Calorimeter GLAST Software 16-19 Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 1 Balloon Flight Integration Calorimeter Calibration Needs J.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
Advertisements

2 Introduction   MiniCal test-beam studies started at the beginning of March (till March 6 we only had 17 APD’s, then 33 APD’s)   A few days were.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Preshower 15/03/2005 P.Kokkas Preshower September Run Data Analysis P. Kokkas.
GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 1 Proposed Flight Trigger Configuration: Engines and Scheduler Table J.
GLAST LAT Project I&T Meeting – Jan 20,2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: EM1 Data Analysis and Calibration Summary Report Eduardo.
GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Response of the GLAST LAT Calorimeter.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop 6 – 06/02/27 F. Piron & E. Nuss (LPTA) 1 Trending CAL performance and mapping crystals Gamma-ray Large Area.
GLAST LAT ProjectTrigger Scheduler, Engines, and Rates 6 Feb 2006 J. Eric Grove Naval Research Lab Washington DC Trigger Scheduler, Engines, and Rates.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCalibration and Analysis group meeting, April, 3, 2006 CAL on-orbit calibration with protons. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop 5 – 05/08/29 F. Piron & E. Nuss (IN2P3/LPTA – Montpellier) 1 Comprehensive review of CAL calibrations Gamma-ray.
Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 1 Calibration Software Needs For CAL BFEM J. Eric Grove Naval.
GLAST LAT Project May 25, 2006: Pre-Environmental Test Review Presentation 6 of 12 LAT Test Results 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Pre-Environmental Test.
GLAST LAT ProjectGLAST Flight Software IDT, October 16, 2001 JJRussell1 October 16, 2001 What’s Covered Activity –Monitoring FSW defines this as activity.
GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 Analyses of Muon Calibration Data Xin Chen.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCAL Recon rewriting meeting, May, 11, 2005 In what cases we need external position estimation ? Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Baseline-Preliminary Design Review, January 8, 2002 J. Eric GroveCAL Ground Software 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Calorimeter.
GLAST LAT Project SE Test Planning meeting October 4, 2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1/13 SVAC Data Taking during LAT SLAC Oct 4, 2004 Eduardo.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop #4, 14 July 2005 David Smith CAL calib at SLAC SVAC1 Stability of the CAL Calibrations Online script “suites”
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.
Preliminary Results from a Trial Beam Test of the Small HBD Prototype at LEGS Bob Azmoun BNL HBD Working Group Meeting May 10, 2005.
ACD Calibrations in L&EO Needed Calibrations Pedestals (low and high range) Low range gains via MIP peak positions Veto and HLD discriminator set points.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
GLAST LAT ProjectInstrument Analysis Workshop, June 2004 J. Eric Grove Naval Research Lab Washington DC Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope CAL Detector.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR, October 2, 2001 E. do Couto e Silva1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectBeam test meeting, September 27, 2006 CsI afterglow - possible explaination of pedestal drift and excess of energy. Alexandre.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Meeting August 6, 2004 David Smith w. Benoît Lott Muons in photodiodes1 MIPs in your Photodiodes David’s Instr. Ana.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
Aa GLAST Particle Astrophysics Collaboration Instrument Managed and Integrated at SLAC/Stanford University The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Degrader 58 Ni Beam Fragments Target FRS: FRagment Separator at GSI Darmstadt, Germany One single beam: 58 Ni, with energy varying between.1 and 1.7 GeV/nucleon.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Muons at NRL 28 Feb 2006 J. Eric Grove Naval Research Lab Washington DC LAT Muon Data Taking During Environmental Test at NRL J. Eric.
GLAST LAT Project CU Beam Test Workshop 3/20/2006 C. Sgro’, L. Baldini, J. Bregeon1 Glast LAT Calibration Unit Beam Test Status Report on Online Monitor.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Update on the HBD Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting May 11, 2005.
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
In high energy astrophysics observations, it is crucial to reduce the background effectively to achieve a high sensitivity, for the source intensity is.
ALICE Offline Week October 4 th 2006 Silvia Arcelli & Chiara Zampolli TOF Online Calibration - Strategy - TOF Detector Algorithm - TOF Preprocessor.
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T Test Planning Telecon, 8 Nov 2004 CAL Test and Calibration DefinitionJ. Eric Grove GLAST LAT GLAST LAT Calorimeter Subsystem Gamma-ray.
CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.
1 Study of Data from the GLAST Balloon Prototype Based on a Geant4 Simulator Tsunefumi Mizuno February 22, Geant4 Work Shop The GLAST Satellite.
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Horn focusing effect 2.Beam stability (direction/flux) 3.Beam.
After integration and test at SLAC and GSFC, BFEM was shipped to the National Scientific Balloon Facility (NSBF) at Palestine, Texas. The experiment was.
Rita Carbone, RICAP 11, Roma 3 26/05/2011 Stand-alone low energy measurements of light nuclei from PAMELA Time-of-Flight system. Rita Carbone INFN Napoli.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Report of GLAST Balloon Flight October Annual meeting of Astronomical Society of Japan T. Mizuno and other GLAST Balloon Team
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
GLAST LAT ProjectNovember 18, 2004 I&T Two Tower IRR 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Integration and Test Two Tower Integration Readiness Review SVAC Elliott.
GLAST LAT ProjectACD CDR January 7 & 8, 2003 Section 8 EGSE, Performance Monitoring, Calibration 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: AntiCoincidence Detector.
Feb C.Smith UVA EC energy calibration – g13 pass0 For pass0 data were cooked with CALDB calibration constants reset to nominal 10 channels / MeV.
Calibrating the CAL in flight: Galactic Cosmic Ray Calibration
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
Single-CAL Test and Calibration
“minimum-ionisation” peak
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
GLAST Large Area Telescope
LAT Test Results GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Pre-Shipment Review
Imaging crystals with TKR
GLAST Large Area Telescope
Analysis of GLAST Balloon Experiment Data
Presentation transcript:

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 1 Balloon Flight Integration Calorimeter Calibration Needs J. Eric Grove Naval Research Lab

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 2 Calibration during integration o Muon calibration Overnight run – reqmt: >8 hrs – Goal: >12 hrs CAL-only trigger or TKR trigger. Data stream – reqmt: at least CAL-only – goal: full instrument – TKR recon for muon trajectories. Need access to data files! o Electronic calibration Full “intlin” calibration CAL-only data stream, CalGSE – No need for full instrument data stream. Full stream would complicate analysis. ~3 hr acquisition time Analysis of data is off line in IDL. No additional analysis software burden. Result is ADC_to_fC tables. At convenient times during BF payload integration, we require Does BF GSE support full CAL commanding? What’s the cmd i/f? How can we do these things without switching to CalGSE?

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 3 Pre-flight calibration o Muon calibration Overnight run – reqmt: >8 hrs – Goal: >12 hrs (~300 good muons per cm 2 ) CAL-only trigger or TKR trigger. Data stream – reqmt: at least CAL-only – goal: full instrument – TKR recon for muon trajectories. Need access to data file o One big, long muon calibration Either Palestine or GSFC >4 days (~2500 good muons per cm 2 ) TKR trigger. Full data stream and TKR recon. Result is good map of light asymmetry. o Electronic calibration Full “intlin” calibration CAL-only data stream, CalGSE – No need for full instrument data stream. Full stream would complicate analysis. ~3 hr acquisition time Analysis of data is off line in IDL. No additional analysis software burden. Result is ADC_to_fC tables. Prior to sealing the pressure vessel and declaring flight readiness, we require

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 4 Flight-ready calibration o Muon aliveness test Question: Are all channels still alive? Short run – reqmt: >15 minutes? – Goal: As long as thermally safe inside pressure vessel. Assume TKR trigger. Full instrument data stream. Need access to data file. Subsequent TKR recon for muon trajectories. o Electronic monitor Question: Any gross electronic changes? Quick “intlin” calibration ~15-minute acquisition time Full instrument data stream. Analysis of data is off line in IDL. Need access to data file. Need raw tlm read routine for IDL. Output summary figures. After declaring flight readiness, we require

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 5 Balloon flight GCRs o GCR rates for Palestine balloon flight Require passage through uppermost full Si layer and bottom of CsI Used CREME96 for 35km above Palestine in 2001, from H to Ni See SpeciesTotal rate (per hr) Non-fragmenting rate (per hr) C22063 N5815 O22055 Ne358 Mg4610 Si357 Fe294 Assuming 8 hrs at float ~4000 CNO ~900 Ne, Mg, and Si ~250 Fe to play with.

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 6 Integration issues o Balloon flight “What is needed to ensure instr works on delivery?” – Command interface – e.g. CalGSE – Data interface – e.g. CalGSE Realtime displays – e.g. CalGSE Off-line post processing – e.g. IDL and CAL routines NRL has supplied some sample diagnostics, will provide more. o LAT flight instrument

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 7 Integration Database o The various calibration processes produce a number of parameters describing the response of the CsI logs. All are time-dependent (TBR). Time scale is likely to be ~ weeks to months (TBR). o Calibration Parameter Database is a service of Software Central. 1. Pedestals Accumulated on board – Telemetered: pedestal, pedestal width, diagnostic histogram – Optional diagnostic mode telemeters full CAL data set, i.e. not zero-suppressed. 2 bytes x 2 parameters x 4 ranges x 2 ends x 1536 logs = 48 kB 2. Differential linearity correction Make the CDB smooth. – Worth thinking about some more. Consider 1 byte per ADC bin per range. 1 byte x 4096 channels x 4 ranges x 2 ends x 1536 logs = 50 MB

