International Agreements: Madrid Protocol, Trademark Law Treaty, and Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks Global Intellectual Property Academy Amman,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
Advertisements

WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON OMANI TRADITIONAL VALUES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD Muscat, February 13 and 14, 2005 International Legal Framework for the Protection.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Managing Intellectual Property Assets in International Business Anil Sinha, Counsellor, SMEs Division World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Collective Marks and Certification Marks
THE MADRID PROTOCOL SYSTEM AIPPI (Hyderabad 2011) Regina Quek One Legal LLC.
Copyright in Saudi Arabia Royal Decree M/11 - Copyright protection to works first published in Saudi Arabia or whose author is a Saudi Arabian national.
Management of an IR: Selected forms and procedures to encounter during the lifespan of the IR Israel, February 8, 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal.
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
AIPPI FORUM AND EXCO TH OCTOBER 2011 INDIA AND THE MADRID PROTOCOL HIMANSHU W. KANE Advocate & Solicitor W. S. Kane & Company.
H AGUE AND MADRID SYSTEMS Moses Moeletsi Chief Director: Policy and Legislation 11 August 2004.
Overview of the Madrid System Legal Perspective Basic Level Place Day Month Year Legal Division Madrid Registry Brands and Designs Sector.
WIPO’s Activities in the ASEAN : Focus on the Madrid Protocol AIPA Annual Conference March 28, 2015 Denis CROZE Director, WIPO Office in Singapore.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
Trade Mark Registration “Protecting your brand”. Trade Mark O Trade Mark – (Brand) a sign that is graphically represented and identifies and distinguishes.
1 Licensing Agreements and the Protection of Intellectual Property Chapter 17 © 2005 Thomson/West Legal Studies In Business.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association MADRID SYSTEM VS. DIRECT INTERNATIONAL FILINGS BY U.S. PARTIES JPO/AIPLA Joint Meeting.
The Madrid system An update on the latest development Israel February 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs Sector.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. CHAPTER 17 Licensing Agreements and the Protection.
SAREE AONGSOMWANG Foundation for Consumers, Thailand.
THE PROTECTION OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN TRADE AND COMMERCE TK.
Understanding Industrial Property By Ronald De Four The University of the West Indies St. Augustine The material presented in this document was sourced.
I DENTIFYING AND P ROTECTING I NTELLECTUAL P ROPERTY Tyson Benson
THE MADRID SYSTEM Legal Framework (I) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Request for Extension of Protection of International Registration to the United States.
THE HAGUE SYSTEM INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REGISTRATION **** A TREATY READY FOR RATIFICATION Background, Procedure and Selected Statistics (1998 and 1999) William.
Cross-border Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Expressions Pedro A. De Miguel Asensio – UCM AIPPI 2011 Hyderabad.
Trade Marks & Branding for Not-for- Profit Organisations Presented by: Jason Watson, Partner Saioa Echevarria Idianez, Trade Marks Attorney FAL MARKS &
World Intellectual Property Organization THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS: OBJECTIVES AND BASIC FEATURES Tel Aviv, July 4,
Overview of the Madrid System USPTO GIPA 23 October 2013 Alan Datri Senior Counsellor  Slide updated 10/25/13.
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
TAIEX Seminar on IP rights The Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Ankara - November 7, 2005 Marie Paule Rizo, WIPO.
MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF TRADEMARKS.
Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk Representation, Address for Service, Signatures, Recording Changes.
Industrial Design Marco Marzano de Marinis SMEs Division.
International Registration of GIs: Building on Existing Systems Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
ADVANTAGES FOR PAKISTAN AND OTHER DEVELOPING COUNTRIES IN JOINING THE MADRID PROTOCOL.
Intellectual Property Legal Implications. What is Intellectual Property? The product of creativity and intellectual endeavour Intellectual Property Rights.
Milano, TRADEMARK. A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services produced or provided by one company from those of.
The Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks Kiev March Noëlle Moutout Assistant Legal Officer.
The Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks Kiev March Noëlle Moutout Assistant Legal Officer.
Trademarks and Brands The Role of WIPO
Conference on the Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol The Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol - the long.
SMEs Division Intensive Presentation of IP PANORAMA Eusloo Seo Counsellor Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Division World Intellectual Property Organization.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
BUSINESS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REGISTRATION IN GHANA BY MRS. SARAH NORKOR ANKU, STATE ATTORNEY REGISTRAR-GENRAL’S DEPARTMENT 27/1/2016.
ANDEAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (COLOMBIA, ECUADOR, PERU) – UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OBJECTIVE “To seek that Intellectual Property has reasonable levels of.
WIPO-INSME International Training Program on Intellectual Property and Management of Innovation in Small and Medium- Sized Enterprises May 12, 2005 José.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
The Madrid Protocol: Key Benefits, Risks and Strategies.
The International Registration of Designs Background and Key Principles of the Hague System.
Unit 3 Seminar International Issues in IP Law. Unit 3 – International Issues in IP Law Unit 3 will focus on Chapters 8, 16 & 21 –Make sure to download.
NORTH AFRICA REGIONAL UPDATE MOHAMED ELDIB. TABLE OF CONTENTS  ABOUT ELDIB & CO  NORTH AFRICA OVERVIEW  LATEST DEVELOPMENTS  IP OVERVIEW  STATISTICS.
IP experiences and challenges of SMEs of the Republic of Tajikistan
Recent Developments at the International Level
Geographical Indications
IP Protection under the WTO
Business benefits and advantages of protecting intellectual property
Trademarks in Cambodia: What You Need to Know
Protecting a Valuable Asset – How to Protect Your Brand With Madrid
A Business-Oriented Overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
Chadd Concepcion | 6 August 2019
Presentation transcript:

International Agreements: Madrid Protocol, Trademark Law Treaty, and Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks Global Intellectual Property Academy Amman, Jordan November 5 - 8, 2007 Nancy Omelko—Attorney-Advisor (Trademarks) Office of Intellectual Property Policy and Enforcement United States Patent and Trademark Office

Rationale for Joining International Trademark Treaties Trademark rights are territorial. But—commerce is international. Need to protect the marks of your nationals both at home and abroad. Treaties provide the means to standardize ways to protect marks. Standardization can reduce uncertainties and streamline process.

Paris Convention Article 2—National Treatment Article 4—Right of Priority Article 6—Well-known Marks Article 6ter—State Emblems, Official Hallmarks Article 6quinquies—Refusal Limitations infringing; non-distinctive; contrary to morality.

Paris Convention (continued) Article 7bis—Collective Marks Article 8—Trade Names Article 9—Seizure Article 10—Prohibition against false indication of source Article 10bis—Unfair Competition Article 10ter—Remedies

TRIPs Article 1—Categories of IP Article 2—Compliance with Paris Convention Article 3—National Treatment Article 4—Most-Favored-Nation Treatment

TRIPs—Trademarks Article 15—Defines protectable subject matter Member countries: May require that signs be visually perceptible May require use Must publish before or promptly after registration Must afford an opportunity for petitions to cancel. May afford opportunity to oppose registration.

TRIPs—Trademarks (continued) Article 16—Describes rights conferred Registered trademark owners have the exclusive right to prevent third parties from using identical or similar signs. Article 6bis of Paris shall apply to service marks In determining whether a mark is well-known, Members shall take account of the knowledge of the trademark in the relevant sector of the public, including knowledge in the Member which has been obtained as a result of the promotion of the trademark.

TRIPs—Trademarks (continued) Article 17—Exceptions—such as fair use Article 18—Term of Protection and Renewal—no less than 7 years Article 19—Requirement of Use—may be cancelled only after an uninterrupted period of 3 years. Excusable Non-use permitted. Article 21—Licensing and Assignment Compulsory licensing prohibited Right to assign with or without transfer of business

TRIPs—Geographical Indications (GIs) Article 22—Defines GIs—Provides legal means of protection for rightholders Article23—Additional Protection for GIs for wines and spirits Article 24—International Negotiations; Exceptions

Madrid Protocol A Filing Treaty International Application (IA) filed through national trademark office The IA must have a basis at the national office: Pending application Registration The national office must certify that the IA is the same as the basis

Extensions of Protection The applicant for IA designates the countries where it want its protection to be extended. This can be done at the time the IA is filed—or later, as a subsequent designation.

Examination If the IA meets all the formalities of WIPO, including payment of the fees in Swiss Francs, each requested extension of protection is sent to the national office for consideration. The national office will evaluate the request on the basis of its own laws.

