ENFA Model ENFA Kick-off Meeting Hamburg, 10 May 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to IMPACT. Models Models are logical constructs that represent systems Models can: – Simplify a complex system – Provide insights to the.
Advertisements

Economy-Energy-Environment (E3)Model: Energy Technology and Climate Change Youngho Chang Division of Economics and Nanyang Technological University.
The Development of a Forest Module for POLYSYS Burton English, Daniel De La Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Jamey Menard and Don Hodges USFS Forest Products.
LECTURE XIII FORESTRY ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT. Introduction  If forestry is to contribute its full share to a more abundant life for the world’s increasing.
Arno Becker Institute for Food and Resource Economics (ILR), University of Bonn ImpactsMarket development Policy measures Policy objectives Leading to.
Topics 1.FASOM Basics 2.FASOM Equations 3.Analyzing FASOM 4.Modifying FASOM.
International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT Model) IMPACT Development Team.
The impact of the rebound effect of first generation biofuel use in the EU on greenhouse gas emissions 17 th ICABR Conference, 19 June 2013 Edward Smeets,
The LULUCF sector: land use, land-use change and forestry
European Non-Food Agriculture (ENFA) 2 nd ENFA Meeting Uppsala, 26 September 2005.
Carbon Sinks and Land Use Competition EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Dagmar Schwab INSEA Colleagues.
“And see this ring right here, Jimmy?... That’s another time the old fellow miraculously survived some big forest fire.” ENFA/INSEA FORESTRY…..
The European Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model (EUFASOM) Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainabilty and Global Change Hamburg University.
Economic and Land Use Implications of Biofuels: Role of Policy Madhu Khanna With Xiaoguang Chen and Haixiao Huang Department of Agricultural and Consumer.
The Future of Agriculture: Powerful trends affecting the U.S. food and agricultural system.
Current Research and Emerging Economic and Environmental Issues on Biofuels Madhu Khanna University of Illinois.
Global Research Alliance Fellowships U.S. Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service and the U.S. Agency for International Development.
European Non-Food Agriculture Introduction Uwe Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University 23 April 2008.
An assessment of the global land use change and food security effects of the use of agricultural residues for bioenergy production Edward Smeets, Andrzej.
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid Optimal Supply.
Michael Obersteiner IIASA Regional Carbon Budgets: From methodologies to quantification. Beijing, China, November 2004 Coupling Carbon Processes.
Inclusion of the agricultural sector in greenhouse gas mitigation policies Problems and potential instruments Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability.
Agriculture Industry Views on Climate Legislation and Markets David Miller Chief Science Officer AgraGate Climate Credits Corp & Director of Research Iowa.
Sustainability Overview Laura McCann, on behalf of Alison Goss Eng U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biomass Program February 23, 2010.
“Policy Decision Support for Sustainable Adaptation of China’s Agriculture to Globalization” Land Use Change Project International Institute for Applied.
Liberalization of Trade in Biofuels: Implications for GHG Emissions and Social Welfare Xiaoguang Chen Madhu Khanna Hayri Önal University of Illinois at.
IPC fall seminar, 15 th October 2007 Sustainability in the Food & Agricultural Sector the role of the Private Sector & Government Panel I: Challenges facing.
Food Options at Farm Level Farm Level Economics and Data Processing 23 April 2008 Stéphane De Cara Ingo Huck UMR Economie Publique Research Unit Sustainability.
Putting the Hopes and Fears of Climate Change Legislation in Perspective _________________________________________ Sustainable Agriculture: The Key to.
Soil carbon in dynamic land use optimization models Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University.
European Carbon Sinks Modeling Status, Data, Analytical Gaps, EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University.
Econometric Estimation of The National Carbon Sequestration Supply Function Ruben N. Lubowski USDA Economic Research Service Andrew J. Plantinga Oregon.