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 8 Calibration Parameter Database 3. Integral linearity correction (ADC to fC) Electronic calibration – Internal charge-injection circuit; used during in-flight diagnostic mode 4 bytes x 10 parameters x 4 ranges x 2 ends x 1536 logs = 480 kB GCR calibration – Might uncover additional non-linearities. Might not; thus these might not be used. 4 bytes x 5 parameters x 4 ranges x 2 ends x 1536 logs = 240 kB 4. Gain (optical conversion efficiency: fC to MeV[center of log]) Accounts for light collection: electrons at preamp per MeV deposited Calculated from GCR Calibration data. Updates ground calibration. 4 bytes x 4 ranges x 2 ends x 1536 logs = 48 kB 5. Light attenuation model (MeV[center] to MeV[position]) Accounts for variation of light collection along each log. Calculated from GCR Calibration data. Updates ground calibration. Small and large PINs have same light attenuation, so each log has 3 models: – Individual ends 4 bytes x 5 parameters x 2 ends x 1536 logs = 60 kB – Sum of ends 4 bytes x 5 parameters x 1536 logs = 30 kB

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 9 Eduardo asks … o “Inputs to in-flight calibration?” I assume “in-flight” means “on-board the LAT.” Pedestal collection and histogramming occurs on board. Electronic calibration triggering and collection occurs on board. – eCalib analysis is on ground. o “Inputs to off-line calibration?” Flight telemetry – Pedestal histograms – Electronic calibration triggers – GCR calibration triggers Ground calibration results o “Inputs to Science database?”

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 10 Appendix 1: Calibration with Cosmic Rays High flux of GCRs gives good calibration of full dynamic range. o Concept: 1. ACD flags events > few MIPs. 2. ACD flags 1 in 1000 single-MIPs. 3. Accept only events with good TKR. 4. Accept only events with no charge- changing interactions in CAL. 5. Correct  E for pathlength in CsI bar. 6. Accumulate dE/dx in each bar. o Derive calibration with statistical precision of better than few % each day over full dynamic range. He: ~140 Hz CNO: ~10 Hz  ~1100 per xtal per day Si: ~0.4 Hz Fe: ~0.8 Hz  ~70 per xtal per day

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 11 Appendix 1: Calibration with Cosmic Rays o Questions for simulation or analytic estimation: 1. What is rate of >few MIPs in ACD for everything but primary GCRs? Does this trigger add significantly to data volume? 2. How well are CsI bars on outer edge of calorimeter covered by tracked GCRs? What is the rate of each species? 3. How does rate of useful GCRs scale with geometry cuts? Cuts with CsI bars. Cuts for good TKR geometry. 4. What is the shape of  E distributions for useful GCRs? How well can they be centroided? – Finite width from dE/dx dependence on E 0, Landau fluctuations, and pathlength uncertainty. 5. Calibration above ~10 GeV: Use long-pathlength Fe. What is rate? How well is pathlength known?

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 12 Appendix 1: Calibration with Cosmic Rays o Particle fluxes CREME96 for 28.5 deg orbit for abundances and spectra. Conservative estimates: Required GCR to pass through upper and lower faces of CAL. o Particle ranges At 2 GeV/n in CsI, ranges of C and Fe are 440 g/cm 2 and 110 g/cm 2, resp. All incident C will penetrate CAL (9X 0 = 76 g/cm 2 ). All but low-energy, large-angle Fe will penetrate. Z rangeRate (s -1 ) 1 – – – – 280.7

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 13 Appendix 1: Calibration with Cosmic Rays o Nuclear interactions Majority of GCRs suffer nuclear interactions as they pass through calorimeter. Interaction lengths: – N,CsI = 86 g/cm 2 – Fe,CsI = 58 g/cm 2 GCR at 45 deg traverses ~100 g/cm 2 of CsI – ~30% of CNO group and ~20% of Fe survive without interacting. o How many per day in each CsI bar? ~1100 non-interacting CNO. ~70 non-interacting Fe. o Scintillation efficiency  Light output of CsI(Tl) is not strictly proportional to  E for heavy ions. dL/dE, the light output per unit energy loss, decreases slowly with increasing dE/dx for heavy ions, but is constant for EM showers. dL/dE is fcn of dE/dx, rather than charge of the beam. Magnitude (in NaI!!): – ~0.9 near minimum ionizing. – ~0.3 near end of range. o Need to measure in heavy ion beam!

Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 14 Appendix 1: Calibration with Cosmic Rays o Calibration Uncertainty  Need to bin GCRs by estimated  E. This is uncertain for following reasons: Uncertainty in initial energy. –  dE/dx ~ 10% over GeV/n. Landau fluctuations. –  L < 5% for CNO near 5 GeV/n. –  L < 5% for Fe near 5 GeV/n Unidentified nuclear interactions. – p-stripping from C is hard to miss. – p-stripping from Fe.  E < 10%. Uncertainty in dL/dE. – Guess < few %. o Adding in quadrature gives rms < 20%. o With ~1000 CNO per bar per day, statistical precision of ~1% per day is achievable.