American Bureau of Shipping Introduction To ABS Rules

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHIP LOADS AND STRESSES
Advertisements

Made by: Vishwas Tomar Nihar Herwadkar Md. Arif Khan S. Krishnanandh
SHIP LOADS AND STRESSES
HULL FRAMING SYSTEMS by GROUP-E MEMBERS 1 JUDE RINALDO 2 AARYL D’SA
AFT END ARRANGEMENT By Group 1.
INTERTANKO Latin American Panel Lima, Peru 13 – 14 September IMO GOAL-BASED SHIP CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Gary Horn Director, Structures & Hydrodynamics.
A Comparison of Numerical Methods to Predict the Progressive Collapse of Lightweight Aluminium Vessels Simon Benson, Jonathan Downes, Robert S. Dow Newcastle.
YACHTS.
Limit States Flexure Shear Deflection Fatigue Supports Elastic Plastic
GBS PILOT PROJECT ROUND TABLE REVIEW TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.
Lesson 4 Shell Plating and Framing.
Crack Management – Part II Feedback From In-Service Inspections Based upon OTC “FPSO Fatigue Assessment: Feedback From In-Service Inspections” Clemens.
Office of Research and Engineering Gusset Plate Inadequacy Carl R. Schultheisz.
Two-Span LRFD Design Example
Univerity of Genova Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Technologies Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Technologies University of Genova,
Ship Design & Engineering
Chapter -9 WEB STIFFENERS.
ISO Wellhead Integrity
Ship Structural Response: Loads
EN358 Ship Structures Ship Structural Components
SHIP STRUCTURES Unique Structures (6.1) What are they optimized for?
Chapter I. Introduction. Naval Architecture: the science and engineering of designing ships and other kinds of waterborne crafts. Kinds of ships Sub systems.
1 Loads, Responses, Failure Modes Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering Department U.S. Naval Academy EN358 Ship Stuctures.
Tripartite Meeting Beijing, 1 November 2005 IMO GBS Classification Society’s View about the Scope, Verification Process and Acceptance Criteria Roberto.
Ship Design & Engineering
1 ENGI 6705: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS - FUNDAMENTALS.
IR-CAP Condition Assessment Program Indian Register of Shipping.
1 Houston Tanker Event 2007 Houston, TX 26 March 2007 Common Structural Rules for Tankers Gary Horn, P.E. Director, Technology ABS Houston.
Crack management Clemens van der Nat Bluewater Energy Services BV.
Floors and Double Bottoms
SHELL CONSTRUCTION GROUP C DMS(DO).
YACHT DESIGN– MONOHULL – CATAMARAN
IACS Tanker Visions – A Class Act Presented by Igor Ponomarev IACS Chairman.
Lesson Five Bulkheads and Pillars.
The Korea Shipbuilders’ Association Shipbuilders’ Experience & Feedback on IACS C ommon S tructural R ules.
Marine Services Condition Assessment Condition Assessment © 2003 Lloyd’s Register of Shipping.
Deck Beams. athwart ship member located under the deck plating usually fitted on every frame more desirable to fit extra beams then to increase thickness.
Multipurpose Polar Icebreaking Subsea Work Vessel
New common IACS Rules for Tankers IACS Joint Tanker Rules Presentation/discussion with Intertanko Spetses September 2004.
Tripartite meeting Beijing, 8-9 November 2008 Status and Early Experience of CSRs Gary Horn Director Rules & Standards, ABS IACS Hull Panel Chair.
Eng Ship Structures 1 Hull Girder Response Analysis
STARTING IN THE NAME OF ALLAH WHO IS MOST BENEFICENT AND MOST MERCIFUL.
Mechanical Design of Process Equipment FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND EQUATIONS Principal stresses Theories of failure
Tripartite Meeting Seoul, Korea, September 2009 Safety & SOLAS Agenda item 4.1 Goal-Based Standards --- application and compliance --- Toshiro Arima.
1 IACS Common Structural Rules INTERTANKO LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Rio de Janeiro, 25 April 2006.
CONSTRUCTION OF SHIPS Prof. Mustafa İNSEL Assis. Prof. Şebnem HELVACIOĞLU GEM111E.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
Lecture 2: Ship structural components
EGM 5653 Advanced Mechanics of Materials
Warm cryostat mechanical calculations A.Catinaccio PH-DT Engineering Office, CERN Page 1 CERN, May 27th 2015.
Combined Loadings Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels Stress caused by Combined Loadings.
Probability of ship fracture John Kent Contents 1What is brittle fracture 2Material fracture toughness 3Calculation overview 4Results.
4th ASF/SNEC – ACS Seminar, Seoul, 22 March 2013
3. Longitudinal strength calculation
Fatigue Analysis in ASME B31.3 Piping
1. Introduction.
4. Local strength calculation
MAXSURF Naval Architecture Software
A study on Fatigue Strength for Tank Structures subject to
Ship Disaster Investigation
SHIP LOADS AND STRESSES
Ship Disaster Investigation
General - Stiffener/web connection
Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels Stress caused by Combined Loadings
Chapter 3 BENDING MEMBERS.
Design of Beams - Limit States
Special Considerations for Structural design and Fabrication for tankers or similar vessels with Large Size (150m or more in length) in polar waters
Application of New Common Structural Rules on Aframax Tankers
Misan University College of Engineering-Civil Engineering Department 3rd Stage
EAT 415 :ADVANCED STEEL BUILDING DESIGN PLATE GIRDER
Presentation transcript:

American Bureau of Shipping Introduction To ABS Rules Presentation to the Naval Academy 6 April 2005

What is Classification? Classification is third party certification in the marine industry Classification is a process which certifies adherence to a recognized set of technical standards, representing that a ship or other type of marine structure is structurally sound and mechanically fit for its intended purpose.

The Classification Process Develop Technical Standards (Rules) Developed through industry-based technical committee structure Embraces recognized external standards Updated annually Customized when necessary (new technology/new application) Implement Technical Standards Design Plan review and engineering analysis Survey during construction Periodic survey throughout vessel life

The Classification Process Rules and Guides Rules are the foundation of the process Over 60 sets of Rules and Guides Developed with industry Redundant Propulsion Guide MODU Rules High Speed Craft Guide SWATH Guide Steel Vessel Rules Naval Vessel Rules Industry Committee Based Peer review from all relevant parties Continual feedback and update Calibrated to proven experience

ABS - a Snapshot world leader in ship safety and environmental protection since 1862 1500 people 225 offices 81 countries ISO 9000 certified 60+ Rules and Guides 10,000 ships in class (250+ Government) totaling over 100 million gross tons 20,000 manhours engineering review per month 708 new construction ships under survey (15 million gross tons) A Industry and Government Involved in Management and Operations

Engineering Group OED - Offshore Engineering Department AA - Advanced Analysis Department SED - Ship Engineering Department Materials & Welding Department Naval Engineering Department

Ship Engineering Department Tanker / Bulk Carrier / Ship Safety Group General Cargo Ship Group Tonnage Load Line Stability Group

ABS Rules Steel Vessel Rules Steel Barges - Ocean Service Barges of any Length Steel Vessels Under 90 m - Crewboats, Tugs High Speed Naval Craft- Patrol Boats HSVs Steel Vessels for Service on Rivers, ICW - River Barges, Towboats Bulk Carriers for Service on the Great Lakes - Freshwater Operations Reinforced Plastic Vessels - F. R. P. Vessels Aluminum Vessels - Aluminum Commercial Vessels 100’ - 500’ Naval Vessel Rules MODU - Mobile Offshore Drilling Units

ABS Guides Motor Pleasure Yachts - Steel, Aluminum, or FRP High Speed Craft, - Commercial/Government Service Planing vessels Fishing Vessels - Steel Fishing Vessels Under 90 m (200’) Offshore Racing Yachts - Steel, Aluminum, or FRP Sailing Vessels Fire Fighting Vessels - Steel Fireboats Crew Accommodations Guide Oil Recovery Vessels - Oil Spill Cleanup Vessels Floating Production Storage and Offloading Vessels - (FPSO) Small Waterplane Area Twin Hulled Vessels - (SWATH)

Ship Acquisition Process MNS ORD A-Spec Requirement Derivation RULES B-Spec Optional Step C-Spec Owner Build-to- Print Contractor Technical Validation CLASSIFICATION

Function - Fitness - Safety Owner’s Requirements not addressed elsewhere mission related owner unique Detailed Component and Performance Standards Classification Rules structural and mechanical fitness physical attributes of ship Statutory Compliance safety of life issues environmental protection Baseline Technical Standards

Hull Classification Considerations Intact and Damaged Stability Specialized Vessel Criteria Freeboard Assignment Strength of Hull Structure Longitudinal Strength Requirements Local Strength Requirements Condition Assessment Surveys During Construction Surveys In-Service

Structural Analysis 1. Load Determination - “What are the Loads?’ 2. Response Determination - “How do these loads affect the Structure?” 3. Strength Evaluation - “Are the structural arrangements and materials adequate for the determined response?”

