Introduction to BaltCICA and case studie in Kalundborg 9.3.2009 ”Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund and European Neighbourhood.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme
Advertisements

Neighbourhood programme
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden INTERREG III B General Introduction BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
18 April 2012, Malmö State Committee of the Pskov region for economic development, industry and trade Pskov Region: experience and possibilities Dmitriy.
Pskov Region: experience and possibilities. Pskov Region is an exclusive subject of the Russian Federation which borders on three states LENGTH OF BOUNDARIES:
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
ESPON 2013 Programme Internal Seminar Evidence-based Cohesion Policy: Territorial Dimensions Kraków, Poland Teresa Sprague & Kathrin Prenger-Berninghoff.
MEGA Metropolitan European Growth Areas – the Baltic Sea Area.
1 PÄIJÄT-HÄMEEN LIITTO PÄIJÄNNE-TAVASTLANDS FÖRBUND REGIONAL COUNCIL OF PÄIJÄT-HÄME Ajankohtaista kansainvälisistä asioista Maakuntahallitus/
FROM GAPS TO CAPS Risk Management Capability on Gaps Identification in the BSR Neringa Brogaitė-Karvelienė Fire and Rescue Department under MoI of Lithuania.
Climate Futures and Oregon’s Coastal Communities A Survey and Strategy to Address the Effects of Climate Change on the Oregon Coast.
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14 October.
A SUCCESS STORY: Rail Baltica Growth Corridor BEST PRACTICES PRESENTATIONS S EVILLE, 16 TH D ECEMBER 2013 R OSA V IHAVAINEN, E DUCATION AND I NNOVATION.
Montevideo Towards territorial climate change and sustainability strategies “ International Symposium on Sustainable Cities” Incheon, Republic of Korea.
TECHNOLOGY FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN COASTAL ZONES Richard J.T. Klein 1,2 1. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany 2. Stockholm.
Part-financed by the European Union The new Baltic Sea Region Programme Susanne Scherrer, Director of the Joint Secretariat Rostock/Riga.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) WP4: Transnational MSP Governance – dialogue and institutional building Palanga,
Part-financed by the European Union Promoting attractive and competitive cities and regions Arve Skjerpen, Norway Member of the BSR INTERREG IIIB Steering.
Partnership for Urban South Hampshire Sustainable Growth.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND INTERREG IIC Community Initiative concerning Transnational Co-operation on Spatial Planning
Integration of Baltic Sea science Kaisa Kononen PhD, Executive Director Baltic Organisations Network for Funding Science EEIG.
Staffan Lund Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SLU Ola Palm JTI – Swedish Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering.
Part-financed by the European Union The Baltic Sea Region Programme by the Joint Technical Secretariat BSR INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
Part-financed by the European Union Management of the Baltic Sea as a common resource Bo Löwendal, Sweden Member of the BSR INTERREG IIIB Steering Committee.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Updated implementation strategy for the remaining Programme period.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Pan-Baltic stakeholders’ dialogue on MSP: Synthesis report Anda Ruskule, BEF Berlin,
Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research Centrum för klimatpolitisk forskning “Baltic Challenges and Chances for local and regional development generated.
Dr Richard Johnson, Mountain Environments, UK.  Lead Partner: Germany: Research Institute of Forest Ecology and Forestry  Partner countries: Germany,
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Research Workshop “Enhancing Research for Marine Spatial Planning in the Baltic.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) “Maritime Spatial Planning - Shipping and Ports in the Baltic Sea” Pan-Baltic.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.
AstrA Introduction to the project Klaipeda, 18 May 2006 Philipp Schmidt-Thomé Geological Survey of Finland, GTK.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
Perceived Climate Change Impacts and Exposure Units ASTRA Conference May 2006 Klaipeda Jürgen Kropp & Klaus Eisenack Potsdam Institute for Climate.
