendum: which side of the road shall we drive on? Right15.5% Right15.5% Left82.9% Left82.9% Blank 1.6% Blank 1.6%

SELF-DETERMINATION “All peoples have the right to self- determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status…” Article 1.1, The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

DEMOCRATIC DICTATORS

THE QUESTION IS THE ANSWER

CANADA – QUEBEC THE ‘NEVER-END-UM’ ForAgainstTurnout %59.6%85.6% %55.4%82.8% %50.6%93.5%

NORTHERN IRELAND Border poll – 1972 Population: roughly 60% Protestant, 40% Catholic Turnout59% yes97%

A MAJORITY OF THE WHOLE

A MAJORITY OF THE MINORITY OF THE WHOLE

A MAJORITY OF THE MINORITY OF THE MINORITY OF THE WHOLE

RUSSIAN DOLLS

YUGOSLAVIA

THE CAUCASUS

RWANDA “Rubanda Nyamwinshi” the majority people

POLL TAX Poll TaxTory Property TaxLabour Local Income TaxLib-Dems Land taxGreens The rates (status quo)

OLYMPICS London London Madrid Madrid Moscow Moscow New York New York Paris Paris

NORMAL DISTRIBUTION CURVE Distribution. Figure 1 -- Standard Normal Distribution

Table I A group of2may exercise a majority veto in a society of 3. That group of3may then exercise a majority veto in a society of 5; – ’’ –5 9; – ’’ –9 17; – ’’ –17– ’’ –33; – ’’ –33– ’’ –65; – ’’ –65– ’’ –129; – ’’ –129– ’’ –257; – ’’ –257– ’’ –513; and that group of513– ’’ –1025. TABLE 1

Ifa countrywants to be independenT then, if a majority of the wholevotes in favo ur, it may. UKYugo- slavia but ifa minoritywants to opt out, and if a majority of that minority– ” –IrelandSerbia but ifa minority of the minority – ” –a majority of that minority of the minority – ” –N IrelandKosova but ifa minority of the minority of the minority – ” –a majority of that minority of the minority of the minority – ” –W BelfastNorth Mitrovica but ifa minority of the minority of the minority of the minority – ” –a majority of the minority of the minority of the minority of the minority – ” – but if….– ” –….– ” – but if17– ” –9 but if9– ” –5 but if5– ” –3 but if3– ” –2 TABLE II

MAJORITARIANISM “Democracy is based on majority decision. It is the most important instrument for finding peaceful solutions to conflicts.” “Democracy is based on majority decision. It is the most important instrument for finding peaceful solutions to conflicts.”UNESCO

DECISION-MAKING BC = Borda count MBC = modified Borda count

THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE Closed questionsyes-or-no for-or-againstwin-or-lose (i.e., some people) Open - i.e., multi-option – questions yes 1 st, (and 2 nd, and 3 rd …) win-win (i.e., all people).

A PLURAL DEMOCRACY Collective wisdom, or unanimity Collective wisdom, or unanimity Common consensus Common consensus Best possible compromise Best possible compromise

AVERAGE PREFERENCE SCORE ON A 5-OPTION BALLOT IF EVERYONE GIVES A CERTAIN OPTION THEIR THAT OPTION WILL GET AN AVERAGE PREFERENCE SCORE OF 1 ST PREFERENCE 1 (THE MAXIMUM) 2 ND PREFERENCE 2 3 RD PREFERENCE 3 (THE MEAN) 4 TH PREFERENCE 4 5 TH PREFERENCE 5 (THE MINIMUM)

A VOTERS’ PROFILE 1 ST 2 ND 3 RD 4 TH 5 TH AveragePreferendeScore A B C D E

A VOTERS’ PROFILE 1 ST 2 ND 3 RD 4 TH 5 TH AveragePreferendeScore A B C D E

A VOTERS’ PROFILE 1 ST 2 ND 3 RD 4 TH 5 TH AveragePreferendeScore A B C D E

A VOTERS’ PROFILE 1 ST 2 ND 3 RD 4 TH 5 TH AveragePreferendeScore A-7-8-c.3 B-8-7-c.3 C D E

A PLURAL DEMOCRACY Collective wisdom, or unanimity1-1.5 Collective wisdom, or unanimity1-1.5 Common consensus1.5-2 Common consensus1.5-2 Best possible compromise2-2.5 Best possible compromise2-2.5

LEVEL OF CONSENSUS ON A 5-OPTION BALLOT IF OPTION D, SAY GETS THE HIGHEST AVERGAE PREFERENCE SCORE OF OPTION D WILL REPRESENT THE 1 – 1.5 UNANIMOUS VIEWPOINT 1.5 – 2 COMMON CONSENSUS 2 – 2.5 BEST POSSIBLE COMPROMISE

CONSENSUS COEFFICIENT The consensus coefficient, C, of option A, is C A ; where S A is the MBC score of option A, where V is the valid vote, and where n is the number of options, C A is given by: C A = S A / V.n

Borda count A full vote=n, n-1 … 2, 1 Modified Borda Count A full vote = n, n-1 … 2, 1 A partial vote=m, m-1 … 2, 1

PARTIAL VOTING IN AN MBC He who votes for 1 option gives his favourite 1 pt.

PARTIAL VOTING IN AN MBC He who votes for 1 option gives his favourite 1 pt. She who votes for 2 options gives her favourite 2 pts (and her 2 nd choice 1 pt).

PARTIAL VOTING IN AN MBC He who votes for 1 option gives his favourite 1 pt. She who votes for 2 options gives her favourite 2 pts (and her 2 nd choice 1 pt). He who votes for 3 options gives his favourite 3 pts, (his 2 nd choice 2 pts and his 3 rd choice 1 pt).

PARTIAL VOTING IN AN MBC If you vote for: Number of options 1234 your 1 ST pref gets: 1 pt 2pts 3 pts 4 pts your 2 ND pref gets: 1 pt 2pts 3 pts your 3 RD pref gets: 1 pt 2pts your 4 TH pref gets: 1 pt

CLOSEDOPEN THRESHOLD HIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOWHIGHLOW COUNTCOUNT All prefs QBS + top-up E L E C T O R A L S Y S T E M S QBS BC/MBC Condorcet some prefs PR-STV Ireland PR-List Swiss Approval Voting AV Australia 2-round France Mixed FPP + PR Croatia MMP - Germany 1 st prefs FPP UK PR-list closed Israel AMSFPP PR-list Holland Lebanon 1 party only1 candidate of 1 party 1 or some candidates of 1 or some parties 1, some or all candidates of any or all parties V O T E R S ' C H O I C E

QBS - THE QUOTA BORDA SYSTEM in a 4-seater constituency All candidates gaining the quota are elected. All candidates gaining the quota are elected. All pairs of candidates gaining 2 quotas are elected. All pairs of candidates gaining 2 quotas are elected. ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ All pairs gaining 1 quota elect 1 candidate, (the one with the higher MBC score). All pairs gaining 1 quota elect 1 candidate, (the one with the higher MBC score). All remaining seats go to those candidates with the highest MBC scores. All remaining seats go to those candidates with the highest MBC scores.

THE MATRIX VOTE