1 Agency Game in the Long Run In the context here the long run means more than one transaction between two parties.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustaining collusion in a prisoners dilemma oligopoly context.
Advertisements

Concepts of Game Theory II. 2 The prisioners reasoning… Put yourself in the place of prisoner i (or j)… Reason as follows: –Suppose I cooperate… If j.
What does it mean to partner?. Outcomes for today A wider understanding of the concept of partnership and what makes them valuable to your organisation.
The Basics of Game Theory
Vincent Conitzer CPS Repeated games Vincent Conitzer
Nash’s Theorem Theorem (Nash, 1951): Every finite game (finite number of players, finite number of pure strategies) has at least one mixed-strategy Nash.
Crime, Punishment, and Forgiveness
1 Predatory Conduct. 2 Predatory conduct is the implementation of a strategy designed specifically to deter rival firms from competing in a market. To.
Game Theory “Доверяй, Но Проверяй” - Russian Proverb (Trust, but Verify) - Ronald Reagan Mike Shor Lecture 6.
Game Theory “Доверяй, Но Проверяй” (“Trust, but Verify”) - Russian Proverb (Ronald Reagan) Topic 5 Repeated Games.
Probability.
6-1 LECTURE 6: MULTIAGENT INTERACTIONS An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems
Chapter 14 Infinite Horizon 1.Markov Games 2.Markov Solutions 3.Infinite Horizon Repeated Games 4.Trigger Strategy Solutions 5.Investing in Strategic Capital.
The basics of Game Theory Understanding strategic behaviour.
1 Game Theory. By the end of this section, you should be able to…. ► In a simultaneous game played only once, find and define:  the Nash equilibrium.
Infinitely Repeated Games Econ 171. Finitely Repeated Game Take any game play it, then play it again, for a specified number of times. The game that is.
Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma If the Prisoner’s Dilemma is repeated, cooperation can come from strategies including: “Grim Trigger” Strategy – one.
Games People Play. 8: The Prisoners’ Dilemma and repeated games In this section we shall learn How repeated play of a game opens up many new strategic.
Chapter 11 Game Theory and Asymmetric Information
INTRODUCTION TO DEBATING: ARGUMENTS DBAT 101. What should I say?  Principled Arguments:  We are more ‘Fair’. Often comes down to rights.  Burden is.
Monopoly 1 Please read the article at the web site In this article the.
Sports Market Outcomes Here we look at some details of a sports league. 1.
Chapter Twenty-Eight Game Theory. u Game theory models strategic behavior by agents who understand that their actions affect the actions of other agents.
2, , and Beyond Debra S. Carney Mathematics Department University of Denver April 11, 2008 Sonya Kovalevsky Day - CCA.
1 Game Theory Here we study a method for thinking about oligopoly situations. As we consider some terminology, we will see the simultaneous move, one shot.
An introduction to game theory Today: The fundamentals of game theory, including Nash equilibrium.
APEC 8205: Applied Game Theory Fall 2007
Game Theory Here we study a method for thinking about oligopoly situations. As we consider some terminology, we will see the simultaneous move, one shot.
1 Section 2d Game theory Game theory is a way of thinking about situations where there is interaction between individuals or institutions. The parties.
Incomplete Contracts Renegotiation, Communications and Theory December 10, 2007.
An introduction to game theory Today: The fundamentals of game theory, including Nash equilibrium.
Recent Research Studies on Cooperative Games In the recent years since around 2003 I have been doing research following up on a specific idea for the finding.
1 Applications Here we look at several applications. We will see a classic example of a dilemma that can arise in such games.
Law and economics: game theory N.J. Philipsen Associate Professor of Law and Economics Faculty of Law, Research Institute METRO Shandong University, Jinan,
Social Choice Session 7 Carmen Pasca and John Hey.
STRATEGIC COMPETITION, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE & GAME THEORY We will look at two facets of ‘game theory’
Agenda, Day 2  Questions about syllabus? About myths?  Prisoner’s dilemma  Prisoner’s dilemma vs negotiation  Play a single round  Play multiple rounds.
Plan for Today: Neoliberal Institutionalism & Concluding Liberalism 1. Complete group activity reporting. 2. Survey neoliberal solutions to the Prisoner’s.
Pseudo Code Possibly one of the hardest skills to get to grips with in learning a programming language is developing the ability to take a problem and.
Dynamic Games of complete information: Backward Induction and Subgame perfection - Repeated Games -
Moshe Tennenholtz, Aviv Zohar Learning Equilibria in Repeated Congestion Games.
Chapters 29, 30 Game Theory A good time to talk about game theory since we have actually seen some types of equilibria last time. Game theory is concerned.
Lecture 7 Course Summary The tools of strategy provide guiding principles that that should help determine the extent and nature of your professional interactions.
Playing the Lottery 6/4/2016Copyright © 2010… REMTECH, inc … All Rights Reserved1 Probability Theory and the Lottery ● The Lottery picks numbers at random.
Vertical Integration: Make, or buy?. What are the issues? Technological Strategic Contractual Organizational In a dynamic context.
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Fall 2009 Lecture 14.
Chapter 10: Games and Strategic Behavior
Voter Turnout. Overview Recap the “Paradox” of Voting Incentives and Voter Turnout Voter Mobilization.
Activity 1-17: Infinity.
1 Alternative Remedies for Breach of Contract Remedies may include money damages or specific performance may be required. In this section we want look.
Ben Ringel Econ 400M. Can’t agree on the some of the simplest, non-partisan legislation: Highway and transportation funding Stabilizing the interest rates.
Settling Disputes out of Court Conflict is a part of everyday life. Courts can help resolve conflicts, but there are other methods to help solve everyday.
Noncooperative Collusion The Cournot Oligopoly model was a single-period noncooperative model. In most models of imperfect competition, it is true that.
Punishment, Detection, and Forgiveness in Repeated Games.
Bargaining games Econ 414. General bargaining games A common application of repeated games is to examine situations of two or more parties bargaining.
Econ 545, Spring 2016 Industrial Organization Dynamic Games.
Mr/Ms Period ---- Class. Take a couple of minutes and write down a couple of sentences explaining what Science means to you.
Joint ventures are fragile as they often are caught in the conflict between partners. Here is the review of the fundamental conditions that give rise to.
Settling Disputes Chapter 4 Unit 1 Driving Questions: “How do we make the law mean something?” 1.
Game theory Chapter 28 and 29
Vincent Conitzer CPS Repeated games Vincent Conitzer
Game theory Chapter 28 and 29
Computer-Mediated Communication
LECTURE 6: MULTIAGENT INTERACTIONS
Paired Verbal Fluency 3 rounds 1st: Partner A then Partner B
Vincent Conitzer Repeated games Vincent Conitzer
Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 – Spring 2009
Part D-II The Economics of Tort Law
Lecture 10 Coordination and Reputation
Vincent Conitzer CPS Repeated games Vincent Conitzer
Presentation transcript:

1 Agency Game in the Long Run In the context here the long run means more than one transaction between two parties

2 Up until this time, we have seen that cooperation between two players typically requires enforceable contracts. In this set of notes we will see a modification to the conclusion. Some new language again. The 1st player in the agency game will be called the principal and the 2nd player will be called the agent. Remember the principal risks funds and because the agent may cooperate or appropriate. On the next slide I have reproduced the agency game without an enforceable contract.

3 agent cooperateappropriate Por performor breach rinvest.51 ior contract.5-1 ndon’t00 cinvest00 i p a l

4 Say the game will be repeated indefinitely period after period where the possible pay-outs each period are what they would be in the single period agency game. The agent has a dilemma now in that he can, or may want to, have a long term relationship with the principal. But, if the agent appropriates in a period the principal might get mad and not work any longer with the agent. Plus, the agent may be deterred from appropriating by the principal with a “tit-for-tat” strategy by the principal. This means the principal will reward cooperation and punish appropriation

5 Specific strategy of the principal The principal will have the basic strategy of investing in each period. If the agent cooperates in that period, then the principal will invest in the next period. But, if the agent appropriates in a period where the principal invests, then the principal will not invest in the following two periods. Then the principal will invest again and follow the rule set out here. Agent payout over three periods 1) if he cooperates.5,.5,.5 2) if he appropriates 1, 0, 0 So the agent is better off over the three periods by cooperating.

6 Review Back in the one period game context we saw the principal would not invest in this setting unless contracts were enforceable which transformed the invest appropriate outcome from (-1, 1) to (.5, -.5) Contracts lead to efficient outcomes. Now, in the long run context, we may not need contracts to bring about efficiency. If the agent wants an enduring relationship, and if the principal follows the tit-for-tat strategy mentioned, then retaliation by the principal brings about the efficient solution. Here it is said a long term relationship is developed and commitment results.

7 The end game problem In the real world relationships end. In other words, maybe a long run game with an infinite number of periods is not totally realistic. Finite, but long run, games with two players have a problem. If both players know when the last period is, then the game may not lead to cooperation. The last period can be thought of as a single period game. The agent has the incentive to appropriate and the principal does not have the ability to retaliate. So the principal will not invest in the last period. This makes the 2nd to the last period one in which the agent can appropriate because there will be no retaliation in later rounds. The principal sees this and does mot invest in the second to the last round. Actually, the logic is used in all rounds then, and the principal never invests without an enforceable contract. (Read box on page 230)

8 Open-ended relationships Here we have the agency game repeated indefinitely with many players. Each round of the game players form into pairs to partner in the game. At the end of each round 1) cooperation occurs but unforeseeable changes cause the parties to abandon relationships, 2) the relationship is dissolved by the principal if the agent appropriates 3) the relationship continues because cooperation happened (without unforeseeable changes.) If the relationship ends both must find new partners next period. All are not guaranteed a new partner next round.

9 Each agent has two choices; 1) cooperate each period and get.5 each period, 2) appropriate and get 1 some rounds and then search in future periods to get a new partner. This choice is like between getting a little payment each round, or getting a lot every once in a while and zero most of the time. It seems that in the real world there will be agents of both varieties. So, some cooperation is possible without enforceable contracts. Summary We have seen here that relationships may arise that allows for cooperation, even in the absence of enforceable contracts.

10 When legal disputes arise in long term relationships courts may try to repair the long term relationship instead of enforcing rights to parties. Repairing the relationship allows for continued performance of the efficient outcome.