Environmental Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region: views of the Ministry of the Environment of Estonia Andres Kratovitš Tallinn, 27 April 2005.
Part-financed by the European Union Baltic Sea Region 2007– Profile Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar, Riga, 9-11 April 2008.
Part-financed by the European Union Setting regions in motion by Giedrė Švedienė, Undersecretary Joint Programming Committee/Ministry of the Interior,
Start and break slide Kick-Off-Meeting April 1 st – 3 rd 2009 Large Conference Hall of Hotel Riga Riga/ Latvia host: Baltic Sea Region Programme
Nordic Council of Ministers Information Office in St. Petersburg 2012.
ReACCt Regional Action facing Changing Climate Dennis Ehm Academy for Spatial Research and Planning (ARL), Germany BSR INTERREG IV B Project Idea.
FROM GAPS TO CAPS Risk Management Capability Based on Gaps Identification in the BSR Project Lead Partner: Fire and Rescue Department under the Ministry.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden The Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Programme After EU Enlargement.
Work of the Task Force on Water and Climate Jos G. Timmerman Rijkswaterstaat Centre for Water Management.
Territorial Trends and Policy Impacts in the Field of EU Environmental Policy ESPON Project
© BBR Bonn 2003 Hamburg, May 2007Wilfried Görmar, BBR The “Territorial Agenda” for the European Union – Effects on the Baltic Sea Region Baltic Sea.
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat,/Sakari Saarinen / Project Coordinator / NEW BRIDGES Kick-off 4-5 March 2009 New Bridges – Strengthening.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) LT – MSP Model Case, “state of the game“ 2 nd PartiSEApate Project Partner Meeting.
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat / Eija Eloranta/Communication coordinator/New bridges kick off 4th March 2009 NEW BRIDGES – Strenghtening.
WP4: Transnational MSP Governance – dialogue and institutional building Overall aim: to engage national bodies, sectors and researchers in dialogue.
Project period: partners Budget: Euro Focus : Risk management, spatial development Trans-national capacity (exercises, training,
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat Björn Grönholm / Head of Secretariat / UBC EnvCom WELCOME !! KICK OFF MEETING New Bridges – Strengthening.
INTRODUCTION 2.EUROPEAN UNION HARMONIZATION PROCESS 3.LEGISLATION STUDIES 4.ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE 5.IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Maritime Spatial Planning as Tool for Underwater Cultural Heritage management.
20 YEARS OF COOPERATION IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION: Participation of Saint-Petersburg in the development and implementation of programs and projects Saint-Petersburg.
Paris 24/04/2010, Connectivity between research, public and policy makers Gulf of Riga Kristina Veidemane Baltic Environmental Forum.
Freeware application found on Google play – download and install Could be used on Android, iPad, iPhone and Mac.
Horizontal Action Climate Warsaw, 29 October 2015 Council of the Baltic Sea States Krista Kampus, Head of Baltic 21 Unit EUSBSR HA CLIMATE Coordinator.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden BALTIC SEA TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION: RU PERSPECTIVE Irina Karelina.
Project preparation workshop “Bringing a transnational project to life” Project idea “Challenges and chances from Climate Change for regional and local.
experience and possibilities
Enviroinfo 2016 Berlin, Germany Venue: University of Applied Sciences
Sustainable coastal development in practice SUSCOD
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14.
FROM GAPS TO CAPS Risk Management Capability Based on Gaps Identification in the Baltic Sea Region (BSR)
TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION:
Risk Management Capability on Gaps Identification in the BSR
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to BaltCICA and case studie in Kalundborg ”Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund and European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument) Climate Change: Costs, Impacts and Adaptation in the Baltic Sea Region Jan Krause Pedersen

