25 February 20031 New Interaction Techniques Target Selection Under Time Pressure Conditions New Interaction Techniques Department of Computer and Information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies
Advertisements

Methodology and Explanation XX50125 Lecture 1: Part I. Introduction to Evaluation Methods Part 2. Experiments Dr. Danaë Stanton Fraser.
Proposing new ways of resolving online conflicts: an intelligent facilitation of forgiveness in CMC Asimina Vasalou, Jeremy Pitt Intelligent Systems and.
Early Effort Estimation of Business Data-processing Enhancements CS 689 November 30, 2000 By Kurt Detamore.
4.1.5 System Management Background What is in System Management Resource control and scheduling Booting, reconfiguration, defining limits for resource.
EyeChess: the tutoring game with visual attentive interface Špakov Oleg Department of Computer Sciences University of Tampere Finland
Fuzzy immune PID neural network control method based on boiler steam pressure system Third pacific-asia conference on circuits,communications and system,
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies. 2 FJK User-Centered Design and Development Instructor: Franz J. Kurfess Computer Science Dept.
The Decision-Making Process IT Brainpower
Improving Collaboration in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operations March 27, 2007 Stacey D. Scott Humans & Automation Lab MIT Aeronautics and Astronautics
Design Activities in Usability Engineering laura leventhal and julie barnes.
The Process of Interaction Design. Overview What is Interaction Design? —Four basic activities —Three key characteristics Some practical issues —Who are.
The Process of Interaction Design
What is Interaction Design?
SienceSpace Virtual Realities for Learning Complex and Abstract Scientific Concepts.
Class 6 LBSC 690 Information Technology Human Computer Interaction and Usability.
Web Usability by Scott Grissom1 Web Usability Scott Grissom Computer Science & Information Systems.
Cyclic input of characters through a single digital button without visual feedback Yang Xiaoqing New Interaction Techniques Dept.
Jesper Kjeldskov & Jan Stage Department of Computer Science Aalborg University Denmark New Techniques for Usability Evaluation of Mobile Systems.
Evaluating Non-Visual Feedback Cues for Touch Input Device Selina Sharmin Project for the course New Interaction Techniques Spring.
The Process of Interaction Design. What is Interaction Design? It is a process: — a goal-directed problem solving activity informed by intended use, target.
Design and Evaluation of Iterative Systems n For most interactive systems, the ‘design it right first’ approach is not useful. n The 3 basic steps in the.
Symbol Creator Usability evaluation of a novel pen- based text input technique Melinda Luoma New Interaction Techniques February 25, 2003.
Using a head joystick in a one axis manipulation.
So nification of the facial expressio ns New Interaction Techniques Department of Computer Science University of Tampere 27 February 2003 Guo Zhiguo Ioulia.
Developing Intelligent Agents and Multiagent Systems for Educational Applications Leen-Kiat Soh Department of Computer Science and Engineering University.
Text Input Under Time Pressure Conditions Department of Computer and Information Sciences University of Tampere, Finland Liang Jing Liang Jing p 01_12.
Applying Eye Tracking for Usability Evaluations of E-Commerce sites Ekaterini Tzanidou, Shailey Minocha, Marian Petre Department of Computing, The Open.
GDSS Notes SYBCA – Heta Desai. Group Decision Support System  The decision support system approach has resulted in better decision making for all levels.
The Need for Speed. The PDF-4+ database is designed to handle very large amounts of data and provide the user with an ability to perform extensive data.
OOSE 01/17 Institute of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Cheng Kung University Member:Q 薛弘志 P 蔡文豪 F 周詩御.
Software Faults and Fault Injection Models --Raviteja Varanasi.
Strategic Directions in Human- Computer Interaction MOIS466 MINIPROJECT Presented To: Dr. Dina Rateb Presented By: Menna Abd El Fadil.
1 Chapter No 3 ICT IN Science,Maths,Modeling, Simulation.
1 Shengdong Zhao Department of Computer Science University of Toronto July 9, 2008 earPod: Efficient, Hierarchical, Eyes-free Menu Selection.
Introduction to SDLC: System Development Life Cycle Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2009.
EWatchdog: An Electronic Watchdog for Unobtrusive Emotion Detection based on Usage Analysis Rayhan Shikder Department.
1 SWE 513: Software Engineering Usability II. 2 Usability and Cost Good usability may be expensive in hardware or special software development User interface.
Quantifying the Impact of Meeting Technology AMI Community of Interest Workshop Amsterdam, September 11/12, 2007.
1 Brief Review of Research Model / Hypothesis. 2 Research is Argument.
Research methods for HCI, HCC Judy Kay CHAI: Computer Human Adapted Interaction School of Information Technologies.
IMPRINT Pro Usability Assessment Pratik Jha, Julie Naga and Dr. Raja Parasuraman George Mason University.
===!"§ Deutsche Telekom Laboratories Target Acquisition with Camera Phones when used as Magic Lenses CHI 2008, Florence, Italy, April 9, 2008 Michael Rohs.
NC-BSI: 3.3 Data Fusion for Decision Support Problem Statement/Objectives: Problem - Accurate situation awareness requires rapid integration of heterogeneous.
Human Computer Interaction
Business Process Change and Discrete-Event Simulation: Bridging the Gap Vlatka Hlupic Brunel University Centre for Re-engineering Business Processes (REBUS)
1 Challenge the future Longitudinal Driving Behavior in case of Emergency situations: An Empirically Underpinned Theoretical Framework Dr. R.(Raymond)
Net-Centric Software and Systems I/UCRC A Framework for QoS and Power Management for Mobile Devices in Service Clouds Project Lead: I-Ling Yen, Farokh.
Usability and Human Factors Unit 4a Human Factors and Healthcare.
I can be You: Questioning the use of Keystroke Dynamics as Biometrics —Paper by Tey Chee Meng, Payas Gupta, Debin Gao Presented by: Kai Li Department of.
Profile Dr Alice Good (MSc, BSC, PGCE, FHEA) Senior Lecturer Human Computer Interaction (SoC) Research Interests Supporting mental health and wellbeing.
Curiosity-Driven Exploration with Planning Trajectories Tyler Streeter PhD Student, Human Computer Interaction Iowa State University
1 Human Computer Interaction Week 5 Interaction Devices and Input-Output.
Usability Evaluation, part 2. REVIEW: A Test Plan Checklist, 1 Goal of the test? Specific questions you want to answer? Who will be the experimenter?
Yan Zhang University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Introduction Research goals  Help build systems that are able to provide.
I can be You: Questioning the use of Keystroke Dynamics as Biometrics Tey Chee Meng, Payas Gupta, Debin Gao Ke Chen.
Supporting team communication and coordination in visual analytics Narges Mahyar University of Victoria April 2014.
HCI Meeting 1 Thursday, August 26. Class Activities [1] Student questionnaire Answer the following questions: 1.When and where was the computer mouse.
Evaluating Dynamic Services in Bioinformatics Maíra R. Rodrigues Michael Luck University of Southampton, UK Tenth International Workshop CIA 2006, Edinburgh.
Pen Based User Interface Issues CSE 490RA January 25, 2005.
Design Evaluation Overview Introduction Model for Interface Design Evaluation Types of Evaluation –Conceptual Design –Usability –Learning Outcome.
IMPROVING THE HUMAN TECHNOLOGY INTERFACE NURSING INFORMATICS CHAPTER 4 1.
PostGraduate Research Excellence Symposium (PGReS) 2015
Usability Evaluation, part 2
PETRA 2014 An Interactive Learning and Adaptation Framework for Socially Assistive Robotics: An Interactive Reinforcement Learning Approach Konstantinos.
F-Pointer: Prototype testing of the finger-manipulated device
CS 522: Human-Computer Interaction Usability and HCI Topics
Realizing Closed-loop, Online Tuning and Control for Configurable-Cache Embedded Systems: Progress and Challenges Islam S. Badreldin*, Ann Gordon-Ross*,
Experimental Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

