SDW20051 Vincent Lapeyrère LESIA – Observatoire de Paris Calibration of flight model CCDs for CoRoT mission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
X-ray Imaging Spectrometers (XIS) of Astro-E2 Hironori Matsumoto (Kyoto University) and the XIS team 1. Overview Astro-E2 is the fifth Japanese X-ray Astronomy.
Advertisements

Parameters to choose the CCD The CCD test bench *Temperature range : -55 to +40°C. *Stabilization : < 0.05°C/hour. *5 temperature probes : CCD and electronics.
Characterisation of CCDs for the EUCLID VIS channel Peter Verhoeve, Thibaut Prod’homme, Nathalie Boudin Payload Technology Validation Section Future Missions.
Optical Astronomy Imaging Chain: Telescopes & CCDs.
1 M. Auvergne. Natal October 2004 Instrument performances. Signal perturbations: Radiations. Scattered light. ACS. Temperature. Readout electronic. Calibrations.
Astronomical Detectors
PLATO kick-off meeting 09-Nov-2010 PLATO Payload overall architecture.
PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars Thierry Appourchaux for the PLATO Consortium
SDW2005, juin, Taormina The Corot Space instrument.
CCD testing Enver Alagoz 12 April CCD testing goals CCD testing is to learn how to – do dark noise characterization – do gain measurements – determine.
Shu Zhang (on behalf of the HXMT team) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Science The current status of HXMT and its calibrations.
1 COROT: Scientific comity Sept Calibrations during the commissioning and before the first run. Calibrations cover closed Calibrations cover open.
Eddington Kick-Off. Vienna, September 17th, 2001 T.Muñoz/C.Laviada (INTA) 1 EddiCam: The Eddington Photometric Camera Preliminary Design Layout.
1st Eddington Workshop. Córdoba, June 14th, 2001 J. Miguel Mas-Hesse 1 EddiCam: The Eddington Photometric Camera Preliminary design.
SIAMOIS, kickoff meeting, Paris, may, SIAMOIS: optical test bench BOSS (Banc Optique SiamoiS) Pernelle Bernardi Observatoire de Paris-Meudon,
AST3 detector properties
Advanced Concepts & Science Payloads Office Eddicam/EST MeetingPage 1 CCD Procurement Schedule driven Review off-the shelf availability Specific mode of.
Photon Transfer Method 1. Using two identical flat field exposures it is possible to measure the read noise of a CCD with the Photon Transfer method. Two.
1 COROT WEAEK Meudon May The CCD performances by Miss Pernelle Bernardi Mr Tristan Buey and the CCD team on stage Régis Schmidt, Bertrand le.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
TESIS on CORONAS-PHOTON S. V. Kuzin (XRAS) and TESIS Team.
Performances of the COROT CCDs for high accuracy photometry Pernelle Bernardi and the CCD team From Meudon : Tristan Buey, Vincent Lapeyrere, Régis Schmidt,
Solar-B SOT/FPP 1 SOT April 2006Ted Tarbell FPP CCD Camera Performance Ted Tarbell 17-Apr-2006.
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
Observation of the photocentre position variations with CoRoT - Scientific motivations and expected performance C. Moutou (LAM) – H. Deeg (IAC) – M. Ollivier.
Plato meeting MSSL Wed+Thur 15+16/Oct/08 UK interests/activities Alan Smith and Dave Walton UCL/MSSL.
 PLATO PLAnetary Transits & Oscillations of stars Data onboard treatment PPLC study February 2009 on behalf of Reza Samadi for the PLATO data treatment.
CDE CDR, September 14, 2004 Your Position, Your Name 1 GATS AIM Science Team Meeting January 23-24, 2007 CIPS Calibration Review, Aimee Merkel, Bill McClintock.
ASTEROSEISMOLOGY and SEARCH for EXOPLANETS Vienna - September 18 th 2001 Optical performance characterization Point Spread Function (PSF) : Telescope +
1 Leonardo Pinheiro da Silva Corot-Brazil Workshop – October 31, 2004 Corot Instrument Characterization based on in-flight collected data Leonardo Pinheiro.
1 WB/lct CCD OVERVIEW Kepler will have 42 CCDs 2,200 column x 1,024 row full frame CCDs Field of View (FOV) > 100 square degrees (113 w/ vignetting)
1Corot Science Week, Berlin, December 2003 Inside the COROT machine Overview of global loop for COROT operations Description of COROT Subsystems.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 31th IADC Meeting, April , 2013, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany Improved Space Object Observation Techniques.
Observational Astrophysics I
1 Optical observations of asteroids – and the same for space debris… Dr. D. Koschny European Space Agency Chair of Astronautics, TU Munich Stardust school.
CorotWeek 3, Liège 4-7/12/20021 (working on Saturday!!!) The CCD flight models Miss Pernelle Bernardi Mr Vincent Lapeyrere Mr Tristan Buey and the CCD.
PVPhotFlux PACS Photometer photometric calibration MPIA PACS Commissioning and PV Phase Plan Review 21 st – 22 nd January 2009, MPE Garching Markus Nielbock.
TIPS - Oct 13, 2005 M. Sirianni Temperature change for ACS CCDs: initial study on scientific performance M. Sirianni, T. Wheeler, C.Cox, M. Mutchler, A.
PPLC – ESA FEB 27th 2009 CCD thermal specs G Epstein CCD thermal specifications Divers for Telescope thermal architecture.
Physics 114: Lecture 8 Measuring Noise in Real Data Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department.
SPIE Astronomical Instrumentation June 26, 2008 Physics of reverse annealing in high- resistivity ACIS Chandra CCDs Catherine E. Grant (MIT) Bev LaMarr,
Corot:Ubatuba Nov The Ground Segment: Data Processing. Software development in laboratories. Brazilian contribution. Michel Auvergne Réza Samadi.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars Claude CATALA Observatoire de Paris, LESIA Main Science Requirements.
1 WFC3 – Critical Science Review Science Driven CEIs Requirements.
MPI Semiconductor Laboratory, The XEUS Instrument Working Group, PNSensor The X-ray Evolving-Universe Spectroscopy (XEUS) mission is under study by the.
Measurement of the photocentre position variations with CoRoT - further investigations M. Ollivier (IAS)
CCD Calibrations Eliminating noise and other sources of error.
for Lomonosov-GRB collaboration
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
Eliminating noise and other sources of error
Miss Pernelle Bernardi
Development of the Soft X-ray Large solid angle Camera onboard WF-MAXI
Validation of N1 Light Curves
30-Nov-2006 Jean-Marc Defise - CSL
Charge Transfer Efficiency of Charge Coupled Device
Institute of Cosmos Sciences - University of Barcelona
Point Source Transmission Simulations on the COROT baffle
First results from BEST at OHP
Summary Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy Jeff Valenti JWST Mission Scientist Space Telescope Science Institute.
Instrument Characterization: Status
First Assessments of EUVI Performance on STEREO SECCHI
SCIENTIFIC CMOS PIXELS
UVIS Calibration Update
HE instrument and in-orbit performance
Observational Astronomy
MAIN CONTRIBUTOR NOISES
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Presentation transcript:

SDW20051 Vincent Lapeyrère LESIA – Observatoire de Paris Calibration of flight model CCDs for CoRoT mission

SDW20052 Overview 1.The CoRoT mission 2.CCD maps : Defects and pixel capacity 3.CCD sensitivities : to temperature and bias voltages 4.CCD irradiation test 5.Conclusion

SDW20053 The CoRoT mission European mission : –Managed by CNES –In association with 3 French Laboratories (LESIA, LAM, IAS) –Contributions of : Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Germany, Spain, ESA Mission characteristics : –PROTEUS spacecraft –Launch mid 2006 –Polar orbit (896 km) –2,5 years The Corot Mission

SDW20054 Scientific mission Specifications Over 5 days : noise < 0,6 ppm (star m V =5.7) Scientific frequency interval [0,1;10]mHz Frequency resolution 0,1 µHz (150 days runs) Observe 10 stars per field between m V =5,7 and m V =9 Duty cycle 95% Specifications Over 1 hour : noise < (star m V =15,5) Observe stars between m V =11 and m V =15,5 continuously during 150 days If possible chromatic information ASTEROSEISMOLOGY PROGRAM (AS) PLANET FINDING PROGRAM (PF) Measure stellar oscillation frequencies about 2.5 ppm amplitudes Detect exoplanet transits about few 100 ppm aplitudes The CoRoT mission

SDW20055 The instrument Afocal telescope –2 parabolic mirrors off axis Camera : –Dioptric objective –Focal plane with 4 CCDs Electronics : –CCD readout –Thermal control –Data processing Onboard software : –Only light curves are send to the ground PROTEUS spacecraft –Polar orbit (896 km) –5 fields during 2,5 years The CoRoT mission

SDW20056 The CCDs 4 CCDs : 2 for AS and 2 PF program CCDs characteristics: –e2v –Frame transfer –Image area 2048 x 2048 pixels, storage area 2048 x 2052 pixels –Pixel size : 13.5 µm –Back illuminated, thinned –AIMO –Scientific AR coating –Flatness ±10µm Readout modes : –AS channel : 10 windows (50x50) once per sec. 100µs for line transfer 10µs for pixel readout Line and pixel binning –PF channel : Full frame once per 32 sec The CoRoT mission © Sodern

