ZEC Model parameters of 20100801 Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao Jan. 18, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3 Models of the Earth.
Advertisements

Global Properties of Heliospheric Disturbances Observed by Interplanetary Scintillation M. Tokumaru, M. Kojima, K. Fujiki, and M. Yamashita (Solar-Terrestrial.
Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau International Solar Cycle Studies 2001 (ISCS), June 13-16, 2001 Longmont, Colorado CME.
CAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment, USTC The Deflection of 2008 September 13 CME in Heliosphere Space ISEST, Hvar, Croatia,2013 June 17 Collaborators:
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Specification of the broad shell of dense plasma for halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao Stanford University Stanford University EGU Session ST2 Vienna, Austria 25 April.
Inverting Geometrical Properties of 3-D Rope-like CMEs From 2-D Frontside Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao Stanford University SH23B Dec. 16, MC Hall.
Forecasting Super CME Disturbances 1.Super CMEs, such as the 2000 July 14, 2003 October 28, 2003 October 29, and 2006 December 13 full halo CMEs, generate.
3-D Pre-Eruption Magnetic Field Configuration Involved in 28 Oct 2003 Fast Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao Stanford University 36 Th COSPAR Assembly Beijing, China,
1 Determination of 3D CME Trajectories using Stereoscopy Paulett Liewer, Jeff Hall, Eric DeJong, JPL Vahab Pournaghsband, UCB Arnaud Thernisien and Russ.
Validating One-point Inversion Solution of the Elliptic Cone Model for Full-Halo CMEs X. P. Zhao Stanford University H. Cremades, UTN-FRM / CONICET SSH31A.
My 20 Years of Service at Stanford Solar Physics Group I. Improvement of inner boundary condition for data-based coronal models (WSO, MDI, HMI). II. Development.
Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China.
Relationship Between Magnetic Clouds and Earth-Directed CMEs: Space Weather Research in Stanford Solar Group Xuepu Zhao The Second International Space.
Identifying and Modeling Coronal Holes Observed by SDO/AIA, STEREO /A and B Using HMI Synchronic Frames X. P. Zhao, J. T. Hoeksema, Y. Liu, P. H. Scherrer.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. Ambient Solar Wind Models SAIC 3-D MHD steady state coronal model based on photospheric field maps CU/CIRES-NOAA/SEC.
Improvement of Inversion Solutions for Type C Halo CMEs Using the Elliptic Cone Model.
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
The nature of impulsive solar energetic particle events N. V. Nitta a, H. S. Hudson b, M. L. Derosa a a Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory.
The global character of the Earth-directed coronal mass ejection and its trigger Xuepu Zhao and J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University The Firs.
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
The First Space-Weather Numerical Forecasting Model & Reconstruction of Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao NAOC Oct.
Determination of Geometrical and Kinematical Properties of Disk Halo CMEs Using the Elliptic Cone Model X. P. Zhao, H. Cremades, J. T. Hoeksema, Y. Liu.
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Characterization of Coronal Mass Ejection Deflection using Coronagraph Image Sequences Jenna L. Zink, GMU Undergraduate Research Scholars Program, Rebekah.
Why a Sun-Earth line Coronagraph is Best Doug Biesecker NOAA/SWPC.
Shock wave formation heights using 2D density and Alfvén maps of the corona ABSTRACT Coronal shock waves can produce decametric radio emission known Type.
1 Interpreting SECCHI White Light Images: FOV Sensitivity & Stereo Viewing Paulett Liewer, JPL; Russ Howard & Dennis Socker, NRL SECCHI Consortium Meeting.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Assessing Predictions of CME Time- of-Arrival and 1 AU Speed to Observations Angelos Vourlidas Vourlidas- SHINE
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
Relation between Type II Bursts and CMEs Inferred from STEREO Observations N. Gopalswamy, W. Thompson, J. Davila, M. Kaiser NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
1 Determination of CME 3D Trajectories using COR Stereoscopy + Analysis of HI1 CME Tracks P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; N. Sheeley,
RECREATING THE THREE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF INTERPLANETARY CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS Timothy A. Howard and S. James Tappin AGU Fall Meeting, December,
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
1 Acceleration and Deceleration of Flare/Coronal Mass Ejection Induced Shocks S.T. Wu 1, C.-C. Wu 2, Aihua Wang 1, and K. Liou 3 1 CSPAR, University of.
Extremely Fast Coronal Mass Ejection on 23 July Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland,20723, USA 2 NOAA Space Weather.
Lessons for STEREO - learned from Helios Presented at the STEREO/Solar B Workshop, Rainer Schwenn, MPS Lindau The Helios.
Strong rotation of an erupting quiescent polar crown prominence W. T. Thompson Adnet Systems, Inc. NASA/GSFC.
Modeling of CME-driven Shock propagation with ENLIL simulations using flux-rope and cone-model inputs Using observations from STEREO/SECCHI and SOHO/LASCO,
CASS/UCSD ILWS 2009 SMEI 3D reconstructions of density behind shocks B.V. Jackson, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington, M.M. Bisi, J.M. Clover, S. Hamilton Center.
Xie – STEREO SWG – Dublin – March 2010 Low Mass Coronal Mass Ejections Missed by STEREO A/B or LASCO and Associated ICMEs H. Xie 1,2, O. C. St. Cyr 2,
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Heliospheric Simulations of the SHINE Campaign Events SHINE Workshop, Big Sky, MT, June 27 – July 2, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
ENLIL Modeling for the interaction event: Effect of Interacting CMEs on SEP Intensity NASA/GSFC H. Xie, N. Gopalswamy, P. Makela, S. Yashiro.
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
On Coronal Mass Ejections and Configurations of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu Stanford University 3/17/ COSPAR 2008.
Shocks in the IPS Wageesh Mishra Eun-kyung Joo Shih-pin Chen.
Solar Origins of the October November 2003 Extreme Events N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC SHINE 2004 WG3 Thursday, June 1 Big Sky, Montana Photo.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
Complexity of Solar Eruptions Nat Gopalswamy, NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD
October-November CMEs Yang Liu – Stanford University
1 Determination of CME 3D Trajectories using Stereoscopy STEREO CMES of 16Nov2007 and 31AUG2007 P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; R.
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
Driving 3D-MHD codes Using the UCSD Tomography
On the three-dimensional configuration of coronal mass ejections
Xuepu Zhao Oct. 19, 2011 The Base of the Heliosphere: The Outer (Inner) Boundary Conditions of Coronal (Heliospheric) models.
Carrington Rotation 2106 – Close-up of AR Mr 2106 Bt 2106
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Anemone Structure and Geo-Effective Flares/CMEs
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
Correlation between halo coronal mass ejections
The Second International Space Weather Symposium
Presentation transcript:

ZEC Model parameters of Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao Jan. 18, 2011

1. Observation According to the _22:00 USAF/NOAA Report of Solar and Geophysical Activity, there were two halo CMEs on Aug. 1, One is a partial-halo CME associated with the 07: :11 UT disappearing filament centered near N37W32 and the other is a full-halo CME associated with the 08:26 UT long-duration flare at N13E21 or N20E35 in AR The two halo CMEs may be a chain reaction. Schrijver and Title (see news/science-at-nasa/2010/13dec_globaleruption/) recently suggest that the solar storm is a “global event”, i.e., an eruption of the entire hemisphere of the Sun. This storm contains., flares, tsunamis, CMEs, and all components go off all at once, hundreds of thousands of miles apart.

Was the event one big chain reaction, in which one eruption triggered another? Or did everything go off together caused by global reconfiguration through, say, the loss of equilibrium of global magnetic field ? As shown in Figure 1, the halo CMEs were first seen in LASCO/C3 at 14:18 UT, several hours after the onset of the associated flares and DSF (There was no C2 observation before 14:18 UT). If it is a chain reaction, the _14:18 halo image may be made of partial and full halo CMEs associated with the two near-surface activities. However, If the solar storm is a “global event”, the halo image may be a single halo CME!

Fig 1. Six white-light halo images observed by SOHO/LASCO C3 between 14:18 UT and16:48 Aug. 1, All images show complicated structure, suggesting that it may be a composite event.

2. Identifying elliptic outline of the _14:18 halo CMEs If it is a single event, an elliptic outline may be obtained by selecting 5 points well-distributed around entire edge of the halo image (Cremades, 2005), as shown by the five green dots in the left panel of Figure 2. How to recognize the full- and partial- halo CME from the images in Figure 1? It is a challenge!

Fig 2 The three elliptic outlines obtained based on the five green dots in the three panels. The elliptic outlines in the Left, middle, and right panels are for the case of Single-halo, Full-halo, and Partial-halo CMEs. To find the elliptic outline of the full- and partial-halo CMEs, we tried to select five points located on the well-recognized half of outer edge of halos (see the five green dots in the middle and right panels of Figure 2).

2.1 Five halo parameters obtained based on the three elliptic outlines in Fig. 2 Table 1 Five Halo parameters SAx Say Dse ψ α Single-halo 11.2 Rs 12.3 Rs 1.24 Rs -34° 133° Full-halo 10.4 Rs 13.7 Rs 1.35 Rs -12° -108° Partial-halo 6.8 Rs 10.0 Rs 4.15 Rs -22° -13°

3. ZEC model parameters We calculate six ZEC model parameters using the one-point approach on the basis of the five halo parameters and the position of the associated near surface activity (Zhao, 2008). We first calculate the CME projection angle β and CME propagation direction, using the halo parameter α and flare position (see top panels of Figure 3), then invert the other four model parameters from the halo parameters (see the bottom panels of Fig 3).

Fig 3 Inversion of the 3-D geometrical property of the _14:18 single, full- and partial-halo CMEs using the halo parameters of the single, full and partial halo CMEs and the position of flare and DSF, i.e. N13E21 (left), N20E35(middle), and N37E32 (right column).

3.1 Six ZEC model parameters and CME propagation directio (λ, φ) Table 2 Model parameters & CME propagation direction α β χ ωy ωz Rc λ φ Single-halo 133° 81.3° -37.0° 56.3° 53.9° 8.25 Rs -6.34° -5.96° Full-halo -108° 63.1° -19.0° 77.9° 75.5° 2.99 Rs 25.42° -9.08° Partial-halo -13° 54.7° -35.0° 56.4° 47.8° 7.17 Rs 7.54° 34.58°

3.2 The kinematic property of the full- and partial- halo CMEs The six C3 images in Figure 1 may be used to measure the sky- plane speed, Vs, and sky-plane acceleration, As, at the measured polar angle, mpa, for the single-, full- and partial-halo CMEs. By combining mpa, Vs, As with the inferred model parameters in Table 1, the true radial speed, Vr, and acceleration, Ar, at time, T21.5, when the CME was arriving at 21.5 solar radii (See Table 3). Table 3 Kinematic properties mpa Vs As T21.5 Vr Ar Single-halo 9° 425 km/s :49UT 569 km/s 0.0 Full-halo 9° 425 km/s :20UT 436 km/s 0.0 Partial-halo 253° 464 km/s :58UT 466 km/s 0.0

4. Propagation direction of the full-halo CME observed by STEREO A/B COR1 and COR2 On Aug. 1, 2010 the Earth Ecliptic (HEE) longitudes of the STEREO Ahead and Behind are 78.4° and °, respectively. The Earth-directed halo CME observed by STEREO Ahead and Behind would be east and west limb CMEs. Figures 4 and 5 show limb CMEs observed by COR1 and COR2.

Fig 4 Ahead (left) and Behind (right) COR1 Observation between 08:01 and 10:01 UT Fig 5 Ahead (left) and Behind (right) COR2 Observation between 08:09 and 10:09 UT

Fig 5 shows east and west limb CMEs with angular width greater than 45°. This pair of limb CMEs started after 08:09UT, implies that it is a Earth-directed CME, the same as the SOHO/C3 full halo CME. To see if its propagation direction is in north-east quadrant, we infer its propagation direction on the basis of the measured image-plane longitude α a and α b of the central axis of the limb CMEs (Zhao, 2011), as shown in Figure 6. It is found that the propagation direction of the Earth-directed CME is indeed in the north-east quadrant, i.e., N11E26, qualitatively agreeing with above result (Table 1).

5. Summary 5.1 We tried to find out the elliptic outline of halo CMEs on the basis of the five points selected around a half of and the whole edge of halo CMEs. 5.2 Based on the assumptions of global storm and chain reaction, we calculate the ZEC model parameters from the elliptic outlines in Figure 2.

5.3 The inferred geometrical and kinematical properties for Single-, Full- and Partial-halos (see Table 4) may be used as an input to simulate CME propagation or interaction in the heliosphere, and to see which agrees with in situ observation. Table 4 The time and model parameters at 21.5 Rs T21.5 λ φ ωy ωz χ Vr Single-halo 16:49UT -6.34° -5.96° 56.3° 53.9° km/s Full-halo 18:20UT 25.42° -9.08° 77.9° 75.5° km/s Partial-halo 17:58UT 7.54° 34.58° 56.4° 47.8° -35.0° 466km/s