From Community College Student to University Student: Transitioning the Transfer EOP 40 th Anniversary Conference Lea J. Manske & Kim Huynh Student Support.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplemental Instruction in Precalculus
Advertisements

MSCHE Annual Conference December st Century Higher Education Projections Increasingly diverse student populations Widely varying levels of secondary.
Survey Responses Challenges and Opportunities Matt Richey St. Olaf College.
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction: Small Group Time
Student Support Services
Division of Student Affairs and Enrollment Management Supporting Student Success and Retention.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
STUDENT SUCCESS CENTERS : WORKING BETTER TOGETHER TO ENSURE STUDENT SUCCESS.
Sophomore Success Program- A Residential Model with Graduation in Mind Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Housing & Residential Life October 2006.
Georgia State University Sadé Tramble, M.Ed- Academic Advisor
Educational Opportunity Program. What is the Educational Opportunity Program? The State University of New York’s Educational Opportunity Program (EOP)
EPS 101 & FYE 101 Northern Arizona University. First Year Seminars... Freshmen Success hinges on:  Developing academic & intellectual competence  Establishing.
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
From Suspension to Success – Collaborating to Transform NACADA Annual Conference October 8-11, 2014 Minneapolis, MN.
 Prescriptive Advising: What we were used to when we went to college  Here is a list of courses that are required for the major (and minor), here is.
Strengthening Institutions Programs Title III
Innovations Conference Philadelphia, PA March 6, 2012.
LFCC SENSE 09 Data Dave Urso John Milam March 23, 2010.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
Retention Plan  Between 2007 and 2009, several committees, including A&S department chairs, issued recommendations for student retention.  Their.
SACS Criteria A well-defined issue related to enhancing student learning Embedded in university’s on-going planning and assessment Broad participation.
Milo Bail Student Center A Report from Service Learning Academy May 10, 2004 UNO Strategic Planning.
Distance Education: An Opportunity for the Future Kenneth L. Esbenshade Associate Dean and Director of Academic Programs February 2008.
FOSTERING OPPORTUNITIES FOR TOMORROW’S ENGINEERS (FORTE) PI: John Reisel Co-PIs: Ethan Munson, Ed Beimborn, Hossein Hosseini, George Hanson, Beverly Pickering-Reyna.
Revisiting a Concept of Academic Advising in Japanese Higher Education
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
2006 SUMMER ACADEMY Promoting Access and Success for Student of Color.
Two Strategies for Developing Solid Referral Relationships A Complete Training Series.
“Using the Developmental Classroom to Teach and Assess Student Services” Amy Garcia, Suzanne Hill, Marty Brooks, Michelle Guzman-Armijo, & Elizabeth.
2011 NASPA Annual Conference  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  March 12–16, 2011 Pre-College Seminars Preparing Students for the First Two Weeks Monday, March.
UMKC Retention. UMKC Goals UMKC Goals: Current Baseline By 2015By 2020 Retention69.2%80%85% Graduation47.5%50%55%
First Year Programs is dedicated to providing comprehensive transitional programming from the moment that the prospective student selects the UW. Efforts.
Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Vice President for Student Affairs Georgia Regents University Today’s Transfer Students: Building a Foundation of Success Transfer.
Advising Strategic Plan University of Cincinnati August 10,2015.
 Identify the factors and data that drove creation of the TCEW  Describe the process used to develop and roll- out the TCEW  Explore early data results.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
An Introduction to Principles of Supplemental Instruction (SI)
University College Academic Advising & Orientation.
CEBP Learning Institute Fall 2009 Evaluation Report A collaborative Partnership between Indiana Department of Corrections & Indiana University November.
Findings of a Student Retention Study University of Saskatchewan Overview of Findings: June 12, 2007 CACUSS 2007 Conference.
Developing the Year One Report: WVC’s Experience as a Pilot College Dr. Susan Murray Executive Director, Institutional Effectiveness.
Partnering for Student Success The Bridge to Clemson University Program Sue Whorton Clemson University National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students.
Debbie Tucker, Ph.D. Arizona State University Lois Goldblatt, M.S. Arizona State University The T. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics NACADA.
2015 SUNY College Fairs Educational Opportunity Program.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Peralta Scholars Program Peralta Community College District Strategic Student Success Initiative.
Michael Abel, Academic Advisor, UNC Charlotte LeeFredrick Bowen, Academic Advisor, UNC Charlotte Advising with a Full House: Collaborative Initiatives.
The Work of the Coach Identify target students and populations Maintain data on each interaction with students and families | Contact Summary Provide.
Networks for Transfer Success Charlene A. Stinard, Director Transfer and Transition Services First Year Transitions, Academic Development and Retention.
A Comprehensive Plan for Student Services. Northeast Wisconsin Technical College Two-year technical college in Green Bay, WI Established as a vocational.
SACS Reaffirmation and the QEP Introduction and Welcome – Kay Jordan, Joe Scartelli Administrative Support: Personnel SACS Reaffirmation Overview – Rick.
MAP-Works University of Southern Indiana.
Honors Program Presentation for Academic Senate May 21, 2013.
Snohomish High School School Improvement Plan. Why Change?
Correlating Engagement and Student Success (Online version) Student Success Specialist Western Oregon University Jesse Poole.
PRESENTER: Deb Sullivan Ford. AVC2CSU is a proposed comprehensive cohort pathway program intended to allow students pursuing select AS-T and AA-T degrees.
Stage 1 Integrated learning Coffee Shop. LEARNING REQUIREMENTS The learning requirements summarise the knowledge, skills, and understanding that students.
Plans for Phase III of Transition Age Youth Initiative.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Assessment of Advising Linda Taylor, PhD, LPC, NCC September 9, 2011.
Creating a Comprehensive Early Warning System to Further Student Success and Retention Shane Hammond CCLA June, 2007.
High-Impact Practice: Mandatory New Student Orientation
Getting Everyone in the Game
Dr. Mark Allen Poisel July 16, 2013
Conclusion & Implications
County College of Morris – Educational Opportunity Fund Program
Presentation transcript:

From Community College Student to University Student: Transitioning the Transfer EOP 40 th Anniversary Conference Lea J. Manske & Kim Huynh Student Support and Equity Programs Cal Poly Pomona March 8, 2009

What We Hope You Will Learn: Participants will learn about our sequential 3 quarter group advising model. Participants will be introduced to and be able to describe the components of our student advising portfolio Participants will learn about the advising tools/strategies used within the quarterly group advising sessions. Participants will discover and be able to identify potential benefits of a group advising model. Participants will be able to draft a plan for creating a group advising program at their own campus.

Student Support and Equity Programs (SSEP) Department within the Division of Student Affairs Houses four major programs Educational Opportunity Program (EOP) Summer Bridge (SB) Undeclared Student Program (USP) Renaissance Scholars Program (RS) Student Population ~ 1,100 EOP/RS students & 400 Undeclared students EOP Admission Target: 300 – 350 declared/undeclared ~ 200 – 250 First Time Freshmen ~ 100 First Time Transfer

Our Advising Model Intrusive Advising Model based in Developmental and Cognitive/Behavioral Theory 5 full-time advisors, 1 Coordinator of Undeclared Services, 1 Associate Director 3 advising sessions per quarter for all undeclared students –Primary advisor for undeclared students –1:1 advising, 60 min/30 min, for first year 1 advising session per quarter for declared students –Supplemental advising for incoming freshmen and transfer –1:1 advising, 60 min/30 min, for first year (prior to Group Advising) Open Advising

How We Got to Group Advising Three Key Elements Were at Play Dwindling resources, limited personnel, level enrollment In the face of this reality, we began to think of alternative ways to effectively serve our students without compromising the positive aspects of our advising program. Unique Advising Needs of Transfers Our Advising Team shared a desire to better serve our transfer population and wanted to create an experience unique to them. Transfer Student Feedback Review of the data collected from our transfer student survey and focus group conversations with our junior/senior students convinced us we needed something more consistent and comprehensive for transfers.

