A review and update of the CDS test CDS Workshop ASM 2009 Perth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emerging Antimicrobial Resistance in Texas The new ESBLs.
Advertisements

The usefulness of direct sensitivity testing of urine samples containing coliform bacteria (determined microscopically) has been established previously.
2009 CLSI M100-S19 Update Nebraska Public Health Laboratory.
Improved growth of Vancomycin resistant Enterococci on ChromID™ VRE agar by incubation in 5% CO 2 Varuna Navaratne, Sydney Bell and Jeanette Pham SEALS.
Methods for detection β-lactamases Sarah Alharbi.
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing – Part II
New Resistance in Gram Negative Rods (GNRs)
Klebsiella oxytoca and K1 enzyme
Welcome to the CDS Workshop Jeanette Pham Syd Bell Hobart 2011.
ESBL producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to CAZ, ATM, FEP, borderline resistant to PIP, susceptible to TIM and TZP. Note the synergy between TIM.
Performance of Fox 10 Vs Staph. aureus DHM (Sydney), Gribbles (Melb.) Used Fox 10 since Jan 05 (> 1000) Borderline strains tested for mecA gene Results:
WELCOME to the CDS WORKSHOP Sydney Excel Spreadsheet for Registration.
Plate 1a: Staphylococcus aureus resistant to penicillin (P0.5) only. Note the annular radius of the zone of inhibition of 9.5 mm around the cefoxitin (FOX.
Plasmid mediated Metallo-Beta- Lactamase (MBL) Plasmid mediated Hydrolyses all beta-lactam (except aztreonam) Inhibited by EDTA Binds zinc (Zn 2+ ) Pseudomonas.
The Use of Cefoxitin for the Determination of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococci John D. Perry Microbiology Department Freeman Hospital Newcastle.
ANTIBIOTICS.
Resistance to  -lactam antibiotics within the Enterobacteriaceae Paul D. Fey, Ph. D. University of Nebraska Medical Center.
Susceptibility testing new agents. Dr. Ian Morrissey Chief Executive GR Micro Ltd. London, UK.
Dave Warshauer, PhD, D(ABMM)
TITLE Mannitol Salt Agar-Cefoxitin Combination as a screening Medium for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylocuccus aureus.
COL Helen Viscount, PhD, D(ABMM) LTC Steven Mahlen, PhD, D(ABMM)
Culture and Sensitivity Helping the Infection Preventionist Interpret Antibiograms Walter Phillips, BS, MS, PhD Director of Microbiology TriStar Healthcare.
Antibiotics 101 Puja Van Epps 1/20/14.
MDR Organisms in Holy Family Hospital Rawalpindi
Beta lactam antibiotics & Other cell wall synthesis inhibitors
BSAC User Group Meeting 2007 BSAC recommendations for interpreting the susceptibility of urinary tract isolates Jenny Andrews.
Antibiogram panel Designing
12 August 2003 AmpC  -Lactamases & their detection David Livermore Health Protection Agency, Colindale, London.
Clinical Cases Beta-Lactam Answers. Case 1 What antibiotic would you recommend for intravenous therapy in a 40yo BM with a Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)
Microbiology Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing – Part I Karen Honeycutt, M.Ed., MT(ASCP)SM CLS 418 Clinical Microbiology Student Laboratory Session.
Detection of  -lactamase- mediated resistance David Livermore Health Protection Agency, Colindale, London.
Vitek 2 – A User Experience.
ESBL, MBL and Amp C beta lactamase detection DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY JIPMER PUDUCHERRY.
Nebraska Public Health Laboratory 2008 CLSI M100-S18 update Paul D. Fey, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Associate Director Josh Rowland, M.T. (ASCP) State Training.
Swedres 2005 Swedres 2005 Figures and tables. Swedres 2005 Table Total use of antibacterial drugs for systemic use in Sveden , DDD/1000/day.
김의종(집필대표), 강정옥, 김미나, 김민중, 김성일, 이경원, 이도현, 이장호, 이남용, 이창규, 신종희, 장철훈, 최혜심
Bacterial Resistance in China
Supplemental testing methods
Dr. Laila M. Matalqah Ph.D. Pharmacology
ESBL, AmpC -lactamase 표준진단법
細菌藥物敏感性試驗規範- 聚焦在主要抗藥性菌種
How to interpret the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing – what to do next? Mi Suk Lee, MD. Division of infectious Diseases Kyung Hee University.
How to interpret the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing – what to do next? Mi Suk Lee, M.D. Division of infectious Diseases Kyung Hee University.
(Ambler class A, Bush group 2) Inhibited by CA
4/28/2017 AST.
Using Nursing Home Antibiograms To Improve Antibiotic Prescribing and Delivery Training Slides for Nursing Home Nurses Comprehensive Antibiogram Toolkit.
Lab: 6 ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY TESTING
MRSA, ESBLs and Carbapenem Resistance
C-158 Genetic and Biochemical Characterisation of OXA-405, a New Extended Spectrum Class D -Lactamase from Serratia marcescens L. Dortet1,2, S. Oueslati1,
Current Status of Antimicrobial Resistance
N°XXXX Rapid detection of extended-spectrum BETA-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae from urine using the ESBL NDP test Patrice Nordmann, Laurent Poirel,
Serotypes, genotypes and antimicrobial resistance patterns of human diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli isolates circulating in southeastern China  Y. Chen,
EARS-Net data on Antimicrobial Resistance in Ireland, Q
Standardisation – What does this mean for the CDS?
The Role of the Microbiology Laboratory in AMS programs
Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae with an AmpC(DHA-1) and blaSHV-11 in a Belgian hospital. Timothy Vanwynsberghe1, Katia Verhamme2, Marijke Raymaekers3,
Clinico-Pathological Conference (CPC) Meet
Antibiotics sensitivity of microorganism causing nosocomial infections
کارگاه میکروب شناسی سیستم ادراری
D-735/178 50th ICAAC Sept , 2010 Boston
Table 1: Resistance profile
BSAC Bacteraemia Resistance Surveillance Update 2013
C th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy October 25-28, Washington, DC Examining Temocillin Activity in Combination.
L. Poirel, P. Nordmann  Clinical Microbiology and Infection 
Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in Europe
Phenotypic detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae: review and bench guide  L. Drieux, F. Brossier, W. Sougakoff,
TRAINING PRESENTATION
Highly antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates are killed by the green tea polyphenol (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG)  A.
Jacques Sirot  Clinical Microbiology and Infection 
Serotypes, genotypes and antimicrobial resistance patterns of human diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli isolates circulating in southeastern China  Y. Chen,
Presentation transcript:

A review and update of the CDS test CDS Workshop ASM 2009 Perth

Gram-positive Staphylococci Streptococci Enterococci Corynebacterium sp. Nocardia (new)

Staphylococci v/s cefoxitin 10/ oxacillin 1 Standard 6 mm cut off Cefoxitin 10 (Fox 10) for S. aureus * No problem with BORSA (MSSA with high penicillinase activity) * No need to incubate at 30 o C Oxacillin 1 (Ox 1) for CNS Excellent correlation with mecA gene PCR Report S or R to methicillin

A commonly isolated S. aureus resistant to penicillin (P 0.5) and susceptible to cefoxitin (FOX 10) with a zone around 9 mm Report: S/ MET

mecA gene negative, Multi-Resistant Methicillin Susceptible S. aureus (MR-MSSA). Resistant to penicillin (P 0.5), erythromycin (E 5), tetracycline (Te 10) and ciprofloxacin (CIP 2.5) but susceptible to cefoxitin (FOX). Report: S/ MET??? Ex-MRSA

Non multi-resistant MRSA = original CA-MRSA resistant to penicillin (P 0.5) and cefoxitin (FOX 10) only, susceptible to erythromycin (E 5), tetracycline (TE 10), co-trimoxazole (SXT 25) and ciprofloxacin (CIP 2.5).

β –lactamase negative NMR- MRSA clear large zone around OX 1, light growth around P 0.5 and a small zone around FOX 10 => excellent inducer of PBP 2a. Report as resistant to methicillin and all other β ‑ lactams.

S. saprophyticus and β-lactam antibiotics UTI isolates of CNS resistant to novobiocin => presumptively identified as S. saprophyticus Intrinsic resistance => false resistance when P 0.5 u and Ox 1 are used * Ampicillin 5 µg (AMP 5) to detect inducible pen’se * Cephalexin 100 µg (CL 100) to detect mecA gene

Typical S. saprophyticus isolated from UTI Susceptible to ampicillin (AMP 5) and cephalexin (CL 100). Also susceptible to trimethoprim (W5), nitrofurantoin (F 200) and ciprofloxacin (CIP 2.5), the surrogate disc for reporting norfloxacin. Report: S/ penicillin, amoxycillin

S. saprophyticus with an inducible pen’se Resistant to ampicillin (AMP 5), susceptible to cephalexin (CL 100), trimethoprim (W5), nitrofurantoin (F 200) and ciprofloxacin (CIP 2.5), the surrogate disc for reporting norfloxacin. Report: R/penicillin, amoxycillinS/ cephalexin, Augmentin

MecA gene positive S. saprophyticus Resistant to both ampicillin (AMP 5) and cephalexin (CL 100), susceptible to trimethoprim (W5), nitrofurantoin (F 200) and ciprofloxacin (CIP 2.5), the surrogate disc for reporting norfloxacin. Report: R/penicillin, amoxycillin, cephalexin, Augmentin

Streptococci and β-lactams Tested on blood Sensitest agar in 5% CO2 Penicillin: P 0.5 u and AMP 5 S/ P 0.5 R/ P 0.5S/ AMP 5 => reduced susceptibility with an MIC between 0.25 and 2 mg/L Cephalosporins: CTX/CRO 0.5 and CTX/CRO 5 S/ CTX 0.5 R/ CTX 0.5S/ CTX 5 => reduced susceptibility with an MIC between 0.5 and 2 mg/L S. pneumoniae from CSF: P 0.5 u and CTX/CRO 0.5 S/ P 0.5 P 0.5≤ 6mm => RMIC ≥ 0.25 mg/L S/ CTX 0.5 CTX 0.5 ≤ 6mm => RMIC ≥ 0.5 mg/L

Enterococci Tested on blood Sensitest agar in 5% CO2 Ampicillin 5 µg Gentamicin 200 µg Linezolid 10 µg Nitrofurantoin 200 µg Quinupristin/Dalfopristin 15 µg Streptomycin 300 µg Teicoplanin 15 µg Tigecycline 15 µg Vancomycin 5 µg

Enterococcus faecalis ACM 5184 The diffuse edge of the zone around ampicillin (AMP 5) indicates susceptibility. Cut off annular radius: 4 mm Note the sharp edge around VA 5, susceptible to vancomycin.

A β-lactamase producing Enterococcus faecalis The sharp edge and the reduced zone around ampicillin disc indicates the presence of β-lactamase.

Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium of VanB phenotype The reduced zone and the light growth towards the vancomycin disc (VA 5) is frequently observed with this phenotype. R/ VANS/ TEC => vanB phenotype

Enterococcus faecium of VanA phenotype Resistance to both vancomycin (VA 5) and teicoplanin (TEC15) is typical of vanA phenotype. R/ VAN, TEC => vanA phenotype

Corynebacterium sp. Tested on blood Sensitest agar in 5% CO2 14 antibiotics calibrated (Table 1a) Penicillin: P 0.5 u and AMP 5 S/ P 0.5 R/ P 0.5S/ AMP 5 => reduced susceptibility with an MIC between 0.25 and 2 mg/L R/ P 0.5R/ AMP 5 => resistant MIC ≥ 4 mg/L * Slow growing isolate: incubate for 48 h

Nocardia sp. Tested on blood Sensitest agar Inoculum:saline suspension equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standard for flooding Incubation: 48 h in air Amikacin 30 µg Ciprofloxacin 2.5 µg Clarithromycin 5 µg Co-trimoxazole 25 µg Imipenem 10 µg Gentamicin 10 µg Linezolid 10 µg Tigecycline 15 µg Acknowledgements: We thank Kerry Weeks, George Kotsiou (RNSH) and Matthew Watts for sharing their collection of Nocardia with us.

Update on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing by the CDS method Joanna Cheng Department of Microbiology SEALS Prince of Wales Hospital

Candida parapsilosis (ACM 5283) susceptible to amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and caspofungin

Cryptococcus neoformans resistant to caspofungin

Media Casitone Complex medium. Casitone Medium contained Bacto casitone, yeast extract, sodium citrate, di-sodium hydrogen phosphate, potassium di-hydrogen phosphate, glucose and agar. This medium is used for testing amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and caspofungin Commercially available (Oxoid)

Inoculum and Incubation Grow the yeast strain on SAB for 24 hr at 35 o C suspend in saline. Adjust the inoculum to 0.5 McFarland standard for Candida spp and 1 McFarland for Cryptococcus spp. OD 0.15 for Candida and 0.3 for Cryptococcus spp. Surface dry the agar media for 1 h. Flood with the organism and discard the excess fluid. Let plate dry for 10min at RT. Apply antifungal discs. Incubate plates at 30 o C for 24 hr. Poor growth may require 48 hr incubation.