SDW20057 Pixel Response Non Uniformity (PRNU) With narrow bandwidth (10 nm), PRNU is dominated by fringing for wavelength greater than 800 nm No fringing with led (  ~50 nm) Evolution of local PRNU with wavelength (Local PRNU is computed in boxes of 32x32 pixels) Flat fields on the same portion of CCD (300x300 pixels) Line : Local PRNU with monochromator (  ~10 nm) Square : Local PRNU with leds (  ~50 nm) CCD maps

SDW20058 PRNU and jitter A part of photometric noise is produced by the motion of the star on the CCD due to the jitter of the satellite (  jit =0.1 pixels (0.14 arsec)) Knowing : –The instrument PSF –The flat field response of the CCD –A model of jitter  We compute a map of jitter noise This map can be compared to scientific specifications. Jitter noise map of the whole CCD. Unit is r.m.s. noise in ppm CCD maps

SDW20059 Pixel capacity Pixel capacity is determined on flat- field images : Evolution of variance with flash duration Measured on boxes 32x32 pixels in order to map the CCD Variance (X) and Intensity (+) evolution versus flash duration time. The dashed line represents the saturation level. Pixel capacity map of a whole CCD. Unit is e-/pix. Pixel capacity decrease in the centre of the CCD Observation confirmed with spot Due to non established phase Strong differences between CCDs CCD maps

SDW CCD gain sensitivity to temperature The gain is measured on plot variance as function of average  G CCD = 4.3 µV/e- with dispersion of 0.1µV on the ten CCDs The gain is measured at different temperatures   Gccd = ppm/K with a dispersion of 150 ppm/K on the ten CCDs Evolution of gain with temperature CCD sensitivity

SDW CCD QE sensitivity to temp. CCD response measured at different temperature –  ccd =  Gccd +  Qe –  Qe vary with wavelength The impact on photometry depends on the target spectrum With a temperature stability better than 5mK the variation is lower than 2 ppm for principal target stars  CCD = -500 ppm/K ± 50  CCD = -400 ppm/K ± 50  CCD = 2500 ppm/K ± 80  = 470 nm  = 640 nm  = 880 nm Evolution of QE sensitivity to temperature with wavelength Evolution of CCD response with temperature for 3 different wavelengths CCD sensitivity

SDW CCD response sensitivity to bias CCD response is sensitive to 3 bias voltages –V od : Output drain –V rd : Reset drain –V og : Output gate VodVrdVog Gain sensitivity to polarisation (ppm/mV) Bias sensitivity to temperature (mV/K) Total Photometric variation for 1 degree (ppm) This variation is over scientific specifications and must be corrected Evolution of CCD response with bias voltages, dashed lines represent nominal values where sensitivity is computed  V od = -35 ppm/mV  V og = 25 ppm/mV  V rd = -15 ppm/mV CCD sensitivity

SDW CCD irradiation CCDs used for irradiation test : –3 E2V 4210 (2K*512 pixels) –Back thinned –Full frame –The irradiated CCDs were smaller but built with the same technology On each chip different irradiations have been applied: –Three different protons energies : 30, 40, 60MeV –Irradiation dose of 4krad applied in 4 times (flux of 10 7 p.cm -2.s -1 ) –During irradiation CCD were operating with chronograms and bias voltage, 2 at 20°C and 1 at –40°C Parameters measured before and after irradiation : –Dark Current and cosmetics –Gain and operating Point –Quantum efficiency and Pixel Response Non Uniformity –Full Well Capacity and “CTE” CCD Irradiation

SDW Result of irradiation Some performances changed : –Dark current –Cosmetic –CTE No change on : –PRNU and quantum efficiency –Gain and operating point –Full Well capacity Dark current at end of life : (2.5 years, 10 mm shielding, T CCD = -40 °C) 10 e -.pix -1.s -1 (lower than 0.5 e -.pix -1.s -1 at the beginning) CCD Irradiation Pixel with telegraphic noise compared to a normal one

SDW Conclusion The 10 CCDs tested are homogeneous except for: –pixel capacity map (differences between CCDs) –Sensitivity to bias voltage (2 CCDs excluded) According to these results and scientific needs 4 CCDs have been selected (2 for AS channel and 2 for PF channel) With CoRoT characteristics, sensitivity to bias voltages cannot be neglected and must be corrected Conclusion