Group Advising – The Vision Create an advising experience that is developmental in nature and builds upon what students learn each quarter Provide consistency of information and develop a sense of community, while maintaining the integrity and quality of 1:1 advising and allowing advisor individuality Offer structure to guide the transition from community college to university, while respecting previous college experiences Focus on the unique needs of the CPP transfer student and empower them to be responsible/active participants in the advising partnership with faculty advisors Incorporate opportunities for individual advising as needed

Setting the Stage for Group Advising Piloted group advising concept in Advisors with the larger declared caseloads developed a basic program in fall 2007 Other advisors added sessions winter and spring 2008 Fully implemented the program in Transfer students were introduced to the group advising model during our New EOP Student Welcome the first Friday of fall quarter.

Setting the Stage for Group Advising Established Quarterly Advising Themes Defined Student Learning Outcomes Identified Expectations of Students Drafted a Communication Plan Developed a Consistent and Flexible Schedule Defined an Advising Session and Documentation Protocol

Creating the Advising Curricula What We Knew About Our Students Needs Two Key questions from Spring 2006 Transfer Survey What topics would be helpful? –Degree Progress and Evaluation clarification –Financial Aid/staying out of debt –Connection/time with an advisor Which campus services or information are most important for you to know about? –81% Transfer Credit and evaluation clarification –79% Graduation Writing Test (GWT) preparation –70% EOP Tutoring Support/Services Fall 2006 Focus Groups Overwhelmingly, transfer students indicated the need for more clarification with transfer credit evaluation to stay on track and graduate sooner.

Group Advising – The Curriculum Quarterly Themes Fall - Transitioning to the University Winter – Reflecting on the 1 st Quarter Spring – Planning for the Future Student Learning Outcomes Expectations of Students Creating the Advising Portfolio Utilizing the Advising Tools

Group Advising Session Protocol group advising sessions offered each quarter with an 8 student maximum Sessions are 60 minutes in length and are scheduled through out the week (10:00am - 5:00pm) Students receive an each quarter outlining the steps to prepare for the next session. Quarterly Advising/Registration Holds Following the group session: Log and document attendance Mid Quarter Progress Report Review Advising/Registration Hold Released

Early Outcomes Assessment Student Participation Fall 2008: 54/72 (75%) enrolled students participated Winter 2009: 67/80 (85%) enrolled students participated 57 (84%) came prepared with the Advising Portfolio. Degree Progress Report (DPR) Assessment Fall 2008, surveyed 54 transfer students 33/54 (54%) indicated having accessed/reviewed the DPR 19/54 (37%) indicated not having reviewed the DPR 20% of the 33 who reviewed the DPR reported that it was confusing and difficult to interpret. Winter 2009, surveyed 61 transfer students 55/61 (90%) indicated having accessed/reviewed the DPR since the last session. 6/61 (10%) indicated not having reviewed the DPR 9% of the 55 who reviewed the DPR reported that it was confusing and difficult to interpret.

Benefits of Group Advising For Students Provides consistent, relevant information related to their transitional needs while allowing for follow-up sessions later in quarter. Creates a forum for students to connect with the university and develop a better sense of belonging. Opportunity to network with other EOP students in similar majors, forming study groups and lending support to one another. Opportunity for students to hear the challenges other students face and to discuss ways to address them in a safe environment. Encourages students to become engaged, to learn to ask more questions, and take responsibility in the advising process.

For Advisors Advisors have more available hours for students who need individualized 1-1 session. Advisors have the opportunity to partner with other advisors to conduct the group advising session. Advisors have the chance to meet with other students who are not in their caseload. Advisors have more time to follow-up with students who have not scheduled their group session. Advisors have the opportunities to meet with students early in the quarter at the group session providing for earlier intervention, referrals, etc. (i.e. tutoring, department advising, connecting with professors). Benefits of Group Advising

“Students, as a whole, felt comfortable in the group setting and almost everyone had input and even information to share with their peers. I thought this was great. I have experienced one on one advising sessions before and although there are times when you still need the personal attention, I feel that for general advising purposes the group sessions helped take the spotlight off the individual student allowing the students as a group to comfortably interact with the advisor.” Michelle Gonzalez EOP Transfer Students & James Bell Intern

Questions?

Thank you for attending! Kim Huynh (909) Lea J. Manske (909)