BIOMASS CARBON ACCOUNTS FOR EUROPE AND GLOBALLY IN GLOBIOM Nicklas Forsell & Stefan Frank, Michael Obersteiner, Petr Havlík….. IIASA – International Institute.
Regional Modeling and Linking Sector Models with CGE Models Presented by Martin T. Ross Environmental and Natural Resource Economics Program RTI International.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
Policy Issues Facing the Food, Agriculture and Rural Sectors and Implications for Agricultural Statistics Mary Bohman and Mary Ahearn Economic Research.
Overview of Economic Methods to Simulate Land Competition Forestry and Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum National Conservation Training Center.
1 Methodologies, Technical Resources and Guidelines for Mitigation Festus LUBOYERA and Dominique REVET Programme Officers UNFCCC secretariat
Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for bioenergy and C sequestration? Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for.
Agriculture’s Role in Climate Change Mitigation July 18, 2007 (revised) Daniel A. Lashof, Ph.D. Science Director Climate Center Natural Resources Defense.
Climate Change and Energy Impacts on Water and Food Scarcity Mark W. Rosegrant Director Environment and Production Technology Division High-level Panel.
Biofuels: Impacts on Land, Food, and Prices Mark W. Rosegrant Director Environment and Production Technology Division AAAS Annual Meeting “Session on Biofuels,
Impacts of Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Policies Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University Contributors.
Measuring Progress towards Green Growth through indicators OECD work UNCEEA Sixth meeting New York, June 2011.
Structure of the US farm economy EconS350 Fall Semester, 2010.
Bioenergy Based on Forestry and Agriculture Resources: Ecological, Technical and Economic Potential in Minnesota and Norway Main objectives: To provide.
Spatial disaggregation in CAPRI
Office of International Research, Education, and Development, Virginia Tech Economic and Impact Analysis of Conservation Agriculture Practices Mike Bertelsen,
Collaborative CGIAR-ESSP Project Outline (1) "Pressures on agriculture from climate change mitigation" Motivation Ambitious climate protection goals: e.g.
Policy Scenario Analyis Chrystalyn Ivie Ramos Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University 23 April 2008.
COMPETITIVE ECONOMIC POTENTIALS of NON-FOOD OPTIONS International Food Security Impacts of European Non-Food Options Chris Llull a, Uwe A. Schneider a,b,
Linking Land use, Biophysical, and Economic Models for Policy Analysis Catherine L. Kling Iowa State University October 13, 2015 Prepared for “Coupling.
Economic Assessment of GHG Mitigation Strategies for Canadian Agriculture: Role of market mechanisms for soil sinks Presentation to GHG Modeling Forum.
Managing Potential Pollutants from Livestock Farms: An Economics Perspective Kelly Zering North Carolina State University.
EUFASOM – Inputs, Outputs, Linkage Options CCTAME – Kick-Off Meeting Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University.
Biofuel Policy: Livestock Emissions Emission reduction (mmtce) Biofuel carbon price (Euro/tce) Total Livestock.
Land Use: Globally consistent national mitigation and adaptation Michael Obersteiner.
1 Agri-environment analysis at the EEA Projects and goals of the European Environment Agency.
What are the key issues around land use & what are the trade-offs between food security and GHG mitigation objectives on the land? Pete Smith ClimateXChange.
Implications of Alternative Crop Yield Assumptions on Land Management, Commodity Markets, and GHG Emissions Projections Justin S. Baker, Ph.D.1 with B.A.
Policies to Accelerate the Bioeconomy: Unintended Effects and Effectiveness Madhu Khanna University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Bioenergy Supply, Land Use, and Environmental Implications
Session 4: Biofuels: How Feasible Are Large-Scale Goals for Biofuel Penetration in the US and Canada? Ken Andrasko, EPA Session Objectives: Gauge.
Location Planning and Analysis
What is Agro-Industrialization?
Environmental modeling application domains
Regional Modeling and Linking Sector Models with CGE Models
Production and Operations Management
Presentation transcript:

ENFA Model ENFA Kick-off Meeting Hamburg, 10 May 2005

ENFA Model Simulates land use decisions in the EU agricultural and forest sectors Represents markets and computes market equilibrium Portrays trade on a global level Accounts for environmental impacts of land use decisions Spatially explicit, dynamic

