2.2 Data Group Membership: Reeves (chair), Lloyd, Morse. Reports to SSC. This group will be responsible for preparation of the AMMA-UK Data Protocol, which.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

University Contracting The University of Arizona Office of Research and Contract Analysis (ORCA)
Catholic School Councils A summary of 19 page document listed on school website.
Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Contracting & Research Services (CRS)
AMMA-UK Management Doug Parker CEH Wallingford 20 Jan 2006 Project Administrator Emma Mason:
BADC Workshop 2: BADC Services to Data Suppliers Royal Met. Soc. Conference – 14 September 2005 Ag Stephens et al.
Christina Hansen, Assistant Vice Chancellor Bob Johnson, Research Librarian for Nursing & Allied Health May 2008 NIH Public Access Policy UCI Libraries.
Data Management Planning Kerry Miller Digital Curation Centre University of Edinburgh DIY Research Data Management Training Kit for.
Research Contracts and IP Services TRAINING WORKSHOPS ON HORIZON 2020 – 27 NOV 2014 The Grant Agreement Roger Wallace – Research Contracts & IP Services.
NOAA Data Sharing Policy for Grants and Cooperative Agreements Ingrid Guch NOAA Environmental Data Management Committee.
NORDRESS Consortium Agreement highlights. All participating institutions have signed the CA This presentation gives a brief overview of the main items.
NIH Public Access Policy What it means to OHSU Researchers Presented by: Andrew Hamilton Date: 10/22/2009.
NSF Data Management Plan Requirements Alex Kanous
Calice Meeting DESY 13/2/07David Ward Guidelines for CALICE presentations Recently approved by the Steering Committee.
AMMA data policy and data base (ADB) Objective: to make the AMMA data available for scientific studies within the AMMA objectives, with minimal restrictions,
NIH Public Access Policy What it means to OHSU Researchers Presented by: Andrew Hamilton Date: 3/18/2007.
ALMA Development Workshop FY2016 Call for Study Proposals - Mechanics Mike Shannon, Program Manager 25 March 2015.
Instructions for VCU’s Internal Approval Form Form is required to obtain Authorized Official’s signature on proposals and awards OSP – 8/2006.
1 NJ Dept. of Health Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 06/18/2015 Is this research defined as: A systematic investigation which includes research.
Best Practices for Graduate Supervision December 10, 2014 Your Role in Graduate Studies.
1 Module 4: Post-Award Administration of Sponsored Projects (Part 1) Office of Research and Sponsored Programs The University of Mississippi 100 Barr Hall.
Andrew Thornton, Chairman, RAH HREC
ACCESS for VALIDITY ACCESS for INNOVATION. Starting January 2011 for NEW proposals Not voluntary – “integral part” of proposal and FastLane Required for.
® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Starting an Interoperability Experiment David Arctur, OGC Director, Interoperability Programs December 8, 2009.
Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.
EPOCA – 11. June EPOCAConsortiumOrganisation.
Tips on Routing and Contracts: An Intro for the Campus Research Coordinator Michelle Artmeier Director of Award Services Ron.
CCSM DATA MANGEMENT POLICY The Community Climate System Model (CCSM) Data Management Policy documents the procedures for the management of model data produced.
WVU Electronic Theses & Dissertations Transforming Graduate Education and Research.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
T-PARC Operations Plan Outline Chapter 1. T-PARC Overview Chapter 2 Scientific Mission Planning Organization and Intensive Observing Period Definition.
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
Common PSMFC “data use agreement or policy” Overview of current data sharing in PTAGIS, RMIS, StreamNet.
Scholarly Publication: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Jean H. Shin, Ph.D. Director, Minority Affairs Program American Sociological Association.
Data Management during GEOTRACES Data Management sub-committee: Reiner Schlitzer, Jing Zhang, Bill Jenkins, Chris Measures Scientific.
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
What is an IPRC? Regulation 181/98 of Education Act
Creation of the Archiving Component of a MOU template for international missions IPDA MOU project members.
Volvox The EC Contract Angela Pettit – Contracts Officer.
Ethics and Scientific Writing. Ethical Considerations Ethics more important than legal considerations Your name and integrity are all that you have!
Data Management Plan for KORUS-AQ Airborne Field Study Dr. Jeong-Hoo Park National Institute of Environmental Research Dr. Gao Chen NASA Langley Research.
Alison Pamment 1, Steve Donegan 1, Calum Byrom 2, Oliver Clements 3, Bryan Lawrence 1, Roy Lowry 3 1 NCAS/BADC, Science and Technology Facilities Council,
The United States Department of Transportation. The United States Department of Transportation Public Access Plan is still under development and is subject.
RULES GOVERNING PRIVATE MEMBERS’ LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS Presentation by NA Table to Committee on Private Members’ Legislative Proposals and Special Petitions.
Science & Engineering Research Support soCiety Guest Editor Guidelines for Special Issue 1. Quality  Papers must be double -blind.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Copyright and Data Matthew Mayernik National Center for Atmospheric Research Section: Responsible Data Use Version 1.0 October 2012 Copyright 2012 Matthew.
1 NJ Dept. of Health Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016 Is this research defined as: A systematic investigation which includes research.
WP15: Data management 1. Observations: Field Work (sediment cores & water column; sections, time series stations, moorings, etc.) Mesocosm Experiments.
UCAR Office of Programs University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Overview of NAME Field Catalog NAME Special Session José Meitín NAME Project Office.
VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION SLIDE 0 New Requirements for VA ORD Investigators: Implementation of Data Management and Access Plans.
SOLAS and the British Atmospheric Data Centre Charles Kilburn Anne De Rudder.
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
CIRTL Data Sharing 10/9/15. New Opportunities The CIRTL Network Commons (CNC) offers the potential for easier access to data for evaluation purposes.
Creation of the Archiving Component of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Template for International Missions IPDA MOU project members.
GSICS Data and Products Servers Volker Gärtner (EUMETSAT) For GSICS Data Working Group.
Evaluation Planning Checklist (1 of 2) Planning Checklist Planning is a crucial part of the evaluation process. The following checklist (based on the original.
GSICS GDWG Report, Toulouse, 9 February GSICS Data Working Group Status Report V. Gaertner CMA, EUMETSAT, JMA, KMA, NOAA/NESDIS, WMO.
Data Management Planning Sarah Jones & Joy Davidson Digital Curation Centre
Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016
Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/12/2016
Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016
Module 2 Key Principles of the Peer Review Programme
2012 Annual Call Steps of the evaluation of proposals, role of the experts TEN-T Experts Briefing, March 2013.
North American ALMA Development Program
Presentation transcript:

2.2 Data Group Membership: Reeves (chair), Lloyd, Morse. Reports to SSC. This group will be responsible for preparation of the AMMA-UK Data Protocol, which will be agreed and signed by all Partners and Associates of the consortium and all members of the SSC. This Data Protocol will be finalised by 1 April The Data Group will also be responsible for liaison with BADC. Data stewardship will be conducted primarily by BADC for which costs have been awarded (through Leeds).

Data Protocol AMMA-UK DP to cover all data collected by UK participants of AMMA Would copy of NERC UTLS DP be suitable ? NERC proposal 6 months submission, 2 years public NERC Consortium Agreement ? –Intellectual Property, Confidentiality (marked), Publication (30 days notification, 30 days response, 6 months delay) Is it suitable for both Partners and Associates? AMMA-EU data policy? –Intellectual Property, Confidentiality (marked), Publication (6 weeks response, 6 months delay) AMMA ISSC Data Base Transversal Centre?

Data collected on the BAe-146 aircraft will be covered by the FAAM Data Protocol (DP) –core and non-core data, the latter which can be covered by a separate agreement (i.e. AMMA DP) Raw data (+meta data) ? Preliminary data (BADC workspace) ? Freedom of Information Act – all data should be accessible QA/QC recommendations – e.g. error flags Satellite data accessed through CEH ? Model data ?