25 February New Interaction Techniques Target Selection Under Time Pressure Conditions New Interaction Techniques Department of Computer and Information Sciences University of Tampere, Finland Zhang Weiwei

25 February Introduction to the Problem Under the time conditions, how users make their decision Under the time conditions, how users make their decision User performance in objective time User performance in objective time Dynamic tracking without any static state Dynamic tracking without any static state To find useful (temporal) parameters facilitating human computer interaction for people with special needs To find useful (temporal) parameters facilitating human computer interaction for people with special needs New Interaction Techniques

25 February Background Research data with operators working in extremely conditions. Such as open space, deep-water research Research data with operators working in extremely conditions. Such as open space, deep-water research General, conventional mouse or joystick can be used to control direction and tracking targets. General, conventional mouse or joystick can be used to control direction and tracking targets. Temporal parameters during HCI (lead or lag cues) cause negative emotions, e.g., annoyance and anger, lead to stress and increase mental workload user. Temporal parameters during HCI (lead or lag cues) cause negative emotions, e.g., annoyance and anger, lead to stress and increase mental workload user. The challenge to usability exploration of temporal model in user behavior dynamics. The challenge to usability exploration of temporal model in user behavior dynamics. New Interaction Techniques

25 February Objectives in General To study the features of user performance in strongly restricted temporal intervals for decision making and adequate action (capturing targets). To study the features of user performance in strongly restricted temporal intervals for decision making and adequate action (capturing targets). How to reduce the complexity of the decision-making and to save time in urgent conditions. How to reduce the complexity of the decision-making and to save time in urgent conditions. In particular, doing comparison for user behavior data when: controlled parameters (cursor coordinates) are redistributed between two hands (manipulation through two analog buttons) and a targets exposition is progressively decreasing. In particular, doing comparison for user behavior data when: controlled parameters (cursor coordinates) are redistributed between two hands (manipulation through two analog buttons) and a targets exposition is progressively decreasing. New Interaction Techniques