Food Non-Food Biodiversity Land use competition

ENFA Model Structure Resources Land Use Technologies Processing Technologies ProductsMarkets Inputs Limits Supply Functions Limits Demand Functions, Trade

ENFA Optimization Model determines the "optimal" use to which each individual technology should be used in each region and time period Maximize welfare Obey restrictions Product prices are endogenous

ENFA Spatial Resolution Political regions (NUTS 2) Soil types Farm types Altitude levels Slopes

ENFA Dynamics 5 to 10 year steps from 2005 to 2030 (2100?) Technical progress Demand & industry growth Resource change Policy scenarios

Data Resource data –Climate, Soil, Water, Existing Forests, Population, Labor Technological data –Inputs / outputs for crop, livestock, forest management, and product processing and transportation options Market data –Observed prices, production, trade, and income levels –Supply Demand function parameters Environmental impact data –Emissions, Sequestration, Erosion, Biodiversity

ENFA Technologies Traditional agriculture –major crops –major livestock Forestry Non-food agriculture Processing (Wildlife preservation)

Non-market Impacts Greenhouse gas emissions Air, water, soil quality Income distribution Rural development / employment Wildlife

Simultaneity Technologies Non-Market Impacts Current and Potential Policies … resource competition … multiple impacts

Crop Technology Data Base RegionAltitudSoilFarmRotationWaterTillageFertilzResidueItemUnitValue Poland0-300SandES3W-W-SIrrigConv.Basic Wheatdt/ha/y50 Poland0-300SandES3W-W-SIrrigConv.Basic S-Beatdt/ha/y200 Poland0-300SandES3W-W-SIrrigConv.Basic Strawdt/ha/y50 Poland0-300SandES3W-W-SIrrigConv.Basic Laborhr/ha/y30 Poland0-300SandES3W-W-SIrrigConv.Basic Landha/ha/y1 Poland0-300SandES3W-W-SIrrigConv.Basic Diesell/ha/y40 Poland0-300SandES3W-W-SIrrigConv.Basic... Poland0-300SandES3W-W-SIrrigConv.Basic Soil-Ckg/ha/y50 Poland0-300SandES3W-W-SIrrigConv.Basic Erosionkg/ha/y15 Poland0-300SandES3W-W-SIrrigConv.Basic NO3-Lkg/ha/y20

Technology Adoption Non-Market Impacts OutputsInputs

Consistency Representative yields not maximum yields on experimental plots Representative input quantities on labor and energy intensive inputs Representative and complete variable costs on remaining inputs Environmental Impacts (from EPIC)

Technical Details Programmed in GAMS Non-linear functions are linearly approximated Solved with CPLEX Variables and equations are aggregated to blocks

Constrained Optimization

Objective Function

Resource Limits Limits exist on Land Water Family labor Public grazing land

Balance Equations

International Trade

Emission Accounts

Basic Results

Technology Potentials Measures of potential –Technical –Economic single strategy multiple strategy

U.S. Ag-Soil Carbon Potentials Carbon price ($/tce) Soil carbon sequestration (mmtce) Technical Potential Economic Potential Competitive Economic Potential

U.S. Afforestation Potentials Carbon price ($/tce) Emission reduction (mmtce) Technical Potential Economic Potential Competitive Economic Potential

U.S. Biofuel Potentials Carbon price ($/tce) Emission reduction (mmtce) Technical Potential Economic Potential Competitive Economic Potential

Land Allocation Carbon Tax Pasture Traditional Crops Biomass for Power Plants Afforestation

Energy Crop Area Subsidy Bioenergy use None 2010 Limit 2030 Limit 2050 Limit Unrestricted

A Simple Example

Constant Corn Price

Endogenous Corn Price (1.80)25 (1.98)50 (2.16)100 (2.88) Carbon Price in $/tce (Corn price in $/bu) Revenue in $/Acre Rainfed CornIrrigated CornBiofuel