BADC Project Web Page Similar to This explains how data can be submitted to and accessed from BADC. BADC Project Workspace Place where files (documents, preliminary data etc) can be shared between project participants. BADC Archive File naming conventions

1. Data to be produced Platform (e.g. 146, site name), Instruments, Data type (e.g. time series, 3-D data, frequency), File frequency and number (e.g. daily, per flight), Preferred format, (e.g. NetCDF, NASA Ames, jpeg), Expected size (Mb) 2. Data required Nature (e.g. model, satellite), Source (UKMO, ECMWF, NASA), Data type (e.g. time series, 3-D data, frequency), File frequency and number (e.g. daily, per flight), Preferred format, (e.g. NetCDF, NASA Ames, jpeg), Expected size (Mb), Can you already get this via BADC ?

Time scale EOP measurements start when ? Dry run for operational planning in 2005 Real-time data for flight planning

UTLS OZONE Data Protocol The aims of the Data Protocol are: to encourage rapid dissemination of scientific results from UTLS OZONE. to protect the rights of the individual scientists funded by UTLS OZONE. to have all the involved researchers treated equitably. to ensure the quality of the data in the UTLS OZONE data archive. These aims conflict at times, and it is hoped that the provisions of the protocol resolve these conflicts fairly. It is recognised that this cannot always be achieved to everyone's complete satisfaction; there are bound to be cases where individual interests clash with those of the UTLS OZONE programme. Therefore to try to meet these aims, all PIs involved in UTLS OZONE, in accordance with and on behalf of their co-investigators, must agree to abide by the following conditions:

1.Preliminary data must be made available to other UTLS OZONE scientists as soon as possible. There are 2 advantages to quick release a) planning of the future phases of the mission can be greatly improved, and b) scientific evaluation of the data can occur in a timely manner. 2.Any corrections or amendments to the preliminary data should be announced as soon as possible. 3.Validated data must be made available to other UTLS OZONE scientists via the BADC within 6 months of creation. The data will then be made available to the public domain 18 months after its submission to the BADC. Exceptions to these times will be outlined in the Implementation plan. 4.Results of model studies using data acquired during UTLS OZONE must be made available to other UTLS OZONE scientists via the BADC. The time scale for submission is the same as that for validated data, as outlined in point 3. 5.Data submitted to the BADC must be in the data format agreed between UTLS OZONE PIs and the BADC. All agreed metadata describing the data must also be supplied.

6.It is each PI’s responsibility to ensure that the data used in publications are the best available at that time. 7.All scientists involved in UTLS OZONE are to have equal and complete access to measurements and model results produced during UTLS OZONE. 8.If measurements or model results from other research groups within UTLS OZONE are used in a publication, joint authorship must be offered. This does not necessarily have to be accepted, particularly in cases where due credit and acknowledgement can be given in other, possibly more appropriate, ways. 9.Whilst the data is restricted from the public domain (see point 3), each PI has the right to refuse to allow his/her work, whether measurement or calculation, to be used in a publication or presentation prior to the PI’s own publication of that work. 10.Whilst the data is restricted from the public domain (see point 3), no data should be transferred to a third party without the originator’s consent. 11.In the event of dispute the final decision rests with the UTLS OZONE Scientific Steering Committee.

ITOP-UK Conditions of Use Applying to Forecasts and Non-Core Flight Data Should ITOP-UK data be used to support a research study, it is essential that the ITOP-UK Principal Investigator will be made aware that the data are being used. It is imperative that the ITOP-UK Principal Investigator be consulted when suspicious data is encountered or when interpretation of data becomes dependent upon understanding the underlying technique. Should a study using ITOP-UK data lead to some publication, it is expected that the relevant ITOP investigators will be offered co-authorship and the opportunity to comment on the manuscript prior to submission for publication. Whilst the data are restricted from the public domain (i.e. during a period of time of 18 months following submission to the BADC), the Prinicipal Investigator has the right to refuse to allow his work to be used in a publication or presentation prior to his own publication of that work.