Human Research Protection Program Training: Post-Approval Event Reporting March 26, 2008 Lisa Voss, MPH, CIP Assistant Director, QIU Human Research Protection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The HRPP FYI Process and the UPIRSO/SAE Review Sheet An IRB Infoshort February 2014.
Advertisements

Susan Burner Bankowski, M.S., J.D. Chair, OHSU IRB
Gerald Treiman, IRB Chair John Stillman, IRB Director Maureen Brinkman, IRB Administrator Ann Johnson, IRB Administrator.
What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one? Presented by Office of Human Research Protection.
Protocol Deviations : Identification, Responses and Solutions The Office of Human Subjects Research’s Compliance Monitoring Program Educational Seminars:
UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS INVOLVING RISKS TO SUBJECTS OR OTHERS & INCIDENTS OF NON-COMPLIANCE ( AKA PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS ) TRACY RIGHTMER, JD, CIP COMPLIANCE.
Reporting Unanticipated Problems Involving Risk to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events WFUHS Policy/Procedure Effective Date 6/1/07 Wendy Murray Monitoring.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
1 © Huron Consulting Group Inc. All rights reserved. Huron is a management consulting firm and not a CPA firm, and does not provide attest services, audits,
IRB-Investigator/ Research Coordinator Mtg. “CUMC’s New Progressive Policy For Adverse Event Reporting” April 13, 2004 George Gasparis Andrew Wit, Ph.D.
Human Research Protection Program CHR Post-Approval Event Reporting Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Beth Shields, MA, CIP, CCRA Quality Assurance Coordinator.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.
Renewing An Approved Protocol: IRB Review Process
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Protocol Compliance Monitoring Darcy Mallon May 7, 2009.
HRPP Policies & Forms Created/Revised for AAHRPP.
Unlocking the Mystery of General Information Reporting Research Compliance Administration Training Presentation Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Presenter:Heather.
Defining Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRSO)
Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING Elizabeth Dayag IRB Administrator Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.
Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
Using Technology to Strengthen Human Subject Protections Patricia Scannell Director, IRB Washington University School of Medicine.
Elements of Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Regulatory Coordinator –SCTR SUCCESS Center QA Monitor – NIDA Clinical Trials Network Stephanie Gentilin,
New IRB Guideline Changes and Converting to eIRB - Suggestions for Maintaining Compliance. Ramesh Ghodgaonkar, BPHARM, MSITS, MSB, MBA Betsy Johnson, BA.
Reporting Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events: A Change in Policy Mary A. Banks RN, BS, BSN Director, BUMC IRB Wednesday, November 14, 2007.
Unanticipated Problems Potentially Involving Risks to Subjects or Others Research Protections Office Serving UVM and FAHC Updated April 2012.
New Adverse Event Reporting Policy Effective September 1, 2007.
Reporting Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems to the UAB IRB Policy and Procedure Change September 22, 2006 Amanda G. Murphy, RN, CIP Assistant Director,
Office of Research Oversight ORO Reporting Adverse Events in Research to ORO Paula Squire Waterman, MS, CIP Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research.
Sara Brand Associate Director Research Compliance Administration.
EMORY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD VERSION Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations and Non-Compliance.
Common Audit Findings UTHSC Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Adverse Event/Unanticipated Problems Policy and Procedures November 2007.
Monitoring IRB Monitoring of Clinical Trials. Types of Monitoring Internally Internally Externally Externally.
Human Research Protection Program Training UCSF’s Subject Injury Program Wednesday, April 11, :30 am to 12:00 pm Carroll Child, RN, MSc. CCRP Clinical.
Office of Research Oversight 1 VHA Handbook Research Compliance Reporting Requirements Revised May 21, 2010 (Presentation prepared for HRPP 101,
JERI R. BARNEY, JD HRPP COMPLIANCE MANAGER YALE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM DECEMBER 13, 2012 Noncompliance.
Understanding Unanticipated Problems (UPs) Elizabeth Ness, RN, MS Director, Staff Development Office of the Clinical Director Center for Cancer Research,
AUDIT REQUIREMENTS, FINDINGS & BASICS RESEARCH COMPLIANCE.
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
VHA Research Compliance Reporting Requirements ORD Accreditation Conference Call December 15, 2011.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Jacquelyn L. Goldberg, J.D. VA IRB Chair Training April 8, 2004.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
Office of Research Oversight 1 Office of Research and Development Local Accountability Meeting January 2009.
Fully accredited since 2006 Tom Conquergood, CIP Working with Quorum October 13, 2015 Thomas Jefferson University.
RIHES-II: H ANDLING A UDITS AND I NSPECTIONS E FFECTIVE D ATE 25 D ECEMBER 2006 V ERSION : 3.0 บุญเหลือ พรึงลำภู 15 มกราคม 2557.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Non-compliance with Human Subjects Research Regulations J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP November 2014 Continuing Education for IRB Members.
The TJU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Part II, Conflict of Interest and IRB Noncompliance J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP.
Stanley Estime, MSCI QA/QI Specialist January 17, 2013 Reportable New Information.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Bussara Sukpanichnant, Human Subject Protection Office, USAMD-AFRIMS Unanticipated Problems 15 th FERCAP International Conference 24 Nov 15 Nagasaki, Japan.
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Dartmouth Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Data Safety Monitoring and Reporting requirements Brown Bag Series: Noon / First Tuesday of the Month.
Reportable Events Emory IRB 9/11/2014.
IRB reporting updates.
What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one?
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
Adverse Event Reporting: Trials and Tribulations
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Navigating Non-Compliance
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING
What are the Major Changes to the IRB under the Final Common Rule?
Event Reporting in Human Subjects Research
Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials
Policy on Prompt Reporting
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Human Research Protection Program Training: Post-Approval Event Reporting March 26, 2008 Lisa Voss, MPH, CIP Assistant Director, QIU Human Research Protection Program