Reading of results After incubation, measure the annular radius of inhibition of the discs: edge of the disc to edge of confluent growth. Ignore any light growth within the inhibitory zone. Report either susceptible or resistant according to the calibration table.

Interpretation of Results Antifungal agentDisc potency (µg) Breakpoint interpretation (mm) MIC for susceptible strains (mg/L) Amphotericin B104≤ Fluconazole254≤ 16 Itraconazole102≤ 2 Voriconazole16≤ 1 Caspofungin52≤ 2

Trailing End Points 1.Trailing phenomenon is observed with azoles, particularly fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole. 2.There is a light growth inside the zone of inhibition or “double” zones. 3.This phenomenon is reduced by the incubation at 30 o C. 4.Rare strains might still show “trailing effect”; report as susceptible to the azoles. Ref: Rex et al. AAC

The ß-lactamases of Gram-negative bacilli An update on the detection of common plasmid mediated β-lactamases in clinical isolates in Australia

Common transferable (plasmid mediated) β-lactamases in coliforms TEM-1, SHV-1, ESBLs (Bush group 2, Ambler class A) Inhibited by CA S/ AMC 60 AmpC: (Bush group 1, Ambler class C) Not inhibited by CA, inhibited by boronic acid R/ AMC 60S/ FEP 10 MBL: (Bush group 3, Ambler class B) Not inhibited by CA, inhibited by EDTA R/ AMC 60R/ FEP 10

E. coli ACM 5186 (used in QC) producing TEM-1 resistant to ampicillin (AMP 25)

An E. coli producing an inhibitor resistant TEM (IRT) resistant to ampicillin (AMP 25) and Augmentin (AMC 60), susceptible to cephalexin (CL 100), imipenem (IPM 10) and cefotaxime (CTX 5).

The same IRT E. coli: resistant to ampicillin (AMP 25), Augmentin (AMC 60), Timentin (TIM 85) and Tazocin (TZP 55), susceptible to cephalexin (CL 100), ceftazidime (CAZ 10) and cefotaxime (CTX 5).

ESBLs (Ambler class A, Bush group 2) Inhibited by CA R/Cephalosporins (including cefepime) and aztreonam S/ Augmentin (AMC 60) S/ Cephamycin (cefoxitin, cefotetan) CDS routine testing → Synergy with AMC 60 (no need for confirmation) S/ Imipenem (T)

K. pneumoniae producing an ESBL S/ Augmentin (AMC 60), typical synergy with cephalexin (CL 100) and cefotaxime (CTX 5) S/ imipenem (IMP 10) and cefotetan (CTT 30).

Disc positions recommended for urine isolates Klebsiella pneumoniae producing an ESBL: synergy between Augmentin (ACM 60) and cefepime (FEP 10), no obvious synergy with cefotaxime (CTX 5) due to high activity of ESBL.

Detection of PM-AmpC in E. coli R/ AMC 60 (not inhibited by CA) R/ CL 100 R/ CTX 5 (high level resistance) R/ cefamycin (CMY-1…) S/ FEP 10 Confirmation (optional): inhibition by boronic acid (BA) (1-Benzothiophene-2-boronic acid)

Routine CDS test showing an E. coli with plasmid mediated AmpC R/ Augmentin (AMC 60), cephalexin (CL 100), cefotaxime (CTX 5); S/ cefepime (FEP 10) and imipenem (IPM 10).

