Quantum Description of Scattering

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The electromagnetic (EM) field serves as a model for particle fields
Advertisements

Tunneling Phenomena Potential Barriers.
Neutron Scattering Theory For Bio-Physicists Hem Moktan Department of Phycis Oklahoma State University.
Chapter (6) Introduction to Quantum Mechanics.  is a single valued function, continuous, and finite every where.
January 23, 2001Physics 8411 Elastic Scattering of Electrons by Nuclei We want to consider the elastic scattering of electrons by nuclei to see (i) how.
Monday, Nov. 11, 2013PHYS , Fall 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #17 Monday, Nov. 11, 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Alpha Particle.
January 11, 2001Physics 8411 Cross-Sections and Decay Rates There are three types of measurements one can make –static properties of particles (mass, charge,
The electromagnetic (EM) field serves as a model for particle fields  = charge density, J = current density.
LECTURE 18 EXPECTATION VALUES QUANTUM OPERATORS PHYSICS 420 SPRING 2006 Dennis Papadopoulos.
3D Schrodinger Equation
The Klein Gordon equation (1926) Scalar field (J=0) :
Chapter 3 Formalism. Hilbert Space Two kinds of mathematical constructs - wavefunctions (representing the system) - operators (representing observables)
2. Solving Schrödinger’s Equation Superposition Given a few solutions of Schrödinger’s equation, we can make more of them Let  1 and  2 be two solutions.
Modifying the Schrödinger Equation
A Fourier series can be defined for any function over the interval 0  x  2L where Often easiest to treat n=0 cases separately.
Lecture 5: Electron Scattering, continued... 18/9/2003 1
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2011 Karine Chesnel.
Incident transmitted reflected III. Heisenberg’s Matrix Mechanics 1924: de Broglie suggests particles are waves Mid-1925: Werner Heisenberg introduces.
From the previous discussion on the double slit experiment on electron we found that unlike a particle in classical mechanics we cannot describe the trajectory.
Cross section for potential scattering
P D S.E.1 3D Schrodinger Equation Simply substitute momentum operator do particle in box and H atom added dimensions give more quantum numbers. Can.
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2012 Karine Chesnel.
Lecture 20: More on the deuteron 18/11/ Analysis so far: (N.B., see Krane, Chapter 4) Quantum numbers: (J , T) = (1 +, 0) favor a 3 S 1 configuration.
Ch 3. The Quantum Mechanical Postulates
The Two-Body Problem. The two-body problem The two-body problem: two point objects in 3D interacting with each other (closed system) Interaction between.
Cross Sections One of the most important quantities we measure in nuclear physics is the cross section. Cross sections always have units of area and in.
Imagine many particles fired at and scattering from a small target We want to predict the rate  at which particles are scattered It makes sense that it.
Substitution Method: 1. Solve the following system of equations by substitution. Step 1 is already completed. Step 2:Substitute x+3 into 2 nd equation.
Physical Chemistry 2 nd Edition Thomas Engel, Philip Reid Chapter 18 A Quantum Mechanical Model for the Vibration and Rotation of Molecules.
Final review Help sessions scheduled for Dec. 8 and 9, 6:30 pm in MPHY 213 Your hand-written notes allowed No numbers, unless you want a problem with numbers.
Ch 2. The Schrödinger Equation (S.E)
Scattering of particles - topic 1 - june 2007 Particle Scattering: –Differential cross section –Trajectories and currents –Mean free path Quantal Scattering:
Ch 4. Using Quantum Mechanics on Simple Systems
PHYS 773: Quantum Mechanics February 6th, 2012
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2012 Karine Chesnel.
What is the determinant of What is the determinant of
System Response Characteristics ISAT 412 -Dynamic Control of Energy Systems (Fall 2005)
Quantum Mechanical Cross Sections In a practical scattering experiment the observables we have on hand are momenta, spins, masses, etc.. We do not directly.
Lecture 19 Spherical Polar Coordinates Remember Phils Problems and your notes = everything Come to see me before.
7:4. SIMPLE MODEL FOR NEUTRON SCATTERING LENGTHS CHAPTER 7 – NEUTRON SCATTERING THEORY 7:1. SOLUTION OF THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION 7:2. SCATTERING CROSS.
Introduction to Time dependent Time-independent methods: Kap. 7-lect2 Methods to obtain an approximate eigen energy, E and wave function: perturbation.
M. Cobal, PIF 2006/7 Feynmann Diagrams. M. Cobal, PIF 2006/7 Feynman Diagrams 
Lecture 6: Cross Section for Electron Scattering 23/9/2003 Recall from last time: where V n is the normalization volume for the plane wave electron.
Particle Physics Particle Physics Chris Parkes April/May 2003  Hydrogen atom Quantum numbers Electron intrinsic spin  Other atoms More electrons! Pauli.
System of Equations Solve by Substitution. A System of Equations:  Consists of two linear equations  We want to find out information about the two lines:
Non-Linear Effects in Strong EM Field Alexander Titov Bogoliubov Lab. of Theoretical Physics, JINR, Dubna International.
量子力學導論 Chap 1 - The Wave Function Chap 2 - The Time-independent Schrödinger Equation Chap 3 - Formalism in Hilbert Space Chap 4 - 表象理論.
Lecture 2 - Feynman Diagrams & Experimental Measurements
Particle properties/characteristics specifically their interactions are often interpreted in terms of CROSS SECTIONS.
Lecture 4 – Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
Theory of Scattering Lecture 3. Free Particle: Energy, In Cartesian and spherical Coordinates. Wave function: (plane waves in Cartesian system) (spherical.
Schrodinger’s Equation for Three Dimensions
M. Sc Physics, 3rd Semester
Quantum Mechanics for Applied Physics
The Strong Force: NN Interaction
Schrodinger wave equation
UNIT 1 Quantum Mechanics.
Theory of Scattering Lecture 2.
Formalism Chapter 3.
Quantum Physics Schrödinger
2. Solving Schrödinger’s Equation
Quantum Two.
QM2 Concept Test 18.1 A particle with energy
Theory of Scattering Lecture 3.
QM2 Concept Test 18.1 A particle with energy
There are infinite solutions to the system.
Scattering Theory: Revised and corrected
Theory of Scattering Lecture 4.
Examples of QED Processes
Quantum mechanics II Winter 2011
Presentation transcript:

Quantum Description of Scattering This is a tutorial on the quantum mechanical description of the (unpolarized) scattering process: we are NOT deriving these results, just going over them The wave function (“amplitude”) consists of two parts: Incident plane wave corresponding to the beam Outgoing scattered wave with amplitude that decays as 1/r (so that the probability density falls as 1/r2 (as it should) The overall wave function is the sum of the two, but the outgoing Here the BOLD characters represent vectors and k and k’ represent (divided by ) the momentum of the projectile particle before and after the scattering.

Interpretation of the wave function The incident and scattered “parts” of the wave function are f(r) = and fscat(r) = The probability flux for a wave function y(r) is given by: So that the incident and scattered flux are: The differential cross-section is given by the ratio and so

Momentum Transfer and Scattering Amplitude The factor f(k, k’) can be thought of as the angular amplitude f(q) for the scattering, and [ds/dW](q)=|f(q)|2. As in the case of the classical scattering process, q2, the square of the magnitude of change in the momentum q = (p’- p), is a key variable, and is related to the scattering angle by: The scattering amplitude function f(k, k’) is given by: f(k, k’) = Quantum Mechanically this is the matrix element for the potential V(r) between the incident wave and the overall wave function.

Integral Equation So there is a bit of circular argument here…because in order to calculate the overall wave function y(r), one needs to know what it is already… What this means is that y(r) is the solution to the “integral equation”: Here f(r) is the incident wave This integral equation is not particularly easy to solve However, in this whole formulation, we have considered the scattering potential V(r) to be a relatively small “perturbation” to the incident wave, and should modify f(r) only slightly

Born Approximation One strategy for solving the integral equation is to do so by “iteration”, starting with the substitution where y(r) appears inside the integral This allows us to calculate the “1st order” approximation for the scattering amplitude f(k, k’)  f1(k, k’) = The resulting wave function y1(r) can be plugged back into the integral to calculate the 2nd order amplitude f2(k, k’) This Iterative Process is called the Born Approximation (after Max Born: ***grandfather of Olivia Newton-John***)

1st order Born Approximation For a Spherically symmetrical potential V(r) = where q is the magnitude of momentum change, or “transfer”, and f(k, k’) is just the Fourier transform of V(r) in variable q Curiously,, the integral for diverges for the 1/r potential Has anybody noticed that the total cross-section integrated from 0 to 180 degrees in q is INFINITE? Could these two statements be related in some way What do we do now Boss? (whose nickname is this?)

Born Approx. on Yukawa Potentuial We use a trick: we apply the approximation on the Yukawa Potential (which can be thought to describe the potential for nucleon-nucleon strong interaction Reason: the integral for f1(k, k’) converges We can recover the Rutherford scattering case by taking the limit m0, and The result: Note the function is in q2: And we have:

Back to Rutherford Scattering And taking the limit m0, and we have: Noting that k = p and E=p2/2m we rewrite the result as: Rather amazingly, this first order Born Approximation result (ok so we had to go through the Yukawa potential) is identical to the one we got from the classical calculation!