3/26/08 Outline for Today Roles of the QIU and CHR Types of Post-Approval Events Post-Approval Event Reports Forms Tips Q&A

3/26/08 What is the Role of the QIU? Provide Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Improvement (QI) activities Work with the CHR to assure rights and welfare of human research participants and reduce risk

3/26/08 QIU Activities Review post-approval event reports Conduct routine site reviews of clinical research studies Conduct directed or for cause on-site reviews of clinical research studies Emergency Use requests

3/26/08 Post-Approval Event Reports Adverse Events Protocol Violations Protocol Incidents Subject or Researcher Concerns and Complaints Approval Lapses

3/26/08 Post-Approval Event Reports Investigator Brochure updates Safety Information or Significant New Finding DSMB/DMC Report Audit Reports Holds on Study Activities Subject Injury Complaints Study Close-Out Reports

Adverse Events (AE’s) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE’s) Determining What To Report and What NOT To Report

3/26/08 Adverse Events (Internal) PI determines event to be: Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related AND Serious or Unexpected Report within 10-working days on Internal AE Reporting Form

3/26/08 Adverse Events (Internal) Death – Unrelated to research as determined by the PI Only for interventional studies Report at time of Renewal or Major Modification via the AE Summary Log

3/26/08 Adverse Events (External) PI determines that the event: Changes the study risks or benefits OR Requires a modification to the CHR Application or the Consent form Report within 10-working days on External AE Reporting Form

3/26/08 Adverse Events (External) AE’s that do not meet the previous criteria: Reporting not required by CHR If Sponsors requires reporting use the AE Summary Log

Protocol Violations Determining What To Report and What NOT To Report

3/26/08 Protocol Violations (Major) Unapproved changes, deviations, or departures from study design that are: Under the PI’s control and Have not been reviewed and approved by the CHR AND May affect participants rights, safety or well-being or impact study data Report within 10-working days on Violation/Incident Reporting Form

3/26/08 Protocol Violations (Minor) Also known as Protocol Deviations Unapproved changes, deviations, or departures from study design that are: Under the PIs control and Have not been reviewed and approved by the CHR BUT Do not impact participants rights, safety or well-being or impact study data Reporting NOT Required – document in study file

Protocol Incidents Determining What To Report and What NOT To Report

3/26/08 Protocol Incidents (Major) Any problematic or unanticipated event related to: Conduct of the study or subject participation and involves significant potential harm to the participants. Subject Complaints Report within 10-working days on Violation/Incident Reporting Form

3/26/08 Protocol Incidents (Minor) Any problematic or unanticipated event related to: Conduct of the study or subject participation and does not involve significant potential harm to the participants. Subject Complaints Reporting NOT Required

Other Events and Safety Information Other Reports

3/26/08 Other Events and Safety Reports Investigator Drug Brochure Safety Information or Updates DSMB/DMC Reports Audit Reports Hold on Study Activities Report within 10-working days on Reporting Form

3/26/08 Study Close-Out Reports Updates CHR on conduct of study since last renewal Required for: Studies that received full-committee review at any time Expedited Review studies that involved participant contact

3/26/08 When NOT to Submit Do not close-out a study if: local enrollment to the study is ongoing local research-related interventions are ongoing local participant follow-up is ongoing data analysis or manuscript preparation that involves use or access to individually identifiable information is ongoing An IRB approved Tissue Bank is approved under the study

CHR and QIU Role in Post- Approval Event Reports

3/26/08 CHR Review Process Note report and keep in CHR file Request: Additional information Require a modification Flag study for future educational efforts, website guidance, and/or monitoring visits Temporarily or permanently suspend and terminate enrollment in study

3/26/08 CHR Review Outcome Determine if the report is an: Unanticipated Problem or Serious or Continuing Non-Compliance

3/26/08 Unanticipated Problem An Unanticipated Problem involving risk to participants and or others, is defined on the basis of whether the event is: Unanticipated or unexpected. Involves risks to participants or others. Related to the research

3/26/08 Serious Noncompliance Failure to follow state or federal regulations for protection of the rights and welfare of study participants, University policies or the requirements or determinations of the CHR and that, in the judgment of the CHR Chair, Vice Chair, convened CHR Panel or AVC-R, results in, or indicates a potential for:

3/26/08 Serious Noncompliance a) a significant risk to enrolled or potential participants or others, or b) compromises the integrity of the study.

3/26/08 Continuing Noncompliance Pattern of noncompliance that, in the judgment of the CHR Chair, Vice- Chair, convened CHR Panel or the AVC-R, suggests: the likelihood that instances of noncompliance will continue without intervention.

3/26/08 CHR Regulatory Reporting Requirements Federal Departments Office for Human Research Protection (OHRP) FDA SF Veterans Affairs (if VA study) Associate Vice Chancellor for Research UCSF Legal Affairs (in certain cases) Study Sponsor Other offices or groups as required by the nature of the study

Top Tips and Additional Discussion Points

3/26/08 Tips Submit reports only once: either by fax or campus mail Consult with the QIU Identify CHR Approval (H number) and PI when calling PI must sign all post-approval event reports

3/26/08 Ask Questions Ask your PI or Mentor Call the QIU: QIU: