1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapters 4 and 5 Scott Matthews Courses: 12-706 and 73-359 Lecture 6 - 9/17/2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pricing To Capture Surplus Value. Capturing Surplus: By applying the price discrimination. Price discrimination: the practice of charging consumers different.
Advertisements

Partial equilibrium B/C - A (Cost Benefit Analysis DEC 51304) R. Jongeneel Zerbe & Dively Ch.7-8.
Price Discrimination Monopoly Wrap-Up Chapter 15 Completion.
Part 3 Markets and Efficiency
Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapter 4 Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 7 - 9/22/2004.
Highlights Chapter 5 ECON Valuation in secondary markets Primary markets are directly affected by the program/policy (hiring of labour, materials..)
AGEC 608 Lecture 04, p. 1 AGEC 608: Lecture 4 Objective: Outline approach for valuing benefits and costs in primary markets (directly affected by policy)
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapters 4 and 5 Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 5 - 9/15/2003.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews / / Lecture 9.
Externalities © Allen C. Goodman 2000 Ideal Market Processes are desirable if … We accept the value judgment that “personal wants of individuals should.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews /
Introduction A monopoly is a firm that is the sole seller of a product without close substitutes. In this chapter, we study monopoly and contrast it with.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapters 3 and 4 Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 4 - 9/10/2003.
AGEC 608 Lecture 05, p. 1 AGEC 608: Lecture 5 Objective: Outline approach for valuing benefits and costs in secondary markets (those indirectly affected.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews / / Lecture 10.
1 Government production Should the government produce as a monopolist or try to act like a competitive firm?
Highlights Chapter 4 & 5 Econ 4140 Greg Mason. Willingness to pay view of CBA Benefits = willingness to pay to gain wanted outcomes Costs = willingness.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapter 4 Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 6 - 9/20/2004.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews / / Lecture 7.
The Welfare Impact of Government Funding for Agricultural R&D. The the effect of the funding is to rotate the supply curve downwards to S'. The assumption.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapters 3 and 4 Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 4 - 9/9/2002.
1 Compare Monopoly to Competition. 2 Compare monopoly with competition The main results here are the ideas that ----1) a monopoly firm will charge a higher.
slide 1Monopoly MONOPOLY A monopoly is a firm which is the sole producer of a good or service for which there are no close substitutes. The monopolist’s.
Chapter 11: Cost-Benefit Analysis Econ 330: Public Finance Dr
The Production Decision of a Monopoly Firm Alternative market structures: perfect competition monopolistic competition oligopoly monopoly.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapters 4 and 5 Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 5 - 9/11/2002.
Part 7 Further Topics © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
The Market for Labor.
Which curve is the demand curve? –Curve 1 Which curve is the marginal revenue curve? –Curve 2 Why? –For a monopoly to sell more, they must decrease price,
Market Equilibrium in Perfect Competition What do buyers and sellers get out of the market? And Why do economists think this is efficient?
Chapter 5 Valuing Benefits and Costs in Secondary Markets
Market Power: Monopoly
Chapter 10 Monopoly. Chapter 102 Review of Perfect Competition P = LMC = LRAC Normal profits or zero economic profits in the long run Large number of.
ECON 6012 Cost Benefit Analysis Memorial University of Newfoundland
Today Begin Monopoly. Monopoly Chapter 22 Perfect Competition = Many firms Oligopoly = A few firms Four Basic Models Monopoly = One firm Monopolistic.
ECON 6012 Cost Benefit Analysis Memorial University of Newfoundland
Monopoly & Efficiency Deadweight Loss Analysis. Efficiency Analysis Allocative Efficiency is when P = MC –No DWL, socially optimal –Monopolies fail as.
LONG RUN COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUM. One Price Monopoly Versus Perfect Competition.
Monopolistic Competition Long Run Equilibrium Chapter 17 Pages
The Incidence of Taxation. The incidence of taxation Indirect taxes.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright  2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. MONOPOLY MONOPOLY Chapter 12.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. The Competitive Firm Chapter 7.
Resource Market Mr. Barnett AP Microeconomics UHS.
Government Policies & Efficiency Econ 1 Chapters 7,6.
Monopoly profit ATC Quantity P 1 Q1Q1 0 Costs D MR MC ATC E1E1 Key Micro Relationships Socially Optimal P = MC Normal Profit P = ATC Max. Total Rev: MR.
Chapter 10 Monopoly. ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 102 Topics to be Discussed Monopoly and Monopoly Power Sources of Monopoly Power The Social.
Market Power: Monopoly and Monopsony
ECON 160 Week 07 March 08-10, 2011 Efficiency & Government Policies.
Combining Supply and Demand Buyers and sellers have to meet at a certain point Buyers and sellers have to meet at a certain point This point is called.
Micro-Economics Review Course Summary. Tax on buyers shifts D-curve, Tax on sellers shifts S-Curve Taxes always produce deadweight loss! –You produce.
Oct The Analysis of Competitive Markets.
MONOPOLIES.  Single seller (pure monopoly) – industry with only one dominant company  Cartel agreement – group of producers who enter a collusive agreement.
Monopoly & Efficiency Deadweight Loss Analysis. Allocative Efficiency Total Welfare is maximized only when MC = MB for society –Since MB = Price => only.
Chapter 22: The Competitive Firm Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 13e.
©McGraw-Hill Education, 2014
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews / / Lecture 9.
5. Secondary Markets Reading: ÝBGVW, Chapter 5 ÝMOMA article.
Output Input; ceteris paribus The law of diminishing marginal return.
Monopoly.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews / / Lecture 8.
ECON 6012 Cost Benefit Analysis Memorial University of Newfoundland
Week 07 March 02-04, 2010 Efficiency & Government Policies
AP MICRO ECONOMICS EXAM REVIEW
Unit 4: Imperfect Competition
5. Secondary Markets Reading: BGVW, Chapter 5 MOMA article.
Equilibrium (cont’d).
Monopoly (Part 2) Chapter 21.
COMMON MISTAKES ON THE AP MICRO EXAM
Deadweight Loss Analysis
Presentation transcript:

1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapters 4 and 5 Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 6 - 9/17/2003

and What is WTP by society to avoid? Q P Q# P# S*: marginal Private costs D S#:marginal Social costs P* Q* Differences in cost functions represent the alternative ‘valuations’ of the product - Thus difference between them WTP to avoid costs

and Notes about Public Spending  Resource allocation to one project always comes at a ‘cost’ to other projects  E.g. Pittsburgh stadium projects  “Use it or Lose it”  There is never enough money to go around  Thus opportunity costs exist  Ideally represented by areas under supply curves  Do not consider ‘sunk costs’  Three cases (we will do 2, see book for all 3)

and Price Floors (e.g. Min. Wage)  Labor market example (tricky)  Supply and demand ‘reversed’ - ideas of ‘consumer’, ‘producer’ switched  In labor market, workers are ‘producers’  Companies are ‘consumers’ of labor  A ‘price floor’ is a guaranteed wage rate level that must be kept  Good for some workers, bad for others

and Price Floor (e.g. Min Wage) L=num of workers P Ld Pm S D Pe Le Pr D+L’ LsLt

and Problem 4-2 from Book  Done on Board

and Monopoly Project - What is NSB? MR1D MC Q1 P1 P2 Q3Q2 Q’ D+Q’ MR2

and Monopoly Project - Agency Cost MR1D MC Q1 P1 P2 Q3Q2 Q’ D+Q’ MR2 C E A A AA A A G G G Agency Cost is A+C+G+E

and Monopoly Project - PS (2 parts) MR1D MC Q1 P1 P2 Q3Q2 Q’ D+Q’ MR2 C E A A AA A A G G G PS is price effect + Quantity effect = B+C+G+E C+G+E is transfer B

and Monopoly  Easy to see loss in CS is B+C. Thus:  Original Buyers lose B+C  Monopolist gains B+C+G+E  Project Costs A+C+G+E  --  NSB = (loss) A+C  Budgetary outlays larger than Social costs

and Secondary (aka spillover) Markets  When secondary markets affected  Can and should ignore impacts as long as primary effects measured and undistorted secondary market prices unchanged  Measuring both usually leads to double counting (since primary markets tend to show all effects)

and Primary: Fishing Days Q1 P0 D Price Government puts more fish in lake for fishermen Makes local lake more attractive, lowers travel/access costs Number of fishing days increases in quantity Change in CS is trapezoid P0-a-b-P1 b a Q0 MC0 MC1 P1

and Secondary Market: Equipment P0 D0 D1 q0q1