Same E. coli with plasmid mediated AmpC and boronic acid (BA) Top half: CL 100, AMC 60 and CTX 5 control discs. Bottom half: CL 100, AMC 60 and CTX 5 with 200 ug BA added

The same E. coli with plasmid mediated AmpC CL 100, AMC 60 and CTX 5 discs placed near 200 ug BA discs BA 200 BA 200 BA 200

Acquired Metallo-Beta-Lactamases (MBLs) Ambler class B or Bush group 3 Inhibited by EDTA (Zinc molecule) IMP-4 (most common) VIM, SPM, GIM, SIM (P. aeruginosa) Hydrolyses all beta-lactam (except aztreonam) Enterobacteriaceae May have a zone > 6mm with IPM 10 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Highly resistant to all β-lactams => no zone Susceptible only to aztreonam

C. diversus: R/AMP 25, AMC 60, CTX 5, CL100 and numerous colonies in cefepime zone (FEP 10) and at the edge of imipenem zone (> 6 mm). No synergy between FEP/AMC → not ESBL Numerous resistant colonies in FEP 10 and some at the edge of IPM 10 zone

Simple phenotypic detection of MBL: Same isolate showing synergy between an EDTA discs placed next to cefotaxime (CTX 5)/ imipenem (IPM 10)/ cefepime (FEP 10)/ Augmentin (AMC 60) discs.. EDTA 415 EDTA 415

MBL producing E. cloacae: Synergy between EDTA and cefotaxime (CTX 5)/ ceftazidime (CAZ 10)/ cefepime (FEP 10) / imipenem (IPM 10). S/ aztreonam (ATM 30) EDTA 415 EDTA 415

Pseudomonas aeruginosa candidate for MBL detection: No zone around imipenem (IPM 10) ceftazidime (CAZ 10), tazocin (TZP 55), cefepime (FEP 10) and Timentin (TIM 85) S/ aztreonam (ATM 30)

The same Pseudomonas aeruginosa with EDTA Detection of MBL: Synergy between an EDTA disc placed next to imipenem (IPM 10)/ meropenem (MEM 5)/ ceftazidime (CAZ 10) discs. S/ aztreonam (ATM 30) EDTA 415 EDTA 415 EDTA 415

Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to all β-lactams, imipenem (IPM 10) ceftazidime (CAZ 10), tazocin (TZP 55), cefepime (FEP 10) and Timentin (TIM 85) including aztreonam (ATM 30). ??? * Small zone around MEM 5, IPM 10 and ATM 30

The same P. aeruginosa: Synergy between EDTA and ATM/TZP/CAZ/TIM and MEM 5 but not with IPM => Non specific synergy between EDTA and beta-lactams =>not MBL EDTA 415 EDTA 415 EDTA 415

K. pneumoniae: R/ Augmentin (AMC 60), cephalexin (CL100), cefotaxime (CTX 5), cefepime (FEP 10), imipenem (IPM 10) zone (> 6 mm). No synergy between EDTA and IPM 10 ??? EDTA 415

The same K. pneumoniae: Synergy between AMC 60 and IPM 10 => sensitive to clavulanate ??? A β-lactamase of Ambler class A or Bush group 2 hydrolysing carbapenem

The same K. pneumoniae: KPC-2 producing K. pneumoniae (France)* The top half: control discs IPM 10, FEP 10, CTX 5. The bottom half: same discs with 10 µg sodium clavulanate added. *Ref: AAC 2005, CA 10

KPC in Klebsiella pneumoniae Plasmid mediated K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) Ambler class A or Bush group 2f Reported in Europe, US (Brooklyn 24%) Not yet reported in Australia Inhibited by clavulanic acid = ESBL affecting carbapenems KPC-1, KPC-2,…KPC-4 High level resistance to FEP, CTX, CRO, CAZ, ATM, …. Imipenem MIC ≥ 4 mg/L (border line) Ertapenem MIC > 8 mg/L (resistant) Inoculum dependent => broth MIC unreliable CDS: ESBL + R/IPM or colonies at edge of IPM zone => Test ertapenem or send for confirmation

Two organisms with unusual mechanisms of resistance

E. coli from UTI: resistant to cephalexin (CL 100), susceptible to ampicillin (AMP 25), Augmentin (AMC 60)… Investigation: β-lactamase negative (nitrocefin) => R/ CL 100 (? efflux) Report: R/ cephalexinS/ampicillin

S. epidermidis from a patient with an infected shunt on long term rifampicin/fusidate treatment tested on Sensitest agar 35 o C (24h) The organism grows only around rifampicin (RD 1) => “rifampicin dependent” Needs to be tested on Sensitest agar supplemented with blood.

The same S. epidermidis tested on blood Sensitest agar showing resistance to ciprofloxacin (CIP 2.5), gentamicin (CN 10) rifampicin (RD 1) and susceptibility to tetracycline (TE 10), fusidate (FD 2.5), vancomycin (VA 5).