DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR fMRI –Signal, Noise and Experimental Design Torben Ellegaard Lund.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1st level analysis - Design matrix, contrasts & inference
Advertisements

The impact of global signal regression on resting state networks
Richard Wise FMRI Director +44(0)
Declaration of Conflict of Interest or Relationship
Outline What is ‘1st level analysis’? The Design matrix
Fund BioImag : MRI contrast mechanisms 1.What is the mechanism of T 2 * weighted MRI ? BOLD fMRI 2.How are spin echoes generated ? 3.What are.
Perfusion-Based fMRI Thomas T. Liu Center for Functional MRI University of California San Diego May 19, 2007.
Statistical Signal Processing for fMRI
Parameters and Trade-offs
Methods Protocol: Previous studies [1, 2] have involved imaging of only a single central slice of the brain. The present study used a similar paradigm,
Introduction to Functional and Anatomical Brain MRI Research Dr. Henk Cremers Dr. Sarah Keedy 1.
1 Temporal Processing Chris Rorden Temporal Processing can reduce error in our model –Slice Time Correction –Temporal Autocorrelation –High and low pass.
1 Temporal Processing Chris Rorden Temporal Processing can reduce error in our model –Slice Time Correction –Temporal Autocorrelation –High and low pass.
Research course on functional magnetic resonance imaging (non-invasive brain imaging) Juha Salmitaival.
Introduction to Functional and Anatomical Brain MRI Research Dr. Henk Cremers Dr. Sarah Keedy 1.
Signal to noise ratio (SNR) and data quality. Coils Source: Joe Gati Head coil homogenous signal moderate SNR Surface coil highest signal at hotspot high.
Principles of MRI. Some terms: –Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) quantum property of protons energy absorbed when precession frequency matches radio frequency.
HST 583 fMRI DATA ANALYSIS AND ACQUISITION Neural Signal Processing for Functional Neuroimaging Emery N. Brown Neuroscience Statistics Research Laboratory.
Efficiency in Experimental Design Catherine Jones MfD2004.
Design Efficiency Tom Jenkins Cat Mulvenna MfD March 2006.
fMRI introduction Michael Firbank
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 26 November 2008 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research.
1st level analysis: basis functions and correlated regressors
Efficiency – practical Get better fMRI results Dummy-in-chief Joel Winston Design matrix and.
BOLD fMRI.
Susceptibility Induced Loss of Signal: Comparing PET and fMRI on a Semantic Task Devlin et al. (in press)
Basics of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. How MRI Works Put a person inside a big magnetic field Transmit radio waves into the person –These "energize"
FINSIG'05 25/8/2005 1Eini Niskanen, Dept. of Applied Physics, University of Kuopio Principal Component Regression Approach for Functional Connectivity.
FMRI Methods Lecture7 – Review: analyses & statistics.
How well do we understand the neural origins of the fMRI BOLD signal? Owen J Arthurs and Simon Boniface Trends in Neuroscience, 2002 Gillian Elizabeth.
Basics of fMRI Time-Series Analysis Douglas N. Greve.
Global brain physiology does not impact regional BOLD activations Yufen Jennie Chen Xue Wang Todd B. Parrish 1 53rd ASNR meeting 2015, Chicago IL Poster.
Data Preprocessing and Motion Correction The bulk of this demonstration will focus on ‘quality control’ measures. Standard processing procedure - Every.
A comparison of methods for characterizing the event-related BOLD timeseries in rapid fMRI John T. Serences.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 14
BMI2 SS08 – Class 7 “functional MRI” Slide 1 Biomedical Imaging 2 Class 7 – Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI)
Conclusions Simulated fMRI phantoms with real motion and realistic susceptibility artifacts have been generated and tested using SPM2. Image distortion.
The General Linear Model (for dummies…) Carmen Tur and Ashwani Jha 2009.
Event-related fMRI SPM course May 2015 Helen Barron Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging 12 Queen Square.
Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston 18.
Idiot's guide to... General Linear Model & fMRI Elliot Freeman, ICN. fMRI model, Linear Time Series, Design Matrices, Parameter estimation,
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM fMRI Course London, May 2012.
1 st level analysis: Design matrix, contrasts, and inference Stephane De Brito & Fiona McNabe.
Analysis of FMRI Data: Principles and Practice Robert W Cox, PhD Scientific and Statistical Computing Core National Institute of Mental Health Bethesda,
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping II: GLM for fMRI Alexa Morcom and Stefan Kiebel, Rik Henson, Andrew Holmes & J-B Poline.
The General Linear Model Christophe Phillips SPM Short Course London, May 2013.
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM fMRI Course London, October 2012.
Parameters which can be “optimized” Functional Contrast Image signal to noise Hemodynamic Specificity Image quality (warping, dropout) Speed Resolution.
BOLD functional MRI Magnetic properties of oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin L. Pauling and C. Coryell, PNAS USA 22: (1936) BOLD effects in vivo.
Physiological correlates of the BOLD signal an Introduction.
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Contrast and Inferences
Variational Bayesian Inference for fMRI time series
FMRI experimental design and data processing
The General Linear Model
Jody Culham Brain and Mind Institute Department of Psychology
Seed-based Resting State fMRI Analysis in FreeSurfer
The General Linear Model (GLM): the marriage between linear systems and stats FFA.
Zen and the art of nuisance variable maintenance
and Stefan Kiebel, Rik Henson, Andrew Holmes & J-B Poline
Seed-based Resting State fMRI Analysis in FreeSurfer
The General Linear Model
Signal and Noise in fMRI
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model (GLM)
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model
Presentation transcript:

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR fMRI –Signal, Noise and Experimental Design Torben Ellegaard Lund

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR The BOLD signal Increased neural activity leads to: Increased regional oxygen consumption (rCMRO 2 ) Increased regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) Increased regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) A decrease in the deoxyhaemoglobin concentration leads to a signal increase in T2 and T2* weighted images

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR The BOLD signal The three components has different time- constants and effects: The rCMRO 2 increase leads to a fast but small signal decrease known as: ”The initial dip” (1s) The rCBF increase leads to the peak which usually dominates the haemodynamic response function (6s) The rCBV increase leads to a signal undershoot.(12s)

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR The BOLD signal What are the optimal imaging parameters?: TE, Bandwidth, sequence type Spatiotemporal resolution/coverage Slice orientation Etc.

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR The BOLD signal T2 or T2* ?

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR The BOLD signal Which TE? S(t)=I 0 e -t/T2*

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR The BOLD signal A time course Langkilde & Rostrup

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR Noise There are several other things than the BOLD signal which vary during a fMRI time course: Drift in shim and gradient currents (1/f noise) Cardiac pulsation Respiration Swallowing Head motion Eye movement Stimulus locked motion

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR 1/f Noise Suggested origins: Drift in shim and gradient currents Motion Spontaneous neural activity

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR Solutions: Fitting T2* Blocking events together 1/f Noise

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR Stimulus locked motion Examples: Swallowing Speaking Jaw clenching Tongue movement Eye movements Head movement Birn et al. HBM 1999

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR Cardiac Induced Noise When critically sampled e.g. TR=143ms Weisskoff et al. 1993

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR Aliasing When? Nyquist criterion: 2f  f s Example heart rates: 61, 74 and 91 bpm Sampled at 0.5Hz i.e. TR=2s

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR Jitter The heart rate is not constant (f s =5.4Hz)  f~0.1Hz=6bpm

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR Cardiac Induced Noise When not critically sampled e.g. TR=3000ms Hu et al Dagli et al. 1999

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR Cardiac Induced Noise GLM regressors: Paradigm and 5 vessel time series (per session) F-test: Null-hypothesis: No effect of vessel time series p<0.05 corrected Lund et al. ISMRM 2002

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR Cardiac Induced Noise GLM regressors: Paradigm and 5 vessel time series (per session) F-test: Null-hypothesis: No effect of vessel time series p<0.05 corrected Lund et al. ISMRM 2002

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR Cardiac Induced Noise Significant effect of nuisance covariates in: Areas surrounding branches of the medial-, posterior and anterior cerebral arteries Ventricles The dural venous sinuses Lund et al. ISMRM 2002

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR Cardiac Induced Noise Over sampled: TR=200ms Under sampled TR=1.6s -but cardiac noise is now modelled Example: Flickering checkerboard Lund et al. ISMRM 2001

DRCMR Danish Research Centre for MR Links SPM FSL SPM extensions DRCMR