Phase 2 Attribution “Footprint” Maps show mock ups for how to answer these questions in Phase 2 (data shown is from Phase I) Probably too many colors to.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Vertex-Edge Graphs.

Advertisements

Jeopardy Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy.

Final Jeopardy Question Type Category 1 Here. Type Category 2 Here 100 Type Category 4 Here Type Category 5 Here Type.

Columbia River Gorge Commission Meeting Air Quality Update on Columbia River Gorge from Oregon DEQ and Washington SWCAA September 9, 2014 Cascade Locks.

Santa Fe is the capital of New Mexico. Olympia is the capital of Washington.

Phase Difference = Phase Difference = 0.05.

Living with the lab Mind (and Concept) Mapping Getting your thoughts together...

Tribal Causes of Haze Representativeness Assessment Phase I Mark Green, Alissa Smiley, and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.

1 EPA’s Proposed Interstate Air Quality Rule Consideration of Issues Associated with Possible Expansion of IAQR to the West Patrick Cummins, WGA Background.

AoH Report Update Joint DEJF & AoH Meeting, Las Vegas November , 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Southwest, Pacific, and Rocky Mountain Regions

States, Capitals, and Abbreviations Review. Nevada.

States, Capitals, and Abbreviations Review. Part I: Name that State! Look at the picture of a state on the map. Click your mouse or the right arrow to.

Harry Williams, Cartography1 THEMATIC MAPS A thematic map shows numeric or character data by colors or symbols. Data displayed in this manner is referred.

Map Skills 7 ‘Sketch Maps?’ To understand why people use sketch maps and how we can draw one. Draw a sketch map of the route they described last lesson.

Question # 1 For $100 15$1,000,000 14$500,000 13$250,000 12$125,000 11$64,000 10$32,000 9$16,000 8$8,000 7$4,000 6$2,000 5$1,000 4$500 3$300 2$200 1$100.

Incorporating Monitoring, Modeling, and EI Data into AoH Analysis AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Case Study: Using the AoH Report for a Preliminary Look at Glacier National Park Trista Glazier March 2005 WRAP Implementation Workgroup Meeting San Francisco,

WRAP CAMx-PSAT Source Apportionment Modeling Results Implementation Workgroup Meeting August 29, 2006.

WRAP Regional Modeling Center April 25-26, 2006 AoH Work Group Meeting Regional Modeling Center Status Report AoH Workgroup Meeting Seattle, WA April 25-26,

AoH Phase I Report Outline AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.

$1,000,000 $500,000 $100,000 $50,000 $10,000 $5000 $1000 $500 $200 $100 Is this your Final Answer? YesNo Question 2? Correct Answer Wrong Answer.

Causes of Haze Assessment Update for Fire Emissions Joint Forum -12/9/04 Meeting Marc Pitchford.

Preliminary Evaluation of Data for Reasonable Progress Montana RH FIP Laurel Dygowski, EPA Region 8 IWG Meeting – April 2007.

Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update. Current and near-future Major Tasks Visibility trends analysis Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002.

Trajectory Calculations Trajectory or backtrajectory analyses use interpolated measured or modeled meteorological fields to estimate the most likely central.

AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.

Jeopardy Category 1 Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category

Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.

STATES, CAPITALS, AND ABBREVIATIONS The Western Region of the USA.

Weight of Evidence Discussion AoH Meeting – Tempe, AZ November 16/17, 2005.

APPLYING THE AOH REPORT IN MONTANA Bob Habeck June 2005 WRAP AOH Workgroup Meeting Seattle, WA.

WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 Results from January/July CMAQ Source Apportionment Modeling Gail Tonnesen,

D. L. Raukar To play any of these games: F5 & click icon.

Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH Sectionalism.

Observations Complex mixture of contributors to 20% worst Many 20% worst extinction days at many sites Sulfate episodes in Midwest, SE and SW Soil.

AoH Work Group Weight of Evidence Framework WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Sulfate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Attribution of Haze Project Update Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting September 8-9, 2004 Worley, ID.

Weight of Evidence Approach: Soil and Coarse Mass Case Studies WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists,

CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP Development Progress Report IWG Meeting Portland, Oregon August 29-31, 2006.

Learning to locate states on a map

Phase I Attribution of Haze Overview (Geographic Attribution for the Implementation of the Regional Haze Rule) or (an experiment in weight-of evidence)

Model Multiplication Name: _______________________________

Hire Toyota Innova in Delhi for Outstation Tour

Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area

Model Multiplication Name: _______________________________

BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association

Species Specific Reasonable Progress Analysis

What is an Infographic?.

Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area

Reasonable Progress: Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area

סדר דין פלילי – חקיקה ומהות ההליך הפלילי

AoH Phase 2 Update AoH Meeting – San Diego, CA January 25, 2006

Learning about Career Clusters

Causes of Haze Assessment Brief Overview and Status Report

DRAFT Reasonable Progress Demonstration

4 + (-5) = A. Start at zero B. Move ______ spaces ___________ to get to the first number. C. From there, move _____ spaces __________ D. My final answer.

You must show all steps of your working out.

308 VS. 309 DECISION PROCESS November 2001 WRAP Meeting

Implementation Workgroup April 19, 2007

Sulfate Contributions to Regional Haze in the WRAP Region

Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

BREAK OUT ACTIVITY Continue the discussion about Marketing in the Age of Alexa, answering the questions below. Develop a slide to accompany your discussion.

Presentation transcript:

Phase 2 Attribution “Footprint” Maps show mock ups for how to answer these questions in Phase 2 (data shown is from Phase I) Probably too many colors to be effective in the “Sulfate Extinction Attributed to WRAP States (excluding UT, WA, WY)” map, but visual inspection supports the Phase I clustering Non-WRAP contributions highlighted in the final 2 maps

Phase I Sulfate and Nitrate Extinction Attributed to Oregon (TSSA Analysis)

Phase I Sulfate and Nitrate Extinction Attributed to Arizona (TSSA Analysis)

Phase I Sulfate Extinction Attributed to WRAP States (excluding UT, WA, WY) Phase I clustering based on SO4/NO3 attribution

Phase I Sulfate Extinction Attributed to non-WRAP Source Regions

Phase I Nitrate Extinction Attributed to non-WRAP Source Regions