25 February ScheduleActivityweeksResult Overview (brief) to the problem & design for usability testing scenario, software installation & familiarization 2 usability testing scenario usability testing 3data Data analysis 2results Writing Project report 21 Project paper/Draft Final version New Interaction Techniques

25 February Research Methods Empirical research and usability testing the new techniques software and tools: Empirical research and usability testing the new techniques software and tools: redistributed controlled parameters (cursor coordinates) redistributed controlled parameters (cursor coordinates) analog buttons software to collect and process data Doing interview to subjects who took part in tests Doing interview to subjects who took part in tests New Interaction Techniques

25 February Preliminary Results The new software had been installed and more familiar with them. The new software had been installed and more familiar with them. Already install that new tool on computer and learn how to use it to track targets. Already install that new tool on computer and learn how to use it to track targets. Do more practices with that new tool to improve the speed of tracking. Do more practices with that new tool to improve the speed of tracking. New Interaction Techniques

25 February Experimental Setup Software installation, calibration for analog buttons. Software installation, calibration for analog buttons. 3 minutes for training. 3 minutes for training. Data collection with different targets exposition: Data collection with different targets exposition: Change the time pressure Change the time pressure 2 sessions per person, 5 trials for each subject Data analysis. Data analysis. New Interaction Techniques

25 February Experimental Setup Analysis data with that software. Do testing with time conditions and collecting data. New Interaction Techniques

25 February Forecasted results Forecasted results Dynamics for user performance and strategy for task realization will be evaluated through the next parameters: reaction time per target a number of errors individual behavior patterns Ave (on 8 subjects) + standard deviation (s) New Interaction Techniques

25 February Prospective applications Understanding human behavior under different time pressure conditions. Understanding human behavior under different time pressure conditions. Adaptive drivers: through analysis of user behavior reactions in special condition, similar to calibration for mouse, to set individual (temporal) parameters in system which are adequate for user performance. Adaptive drivers: through analysis of user behavior reactions in special condition, similar to calibration for mouse, to set individual (temporal) parameters in system which are adequate for user performance. Adaptive interaction techniques for people who has special needs. Adaptive interaction techniques for people who has special needs. New Interaction Techniques

25 February References Hayne, S. and Smith, C.A.P. Decision-Making Under Time Pressure: An investigation of decision speed and decision quality of computer supported groups. AIS Conference, Available at: Hayne, S. and Smith, C.A.P. Decision-Making Under Time Pressure: An investigation of decision speed and decision quality of computer supported groups. AIS Conference, Available at: Mann, L. and Tan, Ch. The Hassled Decision Maker: The Effects of Perceived Time Pressure on Information Processing in Decision Making. Australian Journal of Management, V. 18(2) December, 1993, The University of New South Wales, Available at: Mann, L. and Tan, Ch. The Hassled Decision Maker: The Effects of Perceived Time Pressure on Information Processing in Decision Making. Australian Journal of Management, V. 18(2) December, 1993, The University of New South Wales, Available at: Matiasek, J., Baroni, M. and Trost, H. FASTY – A Multi-lingual Approach to Text Prediction. In Proc. of the 8 th Int. Conf. on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2002, Linz, Austria, July. J.Klaus, K.Miesenberger, W. L. Zagler (Eds.), LNCS Vol. 2398, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2002, pp Matiasek, J., Baroni, M. and Trost, H. FASTY – A Multi-lingual Approach to Text Prediction. In Proc. of the 8 th Int. Conf. on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2002, Linz, Austria, July. J.Klaus, K.Miesenberger, W. L. Zagler (Eds.), LNCS Vol. 2398, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2002, pp Nobuki, O. and Sakai, Y. Human Characteristic on Phase Discrimination between Visual and Auditory Sine-Wave Stimuli. Available at: u.ac.jp/ICCS/olp/o1-11/o1-11.htm Nobuki, O. and Sakai, Y. Human Characteristic on Phase Discrimination between Visual and Auditory Sine-Wave Stimuli. Available at: u.ac.jp/ICCS/olp/o1-11/o1-11.htmhttp:// u.ac.jp/ICCS/olp/o1-11/o1-11.htmhttp:// u.ac.jp/ICCS/olp/o1-11/o1-11.htm Zagler, W.I. Matching Typing Persons and Intelligent Interfaces. In Proc. of the 8 th Int. Conf. on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2002, Linz, Austria, July. J.Klaus, K.Miesenberger, W. L. Zagler (Eds.), LNCS Vol. 2398, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002, p Zagler, W.I. Matching Typing Persons and Intelligent Interfaces. In Proc. of the 8 th Int. Conf. on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2002, Linz, Austria, July. J.Klaus, K.Miesenberger, W. L. Zagler (Eds.), LNCS Vol. 2398, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002, p Fabre, J., Howard, S. and Smith, R. Designing time at the user interface. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2000, Vol. 19(6), Fabre, J., Howard, S. and Smith, R. Designing time at the user interface. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2000, Vol. 19(6), New Interaction Techniques