Precursory projects and results: BSR Interreg IIIB Project SEAREG “Sea Level Change Affecting Spatial Development in the Baltic Sea Region” Decision Support Frame BSR Interreg IIIB Project ASTRA “Developing Policies & Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change in the Baltic Sea Region”

The BaltCICA project … is designed to focus on the most imminent problems that climate change is likely to cause in the Baltic Sea Region. The concentration of large parts of the population and many larger cities in coastal areas make it especially sensitive to climate change. Climate adaptation calls for cooperation and integrated approaches in the Baltic Sea Region Picture: Veli Suominen

The BaltCICA Project aims Assessment of climate change impacts on the living environment and territorial development. Testing and implementation of concrete adaptation measures in close cooperation between regions or municipalities. Assessment of the costs of rising sea levels and increased flood risks on a pan-Baltic level. Development of a process management concept on climate change adaptation and mitigation.

Partners Partners from 8 different countries Regional and local administration, municipalities, nature reserves, research institutes of different disciplines and universities Geological Survey of Finland (GTK, lead partner) Helsinki University of Technology /Centre for Urban and Regional STUDIES (TKK/YTK) Hanko Water and Wastewater Works Union of the Baltic Cities – Commission on Environment (UBC) Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council (YTV) City of Helsinki City of Tampere Geological Survey of Estonia (EGK) University of Latvia North Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve Municipality of Klaipeda Municipality of the Klaipeda district Environmental Centre for Administration and Technology, Lithuania (ECAT) Vilnius University Lithuanian Geological Survey under the Ministry of Environment Kalundborg Municipality Danish Board of Technology (DBT) Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) Nordic Centre for Spatial Development (Nordregio) Norwegian Institute for Urban and Region Research (NIBR) Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde (IOW) HafenCity University/Institute for Urban-, Regional- and Environmental Planning (HCU) EUCC – The Coastal Union Germany Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)

Case studies Map: Michael Staudt, GTK

Case studies Finland: Helsinki City, metropolitan area. Tamperere, groundwater surface water interactions. Hanko, groundwater resources in coastal area. Estonia: West Estonian Coast, flood risk, costs, sea level rise contra isostasi. Latvia: Vidzeme and Riga, policy preparation, stakeholders involvement, public awareness activities, national adaptation strategy. Litauania: Klaipeda district and city, flood risk, adaptation, groundwater. Germany: Hamburg, metropolitan area, harbour, innovativ technologies. Meckelburg-western Pomerania, tourism, beach management. Norway: Bergen, flooding/landslides, landuse/transport, agriculture/aquaculture, business development. Denmark: Kalundborg and Falster, flood risk, adaptation, nature and water management, costs, public involvement.

Case studie area Kalundborg

Natura 2000 Lille Åmose/Tissø

Elevation curves 0,5 m

Elevation curves 1 m

Elevation curves 1,5 m

Elevation curves 3,0 m

Costal erosion -moderate

Protected nature areas

Protected nature areas - Tissø

Water protection and water supply

Waste water management

Sensitive agriculture areas

Potential wetlands

Models and scenario workshop GEUS: Modeling/simulation, IPCC scenarios A2, B2 (35-80 cm sea level rise, 12-16% more precipitation), groundwater/surfacewater interactions. Leading to: Local scenarios(do nothing scenario, buildings/infrastructural protection scenario, natur restoration scenarion, watermanagement and water as a ressource scenario. The Danish Border of Technology (DBT): Description of local scenarios, presentations, two local workshops with stakeholder and one citizen summit, identifing solutions, suggest action plans, method manual. The municipality of Kalundborg: Data supply, presentations, costs, interaction between stakeholders and public spatial planners as well as politicians, local political implementation. A small project conference event in Kalundborg with up to 100 participants.

Needs and results (the municipality) Models & tools easy to handle for the authorities/practical usable Socio-economic benefits and costs of natur/water/climate management (possibilities/limitations) Use of digital elevation models(GIS) Interest priorities Defining which data is needed for modeling Paradigmes/guidelines for impact assessment/decision processes Good ways to presentation of complex spatial planning

Contact: BaltCICA Project Geological Survey of Finland Johannes Klein Beotnimiehenkuja Espoo FINLAND The Municipality of Kalundborg Jan Krause Pedersen Hoejvangen Svebølle Denmark