Ship Structure Longitudinal Strength (Continuous Members) Local Plating/Stiffener Requirements Main Supporting Members Longitudinal/Transverse Bulkheads Web Frames Appendages Rudder/Skeg Bilge Keel Materials Grade ( Strength & Toughness ) Castings / Forgings Welding

Longitudinal Strength Unified IACS Requirement Still Water Bending Moment Wave Bending Moment Hogging Condition Sagging Condition Total Bending Moment

Strength Evaluations Material Selection Failure Modes Grade (Strength vs. Toughness) Castings/Forgings Welding Service Temperature Thickness Failure Modes Yielding Buckling Fatigue Fracture

Fatigue Assessment Description of the Environment Calculations of Ship Motions, Sealoads, and Local Hydrodynamic Pressures Calculations of Structural Response and Stress Transfer Function Selection of Appropriate S-N Curves and Stress Concentration Factors Estimation of Fatigue Life and Comparison with Acceptance Criteria

Approach to Hull Classification Semi–Empirical Approach to Hull Classification Longitudinal Strength P Yielding (Explicit) Buckling (Both) Local Strength Analysis Response Determination Fatigue (Implicit) Main Supporting Fracture (Implicit) Members Material Requirements Strength vs. Toughness

Semi-Empirical Rules Derived from First Principles Stiffeners (beams) Assume Fixed End Beams where M = wl2 / 12 w = s h & SM= M / Fb Allowable Stress Fb = 15.68 KSI or 20.16KSI for Ordinary Steel Fy =34KSI ABS Rule SM= ,0041 c h s l2

Safehull Project Objective “ A Completely Restated Set of Hull Design and Evaluation Criteria” Establish Loads and Combinations Acting on the Global and Local Structure Specify the Extent and Types of Analyses Required to Determine Loads Establish the Required Strength of the Structure to Resist Load Effects

Traditional Approach Nominal Loading - Prescribed Simple Design Equations in Rules Calibrated by Satisfactory Service Experience

Modern Approach Expected Loading - Calculated Analysis Methods to Establish Load Effects Strength Performance Criteria Under Demands of Loads

Net Ship Approach Design Strength is Evaluated with Expected Corrosion Values Removed Nominal Strength can be Preserved for the Entire Life of the Vessel Appropriate Corrosion Margins can be added to Accommodate Longer Design Lives Allows Explicit Means to Assess Sensitivity of Structural Strength to Corrosion

Net Ship Concept Corrosion Fatigue Corrosion/Fatigue Interaction

Corrosion Margins Recommended Corrosion Location/Structural Element Margin for Class (mm)* Cargo Tank Ballast Tank Effectively Coated Deck Plating 1.0 2.0 Side Shell Plating N.A 1.5 Bottom Plating N.A 1.0 Innerbottom Plating 1.5 1.5 Longitudinal Bulkhead Plating 1.0 1.5 Transverse Bulkhead Plating 1.0 1.5 Transverse & Longitudinal Deck Supporting Members 1.5 2.0 Double Bottom Tank Internals (Stiffeners, Floors and Girders) N.A 2.0 Vertical Stiffeners and Supporting Members Elsewhere 1.0 1.0 Non-vertical Longitudinals/Stiffeners and Supporting Members Elsewhere 1.5 2.0

Load Components Determined Through Parametric Seakeeping Analysis Hull Girder Loads Still Water and Wave Induced Bending Moment and Shear Force Vertical, Horizontal and Torsional Internal Tank Pressure Added Pressure Head due to Roll and Pitch Internal Forces due to Accelerations Sloshing External Pressure Hydrostatic Pressure Distribution Wave Induced Dynamic Pressure Distribution

Load Determination North Atlantic Route Strip Theory for Response Probabilistic Approach Long Term Values Incorporating: Wave Spectra Ship Headings Service Speed

Summary of Criteria Features Format Loads “Net-Ship” Concept Strength Criteria Fatigue Criteria Analysis to Obtain Load Effects

Finite Element Analysis (Phase B) 3-Dimensional - Determine Global Loads and Boundary Conditions 2-Dimensional - Determine Local Stress and Deflections Yielding Buckling Fatigue

Naval Vessel Rules Derived from Gen Specs and Design Data Sheets Requires Analysis of Longitudinal Strength using DDS 100 and SPECTRA Program Requires a FEM Analysis Uses Prescribed Loads from Traditional Navy Criteria and Specific Design Loads Concern over Shock Load & Ship Weight

High Speed Naval Craft Based on Design Criteria from NSWC- CD Combat Craft Department and NAVSEA Determines Loads from Vessel Response to Sea State, Speed and Heading Calculate local Slam pressures and Slam Moments Combines Slam Moment with Hull Girder Bending Moments