Benefits Provides for the centralized acquisition, maintenance and management of trademark rights around the world by filing a single international application for a single international registration (IR) in which one or more Contracting Parties (CP) are designated. Appoint a representative before the WIPO Change name or address of holder or representative Cancel some or all goods/services in IR, and thus for all DCPs Record a license Restrict holder’s right of disposal

Considerations National office only has 12 months—or 18 months at most to refuse registration.

Trademark Law Treaty: Procedural Treaty Article 2: (1) Applies to visible signs; - does not apply to holograms; - does not apply to sound and olfactory marks. (2) Applies to marks relating to goods and services. - does not apply to collective marks, certification marks and guarantee marks.

Application Article 3: What countries can require in an application Declaration of use or intent to use. Fees Language Signature Multiple-class application Actual use

What Countries Cannot Require The furnishing of any certificate of, or extract from, a register of commerce; An indication of the applicant’s carrying on of any industrial or commercial activity, as well as the furnishing of evidence to that effect; An indication of the applicant’s carrying on of an activity corresponding to the goods and/or services listed in the application as well as the furnishing of evidence to that effect; The furnishing of evidence to the effect that the mark has been registered—except for Paris priority.

Filing Date—Article 5 Can require: Cannot require: Anything else Request to register Identity of applicant Mailing address Clear reproduction of the mark List of goods/services Declaration of use or intent to use Fees Cannot require: Anything else

Signature—Article 8 Must accept a handwritten signature If country accepts faxed documents, must consider communication signed if signature appears on facsimile—may require original be submitted within time If country accepts electronic filing, must consider signed if sender identified properly. May not require authentication—except for surrender of registration.

Classification of Goods/Services Goods/services may not be considered as being similar to each other simply because they are in the same class of Nice. Goods/services may not be considered as being dissimilar to each other simply because they are not in the same class of Nice.

Change of Address/Ownership Article 10—Country may not request a certificate reflecting the change in name or address. Article 11—Country may not require the following proof of ownership: Certificate from register of commerce; Indication of new owner’s commercial activity—with or without its corresponding to goods/services; Indication of transfer of good will.

Duration and Renewal of Registration Duration of initial and subsequent renewal—10 years Country may not require: Reproduction of the mark Proof of registration or renewal in another country; A declaration or proof concerning use of the mark.

Singapore Treaty The Diplomatic Conference for the negotiation and adoption of the Revised Trademark Law Treaty was held in Singapore, March 13-28, 2006, under the auspices of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The treaty is the product of 7 working sessions of the WIPO Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Industrial Designs (SCT). This treaty updates the 1994 Trademark Law Treaty to which the U.S. is a party.

Electronic Communication Provisions The Singapore Treaty allows for Offices to take advantage of electronic communication systems as an efficient and cost saving alternative to paper communications, at such time that the Office is ready to embrace the technology.

License Recordal Provisions The license recordal provisions will reduce the formalities that trademark owners must face when doing business in a country that is a Party to the Singapore Treaty that requires recordal and will reduce the damaging effects that can result from failure to record a license in those jurisdictions. For companies with significant licensing practices, this will represent an immense cost savings.

Assembly The Assembly provisions create a more attractive treaty for WIPO Member States to join since the built-in review mechanism allows for adapting the treaty to changing times.

Relief Measures when Time Limits are Missed: in cases in which a time limit has been missed for an action in a procedure relating to an application or registration. (i) extension of the time limit; (ii) continued processing; and (iii) reinstatement of rights if the trademark office finds that the failure to meet the time limit occurred despite due care taken, or if the failure was unintentional.

Non-Traditional Marks Now can applied to all signs registrable under the national law of any Contracting Party, including non-visible signs such as sounds and smells, in addition to nontraditional marks such as three-dimensional marks and holograms.

Entry into Force The Treaty shall enter into force three months after ten States or intergovernmental organizations having a regional trademark office have deposited their instruments of ratification or accession.

Membership Paris Convention—172 TRIPS—151 Madrid Protocol—74 Trademark Law Treaty—39 Singapore Treaty—2 ratifications Nice Agreement (Classification)—81

Office of Intellectual Property Policy and Enforcement Thank you Nancy Omelko Office of Intellectual Property Policy and Enforcement nancy.omelko@uspto.gov 571-272-9300