Expert Testimony. What’s the expert’s role FOC Proffered Evidence Evidentiary Hypothesis P thumb numb Thumb numbness makes it SML that spine was injured.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Psychology of Homicide Unit III Lecture
Advertisements

Adorno Law Firm, PL Adorno Law Firm TRIAL TESTIMONY FOR EXPERTS!
 Arizona Bankruptcy American Inn of Court February 9, 2012 Pupilage Number 1 Evidentiary Objections.
DAUBERT IN FLORIDA: ONE YEAR LATER
RECONSTRUCTION EVIDENCE Judge Lynn M. Egan Mr. Gary W. Cooper March 28, 2014.
Problem 1. Problem 1 - Is it relevant? Charles: “I would not have voted ‘Yes.’” Charles: “Alice told me that she would not have voted ‘Yes.’” Document:
Daubert Overview Donald W. Stever Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS OF FORENSIC SCIENCE CHAPTER 2.
ADMISSIBILITY OF TRACE EVIDENCE: A WHOLELISTIC APPROACH-- DESPITE DAUBERT Kenneth E. Melson.
When will the P300-CTP be admissible in U.S. Courts? J.Peter Rosenfeld & John Meixner Northwestern University.
August 12,  Crime-scene investigators (police) arrive to find, collect, protect, and transport evidence. (More on this later!)
Experts & Expert Reports  Experts and the FRE  FRCP, Rule 26 and experts  How are experts used in patent litigation?  What belongs in a Rule 26 report?
1 EXPERT EVIDENCE The evidential value of the expert’s testimony will depend on the expertise of the expert. Reference should be made to the qualifications,
AKA: The Last Words AAKA: Parting Gift Closing Arguments.
OPINION EVIDENCE. OPINION EVIDENCE FRE Evid. Code §§
COEN 252 Computer Forensics Writing Computer Forensics Reports.
CAREFUL, I AM AN EXPERT. Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides that expert opinion evidence is admissible if: 1. the witness is sufficiently.
Forensic Science and the Law
PERSPECTIVES ON DAUBERT: AVOIDING AND EXPLOITING “ANALYTICAL GAPS” IN EXPERT TESTIMONY Richard O. Faulk Chair, Litigation Department Gardere Wynne Sewell,
SCIENCE AND LAW The case of the Italian Supreme Court ruling Paolo Vecchia Former Chairman of ICNIRP 1.
Forensic and Investigative Accounting
Expert Witnesses Texas Rules of Evidence Article VII. Opinions and Expert Testimony Judge Sharen Wilson.
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE Prof. JANICKE OPINIONS ARE GENERALLY INADMISSIBLE RULE 602 REQUIRES ACTUAL “KNOWLEDGE” FOR MOST TYPES OF EVIDENCE KNOWLEDGE.
1 What Is Scientific Evidence? Scientific evidence is most often presented in court by an expert witness testifying on expert opinions. It also includes.
1. Evidence Professor Cioffi 2/22/2011 – 2/23/
The Nature of Evidence A Guide to Legal Evidence & the Courts.
Unit 3 Seminar! K. Austin Zimmer Any question from Unit 2! Please make sure you have completed your Unit 1 & 2 Papers!
The Trial Process and the Investigator as a Witness.
The Trial. I. Procedures A. Jury Selection 1. Impanel (select) a jury 2. Prosecutors and Defense lawyers pose questions to potential jurors (VOIR DIRE)
Forensic Science and the Law. Federal Labs  FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation  DEA: Drug Enforcement Agency  ATF: Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms.
FORENSIC SCIENTISTS, EXPERT TESTIMONY Notes 1.3. Objectives 1. Explain the role and responsibilities of the expert witness. 2. Compare and contrast the.
Skills of a Forensic Scientist & Frye vs. Daubert Standards
Evidence in a Court of Law Chapter 3. Admissibility of Evidence: Relevance Relevance Competence Competence.
What is Forensic Science? the study and application of science to matters of law… it examines the associations among people, places, things and events.
Cross examination Is the DNA a mixture of two or more people? How did you calculate the match statistic? What is the scientific basis of that calculation?
Forensic Neuropsychology Introduction to the Legal System May 25, 2006.
1 What Is Scientific Evidence? Scientific evidence is most often presented in court by an expert witness testifying on expert opinions. It also includes.
Evidence and Expert Testimony. Expert Testimony  Two Types of Witnesses: Fact and Expert  Fact -- have personal knowledge of facts of case  Cannot.
Professor Guy Wellborn
Aim: How can we use scientific inquiry to explain how the world works? DO NOW: In your notebook, describe what scientific inquiry means to you.
The Process of Conducting Research. What is a theory? a set of general principles that explains the how and why of phenomena. Theories are not directly.
September 10, 2012 Warm-up: Use pg. 13 in your text book to answer the following question: 1.What was the most significant modern advance in forensic science?
Admissibility. The Frye Standard  1923 – became the standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examinations. To meet.
The Law & Forensics Chapters 1-3 (Some information not found in textbook)
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Nine: Examination of Witnesses This multimedia product and its contents are protected under.
Designing an Experiment &The Characteristics of Scientific Knowledge.
SCIENTIFIC METHOD What is the Scientific Method? This is a process by which scientists go about answering questions and solving problems. The process includes.
Class Notes 2 The Scientific Method. I. The Scientific Method -an organized set of procedures that help scientists answer questions and solve problems.
(7 th ) Chapter 1-3 Cornell Notes Scientific Inquiry.
Forensic and Investigative Accounting Chapter 8 Litigation Services Provided by Accountants © 2009 CCH. All Rights Reserved W. Peterson Ave. Chicago,
Who’s Daubert?.
Mock Trials Court Systems and Practices.
EXPERT TESTIMONY The Houston Bar Association Juvenile Law Section
Laying the Foundation: Expert Witnesses
What Is Scientific Evidence?
The Expert Witness in Forensic Psychology
Lauren A. Warner, Counsel, CCLB Leanne Gould, CPA/ABV/CFF/ASA, Aprio
J. Max Wawrik Nancy Rosado Colon Law 16 Spring 2017
The Houston Bar Association Eighth Annual Juvenile Law Conference
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
Opinion Testimony, In General
Growth in Recent years is due to:
Inn of Court: Trial Practices
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
Important court decisions
Get Started Immediately!
Introduction to Forensic Science and the Law
The Expert Valuation Witness and the Different Procedural Models in European Court Proceedings . Associate Prof. (Dr. hab. Magdalena Habdas.
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE
Presentation transcript:

Expert Testimony

What’s the expert’s role FOC Proffered Evidence Evidentiary Hypothesis P thumb numb Thumb numbness makes it SML that spine was injured P spine injured What’s the expert’s role? Expert testifies to the EH

Frye Test What is the relevant scientific community. Has that community generally accepted this technique as reliable General Acceptance v. Substantial Acceptance

Daubert Approach Do I (Judge) think this technique is reliable Do I think it should be barred under FRE 403.

What are the Daubert Factors 1.Testability 2.Publication & Peer Review 3.Error Rate 4.Protocols for Use 5.Acceptance in Scientific Community What does Kumho tell us about these factors?

Ellen Expert & the Roulette Wheel

Deciding if Ellen Is an Expert

Do Problem 46

Qualify Willie As an Expert

Have Willie Explain His Methodology

Run Willie’s Methodology Through Daubert Factors 1.Testability 2.Publication & Peer Review 3.Error Rate 4.Protocols for Use 5.Acceptance in Scientific Community

When Is Expert Testimony Permitted?

Helpful v. Outside Lay Knowledge FOC Proffered Evidence Evidentiary Hypothesis D called P a N__ ER’s who use racial epithets are SML to fire because of race. ER fired because of race Is this outside a lay jury’s knowledge? Would expert’s testimony on issue help the jury?

What’s the expert’s role FOC Proffered Evidence Evidentiary Hypothesis P thumb numb Thumb numbness makes it SML that spine was injured P spine injured Is this outside a lay jury’s knowledge? Would expert’s testimony on issue help the jury? Helpful v. Outside Lay Knowledge

When Is Expert Testimony Required (for P to Make a Submissible Case)? When reasonable jurors could not decide whether to draw the inference without expert assistance?

Thumb numbness makes it SML that spine was injured ER’s who use racial epithets are SML to fire because of race. Are Either of These Required?

On What Facts Can an Expert Base an Opinion? Common LawFRE Facts supported by evidence admitted at trial Facts of a sort generally relied on by experts in the field. No

How Is Basis Disclosed to Jury? Common LawFRE Listed in Hypothetical Question Expert Testifies to Basis Facts Based on Personal Knowledge Expert testifies to conclusion, and basis is disclosed (if at all) by later questions or on cross. No

Do Problem 47

Do Problem 48

Do Problem 49